With all this talk of World War III and the possibility of America becoming a nuclear wasteland filled with roaming gangs of radioactive cannibals, it can be easy to forget about the only thing that truly matters in life: Jewish persecution.

Fortunately, in-between publishing articles about Russia, Syria and all those other flavors of the week, the mainstream media have taken the time to provide some REAL NEWS: the suffering of an innocent Jew who, while working at the Anne Frank House, was told to remove his yarmulke – a very symbol of his Jewishness – by his hate-filled superior.

Breitbart:

A Jewish employee of the Anne Frank House museum was told that he was not allowed to wear his kippa because it would conflict with the organisation’s “independent position” and might “influence” the message of combatting anti-Semitism.

Barry Vingerling, 25, said that he was told not the wear his yarmulke when he turned up for work at the museum dedicated to the life of the Jewish girl Anne Frank who died at a German concentration camp during World War Two, reports the New Israelite Weekly.

…

“I have been suffering from it for months, but this is a fundamental moral issue for me,” the 25-year-old told the Dutch-language New Israelite Weekly, saying that he wanted to make the expression of his Jewish faith at the museum celebrating the life of the teen Jewish diarist.

“I made a request in October and discussed it with the manager. Then I found out that the policy was not to show any beliefs in the workplace when you come into contact with the public.

“I was shocked because I was not aware of this. I did not expect it to be an issue. I work in the house of Anne Frank, who had to go into hiding because of her identity. In that same house should I hide my identity?”

Then in November, Mr. Vingerling defied his employers and after turning up to work visibly wearing the kippa; his employer told him that a decision would come soon and that until then he should continue to wear the baseball hat.

After a full six months, the young man was told last week that he was allowed to wear his kippa.

So the Jew was actually allowed to wear his stupid hat in the end.

Yet this non-story still made international news.

How can people read this sort of thing and not conclude that Jews wield a disproportionate amount of media influence?

A Jew only has to see a cloud that’s shaped like the gates of Auschwitz and the entire Western media thrusts their cameras in the direction of his thunderous “oy vey!” Meanwhile, the fate of people who are suffering from real genocide – such as the white South Africans – is either ignored or twisted into a narrative that favors the oppressors.

Obviously, that wouldn’t happen if whites controlled the media. And it certainly wouldn’t happen if Arabs controlled the media (as at least one water filter salesman has claimed).

But hey, the more the Judenpresse continues to publish flimsy stories intended to recall an event that (((happened))) 75 years ago, the more the average person is going to stop caring about it. Holocaust fatigue is real, it’s irreversible and it’s already on the verge of becoming mainstream.

Oy gevalt, remember us goyim! Also lol @ a casino ad in an article about the Shoah. Google Adsense knows what’s up.

Even if you film a video promoting the official Jewish lie of the Holohoax, you still risk the chance of being condemned by Jews. That’s because nothing is ever good enough for them.

Congressman Clay Higgins filmed a video inside one of the fake Auschwitz gas chambers to justify why the United States must have a strong military. This has caused outrage because it did not show proper respect to the trillions of Jews who were allegedly gassed there.

BBC:

Officials at Auschwitz have criticised a US congressman for making and voicing a video inside a gas chamber at the former Nazi death camp.

The memorial and museum tweeted that the gas chamber was “not a stage” but was a place for mournful silence.

Republican Clay Higgins said in the video that the horrors of the WW2 death camps were the reason why the US military should be “invincible”.

Some 1.1m people, mainly Jews, died at the camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.

Mr Higgins made a five-minute video showing him in different parts of the museum talking about the atrocities in the death camp.

At one point, he goes inside a gas chamber and explains how the victims are gassed.

I like the strong stance Higgins has on Islam, but he’s totally wrong about the Holohoax.

Part of the backlash he’s getting probably has to do with the fact that Jews don’t like people filming anything at these Holohoax sites. It increases the chance that their stupid hoax will be revealed to an increasing number of people.

They actually ban filming inside the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam. They claim shooting photos and video would disrupt what is supposed to be a very emotional experience for people. Talk about a ridiculous excuse. They just don’t want people documenting anything inside the building!

The Holohoax is also the only historical event where specific laws have been passed forbidding people from questioning it. If these fairy tales about gas chambers and soap factories were 100 percent true, there’d be no need to enforce the narrative through laws. The laws are in place to force people into accepting historical fallacies about perpetual Jewish victimization.

