It’s not enough to never ever do the Hitler salute.

You must do the Wakanda salute.

Daily Mail:

Oxford undergraduates are being told that simply not being racist ‘isn’t good enough’ and they must be prepared to take action on the issue.

The revelation from a workshop at St Hugh’s College comes amid growing scrutiny about anti-racism training across the university, which critics say does not work.

While not mandatory, students were told they were ‘expected to make time’ to attend the It’s About Race event.

Attendees were shown a series of slides during the session last month.

Under the heading ‘Be an anti-racist’ on one slide, they were told: ‘Are you racist? “No” isn’t a good enough answer.’

The slide stated: ‘We need to… stop thinking that injustice going on in the world isn’t to an extent are [sic] fault’, adding: ‘Stop being a non-racist and start being an anti-racist.’ 

Another slide encouraged a ‘commitment to action’, asking the question: ‘What is your individual contribution/commitment/pledge to tackle inequality and racism?’

Such courses are meant to question ingrained attitudes.

Yeah, man. What are you, personally, doing to tackle racism and slavery?

Nothing, huh?

Then you’re really no better than Adolf Hitler himself.

If you don’t know what you can do to stop systemic racism because you don’t understand what it even is, then you can start by doing things for blacks. Just go serve them, like they were forced to serve you. Walk up to a random black person, and just tell him you think he’s a hero.

You can usually find blacks hanging around the bus stop.

He will say something to you like, “mayne, you got fie dolla?” He means “five dollars,” as in a five dollar bill. He is forced to ask for this money, because he lost all of his own money during slavery, and then he couldn’t ever get a job because white racists hate his skin color.

He might have some weird white substances around his lips. We don’t know what that is, but he can’t get it treated, because if he goes to a hospital, the white staff will say “get the fuck out of here, you filthy nigger!” and point guns at him.

Instead of giving him a five dollar bill, give him $500 or more.

Ask if he needs any cotton you can pick for him. If he says “no,” then ask if you can give him a blowjob.

The hordes of anti-racists are going all-out to attempt to shut down anyone who dares to veer from the official doctrine provided them by the ZOG state, dares to think freely, dares to question the foundations of this corrupt empire of decadence and depravity.

Above is a poster posted on the Portland State University campus, featuring the faces of three men who an anti-racist group wants hunted down for allegedly having hurt the feelings of brown people.

They actually want people to be sent to prison for hurting people’s feelings.

Because the same filthy kikes who went into our courts and argued that hardcore pornography is “free speech” are now arguing that “hate speech isn’t free speech.”

The winds are changing. Our ideas are now going mainstream. And the only way to stop them now is to literally start arresting people.

And Hillary Clinton will do it.

In 35 days, we are voting.

But this isn’t a mere Presidential election.

This is a referendum on the future of Western civilization.

It’s the last chance for this to end in something other than rivers of blood.

Ghislain Gilberti, an “anti-racist” writer and his children were attacked in the city of Belfort, France, on Saturday, 3rd of September.

Four Islamist men allegedly broke into Gilberti’s house, who was with his son, 12, and his daughter, 11 at the time. The men pinned him down and started to beat him while shouting “filthy White!”

They broke Gilberti’s arm,  then they kicked his 12 year-old son in the head and stomach.

Before they left, they threatened the Gilberti’s daughter by shouting “it’s the same price for you” and “we don’t forgive, we don’t forget.”

For some time now, Gilberti has received death threats for his book titled “Jihad.”

He said “The authors of the threats have not read the book, or they have just skim read it. I did not insult Islam in the book. I am rather a defender of all faiths and I combat racist acts in an anti-fascist movement.”

Will he learn his lesson? It’s unlikely, but maybe his kids will see.

These “anti-racists” are taught in college and university that Whites are the greatest evil to ever set foot on the planet, and “Whiteness” must be destroyed, through immigration into White places. In other words, they are taught to be anti-White.

That’s why it’s almost impossible for these people to wake up. It is modern day brainwashing. An education isn’t supposed to teach you what to think, it’s supposed to teach you how to think.

The anti-White establishment took over academia a long time ago and now it is just a breeding ground for more “diversity” cult-members, so the White genocide campaign can keep on running.

An article on the BBC News website dated 30 August 2014 has the title ‘The Fear of Being Seen as Racist’.

Referring to events in Rotherham, in which it was exposed that around 1,400 of the town’s White girls had been abused, raped and passed around for torture and sexual pleasure by Asian men, the article states: “fear of being viewed as racist has been cited as one of the reasons why child sexual exploitation in Rotherham was allowed to proliferate for 16 years.”

