I like these guys

This is a very interesting article from the Guardian’s Simon Allison.

In theory, “racism” was an exclusively white phenomenon. It was later discovered that Asians were also very racist. However, that was explained as “Asians are a part of white supremacy because they are similar to whites in several ways.”

When you get into “black on black racial hatred,” you begin to very seriously confuse the liberal reader. This results in a lot of words being used to overcomplicate a situation which would be very straightforward for someone who does not believe in “racism.”

Once again, we salute the Guardian for covering a story that the NYT and WaPo will not touch.

The Guardian:

An anti-migrant vigilante organisation in South Africa has registered as a political party and plans to contest seats in next year’s general elections.

Operation Dudula, whose name means “to force out” in Zulu, wants all foreign nationals who are in the country unofficially to be deported.

The party, which first emerged in Johannesburg’s Soweto township after riots in 2021, claims to have widespread support, with a formal presence in seven of South Africa’s nine provinces. It claims to be planning to stand candidates in 1,500 of the country’s 4,468 voting districts.

Many Operation Dudula followers have faced allegations of hate speech and physical violence. They have staged protests outside embassies, turned people away outside hospitals to prevent foreign nationals from accessing state medical services, and conducted door-to-door searches of businesses in poorer areas demanding to see identity documents.

In August, Philani Gumede, a 36-year-old from Durban, was convicted of hate speech after sending a voice-note to members calling on them to evict foreigners from businesses in the city. Nomalungelo Ntshangase, a regional court prosecutor, told the court that this had led directly to xenophobic attacks and looting.

In 2022, Operation Dudula followers camped outside Kalafong hospital in Atteridgeville, a suburb of South Africa’s administrative capital, Pretoria, preventing people, including pregnant women, from entering the hospital.

“People were turned away by the protesters based on their appearance and accent,” said Sibusiso Ndlovu, a health promotion supervisor for Médecins Sans Frontières. “They have even demanded that critically ill patients who are migrants must be ‘unplugged’ and taken out.”

Civil society groups have taken the party to court over unlawful evictions and conducting unauthorised citizenship checks in public. A court date has not yet been set.

The Operation Dudula party’s spokesperson, Isaac Lesole, said the transition from civil movement to political party would mean a tempering of tactics.

“We want to demilitarise Operation Dudula. We know the military angle did not appeal to a lot of people,” he said. “Now we’ve taken a new posture, we need to guarantee that we can still achieve a lot without people being militants and killing or kicking things. As a political party, we are governed by a different set of rules.”

But its core ideology would not change, he said. “We view illegal immigrants as criminals, and they must go back to their countries.”

About 3.95 million immigrants live in South Africa, according to 2022 estimates by the Institute for Security Studies (ISS). However, there is no such thing as an “illegal foreigner” in South Africa, as its constitution – widely hailed as one of the most progressive in the world – confers limited rights upon all people within the country’s borders, regardless of nationality or birthplace.

That worked out well, didn’t it?

Operation Dudula has its roots in the riots that swept across KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng provinces in June 2021. In the absence of police, some citizens banded together to protect shops and businesses from thieves.

“You saw a lot of communities starting to self-protect. They started cordoning off malls, and protecting them from being looted. Some of these organisations also felt emboldened to have more operations, under the auspices of ‘anti-crime’,” said Lizette Lancaster, an ISS researcher.

Lancaster said the chronic failures of the state in South Africa, which has high rates of corruption, unemployment and violence, created the space for the party to thrive.

“South Africans have been trying [to hold the state accountable] through protests, but are not getting anywhere,” she said.

“It is almost natural for people to look for another scapegoat. The most obvious scapegoat would be our brothers and sisters that have come here to look for better opportunities.”

Although not expected to win any outright majorities, the fractured nature of South African politics means that small parties can influence the formation of coalition governments – anddemand major concessions in return. The current mayor of Johannesburg is from the Al Jama’ah, a fringe Islamist party that won just one of the city’s 135 wards.

