Now the Bible is banned because it is “vulgar.”

It is being banned by the people teaching anal sex – with men, in fact – to 5-year-olds.

How are you even supposed to respond to this?

The Guardian:

A school district in Utah that last week banned the Bible from school libraries is now being asked to consider a further title for removal: the Book of Mormon.

The Davis school district, which serves Davis county, north of Salt Lake City, said it was considering a new complaint demanding the removal of the foundational text of the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The latest potential removal comes just a week after the Bible was taken off the shelves of libraries in elementary and middle schools after being deemed by a committee to be inappropriate because it contained “vulgarity or violence”. The Bible will remain in high school libraries.

The school district said it would assess the Book of Mormon for “all elements of the definitions of pornographic or indecent materials” as defined under a Utah law concerning sensitive materials.

The request to remove the book referenced violence including battles, beheadings and kidnappings.

A national furore has arisen over the removal of books from public schools in several states, often driven by conservatives targeting material that contains references to gender identity or sexuality.

The debate in Utah has centered upon a law passed last year that allows parents to request the removal of books containing pornographic or indecent material.

One parent in the Davis school district decided to demand the removal of the Bible, claiming it to be “one of the most sex-ridden books around”.

The district decided that while the Bible did not violate the Utah law, it was not suitable for younger students.

There are sex scenes in the Bible. That’s not been a problem since the advent of the printing press, shortly after which the Bible became available to children across the entire Western world.

Is it more “sex-ridden” than this?

That is used in the curriculum for elementary school kids in several American schools.

SEE: Waldorf Parents Cry to the New York Post After 5th Graders Taught to Jack Off, Eat Pussy and Fuck Ass

Just imagine the nerve of these people. There is nothing pornographic in the Bible. The sex is things like this:

I’m steel-manning here. That is describing the incest-rape of Tamar by Amnon, which is probably the most incendiary sexual event in the entire Bible. It’s that one verse. (Here’s the context, in case anyone doubts it.) Go ahead and compare it to the text and imagery above.

The Song of Solomon is a sex book, but it is in poetic metaphor that children would not understand.

The Book of Mormon could be next to be banished. Joseph Smith, the church founder who published the book in 1830, claimed it was translated from inscriptions of prophets on golden plates.

The book is presented as a historically authentic depiction of God’s dealings with people in the Americas, although this is disputed by historians and scientists.

The book of Mormon doesn’t have sex scenes like the Bible does.

So, they will just use some other excuse.

Imagine that “conservatives” like Ted Cruz are still claiming that these people are just “misguided” because of their “ideology.”

Not one person in the government will say “Satanic Jews who want to sodomize your pre-teen sons – before and after they cut their dicks off.”

This county used to be based just a year and a half ago

I cringed when I heard “single mother of 5,” but the article claims she’s a widow

If you don’t say that anal and trannies are the highest moral value, then you are against our values, and you do not belong in our society.

Move to Russia or China, you filth.

This is a democracy country, and in this place, we worship anus and we cut up kids genitals, because that’s who we are.

Christian Post:

A new lawsuit accuses the state of Oregon of imposing an “ideological litmus test” for those seeking to adopt children from foster care, which requires adherence to progressive ideology on LGBT issues.

The law firm Alliance Defending Freedom announced in a statement Monday that it had filed a lawsuit on behalf of Jessica Bates, “a single mother of five wishing to adopt siblings from foster care.” As noted by the law firm, Bates “seeks to adopt a sibling pair, who are generally harder to place.”

The complaint names Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Fariborz Pakseresht, Deputy Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Liesl Wendt, Interim Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services Child Welfare Division, Aprille Flint-Gerner, as well as Malheur County officials Rebecca Garrison and Cecilia Garcia as defendants. It was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton Division.

This is Fariborz Pakseresht, because they now have Pakis in Oregon for some reason

The lawsuit follows the Oregon Department of Human Services’ refusal to grant Bates the certification required to become an adoptive parent after she informed the state that her religious beliefs prevented her from complying with a state law requiring prospective adoptive parents to “respect, accept and support” the “sexual orientation, gender identity, [and] gender expression” of the children they seek to adopt.

As she underwent the necessary training to become an adoptive parent, an instructor informed Bates that “adoptive and resource parents must use a child’s stated pronouns and affirm a child’s gender identity if the child’s identity does not align with their biological sex.” Additionally, the instructor provided an example of how a parent could “support a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity” by “allowing a child to dress however they want and taking them to a Pride parade.”

