More fascism in Canada.

You can’t even feed the bears anymore.

Idaho Statesman:

Every week during the summer of 2018, a woman bought 10 cases of apples, 50 pounds of carrots and dozens of eggs.

The food was for bears, Canada authorities said.

A woman from Whistler was ordered to pay $60,000 after officials said she violated the Wildlife Act in British Columbia.

In July 2018, the Conservation Officer Service, a public safety agency that focuses on human-wildlife conflict prevention, received a complaint that someone was feeding black bears in the neighborhood.

Officials began investigating and found that the woman was feeding black bears during the summer months in 2018. Every week she would buy food for the bears, authorities said.

“Bulk produce — including up to 10 cases of apples, 50 pounds of carrots and up to 15 dozen eggs — was purchased on a weekly basis to feed the bears,” the Conservation Officer Service said Friday on Facebook. “These activities created an extraordinary public safety risk by conditioning bears to human food and presence.”

In September 2018, wildlife officials euthanized three bears that were visiting the residential area. They damaged property and showed no fear toward people, officials said.

The bears were used to getting food from the woman, so they could not be rehabilitated or relocated.

It sounds like she wanted the bears around to protect her.

Probably from black people.

Bears are known to dislike them.

It’s the core conflict between bears and squirrels, the latter being strictly anti-racist.

Wild moment husband HURLS a 'rabid' bobcat across his lawn after it attacked his family https://t.co/VKcKAtZdzo

— Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) April 16, 2021

A relaxing morning can quickly unfold.

And it do.

Oh, it do.

Sometimes, a bobcat will come at you.

It’s unclear where the video was filmed (update: North Carolina claimed it). It was originally uploaded to TikTok, but keeps getting deleted.

It’s still on Twitter, at time of writing.

This was a wild 46 seconds pic.twitter.com/jIHQg0G4qU

— Sada (@Evi3Zamora) April 15, 2021

“IT’S A BOBCAT AND IT ATTACKED MY WIFE – A BOBCAT!”

He throws the sucker, and it comes back for more.

It’s unclear if the issue was resolved.

But here’s the thing: the lockdown has resulted in serious changes in animal behavior. Shutting everything down, staying inside watching Netflix and pornography – the animals are moving back into our territory.

Coyotes are really awful creatures.

Still not as bad as pit bulls though. Nowhere near as good at eating babies as a pit bull.

Really, any man should be able to kill a coyote with his bare hands if we’re honest. But it’s still a pretty cool story, because most men don’t do it. And even if most men did do it, it would still be cool.

New York Post:

A hero New Hampshire father suffocated a coyote to death with his bare hands after the beast attacked his child on Monday, police said.

Ian O’Reilly was walking with his wife and three kids on a trail near Judes Pond in Kensington around 11 a.m. when the wild animal jumped out of the woods and grabbed the 2-year-old child by the jacket, cops said.

That’s when “the dad went into protection mode,” kicking the coyote before choking it, said Kensington Police Chief Scott Cain.

Ian O’Reilly of Kensington, NH, walked away from coyote attack w/ bite marks in arm, chest. Coyote did not survive. O’Reilly’s previous experience dealing w/ rabid animals #Boston25 AT 10/11 pic.twitter.com/HwJZF4HLeY

— Drew Karedes (@DrewKaredes) January 21, 2020

O’Reilly told local outlet WFXT that he was running on instinct and adrenaline when he wrestled the beast to the ground, eventually killing it after a 10-minute skirmish.

“There was no interest in it going away so ultimately I had to make the decision to become the aggressor and jumped on it, attacked it and was able to get it to the ground,” O’Reilly said.

“When I was able to get on top of it I put my hand around its snout so it wasn’t able to attack me anymore,” he recalled.

“From there… I shoved [its] head into the snow… and then eventually was able to expire it through suffocation,” he said. “Ultimately one hand on its windpipe and one hand on its snout did the trick.”

The dad was bitten in the arm and chest and is being treated for rabies as a precaution. The animal didn’t break the toddler’s skin thanks to his heavy-duty snowsuit.

Yeah, imagine a pit bull not being able to break through a snowsuit.

You can’t imagine it.

Why are they calling this an “accident”?

What does that mean?

The geese all at the same time accidentally stopped flying?

Fox News:

A gaggle of geese was found dead in a parking lot in Idaho Falls, Idaho, in what wildlife officials are calling a “freak accident.” The 51 birds were clumped together, soaking wet, as golf ball-sized hail rained down on them during a thunderstorm Saturday night.

But it’s not the hail that killed the birds as the migrated north, officials with the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) said — it’s most likely lightning that caused them to fall from the sky.