Established parties are struggling to respond to Operation Dudula, with seemingly contradictory messages.

In April, President Cyril Ramaphosa called it a “vigilante-like force” taking “illegal actions” against foreigners. “These things often get out of hand,” he said. “They always mutate into wanton violence against other people.”

However, with the ruling African National Congress seeing its support eroded in recent years by a series of corruption scandals, rising inequality, high unemployment and violent crime, it has also begun to echo the rhetoric of Operation Dudula in a bid to shore up its electoral chances.

Last year an ANC spokesperson, Pule Mabe, told the Mail & Guardian newspaper that Operation Dudula was affirming the views of the ANC. “These [foreign] people come here to sell drugs, seat [live] here illegally, undermine our sovereignty, create illegal business.”

Julius Malema, leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a militant leftwing party, said in a speech in July: “South Africans are not xenophobic. [Operation Dudula] is a group of criminals who are in cahoots with some ministers. They are small boys who must be put in their place.”

However, in a sign of how politically expedient xenophobia has become in South Africa, even the ostensibly pan-Africanist EFF has campaigned for restaurants to employ more South Africans. Malema visited restaurants last year demanding to see the identity documents of workers as he demanded businesses hire locals.

Racism is not real. There is also no difference between “racism” and “xenophobia.” They are synonyms for a non-valid observation of natural human behavioral phenomenon.

Everyone just wants their own space with their own people.

This was actually the Westphalian ideal. That is to say: the fact that racism does not exist was a basic part of early “liberal” ideology. It’s a fine enough system upon which to base international law. We do not agree with the liberals nowadays, but some of the original classical liberal ideological points now seem very reasonable.

At the time, of course, Westphalian nation-states were being introduced in contrast to the idea of empires. Now, the reverse is true, in some sense. Nation-state sovereignty is being overruled by super-national entities which the mechanisms of the nation-state government are not capable of opposing.

The father cannot be held responsible for the sins of the son.

I don’t see how it is this nigga’s problem that his kid is a coke head and blasting on niggas.

The Post Millennial:

A 16-month-old boy was fatally shot by his 5-year-old brother in Lafayette, Indiana. The older brother was high on cocaine at the time of the shooting. The parents have been charged with neglect.

Deonta Jermaine Johnson, 27, and Shatia Tiara Welch, 24, were charged with neglect and arrested on Monday in LaPorte and the shooting occurred in March, the Lafayette Journal & Courier reports.

Isiah Johnson’s death occurred on March 28 at the Romney Meadows apartments in Lafayette. Isiah had marijuana in his blood and the 5-year-old was high on cocaine.

Deonta Johnson was asleep during the shooting and Welch wasn’t present. In the apartment, 93 fentanyl pills, marijuana, and other drug materials were found, prosecutors have reported.

Welch owns a gun but told the police that she had usually kept it in a safe under lock and key. Johnson also faces charges of obstruction of justice for hiding the marijuana that was present in the apartment before police arrived on the scene.

In a news release on Tuesday, police officers said, “Detectives with the Lafayette Police Department determined that the child was shot by his five-year-old sibling, who was able to gain access to a weapon in the apartment.”

The 5-year-old boy had found a handgun and shot his brother in the head.

It might be obvious that if you find a gun, you should shoot the closest person you find. Especially if you’re on coke, you could embrace this kind of thinking.

In fact, there are many people on the earth, and if you find a gun, you should be discerning in who you kill.

Especially think about not making it obvious that you are the killer.

Kids these days are so dumb.

What percentage of South Africa is white or otherwise non-black in the current year?

Okay, well.

Just as I thought: the whites are getting together with the Indians and their mulatto henchmen and denying blacks the ability to read.

This is always the game of whites – hold down the blacks by manipulating them into living like primitive savages.

BBC:

Eight out of 10 South African school children struggle to read by the age of ten, an international study has found.

