Journalist Michael Tracey has a new article out in The New Indian Express entitled “How the U.S. media failed in Russiagate.”

In it, he promotes the vicious anti-Semitic canard that Trump is not a Russian agent and the media lied about it.

He lists three people who promoted the Iraq war and then went on to promote the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump is a Russian agent:

1. Johnathan Chait
2. Jefferey Goldberg
3. David Frum

All three of these men are Jewish, and it is a vicious canard to point out the fact that they hoaxed the Iraq war and then went on to hoax the Russian conspiracy.

There is a way to criticize the fact that the media consciously lies to the public and promotes massive, destructive hoaxes in order to achieve diabolical goals without being anti-Semitic. However, what Tracey did was anti-Semitic, because he named the Jewish people responsible for these hoaxes.

In order to criticize the media for lying without it being anti-Semitic, you have to not say who is lying, and not say that they are lying. Even if you do not believe the media, or they are proven to be lying, you cannot say they are lying, because they are all Jews, and thus it is a canard and a trope that they would lie to non-Jews in order to promote a Jewish agenda.

For millions of years, vitriolic haters have falsely claimed that the Jews control the media and use it to lie to people to promote a Jewish agenda. It has been totally debunked, and the fact that a bunch of Jews just got caught lying to promote a Jewish agenda doesn’t mean that Jews lie to promote a Jewish agenda.

We’ve got a hot new meme, coming at you!

ANTI-SEMITIC CANARD!

The Anti-Semitic Canard is a canard who notices obvious things about the Jews that the Jews claim you’re not supposed to notice – and if you do notice, you’re not supposed to say aloud.

Please use the above blank and go to memebetter.com and create your own. Post them below and spread them around the internet.

I will post the best of the best later.

Here are a few I made myself.

This is the new face of neo-Nazi and white supremacist hatred in America.

We’ve got anti-Semitic canards coming out of the wazoo these days. I mean anti-Semitic tropes. I don’t actually know the difference between anti-Semitic canards and anti-Semitic tropes, and they might be the same thing. Anyway, both are everywhere in 2019 America, as we quickly descend into a Hitler-type scenario.

Hot on the heels of Congressbulb Ilhan Omar promoting the discredited trope that AIPAC is a Jewish lobbying organization that seeks to influence American politics, singer Ryan Adams has responded to the New York Times claiming he is a bad boyfriend with virulent tropes.

In a now deleted tweet, Adams claimed that the New York Times was lying about him and that they are rats.

It is hard to think of a more virulent anti-Semitic trope than that the New York Times spreads false information about goyim in order to harm them.

And the idea that Jews resemble rats is one of the longest-running anti-Semitic canards of all time. Anti-Semites continue to make this claim, even though it has been proven to be untrue.

The canard was featured in the Nazi propaganda film “The Eternal Jew.”

It has since become popular in anti-Semitic memes on the internets.

The claim by Ryan Adams that he is going to “take down” the New York Times is also anti-Semitic, and appears to be a threat of a second Holocaust.

Six million Jews died and were transformed into decorative lampshades and bars of soap by Adolf Hitler during the first Holocaust, and Ryan Adams is suggesting we do this again. In light of all the tragedy experienced during the second World War, it is time that Ryan Adams resigns.

The Jews have already experienced one Holocaust and thousands of pogroms, all for absolutely no reason. Now is the time to stop this virulence once and for all.

It is the duty of the US government to protect the Jewish people from Ryan Adams. I am hereby calling on Donald Trump to immediately call for Ryan Adams to resign for expressing this sort of virulent hate with these tropes and canards.

One of those “anti-Semitic tropes” that keep being thrown at innocent Jews by those evil antisemites is that they care more about the interests of Jews than they do about any non-Jewish association they form a part of. In this quite extraordinary article in the Times of Israel, however, high-powered Jewish lawyer, Adam Cannon, reproaches Jews for not doing that enough.

The controversy revolves around the Jewish Labour Movement, which is affiliated to the Labour party in Britain, the main left-wing party in the country. First of all, the author praises the Jewish Labour Movement for doing exactly what antisemites have accused them of doing.

The JLM has been very successful in rightly garnering public attention for its statements and in attracting media coverage for its leadership during the various crises in the Labour party. Since 2015, they have put considerable pressure on those who seek to undermine our community. They have been able advocates working for the community as a whole. Their allegiances always seemed to be with the community first and the Labour Party second.

Source

But, later on, he reproaches them for putting the interests of their party above the interests of Jews.

However, by standing against local MPs who serve our community and continue to be staunch allies of Jews and of Israel, they have shown that the noise they made was, perhaps more for the sake of the Labour Party rather than the community.