“I don’t think it was the hail or wind,” James Brower, regional volunteer services coordinator with IDFG, told Fox News. “Hail would have injured the geese. They’d still be alive. All of these were dead. When the officer arrived nothing was moving or twitching.”

IDFG officer Jacob Berl was the only officer to respond to the scene that night. He said the birds — 48 snow geese and three ross geese — were all centrally located within a 100-yard radius, which is further proof that lightning likely caused their deaths.

At any point in all of human history before like about a century ago, this would have been considered some type of horrible omen.

Of course, now we have science, so we don’t believe in omens anymore.

Just, you know – unexplainable “freak accidents” which just happen at random with no cause.

I recently wrote an essay endorsing the genocide of the pit bull race of dogs.

Now we have a man being charged with “harboring a vicious animal” after a festive Christmas Eve murder-mauling by his evil dog.

Fox News:

A Kentucky man has been accused of harboring a vicious animal after a Christmas Eve pit bull attack in which a woman was killed and her husband injured.

Bell County deputies determined after an investigation that the two pit bulls who “savagely attacked” Lorriane Saylor, 66, and her husband in Arjay Sunday morning belonged to their neighbor, Johnny Dale Lankford, 42.

Johnny Saylor manged to shoot the dogs afterward, killing one of them. The second dog, which was shot in the chest, ran off and wasn’t found until Monday afternoon, when deputies were notified that the dog had returned home. Deputies and an animal control officer put down the dog.

These dogs can take a bullet in the chest and stay on the run for a day.

Imagine that.

Lankford was told of the charge at the Bell County jail, where he is being held on separate charges of assault, domestic violence, unlawful imprisonment and an outstanding warrant. Those charges were brought in connection with an arrest Friday.

Records show Lankford was still locked up Tuesday in lieu of $25,000 bond.

Saylor died after suffering massive injuries to her neck, face and shoulder in the attack, WYMT-TV reported.

Johnny Saylor was attacked when he stepped outside to look for his wife.

“They had my brother halfway out the door, chewing on his arm,” James Saylor told the station.

He said he distracted the dogs long enough for his brother to run back inside and grab a gun.

Deputies said the Johnny Saylor shot the dogs with a .22 caliber pistol.

He was bitten on his head, arm and hand.

So, does this guy deserve these charges?

I’m not sure.

Everyone knows that these dogs are vicious and can attack humans at any moment. Because they were bred specifically for bear-baiting, a popular sport in Shakespearean England.

After bear-baiting was banned, they were used to fight each other in the popular sport of dog-fighting.

I assume that everyone who purchases one of these dogs knows that it is an inherently violent dog, indeed it is the nigger of dogs.

HOWEVER.

That having been said, I know a lot of people who own pit bulls and believe the standard lies about the nature of this evil dog-race. They believe “oh well, yes, they are often violent, but if you just love them, they won’t be.” Which is of course a coal-burner argument. But it is still the mainstream argument.

And coal-burners are not charged when their pets kill people. Maybe they should be.

So I’m torn as to whether or not this man deserves to be charged because his nigger-dogs killed someone.

I think this is ultimately the government’s job to regulate these animals, and it is shocking that they do not do that.

NB4 THIS IS ANALOGOUS TO GUN CONTROL

To kill someone with a gun you have to use it. Blaming guns for gun-crime is not a comparison here. This man did not tell the dog to kill this woman. In fact, there are many different dogs that will kill someone if you tell them to kill someone but that will not ever kill someone randomly.

Any of the dogs that are bred to be guard dogs are capable of killing someone if its master sics it on someone.

A doberman is twice the size of a pit bull and is capable of ripping someone’s throat out with just as much ease. So if someone owns a doberman and tells it to kill someone, that is the same as shooting someone.

Owning a pit bull is like owning a gun that is designed to float out of your house and shoot your neighbors randomly.

And this situation is like if the government allowed you to buy guns that are designed to float out and shoot people at random, while there was an entire industry claiming that guns that are designed to float out of your house and shoot people at random are not really dangerous.

So: you tell me.

Don’t watch this. It’s horrible. I wish I wouldn’t have watched it.

I am just including it so you understand what monsters these animals our country is being flooded with actually are.

The sickening kikes and their allies claim that they have the moral high-ground.

But their brown pets are torturing animals.

And of course, the torture of animals is a key aspect of the kike religion.

New York Post:

A California police department is investigating a gut-churning video posted to social media that shows a teen boy throwing a kitten across the street.

The graphic video, which lasts less than 10 seconds, was posted to Snapchat, the Ontario (Ca.) Police Department said in a statement.

Cops said a local 16-year-old, identified on the social media platform as “Charlie”, is the one believed to have lifted the animal with both hands before flinging it cruelly into the air.

