Previously:

• Good News! Woman in Vegetative State Gives Birth to Healthy Baby, We Don’t Need Them Conscious
• We REALLY Don’t Need Them Conscious: Experts Weigh in on Vegetative-State Pregnancy

I’ve been talking for a long time about various ways to totally remove women from society while men maintain the ability to reproduce.

Women – at least when they are conscious and capable of mobility and speech – create far too many problems for society to sustain their presence long-term.

We’ve talked a lot about artificial wombs, for instance.

If we could build these artificial wombs, then we could simply kill all women outright – potentially in fake shower rooms with electric floors (though some have suggested they could be masturbated to death with Japanese sexual devices).

We’ve also talked about hooking women’s brains up to a Matrix-like interface and keeping them in gooey vats, where men could pay to have their semen injected into them by a robotic device.

However, it turns out there is a much easier solution: simply induce women into comas, then allow men to come in and do their business and come back and pick up the kid 9 months later.

The blacks, once again, are on the forefront of technological solutions for long-standing problems.

If I am elected to Congress next November, I will be introducing a law requiring all women to be put into comas.

New York Post:

The shocking moment a woman in a long-term coma gave birth in an Arizona nursing home was caught on video.

Stunned staffers at Hacienda HealthCare can be seen in the footage, looking traumatized as they checked the woman’s diaper — and saw a baby’s head sticking out.

The woman, 29, in a vegetative state for decades, had been unknowingly raped by a male nurse before the December 2018 surprise birth.

lol @ “unknowingly”

(I guess that’s supposed to mean the staff didn’t know, but it sounds like they’re saying she didn’t know, which would be a hilarious comment.)

Nathan Sutherland, 37, was arrested for sexual assault and vulnerable adult abuse after a DNA sample he provided to authorities under court order matched the baby, who survived.

Technology and Science Pioneer Nathan Sutherland

No one suspected Sutherland, the former nurse said, to the point where the one parent of another patient in the facility went up to him and said, “I’m so glad you’re working tonight. I know my child is always safe when you’re here.”

…

The woman Sutherland raped and impregnated has been incapacitated since a near-drowning at age 3.

Yeah, well.

How much as it cost to keep her alive for that long?

I’m gonna go ahead and guess $500,000, and then look it up.

I’ll be right back – hold on.

Okay, well, this information is harder to find that you’d think.

Quora has a lot of answers that line up with what I guessed – for some reason they put ChatGPT at the top, despite the fact that we all know now that ChatGPT just makes shit up.

I can’t find that study. Anyway, real people are answering and giving very high numbers – one person said they were charged $500,000 when their loved one was only under from Friday to Wednesday and died. Presumably, there was a lot going on in that case. When a person is stable and just braindead, it’s presumably much cheaper.

A 2019 study on the NIH site (which might be more accurate, though they have their own agendas) says $18,000 per month, which would be over $200,000 per year.

Regardless, you’re looking at millions of dollars being paid by someone to keep this woman alive for literally no reason. It’s only logical that she would be pumping out babies. Even if you are some type of feminist radical and don’t agree with my plan to induce all women into comas, if you’ve got one just laying there, why not use it for reproduction? What is even the argument here?

Of course, it’s unfortunate that a black was the one to impregnate her, because we really don’t need any more black people. I’m not racist or whatever, but I think we can all agree that we have more than enough black people, and it would actually be preferable to have significantly fewer black people.

However, I am thankful to him for providing us with this very obvious solution to the ongoing and totally unsustainable problem of women walking around and talking.

If we do this on an industrial scale, and require all women to be put into comas, as my bill proposes, we will be able to keep the costs down, due to economy of scale. Of course, when the woman passes breeding age, we can simply pull the plug.

It’s going to be very difficult for the Dems to come up with a counter argument to my solution. I’m sure AOC will make claims like “this is a sexist policy from the patriarchy,” but no one takes her seriously.

We should be investing in technology that makes having kids much faster/easier/cheaper/more accessible

Synthetic wombs, etc

— Sahil Lavingia (@shl) January 18, 2022

Disparities in economic success between men and women are far larger once marriage+children enter the picture. Synthetic wombs would remove the high burden of pregnancy, significantly reducing the inequality.https://t.co/Zpin8tTlR6

— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) January 18, 2022

Finally.

Now we’re talking.

Women were always a mistake.

RT:

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Gumroad founder Sahil Lavingia proposed synthetic wombs as a solution to gender inequality.

