Hopefully, this goes to the Supreme Court.

It’s apparently the law of the land that you have to hire infinity niggers, regardless of their qualifications, but no one has actually tested the court to find out if you are allowed to fire white people in order to replace them with niggers.

The Post Millennial:

On Monday, longtime CBS anchor Jeff Vaughn filed a lawsuit against the broadcaster and its parent company, Paramount Global, alleging that he had been forced out of his position for diversity reasons, namely because he is white. The Emmy Award-winning news personality had been with CBS-owned KCAL for eight years before being replaced in 2022 by younger, black anchor Chauncy Glover, who fulfilled the network’s racial requirements but had far less experience.

Vaughn argued that CBS selectively targeted him solely because he was a white male, and highlighted a number of ocassions where his decades of expertise were ignored. He claimed that CBS had, from the top down, “implemented an illegal hiring, promotion, or retention policy based on age, race, sexual orientation an sex.”

According to the New York Post, under CEO George Cheeks, the broadcaster set diversity goals such as ensuring 40 percent of primetime writers were people of color in the 2021-2022 season. During the effort to achieve that ratio, CBS News and Stations president Wendy McMahon was hired, at which point Vaughn claimed the diversity push “kicked into high gear.” It was she who oversaw his replacement.

George Cheeks

Wendy McMahon

In his $5 million lawsuit, filed in a federal court in California, Vaughn explained that CBS News Los Angeles’ general manager told him he would be gone in six months, with no direct reason given. He was only told it was “not about the ratings.” Over the following weeks, Vaughn alleged he was excluded from a number of things he would once have been front and centre in.

During CBS News’ 9/11 20th anniversary special, he was “completely left out” despite having been at Ground Zero on September 11, 2001. 

…

When the time came for him to depart, Vaughn was allegedly told to make it seem like it was his decision, but refused. His co-anchor nonetheless tried to paint the situation that way. “CBS decided there were too many white males at CBS, and it acted accordingly,” Vaughn lamented. “It needed to solve its ‘white male’ problem by firing successful white males.”

Well, this is everywhere now.

They’re firing whites left and right.

This is after they decided to put a hiring freeze on white males. Now they are removing the ones who have been working for years.

Probably, when these established white men saw the program of refusing to hire white males in basically any professional field, they assumed that they were grandfathered in. They were not, however. Now that it is basically impossible for a white male to get a job in any field (other than finance and tech, in some cases), these companies are now going through and removing the white males who they’ve employed for decades.

This man was on the ground at 911…!

He’s out.

No connection to the article

Whites win again!

Just joking. This means literally nothing.

You are losing, really badly.

Reuters:

A federal judge in Texas has ruled that the U.S. Minority Business Development Agency, founded during the Nixon administration, must avail itself to disadvantaged entrepreneurs of all races and ethnicities, including whites.

The summary judgment rendered on Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, appointed in 2019 by then-President Donald Trump, was the latest in a recent series of federal court decisions rolling back decades of affirmative action programs aimed at remedying racial discrimination.

Pittman, a judge in the Forth Worth branch of the Northern Texas District, sided with two white businessmen who sued the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA), a branch of the Commerce Department, last year after being denied benefits on the basis of race.

Judge Mark T. Pittmann

The plaintiffs were told they were ineligible for agency assistance because they were not members of any of the races or ethnicities included on a list of qualified minorities presumed to be disadvantaged and thus entitled to services, according to the judge’s summary of the case.

Pittman found that presumption violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law, and cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in a case last June striking down race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

…

As part of his 93-page decision, the judge granted a permanent injunction barring the $550 million agency from “using an applicant’s race or ethnicity in determining whether they can receive business center programming.”

I feel like these little bits of good news are actually harmful, as it give people hope in the system.

There is no hope in the system.

I think the Jews allow these seemingly good things to happen – which don’t really even mean much of anything – in order to give people false hope.

The system must fail totally.

There is no other solution.

Same judge blocked Biden’s student debt relief program last year

Remember that time that two loitering blacks got kicked out of a Starbucks for not buying anything?

You’ll remember that in response, Starbucks declared that all of their stores would now become homeless shelters, where blacks could just hang out, charge they phone, sell and consume drugs, and sleep. Starbucks ended up in some kind of crisis and had to close a bunch of stores, because people don’t pay $7 for a coffee so they can be berated by the homeless.