Upon completing the instruction, Bates raised her concerns with Garcia, the certification officer for the Oregon Department of Human Services office in Malheur County. “One of the things the training really emphasized is SOGI (sexual orientation gender identity) and that the host must respect, accept, and support children whose preferred pronouns & identity don’t match their biological sex,” she explained.

“I don’t know how many children there are out there under the age of 9 who fall into this category (and to me it’s kind of crazy that society is wanting to get kids thinking about this stuff at such young ages; I think we should let them keep their innocence), so this may not even be an issue, but I need to let you know I cannot support this behavior in a child,” she added. “I have no problem loving them and accepting them as they are, but I would not encourage them in this behavior.”

Jessica Bates

Bates shared her belief that “God gives us our gender/sex and it’s not something we get to choose,” stressing that “my faith conflicts with this & I just felt that I needed to let you know.”

Garcia did not initially respond to Bates’ email outlining her concerns and did not reply to a follow-up email she sent a month later. When she contacted Bates via telephone a month-and-a-half after she sent the original email, Garcia informed her that she “was ineligible to adopt due to her religious beliefs.”

The lawsuit contends that the Oregon Department of Human Services is violating Bates’ First Amendment rights to Freedom of Speech, Association and Assembly as well as the Free Exercise Clause. It also cites the state and local officials’ behavior as violations of Bates’ right to “equal protection of the laws” under the Fourteenth Amendment. The complaint is seeking an order declaring the Oregon state law unconstitutional, preventing the state from enforcing it and awarding Bates attorney’s fees.

ADF Senior Counsel Jonathan Scruggs decried the Oregon state law as “an ideological litmus test” where “people who hold secular or ‘progressive’ views on sexual orientation and gender identity are eligible to participate in child welfare programs, while people of faith with religiously informed views are disqualified because they don’t agree with the state’s orthodoxy.”

According to Scruggs, “The government can’t exclude certain communities of faith from foster care and adoption services because the state doesn’t like their particular religious beliefs.”

Well, in fact, actually, they just did.

Maybe get over it and stop whining.

If you don’t like it, move to a fascist dictatorship, where they don’t respect gay anal fisting and licking among infants.

In America, we stand with the values of who we are.

Disturbingly, not a single one of her kids appears to be a tranny

Has there ever been such a blatant double standard of censorship… ever?

RT:

When the founder of a Christian veterans group tried to upload a YouTube ad for his organization, he received an odd rejection, informing him the keyword “Christian” was no longer acceptable under the site’s ad targeting policy.

Chad Robichaux, founder of the Mighty Oaks Foundation, a charitable group that helps veterans overcome wartime trauma, took to Twitter with a screenshot detailing his encounter with the tech giant.

We ran a @YouTube ad for our veterans ministry outreach for those in need & it was denied for the word “Christian”. Insane! #Censorship should terrify every American; conservative or liberal, Christian or Muslim. This bias is a dangerous course for America. @MightyOaksFDN pic.twitter.com/at5CsAfEht

— Chad Robichaux (@ChadRobo) July 23, 2019

There is a lot to critique modern Christians for, and almost everything that they get up to ends up being counter-productive, but even so, it is undeniable that Christianity will soon be outlawed in our society at the rate things are going.

Google – the company that owns YouTube – isn’t a fedora-tipping company that’s just anti-religion in general.

They’re not applying the same standards to other religions.

“We know that religious beliefs are personal, so we don’t allow advertisers to target users on the basis of religion,” the Google-owned platform said. “Beyond that, we don’t have policies against advertising that includes religious terms like ‘Christian.’”

The veteran fired back, arguing the company’s statement was demonstrably false and that he had used the same keyword in previous ads without problems “for years.” Moreover, he claims when he tried running the same ad but with the keyword “Muslim” instead, there was no issue. 

If you’re dead set on enforcing Globo-Homo-Shlomo, why go so easy on Islam? Islam really is the nigger in the woodpile, because while it makes sense to prop it up to attack Christians, Islam will be much harder to assimilate into modern society.

Moslems will fight back and bomb federal buildings and TV broadcasters that blaspheme the faith or take steps to curb Jewish influence in society.

In other words, they won’t be so easily cowed like the Christians.

If Globo-Homo-Shlomo thinks that they can put the Jihadi back in the sandbox, they’re in for a nasty surprise.

This pro-Moslem policy that big tech is pushing is so incredibly short-sighted that it boggles the brain. It only makes sense when you take into account that Islam is also anti-Christian, and the kike’s hate for Christianity outweighs any rational considerations.

Leading expert in gay frogs Alex Jones is bringing us news on evil anti-White corporations censoring Easter.