Mike Freer and Matthew Offord who are being opposed by JLM’s Chair and Vice Chair respectively have achieved a huge amount for our community, from securing millions in funding for the security of Jewish schools and community centres to outlawing divisive BDS motions being passed by public sector bodies. They have represented our interests and concerns to Government with great effect. Both MPs have represented the Jewish population across the country and more than earned their reputations as excellent advocates for our community. Their support has been unwavering.

That the leadership of the JLM have political ambitions beyond their pressure group is not unreasonable nor surprising, but to stand for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party in 2017 against our community’s allies is a tactical error. They should be increasing the Jewish community’s friends in parliament not, at best, maintaining it. I would have had no complaint if they had chosen to stand against one of our opponents in parliament.

Source

Let’s be clear about what is happening here. The two persons he mentions, Mike Freer and Matthew Offord, are both Conservative parliamentary candidates. He is rebuking members of the Labour party for daring to stand against their principal political rivals, the Conservative Party, insisting that MPs who are “good for the Jews” should be given a free pass. Cannon demands that Jews place Jewish ethnic interests above the interests of the political parties they are members of. In other words, he fully validates many of the “antisemitic” accusations traditionally made against Jews, namely that they are disloyal, cannot be trusted, will always turn against you when it suits them, etc.

In 2017, it will become clear that reality itself is anti-Semitic, as every single anti-Semitic canard will be proven to be based on facts.

As such, in order to stop anti-Semitism, we are going to have to alter reality.

Also in 2017, we have the most unexpected happening of all: Al-Jazeera engaging in real journalism.

Truly shaping up to be an amazing year.

RT:

A senior official at the Israeli Embassy in London was secretly filmed discussing with a Conservative staffer how British officials with a pro-Palestinian stance could be “taken down.”

The footage of the controversial conversation was released on Sunday by Al Jazeera, which said it was a preview for a larger four-part expose on Israeli influence on British politics, which would be aired starting next Sunday.

The footage showed a lunchtime discussion between Israeli Embassy official Shai Masot and Maria Strizzolo, who was chief of staff to MP Robert Halfon, the deputy chairman of the Conservative Party at the time the recording happened. The filming was done by an Al Jazeera reporter, who was posing as a pro-Israeli activist, Al Jazeera said.

On the record, Masot is heard asking Halfon whether he could give her the names of some MPs to “take down.” Strizzolo is heard laughing and saying: “Well you know, if you look hard enough I’m sure that there is something that they’re trying to hide.”

If not, you can always set them up in a sex sting.

Never fails.

…unless they flee to the Ecuadorian embassy.

They then move on to the topic of “taking down… the deputy foreign minister” or, according to Al Jazeera, Sir Alan Duncan, a state minister under UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. Duncan has been publicly critical of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories.

Strizzolo asked: “You still want to go for it?” Masot ambiguously replied that the British official was still causing problems. Strizzolo then said: “I thought we had, you know, neutralized him just a little bit, no?” to which Masot said: “No.”

The two also discussed Secretary Johnson, who the Israeli official described as “basically good,” but also “an idiot” who became Britain’s top diplomat “without any kind of responsibilities.”

“So technically if something real happened, it won’t be his fault,” he added.

Responding to the report, the Israeli Embassy released a statement in which Ambassador Mark Regev apologized to Duncan and called Masot’s remarks “completely unacceptable.”

The embassy called its staffer a junior employee rather than a diplomat, and said he “will be ending his term of employment with the embassy shortly.”

During the conversation with Strizzolo, Masot described his ambition to become head of the Foreign Affairs department and “the Intelligence Department in Israel.” His business card calls him “a senior political officer,” according to the Guardian.

Strizzolo told the newspaper the quotes were used out of context, and that the conversation was “light, tongue-in-cheek and gossipy.”

“Any suggestion that I, as a civil servant working in education, could ever exert the type of influence you are suggesting is risible,” she said.

The British Foreign Office expressed satisfaction with the apology, saying that it was “clear these comments do not reflect the views of the Embassy or the Government of Israel. The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed.”

Yes, yes.

I’m sure the British Foreign Office is happy with the excuse that this is just a reality-based anti-Semitic canard.

But will the people be happy with that excuse?

It seems unlikely.

According to Wikipedia, accusations of plotting to control the world are number 7 on the list of anti-Semitic canards.

So in order to make this anti-Semitic canard untrue – and thus achieve the status of “canard” – we are going to have to alter the fabric of reality and create a parallel universe in which Jews are not plotting to control the world.

But how can you alter the fabric of reality?

I only know one way: the Cosmic Cube.

The problem: the Cosmic Cube doesn’t exist.

It is only a thing in Marvel Comics.

So, who could create the Cosmic Cube?

NASA.

They are the only ones with the resources and know-how.

And yet, they have not created this cube.

Why?

The only possible explanation is that they are driven by hatred for the Jews.