In fact, people pay the cost of Starbucks in big cities so they can get off the street where they are being assailed by homeless. Every major city is literally “irate black homeless man blocks your path.” Starbucks had stores in all these major metros, and people would duck inside these well-furnished and well-lit shops for shelter and safety, the expensive coffee being more of a fee for using the premises than the actual value of the drink.

Well, as it turns out, a court has ruled that the store manager who called the cops on the blacks after they refused to leave, triggering this whole incident, was just doing her job as she was instructed, and that she was fired for being white!

NPR:

Jurors in a federal court have awarded $25.6 million to a former Starbucks regional manager who alleged that she and other white employees were unfairly punished after the high-profile arrests of two Black men at a Philadelphia location in 2018.

Shannon Phillips won $600,000 in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages on Monday after a jury in New Jersey found that race was a determinative factor in Phillips’ firing, in violation of federal and state anti-discrimination.

In April 2018, a Philadelphia store manager called police on two Black men who were sitting in the coffee shop without ordering anything. Phillips, then regional manager of operations in Philadelphia, southern New Jersey, and elsewhere, was not involved with arrests. However, she said she was ordered to put a white manager who also wasn’t involved on administrative leave for reasons she knew were false, according to her lawsuit.

Phillips said she was fired less than a month later after objecting to the manager being placed on leave amid the uproar, according to her lawsuit.

The company’s rationale for suspending the district manager, who was not responsible for the store where the arrests took place, was an allegation that Black store managers were being paid less than white managers, according to the lawsuit. Phillips said that argument made no sense since district managers had no input on employee salaries.

The lawsuit alleged Starbucks was instead taking steps to “punish white employees” who worked in the area “in an effort to convince the community that it had properly responded to the incident.”

During closing arguments on Friday, Phillips’ lawyer Laura Mattiacci told jurors that the company was looking for a “sacrificial lamb” to calm the outrage and show that it was taking action, Law360 reported. Picking a Black employee for such a purpose “would have blown up in their faces,” she said.

Starbucks denied Phillips’ allegations, saying the company needed someone with a track record of “strength and resolution” during a crisis and replaced her with a regional manager who had such experience, including navigating the aftermath of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, Law360 reported.

Here are the blacks in question:

Truly pitiful creatures. How can people so dumb ever be expected to do anything other than stink up a white people’s coffee shop? They can’t afford $7 dollar coffee. Them niggas can’t even read.

Phillips’ attorney, however, cited earlier testimony from a Black district manager, who was responsible for the store where the arrests took place, who described Phillips as someone beloved by her peers and worked around the clock after the arrests.

In an email to The Associated Press, Mattiacci confirmed the award amount and said the judge will consider awarding back pay and future pay, as well as attorney’s fees.

…

In the April 2018 incident, Rashon Nelson and Donte Robinson were arrested in a Starbucks coffee shop near tony Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia shortly after the manager called police to report that two men were refusing to either make a purchase or leave the premises. They were later released without charges.

Video of the arrest prompted national outcry and led the current CEO of Starbucks to personally apologize to the men. The company later reached a settlement with both men for an undisclosed sum and an offer of free college education. The company also changed store policies and closed locations across the country for an afternoon for racial-bias training.

I would hesitate to call this “a turning of the tide.”

The jury system has never really gone along with this anti-white stuff (save in extreme cases in extreme cities, like the heinous conviction of James Fields in Charlottesville), but the jury system is a very tiny part of the system.

We’ve seen the polls. More than half of people believe that it is “morally wrong” to “change your gender.” None of that 55% believes in the racism hoax.

Ironically, the biggest hoaxsters, the biggest believers in all this goofy bullshit, are middle class white women, like the one who was fired from Starbucks. Like, you look at her face, and she is the ideal form of the supporter of BLM and child trannies.

I would be surprised if she’s learned her lesson. I’d also be surprised if she doesn’t donate some of her winnings to some kind of black organization. Maybe not. It’s not every single white woman that acts like this, it’s just that they are by far the biggest group, and the ones that are absolutely enforcing this system.

I would also add that it is likely that the fact that she was a white woman would have played a role in the jury decision. White women on the jury would have thought “this could have been me!”

Remember that time that two loitering blacks got kicked out of a Starbucks for not buying anything?

You’ll remember that in response, Starbucks declared that all of their stores would now become homeless shelters, where blacks could just hang out, charge they phone, sell and consume drugs, and sleep. Starbucks ended up in some kind of crisis and had to close a bunch of stores, because people don’t pay $7 for a coffee so they can be berated by the homeless.