“A fear to confront the subject of race ultimately stopped the council engaging with the wider Rotherham community about the problem, the report suggested.”

According to sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary it was the Jewish Communist Leon Trotsky who coined the word ‘racism’, although this is not entirely corroborated. Certainly the word has been used in an ideological sense by Trotsky and the exact details are not relevant. What is beyond doubt is that the word is employed routinely in the present culture as a weapon with which to silence and accuse. Indeed the word ‘racism’ is aimed as a derogatory insult applied uniquely to White people.

What is meant by the epithet ‘racist’ cannot be pinned down as it is used whenever it suits to score a hit against White people or White interests. Amongst most Whites the view is that taking a violent hatred against another person for the sole reason that they differ to yourself racially is unjust and cruel. This is the most common definition given for ‘racism’ when asked. In practice, however the term ‘racist’ is widely aimed at someone who has not demonstrated any hate of other races but who has simply acknowledged the existence of racial differences. That is all it takes!

The real reason the epithet ‘racist’ was created was to attack and hurt the White race, specifically, and to help in the genocide of our race. Feelings of shame and fear of prosecution, social ostracism, loss of career, etc if accused of being ‘racist’ scare people into silence and this is the fear that the BBC headline on Rotherham refers to.

Blackmailing in this way has created the climate in which millions decide it is prudent to comply with the gagging and not to rock the boat, staying silent and carefully avoiding being recorded as being ‘racist’.

In the light of the 1400 White girls raped and pimped systematically by Asians in Rotherham, this fear of being called ‘racist’ effectively means that those who comply by staying silent are complicit in the crime of child rape.

If instead the observers had put moral duty before cowardly cringing over a pathetic word and gangster-like threats by authorities, those girls could never have been abused en mass as they were.

The abuse of countless other White girls by such Asian men continues in other towns around Britain as well as other crimes committed by non-whites who are unchallenged due to the selfish paralysis or confusion over just what one can object to these people doing if they are members of an immigrant community.

It is a moral duty to speak out against crimes targeting our children – including drug dealing. The paedophilia in this case was a racially defined crime. It is no less objectionable when the culprits are White individuals abusing children – but in those cases the fear of being labeled as racist does not come into play and people will generally do something about it and tell the authorities. If the criminal is not one of the protected establishment elite they are quickly put on trial. The matter of the paedophilia in the establishment is tied in with the immigrant paedophilia as abusers from the very anti-racist Great and Good are supplied with victims from the same care homes that many of the Asian men procured their victims from. This article does not aim to explore that aspect in any detail.

The non-Whites involved in these crimes have a racial contempt for White people. Other races routinely discriminate on the basis of race and commit horrendous crimes particularly against our own White kindred.

Simply for a White person to favour our own race by being RACIALLY LOYAL we are denigrated as being haters and ‘racist’. This even though we may hope and try to be civil to people of other races in the expectation that the other individual will be similarly considerate to us. It is all as nonsensical as if someone was accused of being familyist’ because they love their own close relatives somewhat more than they love total strangers. Imagine such a crime being written into law with the assumption being that if you are loyal to your family, your wife/husband, children or your parents you must surely hate those who are not in your family – such as your neighbours or absolutely anyone not that close to you. Yet that is how we have been taught to view racial loyalty, but only in the case of White racial loyalty. Somehow even though so many fellow Whites regard the idea of White racial loyalty as a bad thing, these people applaud or admire when another race or religious group pull together to work as a collective. Other races are congratulated for working to advance their group interests at the expense of the Whites who are portrayed as historical oppressors.

None of this is justifiable when one tries to take an objective view of things. It is not normal for humans to think objectively however. Human nature is to be biased as well as manipulated. In fact, our genetic interest should also mean we Whites are loyal to our race, just as other races are to their own. Nature intended this in the same way that we show preference to close kin. Science records ‘kin selection’ as an instinct vital to mammal psychology and a source of self-sacrifice, kindness, generosity and love as well as a healthy sense of identity. All human beings need a sense of identity and our modern extremist taboo against the racial aspect of identity causes mental illness. It leads to a sense of loss of purpose, depression and failure – leaving White people at a disadvantage compared to the other races who are encouraged to embrace a racial identity even when they are of mixed race.

White people going through their lives as rootless individuals unable to embrace their racial identity and forbidden to discriminate, while indoctrinated to feel guilt for any antipathy towards immigrants are seen by the outsiders as clear victim material. They are targeted like disorientated prey by predators. The girls of Rotherham – lambs to the slaughter clearly dangled as temptation to the Asian predators.