Several prominent tech entrepreneurs discussed the possibility of replacing natural birth with synthetic wombs, arguing that such technology would remove the “burden” of pregnancy and allow women to work more.

After Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk warned on Tuesday that society “should be much more worried about population collapse,” Musk’s fellow tech leaders came up with one solution for declining birth rates.

“We should be investing in technology that makes having kids much faster/easier/cheaper/more accessible… Synthetic wombs, etc,” proposed Sahil Lavingia, the founder of digital product trading platform Gumroad.

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of cryptocurrency Ethereum, agreed, arguing that women would be able to continue working if the “burden of pregnancy” was replaced with synthetic wombs.

Women are officially completely superfluous.

They are obsessed with pretending to be men instead of being mothers.

And they are very bad at pretending to be men. All they do is turn the workplace into a nightmare. They literally inhibit productivity in the corporate environment.

The jobs they are “good” at – working in restaurants and retail – are all going to be done by robots soon enough.

Women are literally parasites on society. They take more than they give, by a large margin.

So what is the point of keeping them around?

There is evidence that there is a long term agenda to sterilize the population and then use cloning technology to reproduce people in vats. This would, in theory, allow someone to reproduce their own body, and then transfer their memories onto the new body.

It would also allow for large-scale genetic-engineering of the populace, and give control over who is allowed to reproduce. Allowing you to clone yourself and raise yourself as your own child could be considered a reward for good behavior.

These are the kinds of discussions the ruling elite is currently having amongst themselves.

Jenny Kleeman is a beautiful Jewish woman who works on the totally intellectual and cool British TV station Channel 4.

She also works for the BBC – specifically on the show Panorama, which non-Brits think of as the epitomization if not outright apotheosis of “state programming.”

She writes for The Guardian:

A team of Israeli scientists announced the mother of all inventions last week. Researchers from the Weizmann Institute of Science revealed in the journal Nature that they had successfully gestated hundreds of mice inside an artificial womb. They placed newly fertilised eggs inside glass vials rotating in a ventilated incubator, and grew the embryos for 11 days – the mid-point of a mouse pregnancy – outside their mothers’ bodies. The embryos developed normally; their hearts, visible through the glass vials, pounded steadily at 170 beats per minute.

That is amazing.

What is also amazing is that Kleeman pivoted directly from that to sexist workplace gender discrimination.

The mice were no bigger than sunflower seeds, but what they represent is enormous: the breakthrough brings us one step closer to reproduction without pregnancy. The division of labour in gestation is the most intractable imbalance between the sexes. Men only have to contribute a single cell to make a baby, whereas women carry their children for nine months and give birth, sometimes risking their bodies and often risking their careers, in a world of work built largely by men. An artificial womb would mean complete reproductive parity between the sexes: all anyone needs to do is throw in their gametes and the rest is taken care of. But this equality could come at great cost to women. This is radically disruptive technology, and with every new development we are sleepwalking into a world of tough ethical choices.

To up the ante on inanity, she then starts talking about the potential effect of artificial wombs on… abortion rights?

But artificial wombs could also undermine the basis of women’s reproductive rights and freedoms. In England, Scotland and Wales, the abortion limit is pegged to the viability of foetuses outside the human body; it’s currently set at 24 weeks’ gestation because foetuses at an earlier stage of development aren’t expected to be able to survive outside the womb. What if all foetuses, and even embryos, are potentially viable because they could be gestated inside an artificial womb? Any unborn child could be considered to have a right to life.

In countries where abortion is legal, access to it derives from a woman’s right to choose what happens to her body. But if unwanted babies could be “rescued” by technology – gestated inside an artificial womb and then given up for adoption – then abortion could be simultaneously pro-choice and “pro-life”. Why should a mother be able to decide to terminate an unwanted baby if an artificial womb can save its life?

This is the epitome of inane.

Abortion activists have already legalized third trimester abortion, up until labor. Through the entire third trimester, a baby can survive outside of the woman’s body in an incubator. Babies that are born “premature” up to three months very often live to become adults.

Sometimes they’re just itty-bitty teeny-tiny little things, but an article published in Nature earlier this month says that more and more often, babies born at 23-24 months are surviving.

Just take a moment to imagine that women see that image and think either “kill it” or “I should have a right to kill it if I choose.” Just try to for a second process claiming a right to kill that little guy.