In fact, people pay the cost of Starbucks in big cities so they can get off the street where they are being assailed by homeless. Every major city is literally “irate black homeless man blocks your path.” Starbucks had stores in all these major metros, and people would duck inside these well-furnished and well-lit shops for shelter and safety, the expensive coffee being more of a fee for using the premises than the actual value of the drink.

Well, as it turns out, a court has ruled that the store manager who called the cops on the blacks after they refused to leave, triggering this whole incident, was just doing her job as she was instructed, and that she was fired for being white!

NPR:

Jurors in a federal court have awarded $25.6 million to a former Starbucks regional manager who alleged that she and other white employees were unfairly punished after the high-profile arrests of two Black men at a Philadelphia location in 2018.

Shannon Phillips won $600,000 in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages on Monday after a jury in New Jersey found that race was a determinative factor in Phillips’ firing, in violation of federal and state anti-discrimination.

In April 2018, a Philadelphia store manager called police on two Black men who were sitting in the coffee shop without ordering anything. Phillips, then regional manager of operations in Philadelphia, southern New Jersey, and elsewhere, was not involved with arrests. However, she said she was ordered to put a white manager who also wasn’t involved on administrative leave for reasons she knew were false, according to her lawsuit.

Phillips said she was fired less than a month later after objecting to the manager being placed on leave amid the uproar, according to her lawsuit.

The company’s rationale for suspending the district manager, who was not responsible for the store where the arrests took place, was an allegation that Black store managers were being paid less than white managers, according to the lawsuit. Phillips said that argument made no sense since district managers had no input on employee salaries.

The lawsuit alleged Starbucks was instead taking steps to “punish white employees” who worked in the area “in an effort to convince the community that it had properly responded to the incident.”

During closing arguments on Friday, Phillips’ lawyer Laura Mattiacci told jurors that the company was looking for a “sacrificial lamb” to calm the outrage and show that it was taking action, Law360 reported. Picking a Black employee for such a purpose “would have blown up in their faces,” she said.

Starbucks denied Phillips’ allegations, saying the company needed someone with a track record of “strength and resolution” during a crisis and replaced her with a regional manager who had such experience, including navigating the aftermath of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, Law360 reported.

Here are the blacks in question:

Truly pitiful creatures. How can people so dumb ever be expected to do anything other than stink up a white people’s coffee shop? They can’t afford $7 coffees. Them niggas can’t even read.

Phillips’ attorney, however, cited earlier testimony from a Black district manager, who was responsible for the store where the arrests took place, who described Phillips as someone beloved by her peers and worked around the clock after the arrests.

In an email to The Associated Press, Mattiacci confirmed the award amount and said the judge will consider awarding back pay and future pay, as well as attorney’s fees.

…

In the April 2018 incident, Rashon Nelson and Donte Robinson were arrested in a Starbucks coffee shop near tony Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia shortly after the manager called police to report that two men were refusing to either make a purchase or leave the premises. They were later released without charges.

Video of the arrest prompted national outcry and led the current CEO of Starbucks to personally apologize to the men. The company later reached a settlement with both men for an undisclosed sum and an offer of free college education. The company also changed store policies and closed locations across the country for an afternoon for racial-bias training.

I would hesitate to call this “a turning of the tide.”

The jury system has never really gone along with this anti-white stuff (save in extreme cases in extreme cities, like the heinous conviction of James Fields in Charlottesville), but the jury system is a very tiny part of the system.

We’ve seen the polls. More than half of people believe that it is “morally wrong” to “change your gender.” None of that 55% believes in the racism hoax.

Ironically, the biggest hoaxsters, the biggest believers in all this goofy bullshit, are middle class white women, like the one who was fired from Starbucks. Like, you look at her face, and she is the ideal form of the supporter of BLM and child trannies.

I would be surprised if she’s learned her lesson. I’d also be surprised if she doesn’t donate some of her winnings to some kind of black organization. Maybe not. It’s not every single white woman that acts like this, it’s just that they are by far the biggest group, and the ones that are absolutely enforcing this system.

I would also add that it is likely that the fact that she was a white woman would have played a role in the jury decision. White women on the jury would have thought “this could have been me!”

Denver City Council member Candi CdeBaca, who is running for re-election, says white owned businesses should be taxed extra and redistributed to black owned businesses. pic.twitter.com/s9JhSdAmtj

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 5, 2023

Biden is raising capital gains to 45%.

There are special taxes on white people.

Basically, you’re seeing communism implemented right in front of you, and no one is really complaining very much.