The girls had been indoctrinated to view these immigrants as friendly, attractive and glamorous. They are taught in the perverted sex education at school to experiment sexually at an early age and copy the media that pushes over-sexualised imagery of how young women should dress and conduct their relationships. Adults did not warn the girls about this danger. They left it to the system to direct the girls straight into trouble. Even as the girls became embroiled in the abuse the adults turned a blind eye allowing atrocities to happen – out of sight, out of mind. Just so that they would remain respectable non-discriminating participants of multiracial society. Their conformity means they are culpable for the horrendous experiences of the young victims.

When news broke of the industrial scale of the pimping by Asian men of these poor White girls, the public was duly shocked. Questions were asked as to how this was allowed to happen. For the first time in our hysterically anti-racist, anti-White society even mainstream media outlets spoke out about the need to acknowledge the part race plays in this tragedy. People have to change their perspective and stand up to be counted as proud to be ‘racist’ if that really is a prerequisite to demand justice, the guilty charged and their vile practice stamped out.

It is time to shake off the stigma of the accusation of ‘racist’ and see such an accusation instead as if it were a badge of honour. To be a ‘racist’ is to be someone who cares, who stands up against oppression and bullying and who will not look the other way when the welfare of children is concerned. Our children must be raised to value themselves, to have a racial identity and pride that prevents them admiring other groups who have this quality they lack and acting like love struck poultry around hungry foxes. They must learn to discriminate and keep to their own.

Fear of being seen as racist has been exposed as a scourge in our society. Far from being ‘institutionally racist’ as the Ferguson Report stated, the Rotherham scandal has shown the police and social services are institutionally ANTI-racist, with devastating results. Fear of being called ‘racist’ leads to children getting raped.

The authorities are still completely missing the point about the Rotherham scandal. Instead of doing something to protect White girls and children from these filthy Non-White pervert rapists, they think they can distract people by talking about having enquiries to find out how many people knew that it was going on. Everybody knew that it was going on, Nationalist groups have been raising the alarm about it for decades now.

It was not just a few Labour councillors that were frightened of being called ‘racist’, the whole country has been poisoned with the idea that love for your race is wrong. Finding a few scapegoats wont solve the problem, the whole idea of ‘racism’ being a bad thing needs to be completely discarded if we are ever to be able to protect our people.

Daily Mail:

Three Labour figures have accused Tony Blair’s government of turning a blind eye to child abuse and terrorism in the Muslim community – for fear of inflaming community tensions.

Former MP Ann Cryer said the ‘politically correct brigade’ predominant on the left dismissed her warnings after she exposed a sex-abuse scandal involving Asian men in her constituency.

Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk said far too many on the left had been guilty of ‘obsessing about multiculturalism’ rather than more important issues such as child rape.

And Denis MacShane, a former Foreign Office minister and MP for Rotherham, said he was threatened with the sack by Jack Straw for urging Muslims to turn away from terrorism.

The sustained criticism of the Blair government’s record came as it emerged that MPs will launch an investigation into whether the Home Office knew about allegations of abuse in Rotherham as far back as 2001.

At least 1,400 girls as young as 11 were assaulted and raped by gangs of Asian men over a period of 16 years. Some had guns pointed at them or were doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight.

The Commons home affairs committee will question Home Secretary Theresa May over what her department knew about what had gone on in Rotherham.

It is now known that in 2002, a Home Office researcher was conducting an investigation into trafficking and underage prostitution by mainly Muslim gangs in Rotherham, but it was never published.

Home Secretary at the time was Labour’s David Blunkett, and there is no suggestion that he knew of the report’s existence. But the committee of MPs will ask whether there was an overriding culture in the Blair government aimed at avoiding any harm to community cohesion.

Keith Vaz, chairman of the committee, said: ‘We would be very keen to get from the Home Office a full and frank response to the research that was commissioned in 2002.

‘This is an essential part of the jigsaw to determine why the council failed to act, and whether the Home Office could have done more to ensure that it did act.

‘We want to see every piece of information the Home Office holds on this, and I will be writing to the Home Secretary to ask that the databases are searched to see what files it holds on this horrific behaviour in Rotherham.’

Former Labour MP Ms Cryer said that when she raised similar issues in her constituency of Keighley between 2002 and 2004, her views were dismissed.

‘A politically correct left just saw it as racism,’ she said. The MP was shunned by elements of her party and a panic button was installed in her house.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s World This Weekend programme, she said: ‘The politically correct brigade will always have anxieties about this sort of thing.