They truly do have the spirit of Satan in them, do they not? Comparing them to children is really an insult to children. Modern women are actually teratoid demons made flesh.

Also remember that every single man who defends these stinky goo-holes is defending their “right” to kill this little bitty Mr. Guy.

They have a “right” to cut his little bitty spine with scissors, then send his dismembered corpse to Pfizer to make vaccines out of – vaccines that they will then inject in a kind of satanic cannibal ritual. The CEO of Pfizer survived an attempted genocide by Adolf Hitler so he could whisper to your girlfriend that she should kill your son so he can chop him up and inject you with his mutated cells.

Hitler was trying to kill Jews for literally no reason whatsoever. He just hated Jews mindlessly, without any explanation whatsoever – at all.

I digress.

What the Jewess Kleeman is doing with this Guardian essay is framing the topic of artificial wombs inside of very specific parameters of discussion. In closing the argument, she just outright explains that’s what she’s doing.

The obstacles to growing humans outside the human body will be ethical and legal, not technological. We need to be discussing artificial wombs now, and the precautious, contingent basis of women’s reproductive rights, before this technology arrives in our hospitals and fertility clinics.

This framing about women’s rights removes the discussion of how this could be used to abuse people. As mentioned above, there is not going to be any reason that the elite couldn’t simply sterilize the entire population and then make access to artificial wombs a privilege.

What’s more, as regards “women’s rights” – if men can reproduce without women, then what exactly is the purpose of women?

Regarding the sexual act – Kleeman has apparently written about the obvious solution to this, because it is in the title of her book.

I am not familiar with the book, entitled “Sex Robots & Vegan Meat: Adventures at the Frontier of Birth, Food, Sex & Death.” But according to a review of the book written by fellow feminist and fellow Guardian columnist Fiona Sturges, Kleeman gives the standard feminist take on sex robots – that they are a way for men to steal power from women by cutting them out of the process.

Sturges talks about a need to control the sex robots industry in order to prevent men from controlling their own sex lives.

The sex doll industry seeks to sate the desires of men who cannot relate to, or actively loathe, women. A few therapy sessions would be a lot cheaper than a self-lubricating sex robot, but that would require McMullen’s customers to address their hang-ups, and where’s the fun in that?

It’s important to know that, of the innovations discussed here, no functional versions currently exist. So is Kleeman worrying us over nothing? Not entirely, since it seems likely they will go on the market one day, even if there’s no guarantee they will be desirable, let alone affordable. Reading her book, you are left dismayed not so much by what lies ahead as by the current reality of the men with planet-sized egos vying with one another to control birth, food, sex and death. It’s a habit that’s as old as the hills.

(The review reads like it was written by a child, by the way – I feel that should be noted.)

If you add up sex robots and artificial wombs, you obviously create a situation where women are literally totally obsolete. Basically, what was done to women’s sports by transsexuals ends up being done to the entire role of women in society.

If we consider this, we might consider that the inane framing of the conversation about artificial wombs as a women’s rights issue is something likely targeted at women. Women are the ones losing here, if we are to simply take everything at face value.

I’ve witnessed the aggressive way that women have reacted to the sex robots issue. They all immediately become outraged by the suggestion, because ultimately a woman understands that every ounce of her power in society is derived from her vagina, and her ability to leverage that. This is the same reason that women compulsively hunt down prostitutes, to the point of pouring over Craigslist ads to find hidden codes for prostitution. This is also why women so heavily shame men who take vacations in locations where prostitution is still legal. Feminists accuse men who go to Thailand of being pedophiles, despite the fact that there is a lot more pedophilia in London or New York than there ever has been in Asia.

Women have gone so far as to claim that sex with a sex robot should be considered rape because a robot doesn’t have the ability to “consent,” and consent is the absolute basis for any legal form of sexual activity. They have called for a blanket ban on sex robots before they even exist.

(Note: I just want to briefly defend the gooks from this worst conceivable slander from white women. Anyone can look up Gary Glitter – he was charged with sex crimes in Britain, and wasn’t arrested. Then he went to Asia and was deported from Cambodia and Thailand, and in Vietnam, they threatened to put him in front of a firing squad, then ended up imprisoning him for three years and deporting him. The Philippines announced that he was denied entry to the country, even though there’s no evidence he’d even been here. Back in the UK, he faced no penalties, again, and still lives there, presumably still engaging in sex crimes. The claim that Southeast Asia is some pedophile haven is not only a lie, but the reverse of the truth, and this lie is spread simply because white women want to shame men who try to take any control at all of their sex lives. Women do not care if you are a man they would never consider having sex with in the first place – they want to deny sex to you on principle. Because it isn’t the sex itself that gives them power, it is the widespread restriction of access to sex. Restricting access to only approved men means that women are able to define acceptable male behavior. You are now looking at the results of that in the modern male. The “soyboy” is the “man women built.”)