New York Post:

A Denver councilwoman caused a stir when she declared that white-owned businesses should pay reparations.

Candi CdeBaca, a 37-year-old Democratic Socialist who is facing a run-off election in June, told a business forum Thursday that white-owned businesses should pay an additional race-based tax, which would be given in turn as reparations to minority-owned businesses.

“Capitalism was built on stolen land, stolen labor, and stolen resources,” CdeBaca told the Greater Metro Denver Ministerial Alliance, 9 News reported.

She said business improvement districts could levy the racial tax.

‘You could be collecting those extra taxes from white-led businesses all over the city and redistributing them to black and brown-owned businesses,” she said.

It’s a shame.

America used to be a nice country.

Candi CdeBaca

The last thing American needs is more whites.

Washington Times:

The man who has run San Francisco’s elections for two decades isn’t having his contract renewed for “racial equity” reasons.

The city’s Elections Commission voted 4-2 last week against reinstating John Arntz, who is White, as the director of the San Francisco Department of Elections, according to a Monday report from Mission Local.

Mr. Arntz’s role will end in May, but he’ll have a chance to reapply for the position.

“Our decision wasn’t about your performance, but after twenty years we wanted to take action on the City’s racial equity plan and give people an opportunity to compete for a leadership position,” read an email from Elections Commission President Chris Jerdonek to Mr. Arntz, per Mission Local.

…

Mayor London Breed told Mission Local that Mr. Arntz has served the city “with integrity, professionalism and has stayed completely independent” and has avoided “the web of City politics, which is what we are seeing now as a result of this unnecessary vote.”

Aaron Peskin, who serves on the city’s Board of Supervisors, told the outlet that the decision was “malfeasance.”

When John Arntz took over as Director of Elections, the Department was a mess — remember ballot box tops floating in the bay?

Arntz turned it around. It’s now one of our best run departments.

Why on earth is the Elections Commission moving to dump this strong elections leader?

— Senator Scott Wiener (@Scott_Wiener) November 22, 2022

The managers that Mr. Arntz oversees wrote a letter of support to the Elections Commission before its meeting last week. They implored the commission to keep their boss in his position.

The letter said that when Mr. Arntz took over in 2002, he brought respect to a department that “saw five different Directors in as many years, the Department’s budget was in the red by millions of dollars, San Francisco’s elections infrastructure was in disarray [and] the public lacked confidence in Department operations due to various election irregularities.”

I mean, this guy is probably actually Jewish in fact, but if so that is a mistake, because Jews are the chosen ones.

Lori Lightfoot is a real human being with a real human body. Her face is human.

She doesn’t have cancer. She just suffers from a particularly aggressive strain of diversity — a diversity which she seeks to promote, empower and enforce.

New York Post:

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has reportedly defended her controversial decision to grant interview requests only to minority journalists — calling the number of non-whites covering her “unacceptable.”

“I would absolutely do it again. I’m unapologetic about it because it spurred a very important conversation, a conversation that needed to happen, that should have happened a long time ago,” Lightfoot told The New York Times’ “Sway” host Kara Swisher on Monday of the temporary May declaration.

As she marked her two-year anniversary in office in May, the Democrat — whose city is in the midst of a plague of gun violence and is on track to surpass last year’s total of 48 mass shootings — assailed the “overwhelming whiteness” of the Windy City’s media and announced that she’d grant one-on-one interviews only to minority members, Fox News reported.

“Here is the bottom line for me, to state the obvious, I’m a black woman mayor. I’m the mayor of the third-largest city in the country, obviously I have a platform, and it’s important to me to advocate on things that I believe are important,” Lightfoot told Swisher.

“Going back to why I ran, to disrupt the status quo. The media is critically important to our democracy … the media is in a time of incredible upheaval and disruption but our City hall press corps looks like it’s 1950 or 1970,” she added.

Lightfoot urged media outlets to be “focused on diversity.”

“In Chicago, we have a huge amount of diverse media talent. We’ve got schools that are of journalism that are best in class across the country, and I would say, really, across the world,” she said.

“So the absence of journalists of color, covering the mayor of the third-largest city in a country is absolutely unacceptable. And so I decided to say something about it,” the mayor added.

But she also noted that politicians should not get to decide who covers them.

The only way for brown people to get ahead is to ban and punish white people.

Sure, that’s illegal, but the important thing is that it works.

Laws against racial discrimination were invented by white supremacists.

I have a question.