The kitten was seen hitting the ground, clearly in shock and pain.

Although the suspect has yet to be found and arrested, cops say they located the cat’s owner.

“The kitten survived the incident, but did suffer an injured leg,” the agency said in a press release. “The Inland Valley Human Society is assisting with the investigation and the care of the injured animal.”

The cat’s owner, Perla, and her mother told NBC4 the video is too upsetting to watch.

The cat is a stray they found four months ago and named “Spots.”

The owner said she hopes the kitten tossing teen is charged with animal abuse.

He deserves a whole lot worse than that.

To be honest, someone who would do that to a cat doesn’t deserve to live, and in any normal society, he wouldn’t be allowed to.

I’m very glad Spots is okay.

But think of this next time someone calls you an evil Nazi for not wanting these filthy fucking savages in our country.

Think of Spots the cat.

Since the dawn of time – or at least since that black cube thing landed from space and made the monkeys start a war with each other – the world has wondered: who is the greater beast?

The nigger dawg?

Or the K-9 dog?

What if one beast was handcuffed and the other on a chain?

Who then would be the master?

And who would then be the mugu?

This bitch needs to learn how to drive.

How the shit do you crash yourself into a beach when you are a creature of this size?

I mean, I thought human women were stupid and incapable of driving, but this Whaless takes it to a whole other level.

These whales need some Whale Sharia to keep these bitches away from the shore and way out in the middle of the ocean where they belong.

Silly South Americans.  We in the civilized North America figured out apes were human beings following the civil war, nearly two centuries ago.

RT:

In an unprecedented decision, an Argentine court has ruled that the Sumatran orangutan ‘Sandra’, who has spent 20 years at the zoo in Argentina’s capital Buenos Aires, should be recognized as a person with a right to freedom.

The ruling, signed by the judges unanimously, would see Sandra freed from captivity and transferred to a nature sanctuary in Brazil after a court recognized the primate as a “non-human person” which has some basic human rights. The Buenos Aires zoo has 10 working days to seek an appeal.

The “habeas corpus” ruling in favor of the orangutan was requested last November by the Association of Professional Lawyers for Animal Rights (AFADA) alleging that Sandra suffered “unjustified confinement of an animal with proven cognitive ability.”

Lawyers argued that just as a person, the ape is capable of maintaining emotional ties and has the ability to reason, while feeling frustrated with her confinement. Furthermore, the legal team claimed that the 29-year old orangutan can make decisions, has self-awareness and perception of time. And therefore, all things considered, Sandra’s presence at the Zoo constituted illegal deprivation of liberty.

Habeas corpus is a fundamental legal term in human rights, dating back to the early fourteenth century during the reign of Edward I in England. At that time courts began requiring the monarchy to report the reasons behind restricted freedom of a subject.

“This opens the way not only for other Great Apes, but also for other sentient beings which are unfairly and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty in zoos, circuses, water parks and scientific laboratories,” the daily La Nacion newspaper quoted AFADA lawyer Paul Buompadre as saying.

Seriously here though – I did always feel bad for a lot of zoo animals.

I think some of them are way too intelligent to be in cages, or they are just suffering from it in a way that is unfair.  Obviously, most zoos now (in civilized countries) have moved into the angle that they are conservation organizations, protecting endangered species with captivity, and I think this is valid.

You know what isn’t unethical though: aquariums.  Fish could definitely care less.

They are also way more fun to look at.

Have you guys seen the one in Atlanta?

Bloody brilliant, mate.

Here we have a story involving a cat named Baz that through no fault of its own has a patch of black fur under its nose.  The feature looks reminiscent of Adolf Hitler’s mustache.

The owner of  the cat believes that this is what led to him being severely beaten and thrown into a bin left to die.

I cannot begin to comprehend why people would want to mistreat animals in such an inhumane manner.  Especially when it comes to cats and dogs.  These creatures can make wonderful companions for people if they are given love and affection.

Fortunately the cat survived, though short one eye.

ITV:

A cat who survived a brutal beating because he looks like Hitler has battled back from the brink of death to make a full recovery.

Baz, a seven-year-old moggy, has a distinctive patch of black hair under his nose like the Nazi dictator’s moustache.

He was found dumped in a bin and clinging to life with severe injuries and blinded in his left eye.

Owner Kirsty Sparrow, 26, fears the timid tomcat was targeted by cruel youths because of his unfortunate likeness.

But five months on black and white Baz has been nursed back to full health and is now brave brave enough to venture back outside thanks to his caring neighbours.

Whoever did this is sick.  People who do these types of things to animals for no reason are savages.  The German National Socialists were way ahead of their time in regards to the ethical treatment of animals.  They surely would not have approved of this incident regardless of what the cat looked like.