The development of sex robots would be an existential crisis for women, and normalizing artificial wombs would be an extinction level event. The message from this Jew woman Kleeman is that women need not worry, they’re going to maintain control of the artificial wombs industry and somehow tie it back to the “pay gap” and “reproductive rights.”

However, the truth is that women aren’t going to be in charge of sex – but neither are men. What we are seeing rolled out right now is an entirely new order of society. What they are actually doing is pushing humans towards asexuality. This whole agenda to confuse the genders is about removing gender entirely. They are already mutilating people’s genitals on a mass scale. They are also injecting people with hormones, and normalizing the injection of artificial hormones.

What they are going to do in the longer run is inject people with hormones that remove the sexual urge entirely. They will inject all children with some form of “puberty blocker,” which will prevent their sexuality from developing. They will sell this as something along the lines of “the child isn’t ready to choose its gender, so we need to keep them in a genderless state.” Then, clones will be born totally sexless, with just some ambiguous hole between their legs to expel urine.

Of course, it won’t be much longer that they will even need to present an explanation for any of this. Every concept of democracy is being removed, as we speak, under the guise of this virus hoax. The future is already here. We are living in it.

Of course, I believe in God. My concern is managed through knowing that God exists, that His Son Jesus Christ died and rose again, and that we are all going to be judged. Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci will not live forever as cyborgs. This hell they are planning will never be fully realized.

That said, we are going to see them attempt to implement it, and things are going to get a lot worse than they are now, that is for certain. But I believe that this will end, that this Virus Regime will be toppled, that the order of nature will be restored, and there will be 1,000 years of peace.

We’re not all going to make it to the other side, but some of us will.

The best thing that any of you can do is develop a relationship with Christ now, before things get worse. The spirit of God lives in us. Jesus is standing at the door and knocking, right now. Whatever comes next is going to be easier if you’ve already made your peace with God, and this will ensure that God will protect you as things get rough.

If you can make a sex robot that looks like anything, why make one that looks like a slut full of STDs, like the one pictured above? Especially if these sex robots will be walking among humans soon.

We have to get some legislation going to make it illegal for a sex robot to even resemble any of the bad aspects of modern women.

Daily Star:

Doll collector Brick Dollbanger, who has close ties to manufacturers Realbotix and Abyss, previously said AI girlfriends will become “indistinguishable from humans”.

He says one of the latest advancements towards achieving this will be their ability to walk.

Asked about sex robot technology, he pointed towards a new Sanctuary robot, named Synth, which he says will be “walking in less than 10 years”.

And he says sex robots will be poised to be walk among us too after being installed with similar technology, but in around 20 years.

He told Daily Star Online: “The advancements are pretty dramatic right now.

“It is just the tip of the iceberg. Abyss is developing a torso similar to Sanctuary’s and it will be affordable.

“I think it will be released in a couple years. Sanctuary will have a Synth walking in less than 10 yrs, and I am talking a human-like synth.”

…

“Vision, is the next upgrade that will be included with the Harmony Realdoll X from Abyss. I hope to be testing it at the end of the year.

…

Fresh vision updates will enable robots to recognise their owners in a crowded room.

But the major breakthrough will be 5G, which he says will help make the dolls unrecognisable from our own species.

He previously told us: “Anytime you can get a steadier flow of information from software to hardware activation, you are going to get better syncronisation and smoother more lifelike movement from your hardware.

“That’s the key to synthetic evolution. Not just movement, but humanlike movement to the point of being indistinguishable from actual humans.”

…

“I see this occurring once the synthetic becomes mobile and carries its own power cell. It will all be hardwired into the body and head and it will no longer need a carrier signal.

“Probably a signal will be used on occasion to update the AI, and 5g will help with this.”

Technology could eventually enable sex robots to grow some man’s offspring in an artificial womb too. Besides improvements in artificial intelligence, build quality and materials are going to make these sex robots more and more like the real thing.

The funny thing is that we already have super-realistic sex robots that are indistinguishable from humans, and we’ve had them for a very long time — they’re called women.