South Africa ranked last out of 57 countries assessed in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, which tested the reading ability of 400,000 students globally in 2021.

Illiteracy among South African children rose from from 78% in 2016 to 81%.

The country’s education minister blamed the results on school closures during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Maybe giving all the students candles would help?

Describing the results as “disappointingly low”, Angie Motshekga also said the country’s education system was faced with significant historical challenges, including poverty, inequality and inadequate infrastructure.

…

The study showed that 81% of South African children could not read for comprehension in any of the country’s 11 official languages.

Alongside Morocco and Egypt, South Africa was one of only three African countries which participated in the assessments to monitor trends in literacy and reading comprehension of nine- and 10-year-olds.

Based on tests taken every five years at the end of the school year, the new study places countries in a global education league table.

Singapore secured top spot in the rankings with an average score of 587, while South Africa ranked last on 288 points – below second-last Egypt’s average of 378. The scores are benchmarked against an international average of 500.

…

South Africa’s struggles with its education system are longstanding, with significant inequality between black and white students a consequence of the segregation of children under apartheid.

And there you have it: whites are, once again, completely responsible for black failure.

You may also note that none of the rest of the black African countries were included in this study.

Obviously, those other black African countries, which do not have any white people to oppress them, would be scoring at 100% or even higher. The study includes the one African country that still has white oppressors just to make the blacks look silly.

Imagine the literacy rate of say, Wakanda. It would easily be 200% or above.

This is cringy as hell

My opinion of this guy is kinda mixed, to be honest.

On the one hand, he’s race traitor scum who sold out his own people for a Nobel prize and a place in history books that’ll never be written.

On the other hand, by getting rid of apartheid, he probably caused more black death and suffering than any other man in modern history.

So it’s complicated…

The Guardian:

South Africa’s last white president, FW de Klerk, who with Nelson Mandela oversaw the end of apartheid, has died in Cape Town aged 85, with his office issuing a prerecorded posthumous video apology for the country’s discriminatory system of white minority rule.

“I, without qualification, apologise for the pain and the hurt and the indignity and the damage that apartheid has done to black, brown and Indians in South Africa,” a gaunt De Klerk said in the recording.

He added his concern, however, over South Africa’s future, saying: “I’m deeply concerned about the undermining of many aspects of the constitution, which we perceive almost day to day.”

De Klerk’s death was announced by his foundation earlier on Thursday. “Former president FW de Klerk died peacefully at his home in Fresnaye earlier this morning following his struggle against mesothelioma cancer,” the FW de Klerk Foundation said in a statement.

De Klerk, who jointly won the Nobel peace prize with Mandela, leaves behind a complicated legacy in a country still scarred by the consequences of the brutal institutionalised system of white-minority rule that he helped usher out.

As well as ending apartheid, De Klerk, who as a minister had helped uphold white-minority rule, also helped dismantle South Africa’s nuclear weapons programme.

South Africa’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, said he and the government were saddened, adding that De Klerk had played a “key role in ushering in democracy” in the country. Ramaphosa said: “He took the courageous decision [as president] to unban political parties, release political prisoners and enter into negotiations with the liberation movement amid severe pressure to the contrary from many in his political constituency.”

Mandela’s own foundation said in a separate statement that De Klerk would “for ever be linked to Nelson Mandela in the annals of South African history”.

“De Klerk’s legacy is a big one. It is also an uneven one, something South Africans are called to reckon with in this moment,” the Mandela Foundation said of his death.

White people are still evil though, at least according to this Arab news outlet

A lawyer whose political inclinations were conservative, De Klerk was born in Johannesburg into an influential Afrikaner family. He went on to serve in the white-minority government of PW Botha as an MP in the National party.

While many white South Africans and senior anti-apartheid figures – including Archbishop Desmond Tutu – believed he would continue with Botha’s racist policies when in power, De Klerk, concerned about growing racial violence, including ethnic violence between Xhosa and Zulus encouraged by the state, began moving against the apartheid system.

