The Daily Beast initially reported that Nick Fuentes didn’t go into the meeting with Ye and Donald Trump. When I heard that, I said “I don’t believe that.” Shortly thereafter, Axois’ Jonathan Swan – who is my personal favorite commie Jew journalist, simply because he actually behaves professionally despite having the same agenda as every other Jew – reported that The Daily Beast was wrong and Nick did meet with Trump.

On Friday night, Nick confirmed that the details of this story are accurate.

Trump gave a short statement to the media, reading: “Kanye West very much wanted to visit Mar-a-Lago. Our dinner meeting was intended to be Kanye and me only, but he arrived with a guest whom I had never met and knew nothing about.”

In Trump’s defense, I’m sure that’s true. I’m also glad Trump didn’t condemn Nick.

Of the Mar-a-Lago Heroes Dinner, Swan reports for Axios:

A source familiar with the dinner conversation told Axios that Trump “seemed very taken” with Fuentes, impressed that the 24-year-old was able to rattle off statistics and recall speeches dating back to his 2016 campaign.

Paraphrasing the conversation, the source said Fuentes told the president he preferred him to be “authentic,” and that Trump seemed scripted and unlike himself during his recent 2024 campaign announcement speech.

Trump responded, “You like it better when I just speak off the cuff,” the source said. Fuentes replied that he did, calling Trump an “amazing” president when he was unrestrained. “There was a lot of fawning back and forth,” the source added.

“Fawning.”

😂😂😂😂😂

Fuentes told Trump that he represented a side of Trump’s base that was disappointed with his newly cautious approach, especially with what some far-right activists view as a lack of support for those charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

Trump didn’t disagree with Fuentes, but said he has advisers who want him to read off teleprompters and be more “presidential.” Notably, Trump referred to himself as a politician, which he has been loathe to do in the past.

Fuentes also told Trump that he would crush potential 2024 Republican rivals in a primary, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Trump asked for Fuentes’ opinion on other candidates as well.

Trump at one point turned to Ye and said, “I really like this guy. He gets me,” according to the source.

😂😂😂😂😂

“To be honest, I don’t believe the president knew who the hell [Fuentes] was,” the source added.

Trump asked if Fuentes was on social media such as Truth Social, the former president’s alternative to Twitter.

Fuentes told Trump that he was on Truth Social but had been banned from the social media platform Gettr because Trump adviser Jason Miller, the CEO of the company, wasn’t a fan of his.

Trump asked whether it was because Fuentes was on the “fringe” of his supporter base, the source said. Fuentes acknowledged that he was, saying he’s “one of those people who got banned from everything.”

Ye, whose Twitter account was recently restored after being restricted for anti-Semitic comments, posted a video on Thursday night titled “Mar-a-Lago debrief.”

Ye claims in the video that Trump was “really impressed” with Fuentes because “unlike so many of the lawyers and so many people that he was left with on his 2020 campaign, he’s actually a loyalist.”

A source familiar with the conversation told Axios Trump took a phone call during the dinner, and his demeanor toward Ye seemed to change when he got off the call. Trump made some nasty comments about Ye’s ex-wife, Kim Kardashian, and told the rapper to pass them on.

The Jew handlers called – told him “listen up, GOY, GOY, GOY – shut it down! Insult that schvartze’s baby mama like he insulted God’s chosen people!”

Disgusting.

I’m tired of it.

I would support Trump if there was no one else to support, but frankly, there is someone much, much better.

I’m referring to Ron DeSantis, of course: America’s next president.

Just joking.

You know who it is. You all know who I’m talking about.

You all know what is happening next.

You know where this site is going and you know where America is going.

We’ve had scores to settle with a certain group of chosen ones for a long time.

A long time.

It’s time to go all in.

Yesterday, I wrote about how I didn’t understand what the hell was going on with Axios journalist Jonathan Swan, who I noted that I actually think is clever.

Swan had just posted a tweet shilling the war in Afghanistan for the sake of feminism, which is a media talking point put out by the CIA to justify the continuation of a neocon war under a Democrat president (Obama, 2010). I said I just couldn’t understand why a young white man in my age group would be pushing this anti-white agenda.

Then, someone pointed out why he would be doing that.

At first I felt dumb for having not checked that, then I just felt relieved.

I’m glad to know that he’s not a clever white man fighting for the Anal Empire.

It’s also kind of a funny situation. Because of course he’s Jewish. There literally is not a single white man with any sort of intelligence or cleverness working for this agenda, at least not in a capacity where they are doing things like going out with a straight face and saying “we have to keep the Afghan war going forever because of Afghan feminism.”