Nestle and Cadbury have removed the word Easter from their chocolate eggs.

Not only do companies like Nestle think that water is not a human right and harm the environment with their practices, now they are trying to kill yet another holiday that White people like.

A small group of politically correct soldiers (Antifa) in Portland, Oregon decided to try and intimidate some Christians who had the nerve to publicly celebrate the holiday.

What happened next was nothing short of a Christmas Miracle!

Santa was in his shiny red sleigh rushing to deliver presents to good boys and girls, but he apparently brings an early hip replacement to the bad xirs and xes!

This was obviously a multi-racial religious group, but these Antifa fanatics have their politics informed by the Google HR department.

These Judeo-Left assholes spend hours listening to lectures about the “structural oppression” of everything from onion rings to Apu.

But after Charlottesville and now this, maybe the pajama boys LARPing as communist revolutionaries should take a class on how to cross the street.

Life comes at you fast!

The Cryptocracy has a proclivity for timing the publication of heavily publicized speeches, “news” articles and books that dishonor and defame Jesus and Blessed Mary close to Advent and Lent —  observances which some Protestants and Mormons disparage as meaningless or even pagan, but which the Cryptocracy knows are archetypal sacred seasons linked to the people’s image of Christ, presenting an opportunity for demon-possessed individuals to ritually insult and traduce them.

“Conservative hero” Bill O’Reilly’s book deflecting blame from Jews for the Crucifixion of Christ while blaming the Romans exclusively and denying Christ’s struggle with Pharsiaic Judaism, was reissued as a children’s volume (The Last Days of Jesus), timed for Lent, 2014.

Eight days prior to Good Friday 2014, Laurie Goldstein pimped a hoax about a papyrus “proving” that Jesus had a wife (cf. NY Times, April 10). After the damage was done, the tale was shown to be a fake.

We have witnessed this hateful phenomenon occur in the corporate American media like clockwork year after year.

The latest such attack on Jesus and Mary is timed to coincide with Christmas 2014. It was launched by Valerie Tarico and it is being massively publicized online by websites like Salon.

Tarico is supposed to be a liberal “atheist,” but as my colleague Maurice Pinay points out, she exempts Judaism from the focus of her contempt.

How many of us will militantly protest this outrage and expose it, by demonstrating its roots in rabbinic hatred for Jesus and Mary, as easily documented in the Babylonian Talmud,MishnehTorah, Toledoth Yeshu and numerous other authoritative texts of the rabbis?

Failure to do so ensures the continuation of the Talmudic defamation of Christ and Mary every Good Friday and Christmas season henceforth.

I realize that on Christmas Eve we are supposed to be engulfed in nothing but warm fuzzy feelings of “good cheer,” but with modern Herods still very much afoot and spreading their errors, there never is a time not to defend Christ and His Mother, and I make no apologizes for doing so on Christmas Eve.

I don’t know about you, but I find I can only attain a state of peace and serenity after I have assured myself that I have done my duty by working at the jobs that I know need to be done before I can relax. I find myself at that juncture on this holy eve.

If it wasn’t for misguided Christians lobbying to free the Blacks from slavery, they would still be in chains throughout the world.

Don’t expect any thanks from them for doing that though, their latest craze is burning pictures of ‘cracker Jesus’ as a way to fight ‘racism.’

There really is no point to doing anything for the Blacks, because they will always just throw it back in your face.

It is nature’s way of reminding us that our love should only be for our own race and no one else.

Illinois Review:

There’s a new social media challenge sweeping the Internet called #BurnWhiteJesus, or the White Jesus Picture challenge.

The movement calls on people to post videos of themselves online burning pictures of Jesus, according to Inquistr.

The reason behind the challenge is racism, according to the religious education website Patheos.com, who says the common portrayal of Jesus as a white man “is used to advance white supremacy around the world.”

“Mr. Savannah Black” posted his video which shows him explaining the challenge and then burning two pictures of Jesus.

“This will be the hardest challenge for most black folks to do,” he said. “In order for you to free your mind you must get rid of this image from your subconscious, in order to have real liberation of the self.”

A judge who condemned a Christian couple for turning away gay guests from their hotel  yesterday said her decision may have been wrong.

Supreme Court deputy president Baroness Hale called for a rethink on religious and gay rights six months after she rejected the B&B owners’ arguments in a key test case.

Lady Hale said in a speech that the law has done too little to protect the beliefs of Christians. And she cast doubts over her own judgment in the landmark case in which a gay couple sued Christian hoteliers Peter and Hazelmary Bull.