…

After becoming president in 1989, he allowed anti-apartheid protests, removed restrictions on some banned political parties and – like his predecessor – met secretly with Mandela.

The turning point came on 2 February 1990, five months after his election, when in a speech to parliament De Klerk announced that Mandela, the imprisoned leader of the African National Congress (ANC), would be released from jail, where he had been for 27 years. The announcement electrified a country that for decades had been scorned and placed under sanctions by much of the world for its brutal system of racial discrimination.

The speech marked the official end of segregation policies and the start of the negotiations that led to a constitutional democracy with equal rights for all South Africans.

Nine days later, in a historic moment that would reverberate around the globe, Mandela walked free from Victor Verster prison, although De Klerk continued to head South Africa’s white-minority government until 1994, when Mandela’s ANC swept to power in national elections.

Please note that this is the precise reason, given by the Anti-Defamation League, as to why Israel cannot ever be a single state with Palestine – the Jews would be outvoted.

It is also the way the Democrat Party obtained total control of the United States, having replaced some 40% of the country with nonwhites.

De Klerk was conscious of the risks involved. “There is an element of uncertainty, obviously, with regard to everything which lies in the future,” he told reporters the day after his speech, and violence would continue throughout the transition period.

After the end of white-minority rule, he served as deputy president until 1996.

In later life, De Klerk was overshadowed by the towering figure of Mandela. “Sometimes, Mr De Klerk does not get the credit that he deserves,” Tutu told David Frost in an interview in 2012.

The relationship between De Klerk and Mandela, as the former admitted during his Nobel peace prize acceptance speech, could be fractious and was marked by bitter disagreements. Mandela accused De Klerk of allowing the killings of black South Africans during the political transition, while De Klerk said Mandela could be extremely stubborn and unreasonable.

While some white South Africans accused De Klerk of “giving the country away”, many black South Africans continued to view him with suspicion and his legacy would remain contested throughout his life, not least over accusations of involvement in state-sponsored atrocities committed on his watch, claims he always denied.

“If we had not changed in the manner we did,” De Klerk said in an interview with the Observer 11 years ago, “South Africa would be completely isolated. The majority of people in the world would be intent on overthrowing the government. Our economy would be nonexistent – we would not be exporting a single case of wine and South African planes would not be allowed to land anywhere. Internally, we would have the equivalent of civil war.”

He’s basically saying that the Jewish-globalist economic system would have declared war on the country to force whites out of power if he had not voluntarily forced whites out of power.

De Klerk’s judgment on apartheid, too, was softer than many subsequently would have liked, with many inside the country seeing him as a symbol of the failure of white South Africa to acknowledge the full horrors of the system and to bring perpetrators to justice.

…

The FW de Klerk Foundation had announced in June that he had been diagnosed with a cancer that affects the lining of the lungs.

His death, perhaps inevitably, has been greeted with mixed responses. Julius Malema, the leader of the leftist Economic Freedom Fighters party, who had accused him of being “a murderer” during a visit to the country’s parliament last year, tweeted: “Thank you God,” followed by five dancing emojis.

Malema castigated media reports that said De Klerk was a former president of South Africa. “He is a former apartheid president,” said Malema in a tweet. Others on social media said De Klerk should not be accorded a state burial.

The former opposition Democratic Alliance party leader Tony Leon tweeted: “Farewell FW de Klerk. Like Mikhail Gorbachev, he reformed the system he inherited in 1990. And if he had not relinquished power in 1994, likely SA would be Syria or Venezuela today.”

It’s hilarious how that Jew Tony Leon is actually happy that South Africa isn’t like Syria or Venezuela, considering both of those countries are much better off than South Africa in virtually every imaginable way.

This place was a hellhole before blacks took it over

Pictured: Israeli soldiers patrolling the separation barrier in Bethlehem.

It really hurts Palestinians to compare Iyad Hallaq to George Floyd.