It also points to the fact that my own heuristics for understanding the world are true even when I’m not aware of it. I have been genuinely stumped by Swan, ever since watching that Trump interview.

Frankly, he doesn’t look very Jewish. I had actually read the story of his father being from Scotland and moving to Australia. Also to be fair to me, there are not many Jews in Scotland or Australia.

But yeah.

I feel greatly relieved.

I actually like Jonathan Swan. Not in a gay or professional way, but he seems like a clever guy who could be doing something of value, but has instead chosen to be an evil scumbag, shilling idiotic hoaxes and anal wars.

RT:

A State Department official has lamented the US military’s exit from Afghanistan as bad for women, allegedly airing the “private” opinions of many others. But the talking point also mirrors an infamous leaked CIA memo.

Molly Montgomery, deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs, expressed apprehension about the end of the United States’ nearly 20-year occupation of Afghanistan, claiming that the withdrawal would have devastating consequences for Afghan women and girls.

“Woke up with a heavy heart, thinking about all the Afghan women and girls I worked with during my time in Kabul,” Montgomery tweeted on Friday. “They were the beneficiaries of many of the gains we made, and now they stand to lose everything. We empowered them to lead, and now we are powerless to protect them.”

The message was deleted shortly after it was posted. A spokesperson for the State Department told inquiring media outlets that Montgomery “deleted the tweet on her own volition.”

This deleted tweet from a senior Biden State Department official captures the private feelings of many others. pic.twitter.com/uoeEukSerh

— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) August 13, 2021

There has been growing concern about the fate of Afghan women, as a sweeping Taliban offensive continues to seize more territory in the country. The militant group uses Sharia law, under which women are subordinate to men. In the past, the Taliban have been accused of flogging and stoning women accused of indecency.

While the tweet may have been voluntarily removed, its provocative connotations seem to clash with the Biden administration’s framing of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. The exit has been heavily criticized by media outlets and Beltway insiders as premature and irresponsible.

Jonathan Swan, a reporter for Axios, claimed that the scrubbed tweet “captures the private feelings of many others.”

Some replies expressed sympathy with the position, suggesting that the US could take in more Afghan refugees.

…

However, there’s nothing new about Montgomery’s messaging. In a leaked memo from March 2010, an elite CIA “problem-solving” group, known as the “Red Cell,” proposed that the best way to fight apathy and opposition to the war in Afghanistan was to highlight the “aspirations” of Afghan women and “their fears of a Taliban victory.”

Obviously, as I’ve regularly pointed out, that 2010 memo has served as the basis of the entire narrative about Afghanistan for years now – “it’s a war for feminism.”

No one can really play dumb on that point, if pressed. This is something everyone knows. It’s a stupid narrative created to sell the war during the Obama years to people who opposed George W. Bush. It’s a kinder war – soft and sweet, like a pussy.

I guess I just don’t understand Swan’s motivation.

For those who don’t know who he is, here is his absolutely hilarious interview with Donald Trump, from July of last year.

It was one of the few times since like, Bush-era Daily Show or Colbert that I was able to appreciate a leftist creative. It’s obvious that he understands the comedic value of Trump.

Virtually every contemporary journalist that I’ve ever read, watched or examined in any other way is simply a shiftless gutter-licker. If they are not women, coloreds or Jews, they are low IQ morons who had fantasies of becoming a novelist or the next Sy Hersch or Hunter S. Thompson. Instead, they ended up writing copy for the most powerful people in the world, while framing themselves as fighting against some invisible establishment. The fake and invisible establishment that leftists fight against has been dead since the sixties, and the last vestiges of it were crushed when Dick Nixon resigned in 1974.

Now, the same people who raged against George W. Bush support those same policies reframed as support for feminism.

Unlike Jon Oliver, Swan seems like a very normal, smart guy.

For the record – no, he’s not married to a Jew, as far as I can tell. Betsy Woodruff is from Virginia. Though maybe she controls his mind, as is the standard relationship model of millennials.

His wife is not especially anything. They are extremely normal, existing alongside these mutants and trannies that make up the bulk of the journalistic profession.

Why would he not want to do something more meaningful with his life than shill for the CIA and his personal obliteration at the hands of an anti-white mob?

Is he simply driven by a desire to be a part of what is considered “normal”?

That is the obvious answer, but I typically imagine that someone with a bit of cleverness behind his eyes also believes in something.

Intelligence is generally linked to morality, and vice-versa. That is the general problem that the current regime is running into now – intelligent people would rather drop out on fentanyl or an 18 hour a day Rimworld routine than join the Evil Empire.

What I also wonder is: how many people does Swan represent?