Mr Bull, 74, and his 70-year-old wife refused a double room at their Cornish hotel to Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall in 2008 because they were not a married heterosexual couple.

The incident led to a string of court cases, which culminated in defeat for the Bulls at the Supreme Court – where Lady Hale, leading four other judges, ruled that the rights of the gay couple outweighed the conscience of the Christian couple. Lady Hale declared in her Supreme Court ruling that we should be ‘slow to accept’ the right of Christians to discriminate against gay people.

But in March she acknowledged that the laws which ignore Christian consciences might not be ‘sustainable’. Last week, in a highly unusual move, Lady Hale and her fellow judges ordered that the Bulls will not be liable for legal costs – a decision which spares them a huge bill which would pay for the lawyers who represented Mr Preddy and Mr Hall.

And in a speech to Irish lawyers yesterday she gave an indication that her judgment against the Bulls may have been too harsh, asking whether courts would be better off taking a ‘more nuanced approach’.

Lady Hale suggested that the law should develop a ‘conscience clause’ for Christians like the Bulls.

Read More

If Christianity is all about worshipping the Jew, as some people claim, then why is it that the Jews in Israel regularly vandalise Christian monasteries and Churches?

This week, the latest Christian building to be vandalised by them is Deir Rafat Monastery.

The article below chooses only to draw attention to the ‘price-tag’ aspect of the vandalism and not the insults against Christ and his mother. I guess we are supposed to think that they were just ‘random’ insults and not drawn straight from the pages of the Talmud, which apart from constantly insulting Christ and his mother, says that all White people are animals.

From Forward:

A Catholic monastery near Beit Shemesh was vandalized with anti-American and anti-Christian epithets.

“America is Nazi Germany” and “Price Tag — Peace Agreement,” as well as “Jesus is a monkey” and “Mary is a cow,” were spray painted on the walls of the monastery. The tires of four vehicles also were slashed.

The monastery is located in Deir a-Rafat village located close to Kibbutz Tzora near Beit Shemesh.

The vandalism was discovered by monks on Tuesday morning; Jerusalem police are investigating.

Price tag refers to the strategy adopted by extremist settlers and their supporters generally to exact retribution for settlement freezes and demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Jews.

Other monasteries in the area have been victims of suspected price tag attacks in the past.

Things truly are back-to-front and upside-down in the Jewnited Kingdom. Lewd acts in public are now protected by law yet reading the Bible in public has been outlawed. We spent 500 years fighting for the right to read the Bible and now they are trying to ban it again?

Luckily this preacher was supported by a charity funding cases like his, where people are arrested for reading the Bible.

From the BBC:

A Christian street preacher who was held by police without food or water for 15 hours after he was arrested over comments he made to two gay teenagers has been given £13,000 in compensation.

John Craven was held in Manchester after two boys claimed they were offended by his views on homosexuality.

The 57-year-old said the experience in September 2011 had been “distressing”.

Greater Manchester Police agreed to compensate Mr Craven after he alleged a breach of his human rights.

Mr Craven, who has regularly preached in Manchester city centre for seven years, was approached by the boys while he was preaching about salvation.

He said the teenagers asked him what he thought of gays, which he had answered by quoting from the Bible’s teachings on the subject, before adding that “whilst God hates sin, He loves the sinner”.

He said the pair then began to kiss in front of him and act out sexual acts.

The boys then reported Mr Craven to a nearby mounted police constable, who placed him under arrest for “public order offences”.

He was taken to a city centre police station and held for 19 hours while an investigation took place.

He said that within this time, he was denied food, water and his medication for rheumatoid arthritis for 15 hours.

He added that he was eventually given a bowl of cereal and a microwave meal after a friend complained about his treatment.

He said he had “never intended to cause anyone harassment, alarm or distress – in fact, quite the opposite”.

“The actions of the police have left me feeling nervous and anxious [and] I found the whole episode extremely distressing,” he said.

Mr Craven brought legal action against the force alleging wrongful arrest, false imprisonment and a breach of his human rights.

His case was supported by The Christian Institute, a charity that promotes the Christian faith.

Director Colin Hart said: “Nobody should face 19 hours in custody for simply answering a question about their beliefs.

“The disgraceful way in which Mr Craven was treated fell well below what the public deserve.

“In terms of the infringement of religious liberty, it was one of the worst cases we have ever dealt with.”

Greater Manchester Police agreed to pay a total of £50,000 in costs and compensation in an out-of-court settlement.

Supt Alan Greene said the force could not “go into detail about the circumstances, [but] we can acknowledge that we did make mistakes and, in particular, kept the claimant in custody for too long”.