The Guardian:

Human Rights Watch has accused Israeli officials of committing the crimes of apartheid and persecution, claiming the government enforces an overarching policy to “maintain the domination by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians”.

In a report released on Tuesday, the New York-based advocacy group became the first major international rights body to level such allegations. It said that after decades of warnings that an entrenched hold over Palestinian life could lead to apartheid, it had found that the “threshold” had been crossed.

“This is the starkest finding Human Rights Watch has reached on Israeli conduct in the 30 years we’ve been documenting abuses on the ground there,” said Omar Shakir, the group’s Israel and Palestine director. Shakir said his organisation had never before directly accused Israeli officials of crimes against humanity.

Responding to the claims, Israel’s foreign ministry accused Human Rights Watch of a “longstanding anti-Israeli agenda” and said the report was a “propaganda pamphlet” that had “no connection to facts or reality on the ground”.

“The fictional claims that HRW concocted are both preposterous and false,” it said.

Palestinian officials and agencies welcomed the report, including the foreign ministry, which said it exposed “Israel’s colonial occupation and its discriminatory and racist policies against the Palestinian people”.

The report drew on years of human rights documentation, analysis of Israeli laws, a review of government planning documents, and statements by officials.

Human Rights Watch compared policies and practices towards nearly 7 million Palestinians in the occupied territories and within Israel with those concerning roughly the same number of Jewish Israelis living in the same areas.

It concluded there was a “present-day reality of a single authority, the Israeli government … methodologically privileging Jewish Israelis while repressing Palestinians, most severely in the occupied territory.”

First used in relation to South Africa’s racist segregation against non-white citizens, apartheid – which is Afrikaans for “apartness” – is a crime against humanity under international law.

The only logical conclusion here is that Human Rights Watch is secretly controlled by Tucker Carlson.

A top Jew terrorist has finally taken his place in hell.

The media is truly distraught. The Guardian called him “a giant.”

That is probably not a dig at his weight, though it would have been appropriate.

I’m shocked they’re not blaming coronavirus for his death…!

DW:

Anti-apartheid veteran Denis Goldberg has died at his home in South Africa at the age of 87, his foundation said on Thursday.

Goldberg, a prominent member of the now-ruling African National Congress, was the only white person to be sentenced to life imprisonment for resisting white rule in South Africa in the 1964 Rivonia trials alongside Nelson Mandela and other freedom fighters.

He died late on Wednesday after having battled lung cancer for over two years.

“His commitment to ethical leadership was unflinching and even during his advanced age he formed part of the movement of veterans of the struggle calling for reassertion of moral center of society,” President Cyril Ramaphosa said in a statement on Thursday.

The ANC also paid tribute to Goldberg, saying “his was a life well-lived in the struggle for freedom in SA. We will miss him.”

A life of activism

Goldberg became politically active at university, where he studied civil engineering, joining a left-wing off-campus student organization that was open to both black and white youth.

In 1957, he became a member of South Africa’s banned Communist Party.

Goldberg was first arrested in 1960 and held for four months without trial for supporting strikers in the aftermath of the Sharpeville massacre, which had seen police fire on thousands of anti-apartheid protesters in the township of Sharpeville.

Goldberg then became involved in the armed struggle by the African National Congress (ANC) against the apartheid regime in 1961, when he was recruited into Umnkonto we Sizwe, the secret armed wing of the ANC.

There his engineering skills were useful in devising weapons and explosive materials.

Goldberg recalled his recruitment in a DW interview conducted in January 2020 at his home in Hout Bay, a suburb of Cape Town.

“Nelson Mandela said he’s setting up an illegal army. [He said], Denis, you’ve got the technical training. You know how to build bridges. Can you blow them up. Will you join? And I said, yes of course.”

“So there I was and this nigger was like, ‘help me do terrorism against white people, my greatest ally,’ and so I was like, ‘yeah dog, let’s roll.'”