Will she take donations from supporters like she takes questions from journalists? (ONLY from only people of color)

Follow up questions.
Why does she need a "national base" if she is a CITY mayor?
Is it due to city violence reducing her "local base" support? pic.twitter.com/iB5tGRWe7M

— Scarlet (@Scar20370907) July 27, 2021

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot doubled down on her 'racist' comment about reporters: "It's so sad to see," @ByronDonalds tells Chris Salcedo.

"Chicago, next time you have the chance to vote for a Mayor, it's time to send a strong message that you're not going to tolerate this." pic.twitter.com/NW6gt22oCD

— Newsmax (@newsmax) July 27, 2021

At the time that the brave and oppressed mayor said she would be doing an event from which whites would be banned, several outlets protested and refused to send any journalist at all.

That included the white supremacy newspaper Chicago Tribune.

I am a Latino reporter @chicagotribune whose interview request was granted for today. However, I asked the mayor’s office to lift its condition on others and when they said no, we respectfully canceled. Politicians don’t get to choose who covers them. https://t.co/YMW8M8ZgJm

— Gregory Pratt (@royalpratt) May 19, 2021

In order to have equity, we’re going to have to ban whites from reporting altogether. In fact, they are going to need to be banned from most jobs.

Are whites even fit to shine the shoes of oppressed, superior colored people?

Nope.

Shoe shining should only be done by the Pakistanis, or by robots built by robotics companies only staffed by black robotics engineers.

Blacks built zero point energy flying pyramids when they was kings in Egypt. They could easily build shoe-shinning robots if whitey would just get up off their backs and stop oppressing them.

Elevator goin’ up!

Daily Mail:

Coca-Cola is under fire for uploading a resource video encouraging employees to ‘be less white’.

Slides from the video went viral on social media late last week after they were shared by a ‘whistleblower’ working for the soft drink giant.

…

The slides appear to come from an 11-minute video titled ‘Confronting Racism with Robin DiAngelo’.

DiAngelo, an author and consultant, argues that even well-meaning white people are complicit in racist structures unless they actively work to be ‘anti-racist’.

Robin DiAngelo

One of the slides features the title ‘Try to Be Less White’, before another claims that whiteness is associated with arrogance, defensiveness, ignorance and a lack of humility.

Another slide states: ‘In the US and other Western nations, white people are socialized to feel that they are inherently superior because they are white‘.

It continues: ‘Research shows that by age 3 to 4, children understand that it is better to be white.’

Coca-Cola has confirmed that it uploaded the video to their ‘LinkedIn Learning platform’, but insist it is not a part of the company’s compulsory curriculum.

A spokesperson told The Washington Examiner that the video was accessible to Coca-Cola employees as part of its ‘Better Together global training’, which is designed ‘to help build an inclusive workplace.’

I don’t know what they mean by being “less white.” I have read all of this de Angelo material. Literally, I read it. I mean, I had the ebook, and I skim-read like, most of it. I don’t understand what any of it means.

When you hear it “be less white,” even non-liberals think, “what, you mean like, I should sell crack cocaine and do drive-by shootings? I should be really loud at Wendy’s? What do you mean by this?”

This is the actual summary, right here:

Basically, it means that white people should develop some kind of pathological complex, abandon their basic self-esteem, and denying their own self-image, believing that they are an inherently evil villain.

Robin says it’s a revelation, and the next generation will hear her.

Clearly, she has some kind of problem with her father. I mean, you don’t have to be a psychoanalyst to see where this psychopathology is coming from. But attempting to purposefully abolish one’s self esteem and total self-image is insane. What she is describing is attempting to give yourself a psychological breakdown by embracing personal doubts.

We all have personal doubts, these voices muttering in the back of our heads that tell us we’re not good enough. You could go into the metaphysics of that, but I don’t want to. Those mutterings of self-doubt serve an evolutionary function, to push us to better ourselves and to be something we can be proud of.

You also have this:

I have spent most of my life in foreign countries. I used to say “most of my adult life,” but it is not “most of my life.” I can tell you, that within 3 to 4 hours of being in China, you would understand that your situation and its experiences would be better if you were Chinese. I also had the experience of spending two periods a day at an all black school during my senior year of high school, and it took me about 3 to 4 minutes to understand that it would be better to be black.

What see is doing is exploiting the fact that most people are not familiar with all of the research that shows that it is a basic neurological function that people feel a kinship with people who share similar genetics. This is really, in no way whatsoever, a debatable issue. It is entirely settled.