Just recently I spent a couple of weeks exploring Europe.  The first city I spent some time in was Amsterdam.  This is a city best known for its Red Light District, drugs, prostitutes, coffee shops, windmills, water canals and the extensive use of bicycles as a means of transport.  I was actually quite surprised at how much of the city is designed around the use of bikes.  You’ll often see cute chicks in their 20s riding around on mopeds.  This is something that you’d rarely see in America, where the motorcycle culture is dominated by wannabe tough guys and middle aged men.

While in Amsterdam, I knew I had to visit the Anne Frank House.  This is the place where Jewish teenager Anne Frank allegedly hid from evil German Nazis during World War II.  That’s at least the fairy tale that the Jews have sold us.  The diary that she supposedly wrote during her time there has been a key tool used by Jews to promote their stupid Holocaust hoax.

There are many reasons to believe that the Anne Frank diary is a fraud.  A significant number of them are described in an article published by the Institute of Historical Review.  It is highly probable that much of the diary was written by Anne’s father Otto Frank or perhaps even the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin.  The content of the diary appears to have been written by someone well beyond the life experience of a 12 or 13 year-old.  The diary even contains passages with detailed references to homosexuality and masturbation.  They sound more like some type of deranged sex fantasy from the mind of a perverted old man versus something that was written by a young girl.

Despite all of that, my visit to the Anne Frank House reconfirmed my suspicions that the diary is a fraud.

The Anne Frank House has been transformed into a museum and is a major Amsterdam tourist attraction.  I literally had to wait an hour to get into the museum.  What’s interesting is that before you even get inside, there are all sorts of signs saying that photography is not allowed.  The signs claim that photography is banned because taking photos may somehow damage the displayed material.  I found this to be a little odd since the museum’s contents should mostly be less than a century old.  It isn’t like they are displaying Egyptian mummies or other fragile material that could damage easily.

They also claim that photography is not allowed because often times a visit to the Anne Frank House is an emotional experience for people.  Taking photos, they say, would be disruptive to people having this so-called emotional experience during their visit.

This rationale for not being allowed to take photos inside the building is ridiculous.  It sounds as if the real reason photography is banned is because they want to prevent people from documenting what’s inside the building.  If photos were allowed, independent researchers would be able to scrutinize the diary’s contents much more thoroughly.  Obviously they do not want this happening, otherwise they would be much more accommodating to the general public.

After finally getting inside the museum, I figured at some point the actual diary would be on display somewhere.  What’s interesting is that they do not display the diary in the museum.  Instead they display what they say are facsimile versions of the diary.  They justify this by saying that the real diary is stored in a special place to preserve it from environmental exposure.

Once again this raises even more questions.  Why can’t the real diary be displayed?

The Russians have displayed Vladimir Lenin’s dead body for public view since 1924.  If a dead body can be displayed for 90 straight years, why can’t a 70 year old book be shown?  It makes no sense, unless of course there are ulterior motives at play.

These types of policies indicate clearly that the people at the Anne Frank House are hiding something.  If the public were to know the many questions that surround the authenticity of the diary itself, the Anne Frank House would no longer exist as a tourist attraction.  Not allowing pictures in the house and not showing the actual diary is problematic for obvious reasons.  The lack of transparency does not inspire confidence that the diary itself is legitimate.

It is also worth noting that much of the material inside the museum is designed to illicit an emotional response from the visitors.  They are not interested in a visitor logically analyzing the lies they are presenting.  Lots of photos and personal items are shown, but there is no information proving that the diary was in fact entirely written by Anne Frank.  For instance, they show several interviews with people who knew Anne in real life.  The museum has uploaded some of them to their YouTube channel.  If you watch them you will see that the clips they selected contain emotionally driven material.  Visitors are supposed to suspend all logic while they are bombarded with emotional tales of suffering and tragedy at the hands of evil German Nazis.

With that said, I must admit that my visit to the Anne Frank House was actually a very emotional one.  Not because I felt sorry for a Jewish girl who lived inside an attic, but because I could barely contain my laughter at how ridiculous it all is.  Once you understand that the diary itself is a fraud, it makes the entire museum a comical absurdity.

Based on my visit, I am more convinced than ever that Anne Frank’s diary and the story surrounding it are based off of lies.  The diary is nothing more than a propaganda tool used by the Jews to push their stupid Holocaust hoax.  If you confront a Jew about any of this it is pretty much guaranteed they will defend the diary by yelling “evil Nazi,” “anti-Semite,” “6 million” and “muh Holocaust.”