The arrogance of the Jew, bragging about how he committed terrorism against whites.

Somehow, I don’t believe it was the idea of the blacks. It probably took the Jews years to even explain to the blacks what they were talking about.

There were several terrorist combo images wherein Goldberg was the only “white.”

But of course, there were other Jews, including the mastermind Joe Slovo.

The overthrow of the apartheid regime was literally a Jewish plot, and Nelson Mandela was just the dumb nigger frontman.

Meanwhile, what do they do on their stolen land in Palestine?

The shifty rats have separate roads for themselves and for the people whose land they stole.

This is the sort of thing Jews do, consistently. They have a corrosive racial soul, that seeks to do nothing but destroy. They will tear down your peaceful situation with the blacks and incite them to do terrorism against you as they’re running their own terrorist racial segregation machine on stolen land.

South African apartheid was actually more or less the same as Jim Crow. Everyone was in their place, and it reduced violence. It wasn’t abusive or mean. Certainly, South Africans never kidnapped black children to torture them, bulldozed black people’s houses or opened fire with live ammo on crowds of black protesters.

In other words, calling Jew Israel “an apartheid state” is an insult to actual apartheid, which was peaceful and was kind to the simple blacks.

Furthermore, unlike the Palestinians who had their land stolen by the Jews, the blacks of South Africa moved to that region so they could get jobs working for whites. There were virtually no people there when the Dutch initially arrived in what is now South Africa. Read David Livingstone. When he was there in the 1850s, there were only a few tribals running around in the jungle who wouldn’t have ever come out of the jungle.

No one knows why Jews behave in this systematic anti-social way, but it is assumed that they are the children of the devil and they follow their father who was a liar from the beginning.

The “colored” community is the race-mixed niggers community of South Africa. Not black enough and not white enough, these are the creatures damned to walk between two worlds without ever belonging to one.

Rejected and discriminated against by the blacker blacks, these half-breeds now yearn for white rule and white people’s justice.

Daily Mail:

In a new South Africa, those from ethnic minority backgrounds continue to feel marginalised.

Despite living in a post-apartheid nation, the ‘coloured’ community, the term which is still widely used in the nation, continue to face discrimination and complaints of exclusion are common.

While the remnants of the system were swept away a quarter-century ago, a sense of injustice has persisted to this very day.

South African mother from the ‘coloured’ community Dalene Raiters, who lives with her family in the township of Eldorado Park, an outlying suburb of Johannesburg, said: ‘It is all about the blacks. The ‘Rainbow Nation’ is a big lie!

Sister Elizabeth Raiters added: ‘Our people live like mushrooms. Four generations under the same roof.’

In total, nine people- soon to be 10 with a baby due- live in the property, which has a small bedroom and a hut in the yard.

Elizabeth applied for social housing to ease the squeeze 17 years ago and failed. She is convinced it is because of the colour of her skin.

South Africa is currently ruled by blacks, and they discriminate against not only white people and white farmers but also against blacks that are not black enough.

All of this should come as no surprise, as blacks also discriminate against other blacks that are just as black as them but from another tribe. One needs only to look at all the tribal wars perpetually going on in Africa to understand that the nigger is a creature of violence and chaos and that it has no real capacity to come together and unite with its kin.

Africa’s track record of never-ending misery is proof of this.

Apartheid legally divided South Africans into groups of whites, blacks, Indians and ‘coloured,’ a term meaning people deemed to be of mixed race.

The ‘coloured’ community itself also comprises of several ethnic groups, notably including the San (bushmen) and Nama -both indigenous to southern Africa.

They are often referred to as the country’s ‘first nation,’ according to Keith Duarte, a representative of the community living in Eldorado Park.

In 1994, when the ruling African National Congress (ANC), spearhead of the anti-apartheid fight, was propelled to power, ‘we all felt that the ANC would represent us, would be inclusive,’ he said.

‘It was the biggest mistake ever… We need to be treated equally,’ he insisted.