You can read about this wherever you want, but let me just give you the first three paragraphs from a 2018 TIME Magazine article about a study on genetic similarity between friendship and romantic relationships:

You may have more in common with your friends than you think, according to a new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Your genes may be similar, too.

Past research has suggested that people tend to be somewhat genetically similar to their spouses and adult friends, likely because humans naturally gravitate toward people with whom they have something in common. But how and why does this subconscious sorting happen? Researchers from Stanford, Duke and the University of Wisconsin—Madison studied 5,000 pairs of adolescent friends using data from Add Health, a long-term study of people who were in grades seven through 12 during the 1994-1995 school year. They ran a number of genetic comparisons, seeking to learn more about pairs of friends and schoolmates.

Overall, the researchers found that friends were more genetically similar than random pairs of people, and about two-thirds as similar as the average married couple. Study author Benjamin Domingue, an assistant professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, says this similarity is strong enough to detect, but not nearly on the same level as siblings, for example.

There are mountains of academic research on this by sociologists and geneticists (as well as denizens of other fields), and it has been widely discussed in peasant media. It was the touched on in the infamous 2009 “racist baby” cover storm in Newsweek Magazine.

As noted above, the jury is still out on how this process happens, but it definitely is not conscious. It is the result of a neurochemical process. It appears to be a function of the DNA to seek out people of similar genetics and build relationships with them. The basic assumption would be that the genes want to propagate themselves, and so people’s brains are told to recognize people with similar genes as people they should be connected to, and to help out. (This is why I support government money for aunties and uncles, cousins, or grandparents to adopt children when there is no option of the mother and/or father of raising the child; look up the number of serial killers that were stranger adopted – it is a staggering piece of data.)

As personal example, I am mixed Irish and German, and my best friend from high school and my adult best mate are of the same mix. When the relationships were formed, I was not aware of the background of either person, nor were they aware of mine.

This process is in degrees. You feel the strongest bonds with your siblings, then people with similar ethnic makeups, then with racial groups. Just to put this into further perspective, after the whole “stranger adoption” phenomenon blew up (something which I am aggressively against, by the way), governments started to have to legally disclose the origins of the children at puberty, because brothers and sisters kept marrying one another. There have been several internationally covered cases of twins separated at birth marrying each other.

It makes absolute sense, if you understand the internal system of kinship between kin relations, that brothers and sisters who didn’t know they were brother and sister, and thus did not have the taboos that develop as a part of socialization (in all cultures, due to the high chances of deformity from inbreeding), would end up feeling an immediate connection with each other and getting married. Just so, if you do DNA tests with your closest friends (which I don’t recommend doing, because this DNA testing industry is about the shadiest thing this side of the Texas power grid), you will find that they have a similar ethnic background. Note that this is only really an issue if you’re an America, as if you’re from Europe, or Asia, or India, or wherever the people that read this website are from (a surprising number are from India, actually), you’ve naturally got a similar ethnic background with everyone around you.

If I can go briefly further into another personal, just to drive the point home here, I had a Korean friend in (X Southeast Asian country). He was the closest nonwhite friend I’ve ever had. He told me the story of living in Canada, where he briefly dated a white girl. He said that the relationship was sabotaged by his sister – who insisted that he date a Japanese girl! As most people are probably aware, Japanese and Koreans hate each other about as much as Iranians and Saudis, but as my friend explained, the Japanese girl was “from the same main race,” so the relationship was acceptable, whereas the relationship with the white girl was simply not acceptable.

So obviously – obviously – within a society that is a majority white, a child is going to immediately realize, as soon as it is aware of any social dynamics at all, that being a part of the majority group is better than being a part of the minority group, as you are going to have higher levels of kinship with those around you.

All of this is to say: what these people are calling “racism” is simply a biological function, which is hardwired into the most basic functioning our neurobiology. (Obviously, “racism” used to have the definition of “hurting” and then of “hating” other people because fo their race, something which may or may not be a problem, depending on the degree. The term has only recently come to mean “holding any sense of being a part of a group, if you are white,” and this is literally just purposefully inflicting psychological trauma on white people for malicious purposes.)

This “deconstructing whiteness” thing is a poisonous, hateful, catastrophic doctrine, designed in its entirety to intentionally hurt society. This woman, and all of the rest of the charlatans promoting this nonsense, are taking known psychological and sociological phenomenon, things that we have amble scientific explanation of as being hardwire nature, and presenting it as evil. It is more predatory than any advertising campaign.