‘You don’t want to give the BNP and the EDL ammunition, but I had to think if these were my daughters I’d be very upset about this, so what can I do to alleviate the situation.’

Ms Cryer revealed that former London mayor Ken Livingstone suggested she had ‘misunderstood’ the situation in Keighley. ‘Frustrated is an understatement. I was very cross.’

The only way to prevent White children from being raped by Non-Whites, is to cleanse the country entirely of Non-Whites. Obviously not all Non-Whites are rapists, but even if just a tiny amount are, that is reason enough to get rid of all of them. This is the way we behave if there is just a tiny risk of a contaminated product on shop shelves, the entire range of the product is recalled and everyone is warned to return any, should they have some. This happened recently nation-wide with baby food, when there was a fear that just a few jars might have had poison in them.

It is only through fear of being ‘racist’ that the same logic is not being applied in this instance.

Don’t you just love it when anti racists get their asses kicked by the minorities they “claim” to protect?

These people could care no less about the feelings of the idiot “anti-racists” who want to help them invade our countries. They are just more oppressors with free things.

Anti-racists should all be forced to go live in Africa for a month and see if it changes any of their opinions.

Jeremy Clarkson celebrity car driver is the latest to be forced to get down on his knees and beg forgiveness for using a word that only the privileged colored classes are allowed to use. Special external investigations are being demanded and there have been calls for Clarkson to be sacked for the blasphemy. The prime minister has weighed in on this crime of all crimes and a government spokesman has made it clear that this word must not be used by anyone, ever, in any context. Except, that is, for Blacks, Non-Whites and the newspaper reporting the story.

From The Guardian:

Jeremy Clarkson has begged viewers’ forgiveness after he appeared to use the N-word during filming of his BBC programme Top Gear.

In a video statement posted online on Thursday, he said that he had tried to obscure the word when reciting the “eeny, meeny, miny, moe” nursery rhyme to chose between two cars, but that his efforts to do so “weren’t quite good enough”.

Clarkson had previously issued a robust denial of the allegation, telling his 3.2 million Twitter followers: “I did not use the N-word. Never use it. The Mirror has gone way too far this time.”

But footage of the incident was later posted on The Daily Mirror website. In it Clarkson recites the beginning of the children’s nursery rhyme “eeny, meeny, miny, moe” before apparently mumbling: “Catch a nigger by his toe.”

His apology came after a day of growing calls for the BBC to sack him. The corporation issued a strongly worded statement saying: “Jeremy Clarkson has set out the background to this regrettable episode. We have made it absolutely clear to him, the standards the BBC expects on air and off. We have left him in no doubt about how seriously we view this.”.

Downing Street condemned any use of the word, saying that David Cameron – a friend of Clarkson’s – would “certainly not” use it.

Aliya Mohammed, the chief executive of Race Equality First, called for immediate action from the BBC.

….

Lawyers for the Indian-born actor Somi Guha, who appeared in The Bill and other television shows, made a formal complaint to the BBC Trust as calls for Clarkson to be sacked gathered pace. In the letter, which was also sent to the media regulator Ofcom and has been seen by the Guardian, the lawyer Lawrence Davies demanded an external investigation into how the offensive language had come to be edited out of the show and whether Clarkson had been reprimanded.

Davies, director of the law firm Equal Justice Solicitors, said Clarkson would be dismissed in any other line of work. “It’s appalling. He’s a repeat offender and should be sacked,” he said.

“If he was a Ukip councillor in a private meeting I believe they would suspend or dismiss him. If he was the owner of an American basketball team he would be fined and banned. But the BBC consider themselves unaccountable on the issue of racism.”

The prime minister’s spokesman said: “In terms of any usage of that word, that would be quite wrong.”

He added that the BBC would be investigating the claims. “If there are those types of reports and allegations I’m sure that is something the BBC will look at.”

Read More

Ukip was plunged into a race storm yesterday after unveiling a series of posters campaigning against EU immigration.

The party has paid for billboards across the country to be emblazoned with messages such as: ‘26million people in Europe are looking for work. And whose jobs are they after?’

Another has a picture of a construction worker begging on the street, with the slogan: ‘EU policy at work. British workers are hit hard by unlimited cheap labour.’

The £1.5million campaign is funded by the Yorkshire businessman Paul Sykes, who is a former Tory donor.

All the posters call on voters to ‘Take Back Control of Our Country’ by backing Ukip in European elections on May 22.

But they were immediately condemned by rival politicians.