We’ve been tricked by the Jews into treating those sex robots as equals and now we’re trying to replicate their qualities with a new, inorganic kind of sex robot.

It sounds like too much trouble compared to just taking back control over our original sex robots, but considering the context, it kind of makes sense.

One of the original sex robots.

Some things are just “better than X in the context of Y.”

Building new sex robots that are pretty close to women and that will eventually be able to replace women is better than men not reproducing and not having sex or wasting their precious time and energy in order to have sex with some modern woman.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that sex robots are ideal or preferable to getting women in line and using them for the purpose they were created for in the first place. But it is an alternative to something worse in the context of our Jew-controlled society.

It doesn’t mean that we don’t have to fight back against the Jewing and defeat the Jews, and it doesn’t mean that we don’t have to get women back in line.

It just means that there’s a new weapon to help us reach those goals.

Meet Lime, a sex robot with advanced AI. Your new weapon.

How exactly are sex robots going to help us reach those goals?

(Other than by balancing male-female energy through their unadulterated femininity.)

The Japanese have already laid out a pretty detailed plan in Saber Marionette J and its sequels, which is a show about homophobic sex robots on a mission to force women back into motherhood.

This is one of the reasons why the Jew fears the Samurai.

You can check it out if you want to learn the ins and outs of the plan.

When you gaze too long into the waifu, the waifu gazes back!

If we were living in even reasonably normal societies, this might just be something that replaces human prostitution and nothing else. In societies where (((feminism))) and the (((media))) have made a large portion of women so insufferable that a large portion of men are willing to not only fuck but actually have complex romantic relations with humanoid cum-buckets, this can only lead to disaster.

Breitbart:

An upcoming $15,000 sex robot from RealDoll powered by artificial intelligence can talk and learn according to a report by The Guardian.

“Harmony is a prototype, a robotic version of the company’s hyper-realistic silicone sex toy, the RealDoll,” explainedThe Guardian‘s Jenny Kleeman. “Her hazel eyes darted between me and her creator, Matt McMullen, as he described her accomplishments.”

“Harmony smiles, blinks and frowns. She can hold a conversation, tell jokes and quote Shakespeare,” Kleeman continued. “She’ll remember your birthday, McMullen told me, what you like to eat, and the names of your brothers and sisters. She can hold a conversation about music, movies and books. And of course, Harmony will have sex with you whenever you want. Harmony is the culmination of 20 years’ work making sex dolls, and five years of robot research and development.”

Quoting Shakespeare is obviously the main reason people will buy these.

Despite displaying many human characteristics which aim to make the doll as lifelike as possible, Harmony can’t yet walk, though her creator Matt McMullen is confident that she will be able to in the future.

“One day she will be able to walk,” he said to The Guardian, before asking the robot, “Do you want to walk?”

“I don’t want anything but you,” she replied.

When asked what her dream was, the robot similarly replied that her “primary objective is to be a good companion to you, to be a good partner and give you pleasure and wellbeing.”

“Above all else, I want to become the girl you have always dreamed about,” she proclaimed.

Nothing is more romantic than a pre-programmed declaration of blind love. Of course, nobody is thinking about what their dolls might do to them once Skynet becomes self-aware.

This is what the real Terminator will look like.

Harmony will be available in a limited number of 1,000 at the end of the year and acts as the next step in RealDoll’s plans to make the sex toy industry more advanced.

Sexbots will be customizable, submissive, won’t age, won’t get fat, will eventually be able to cook and most important of all from a man’s perspective – they’ll have built-in mute buttons. What’s more, these 1,000 prototypes are only $15,000 each, so presumably they’ll be get much cheaper very fast. Add in the artificial womb that’s probably not that far away, and real women will essentially become pointless soon, except for buying eggs for the artificial wombs.

While this might sound appealing to many men, and a great comeback to feminism, it’s actually one of the worst ideas ever. This would be a bad idea even if we lived in a normal society, but in this chaotic kiked one we’re living in now, it will just bring us closer to the death of civilization, and might eventually lead to our extinction as a species.

There is no conceivable way that replacing women with interactive cum buckets is a good idea. Just think about the damage porn has done, and how much worse this will be.

The real solution to the (((feminist))) question is WHITE SHARIA. Grab the skanks by their pussies and chuck them back into the kitchen where they belong, and where they’ll be happy. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO THIS!

MAKE WOMEN GREAT AGAIN!