A point that I have driven all the way home since this entire “Black Lives Matter” agenda really kicked off about a year ago, no element of this improves the lives of black people, in any way, at all, other than possibly temporarily inflating the egos of individual black people, and possibly giving them money (which they will quickly blow, as they have no conception of managing finances).

This chart matters:

Chicago saw a 55% increase in the murder rate as a result of the Black Lives Matter movement. Imagine the other crimes that increased during this period in the black community. This agenda is not only not helping black people, it is actively destroying their communities.

What would actually help black people would be to do something about the drugs, violence and single-parent home situations in their communities. I do and have always supported this.

According to CNN, I’m an evil person because I made politically incorrect jokes, but I am 100% supportive of programs that could, based on graphs and statistics, improve the lives of black people. We do not have a choice as to whether we live with black people, so it would actually be beneficial to me and my people to benefit them. The fact that their communities are riddled with drugs and violence does not make America a better country, and yet, all of these Black Lives Matter programs, if we are to look at statistics and graphs, are resulting in making the lives of black people much worse.

We have thousands of years of documentation showing that what leads to social harmony and widespread personal contentment is healthy families. If you wanted to help the black community, the first thing you would do is look for ways to cripple the ability of black women to profit from having children out of wedlock. Instead, our society is entirely designed to encourage single motherhood among all women.

The question becomes: why?

The basic answer is that Jews hate white people. I think you can go around in circles forever, and try to come up with ever more complex explanations of what is going on here, but you are ultimately just going to come back to the fact that these people, who have the most extreme in-group preference of any group on earth, possess a collective desire to harm us.

There was a guy with a silly mustache who lived a long time ago who said that. Ever since he took some executive actions to attempt to deal with that problem, we’ve been prevented from talking about it. But it is right there, for everyone to see. There are a few kooks with daddy issues like Robin Di Angelo who are being used in this weird agenda, but the anti-white agenda is overwhelmingly coming from an academia and a media complex that is dominated by Jews.

It’s unfortunate that recognizing the deleterious affect of Jewishness on Western is considered anti-intellectual. But facts are facts, and the only reason you are not allowed to talk about the deleterious affect that Jews have on Western society is that it is so obvious, and so openly visible, that there is not really any viable counter-argument which does not eventually fall back on cartoonish levels of anti-intellectual nonsense along the lines of “white people are uniquely evil for vague reasons and therefore they shouldn’t be allowed to have personal self-esteem or identity.”

Manufacturing Discontent

Can we make some kind of critique about consumerism here? Is this its final, fatal form? The manufacture of false emotional needs, based on an inferiority complex, in order to provide ideological products to meet these manufactured needs?

Is it ironic that the king of advertising, the company that convinced billions of people that they needed a sugary beverage (maybe with a dash of cocaine), in order to produce an unnatural, toothy smile on their faces, is now marketing this ideological product? No, that isn’t actually irony. What is actual irony is that they don’t make money from manufacturing the need for anti-white ideology.

The government, and the global corporate media complex, is threatening companies that refuse to engage in “diversity training,” and the diversity training ends up being this lunatic woman with daddy issues telling you to purposefully destroy your sense of personal identity for the purpose of enhancing the wellbeing of blacks.

Same old story. Coca-Cola advertising and cocaine. Strolling down the Broadway in the rain. Neon light sign says it. I read it in the paper, they’re crazy.

Yeah, suit your life, maybe so. In the White House, I know.

All over Berlin, they do it for years. And in Manhattan

This is one of those rare situations where I agree that worse can be better. 

Breitbart:

Sara Thornton, head of Britain’s National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), has said the law should be changed so forces can actively discriminate against white recruits in order to increase diversity.

Currently, discriminating against people in job recruitment on the basis of certain “protected characteristics”, including race, sex, and sexuality, is technically illegal under the Equality Act of 2010.

However, excluding certain people — generally white people, or at least white males — from supposed internships, even if they pay more than a typical working-class job, or deprioritising them from training schemes or workshops designed to boost employment prospects, is allowable under the act’s so-called “positive action” provisions.

There’s a reason that the police used to employ brown people to police other brown people.

If you are being policed by people who don’t look anything like you or who don’t understand your cultural mores, you start treating the police as an occupation force and start refusing to cooperate. Smart civilization-planners figured out long ago that you have to draw from the local community if you want to have an effective police force.

I am thankful for idiot bulldykes like this police chief barging in and ruining the effective system of life support that keeps the whole thing chugging along.

I wonder how White Britons are going to react to Moslems with bizarre accents showing up to their door and getting all up in their personal space.