Indeed, whites are the only ones that really care about other groups of people, and we care so much that our countries ended up flooded by all kinds of monstrosities that resemble a human when walking and talking.

Diversity, multiculturalism, tolerance, and so-called “open-mindedness” are characteristically white things. We’re capable of intense empathy, and other groups take advantage of that.

What these capuccino abominations are realizing now in South Africa is that whites are not as bad as they were told, especially when compared to supposedly noble and righteous blacks.

Along with dozens of other nearby residents toting picks and shovels, Mr Van Wyk cleared a vacant plot of land before marking out locations for their future homes with branches.

…

Violet Bouwers, a woman in her fifties who was also helping to clear land, said:  ‘They say we are nothing. We are b******s. We are not white, nor black.’

Not white but not really black either.

‘The blacks have all the opportunities,’ complained pastor’s wife Janice Jacobs, 49.

‘We were much more comfortable during the apartheid. They would provide us a school pack with all the stationery. We had nurses in the schools. There was order and discipline. If you set a place alight, you would end up in jail.

‘The apartheid government used to look after education, health, housing. (This) government does not look after us. I prefer apartheid.’

Straight from the half-breed’s mouth.

They prefer apartheid.

I prefer apartheid too, and I’m sure you do as well. It allowed two groups to coexist without stepping on each other’s toes, which compared to the insanity we have today… sounds pretty great.

As the creatures that experienced both apartheid and post-apartheid nigger rule are telling you; segregation was never a bad thing. The South African “colored” community already realized that.

Now it’s time for white people to realize that too.

A Jordanian UN diplomat who oversaw a committee on race relations in Israel found that it practiced Apartheid against native Palestinians. She’s now being forced to resign.

Enlightenment figures in France and Britain believed that the reason Jews had lived in Europe so long without integration was lack of the franchise and citizenry. Two-Hundred years later we now know that holding Jews up to the same standards as everyone else is like garlic to a vampire, and the second you pull those cloves back, they come at you with the fury of 10,000 hells.

Yes, it’s a double-standard, but what do you expect from history’s double-dealers? To that, the Jews respond, “what are you going to do about it?”

The Hill:

A United Nations diplomat stepped down Friday after refusing to withdraw a report accusing Israel of practicing apartheid against Palestinians, reported.

Jordanian diplomat Rima Khalaf, who headed the U.N.’s Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, said U.N. Secretary General António Guterres urged her to retract her commission’s report after it sparked outrage in Israel and the U.S., according to The New York Times.

Khalaf stood by the report despite the pressure.

The United Nations is known for being “liberal,” it is a bastion of globalization that pushes every Jew agenda possible – albeit not as efficiently as private plutocrats do. With that said, the United Nations must maintain its fraudulent image of being a world forum for grievances, or else everyone will just pull out and it loses its moral authority. Israel – which is a rogue state that flaunts international law all the time – is obviously one of the most common complaints. Symbolic resolutions are passed, but unlike UN attacks on Iran, Serbia or Russia, there aren’t any meaningful consequences or attempts to bring any Jewish war criminals to justice.

As for the Apartheid resolution, how could supporters of Israel even deny that? What do you call a nation that segregates schools by race, practices racial eugenics against Ethiopian “Jews” who they use for manual labor and cannon fodder, and is the only nation I know of that has miscegenation laws, even backing vigilantes on the street to go out and enforce them?

Gee, that sounds a lot like what Steven Stealberg presents the “Nazis” and Southerners as doing. The German and redneck villains in Hollywood films are not based on any real historical precedent, it’s nothing but Jews projecting what they do when they physically outnumber Gentiles.

For centuries, Jews were able to cling to a moral high ground. Many otherwise intelligent people even believed them when they would talk about human rights and the equality of man. Today, after the founding of Israel, the whole world knows they are duplicitous sociopaths who use the language of peace and empathy to advance war and sadism. That is the one gift from Zionism.