What is the specific number of clever white men of my generation have kept their wits and not turned into a fat slob, and yet still willingly serve the Evil Empire?

And Swan, I know you’re reading this (and no doubt thinking “how cocky of him to think I would read this thing I’m current sitting here reading”) – no, I don’t expect you or anyone else to go full-Anglin. There is a lot of room in this world to operate between me and being an open CIA shill promoting the extension of the war in Afghanistan, which is literally about the single shittiest thing anyone can do.

However, I should say: my legacy is protected. I will not only be remembered as someone who resisted this evil, but also as an artist, who was able to make people laugh as the world burned. This whole “neo-Nazi” bit will be understood as high satire by future historians, and my christomathy will be required reading in universities.

That’s contingent on my side winning, of course.

But if your side wins, Jonathan, what do you get?

You’ll be lucky if you don’t simply get lynched for being a heterosexual white male (married to a white woman at that!). Anything beyond “not lynched” is going to be a bonus, but I do not expect it will be a very good bonus.

If you’re a secret pedophile or satanist, then I guess I get it. If not, then you need to ask yourself what the hell happened to your life that you are now promoting CIA talking points supporting a continuation of the Afghan war.

UPDATE: 

I just realized he is getting kind of fat.

But I don’t think that explains it.

On Tuesday, I wrote 13 articles, totaling 5,699 words, in the style of the website Axios. This is approximately equal to a day’s worth of articles by the entire staff of that website, and I believe I kept my quality at the same or higher level than that site. I did this using the day’s news, entirely within my standard 10-hour Tuesday shift.

What that means is that I am singlehandedly capable of running a multimillion dollar website which has dozens of staff members. I am impressed with myself, and once again distraught by the fact that I am incapable of making money or promoting my material, due to the attacks I’ve experienced from the Jews.

For posterity, I’ve collected the 13 articles here, in this single article:

1. Nevada Court Throws Out the Results of County Commission Race Because of Fraud
2. Jewish “Conservative” Controlled Opposition Author’s Book Banned for “Transphobia”
3. More Absurd Fraud: Californians are Planning to Move to Georgia to Vote in Runoff Senate Election
4. Mommy Governors Issuing Insane, Tyrannical New Lockdown Decrees
5. America First: Donald Trump Ordering the Withdrawal of Many Soldiers from Afghanistan and Iraq
6. “I’ll Call My Dad!” – Female German Defense Minister Says Europe Can’t Protect Itself Without US
7. CDC Discovers Dangerous Rat Virus in Bolivia – Allegedly
8. The UN Warns of a “Famine of Biblical Proportions” Sweeping Much of the Third World
9. Western Intelligence: Putin Meant to Kill Navalny – But He Goofed!
10. Bird-Hating EU to Massively Increase Offshore Wind Farms
11. After Mockery, Jake Tapper Deletes Tweet Bragging About How He “Survived” the Election
12. Arkansas: Cowardly Cop Goes to Wrong House, Shoots Homeowner’s Small Dog
13. Tucker Carlson Calls Out the Great Reset, Says Lockdowns are a Globalist Conspiracy!

Bizarrely, several people complained to me about the use of this style on Tuesday, apparently under the impression that I had all of a sudden changed the entire writing style of the site permanently. I would have thought it obvious that this was not permanent, and was simply a fun experiment.

However, as I’ve seen that the audience is so strongly against it, I am thinking about making it permanent, in order to punish the audience, which is disrespectful, entitled, rude, and completely ungrateful. In one word, I would describe the readership as “scumbags.”

This style of pointless, condescending bullet points and childishly simple sentences is dehumanizing to the reader, which is exactly what the Daily Stormer readership deserves.

Frankly, I do not believe the due credit is given to me. I would challenge any single fake news journalist to produce 13 Axios-style articles in one day. Frankly, none of them would be capable. What’s more, there is more truth on this website than any other website on the internet (most of them truths that are unavailable on any other website), and I have continually, over the years, made predictions about the course of society which have proved true.

Just this year, I was not only the first person calling the coronavirus a hoax, I was the only person saying that the lockdown agenda would last for years. Many people emailed or messaged me and said that I would look like a fool for claiming that there would be a second lockdown in the fall, and yet here we are.

What I do on this site is something that no one has ever done before in history, and I should get much more respect than I do.

Going deeper: What I will say is that I do agree with the Axios philosophy that articles tend to have too many words, including details that are of zero consequence, and that this is an antiquated style of journalism that doesn’t really serve modern audiences. The quoting system that we use on this site allows for the removal of unnecessary details, but I still feel that our news articles include too many words. I am going to incorporate some of the things I learned during the Axios Experiment into my daily writing going forward.