This can go one of two ways:

1. Something innate is triggered in the average Briton when he sees that he is being bossed around by people that look nothing like him and have a barely concealed contempt for him. (Although to be fair, most police officers have a barely concealed contempt for average citizens even now.)
2. This goes the South Africa route, where the police participate in punitive raids against White farmers by criminal black gangs and the average Briton still does nothing.

Now, when I talk about “doing something” I don’t mean millions of Britons spontaneously running out onto the front porch with their combat spoons drawn and ready to overthrow the government/launch Race War.

Ideally, communities will start by simply organizing their own town watches/neighborhood patrols. Because of growing normie discontent with the police, the idea will be supported by both Labor, Tory and third party voters alike who first and foremost don’t want to see their home lose its real estate value because of rampant vandalism and crime.

And then, in second order of importance, people want their kids to be safe and not kidnapped/turned into kebab by Paki rape gangs.

Despite these groups’ protests to the contrary, the media will go to war and smear these neighborhood watch groups popping up all over Britain as “White Supremacist” organizations. Refusing to back down, and supported by the community, these organizations will begin to refuse to cooperate with the police, citing concerns about the personnel – many of whom are former Moslem terrorists and convicted child diddlers.

Bit by bit, these safe zones will begin to attract White Britons fleeing crime and in search of “better schools” and the territory along the patrol route of these friendly neighborhood watch groups increases. Former badge-niggers who were fired for not being anti-White enough will begin to join up, offering their expertise… for a price, of course. Army dropouts will join in and even the local NEETs will crawl out of their basements for some sunlight and exercise. These neighborhoods will begin to improve. Union Jacks and English flags will start to proudly flutter in the streets and out of windows.

But the Occupation government will start talking about the need to shut down these “right-wing terror camps festering in the heart of Britain” and will start preparing an operation to restore Multi-Kulti control.

A showdown will loom as the entire UK waits with bated breath to see what will happen next…

/fin.

I think this is actually a realistic if perhaps a bit optimistic scenario.

And if you’re wondering how I came up with it, all I did was take the migrant’s preferred takeover strategy in Sweden and reverse-engineer it for White Britons.

By the way, people who say, “the worse the better” are quoting Lenin and not as smart as they think they are.

Lenin had a network of high-placed sympathizers, a political party and the financial support of the German Army High Command.

Needless to say, the average White Briton does not have any of that. 

“Worse is better” only when you have a plan, and are exploiting the chaos to advance your own agenda.

Most of the time, worse is just worse.

But hey, being able to quote obscure historical tidbits is enough to convince the low-IQ that you’re smart, so that’s why some people go ahead and do just that. But being able to rote-memorize a few phrases uttered by famous revolutionaries does not a master revolutionary make. Even my little fantasy LARP took more brain cells and IQ power than memorizing the phrase, “the worse the better” and arguing for “accelerationism” – whatever that means.

A C C E L E R A T I O N I S M in action.

Just sayin’.

Put some effort into your DOTR fantasy scenarios. They should be at least as realistic as what I was able to cook up one lazy overcast afternoon after browsing Breitbart and /pol/.

Seeing as this happened in New York, I’m surprised a Jew didn’t hand this darkie a weapon and tell him to go wild.

New York Post:

An unhinged man who prosecutors say vowed to “kill every white” person during a violent three-day spree is off the streets and behind bars.

Kevin Raphael is accused of descending on three unsuspecting men in late July — including one who was walking with his pregnant wife — while shrieking anti-white sentiments. He allegedly punched two of the men in the head and face as they sat on the bus.

“What are you looking at? What are you looking for? I kill white motherf–ers like you,” prosecutors say Raphael told the man and his wife in Crown Heights on July 29, while gesturing to his waistband as if he had a gun.

The next day, Raphael allegedly sauntered up to a law student as he sat on the B25 bus, and said, “I hate all you white motherf–ers. You’re a f–t,” before punching him in the face.

The 39-year-old wrapped up his rampage on July 31, when he boarded the B41 and approached a doctor and allegedly started pummeling him.

“You white motherf–ers think you got it like that. You white motherf–ers,” he yelled as he wailed on the commuter, who suffered a concussion from the blows.

He was arrested on July 31, but has repeatedly refused to leave his cell to be arraigned on the charges. He finally appeared in Brooklyn Supreme Court Wednesday, after a judge issued a force order demanding his appearance.

Raphael was indicted on a 13-count indictment, which includes third-degree assault as a hate crime and related charges.