Labour MP Mike Gapes said he hoped the ‘racist posters encourage all decent British Commonwealth and EU citizens’ to vote for another party next month.

He added: ‘It is time for all democrats to expose lies and hatred being peddled by Ukip and defend British values of tolerance and respect for others.’

Stella Creasy, Labour MP for Walthamstow, said: ‘Don’t tolerate those who talk down Britain’s chances of competing in the global economy. I’m not with Ukip because I don’t want to stop the world and get off to sulk.’

But Ukip leader Nigel Farage said the posters were ‘a hard-hitting reflection of reality’ and only the ‘chattering classes’ would object.

One contained a dramatic image of a burning Union Jack with the European Union flag emerging from the flames. It carried the words: ‘Who really runs this country?’ Another contains a picture of Britons commuting to work on a bus next to an image of a EU official being chauffeur driven.

Read More

“SCHOOLCHILDREN ARE BEING ASKED TO DEBATE WHETHER ‘ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE FASCISTS’ as part of classes TO COMBAT VIOLENT EXTREMISM…

excerpt from The Traitor within

Below was reported on the BNP website  22nd November 2013

We have been flooded with reports from outraged parents in Staffordshire after receiving a letter from the Head Teacher, Mrs Lynn Small, of Little Green Community School, stating that if parents refused to allow their children to attend a “multicultural workshop” their children will have a “Racial Discrimination note attached to your Child’s education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career”!

A friend to this paper posted this article a while ago. It seems nothing has changed.

On 17 November 2009, Graeme Paton, the Education Editor ofThe Daily Telegraph, told us this:

“SCHOOLCHILDREN ARE BEING ASKED TO DEBATE WHETHER ‘ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE FASCISTS’ as part of classes TO COMBAT VIOLENT EXTREMISM…  Children are asked to discuss why certain phrases – including ‘They’ve taken your jobs’ and ‘They get better treatment’ – are used to inflame public opinion. Another exercise aims to dispel common ‘myths and stereotypes’ surrounding asylum seekers. This includes views that they are a drain on the UK economy, get priority in council housing waiting lists… and can be linked to rising crime…

Koser Mahmood, AN ENGLISH TEACHER at a school in Lancashire, where most pupils are white British and a fifth are from ethnic minorities, said: ‘Counteracting violent extremism is an important part of the COMMUNITY COHESION PROGRAMME… Many teachers lack the confidence AND VOCABULARY needed to address it. But WE MUST ADDRESS IT’…
Schools should have a named teacher to whom pupils can report any concerns of GROOMING BY EXTREMIST GROUPS.”

‘Grooming by extremist groups’ meaning having any young person told any unfashionable facts that haven’t been vetted by the PC Crowd and their immigrant foot soldiers, I suppose.

You know, being told stuff like,’they’ve taken your jobs’, ‘they get better treatment,’ ‘they are a drain on the UK economy, get priority in council housing waiting lists… and can be linked to rising crime.’

All of which very, very provable assertions happen to be true. Apparently however, according to Koser Mahmood and co., mentioning such truisms equates to ‘violent extremism,’ ‘inflaming public opinion’ and ‘grooming by extremist groups.

Or so they would have our young folk believe. New Labour would rather our youngsters be brainwashed into thinking that the stark realities are ‘myths and stereotypes’ and that ‘all white people are Fascists,’ than have them apprised of the simple truth.

There’s a sewage works worth of dirty work to be done before the anti-Brits are flushed out of the system, folks.

It’s a job to die for.

A Conservative councillor is to undergo diversity training after offending ethnic minorities with her claim that golliwogs are ‘nostalgic, not racist’.

Cllr Dawn Barnett was found guilty of bringing Brighton and Hove City Council into disrepute with her remarks.

In August, Cllr Barnett said she thought golliwogs were ‘nostalgic, not racist’.

And she dismissed complaints against a city homestore selling golliwog placemats as ‘political correctness gone too far’.

However, a panel of three fellow councillors cleared the 72-year-old of failing to treat others with respect and breaching the Equalities Act.

The board – sitting in a closed hearing on Thursday – also recommended that all councillors should undergo diversity training in the future.

Her comments provoked four ‘separate but similar’ complaints from three people and the council’s Black and Minority Ethnic Workers’ Forum.

One complainant asked for an apology from Cllr Barnett while another said they wished to see her expelled from the council.

Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Barnett said the issue should never have progressed to a hearing and was a waste of taxpayers’ money.

The hearing was originally scheduled for November 28 but was dramatically postponed when Cllr Barnett fell down a flight of stairs on her way to the meeting.

Read More