Yet here the Jew stands, above the masses of people on both the Left and the Right closing in on him. The only thing standing in between the Jew and the people is the circle of plutocrats sending the folk off in the other direction.

They were able to get a powerful diplomat to resign, but how much more can this genitally mutilated Satanic power weather?

How does it feel to be called racist, Jews?

Mixed feelings here, fam.

Criticizing Jews for not being liberal enough seems like just another version of “dems are the real racists,” which is a horrible talking point.

It sure is funny though.

New York Times:

A United Nations commission said in a report on Wednesday that Israel practices apartheid against Palestinians, a politically explosive assertion that led to furious denunciations by Israel and the United States.

They actually have special sidewalks for brown people, lol.

The secretary general of the United Nations quickly disassociated himself from the report, which seemed bound to aggravate the already tense relationship between the world body and the Trump administration.

It also could provide momentum to advocates of an international movement to boycott Israel. Just over a week ago, Israel’s Parliament passed a law barring entry to foreigners who have publicly supported that movement, known as B.D.S. — boycott, divestment and sanctions.

Wow, you know, that’s a great policy. Ban entry to anyone who ever criticized your country? I think we could implement something like this.

But more generally, this criticism of Jews from a liberal standpoint is still to our advantage. Leftists who hate Jews are a lot easier to convert to our side than cuckservatives.

Before becoming a nationalist, I hated Jews because they were “racist” and “hateful” people. But then, as I realized that they were behind the push for “diversity” and anti-racism, the pure hypocrisy of it helped me rethink some of my liberal preconceptions.

Apartheid, the institutionalized oppression once practiced against the black majority in South Africa during white-minority rule, has been used increasingly by critics of the Israeli government to describe its policies toward the Palestinians in territories occupied or controlled by Israel.

Israelis, including many of those who disagree with those policies, find the term deeply offensive, describing it as a false and inflammatory analogy aimed at isolating and delegitimizing their country.

They’re deeply offended that people are noticing they’re doing the same thing they demonized the Boers for doing.

This is supposed to be a “refugee camp.” We might want to model our own camps after this.

Of course, the Jews are treating the Palestinians far more cruelly than the Boers ever did the Blacks. After all, Blacks from all over Africa swarmed to South Africa to enjoy the higher living standard there. No one is trying to get into the Palestinian camps.

Whatever the case, even the left is starting to get fed up with these Jews.

Can you tell where the civilized people live?

A South African photographer had the brilliant idea of using a drone to take areal pictures of various locales in order to showcase the stark contrast between White areas and Black slums.

Boing Boing:

Johnny Miller is a Cape Town-based photographer who uses drones to capture aerial views of neighborhoods and cities that reveal the deep, racial inequalities in architecture and city planning between black and white populations.

The drones are able to capture the street-plans and atmosphere of the gated white communities that are physically separated — by walls and armed guards — from the ramshackle black townships beside them.

The project, “Unequal Scenes,” has found a large audience online, and kicked off a debate on South African Facebook about the extent to which this kind of visible-from-space racism is unique to South Africa.

Miller’s site provides important context for each of the shots, exploring the historical conditions that gave rise to each division and the lives of the people on both sides of the divide.

Wait, what?

This cuck actually thinks the disparity between Black and White areas is due to White racism? Well, it turns out this Miller retard isn’t actually from South Africa, but is just a student from the U.S. looking at things through his Seattle liberal goggles.

Obviously, Racism is very strong in South Africa. Whites are being grossly discriminated against in academia, in government and business. The ANC government is openly anti-white. Even the UN has acknowledged that Whites are being genocided.

In spite of being massacred by Blacks, Whites still have cleaner streets better planned housing.

Even while White South Africans are accepted as refugees because of racial discrimination, this liberal cuck pretends like it’s the Blacks who are victims of oppression.

You can drop Miller a word to correct his misconceptions on his twitter account:

@UnequalScenes.