They’ve been doing it since 2019

The goofy thing is, I’ve not really seen any white male anger in response to what is going on with these women and coloreds. You’d think white men would be angry. But I haven’t seen it.

I’ve seen a lot of men going along with this nightmare world, and I’ve seen a few men rationally analyze it as totally non-viable in the longterm. The only right-wing personality I know as being really angry is Bill ORLY.

He is just a really angry, mean person in a cartoonish sort of way.

He got banned from the media for like, rape or whatever, and now he’s out white knighting for AOC and saying there should be a law against flirting with her. So maybe he’s not so angry anymore, or his anger has just been directed towards men who flirt with AOC – I don’t know.

I will say that I don’t think Bill O’Reilly is having a particularly important influence on society.

Campus Reform:

For the Fall 2022 semester, the history department at the University of Kansasis offering Angry White Male Studies as a course that will explore the “prominent figure” that is “the angry white male.”

“This course charts the rise of the ‘angry white male’ in America and Britain since the 1950s, exploring the deeper sources of this emotional state while evaluating recent manifestations of male anger,” the course description reads.

“Employing interdisciplinary perspectives this course examines how both dominant and subordinate masculinities are represented and experienced in cultures undergoing periods of rapid change connected to modernity as well as to rights-based movements of women, people of color, homosexuals and trans individuals,” it continues.

The instructor Christopher Forth writes in the description that the class will ask the following questions: “Where does he come from? What’s he angry about? Is his anger misplaced? Is he blaming the right people? How long has this been going on? Is he a global phenomenon? And how do we move forward?”

Christopher Forth

Forth is a professor of history and the Dean’s Professor of Humanities, serving in the departments of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and American Studies.

He and his class drew significant criticism from Kansas Congressman Ron Estes in 2019. Campus Reform previously reported on Estes’s comments regarding the course’s possible violation of Title IX.

Why is this asshole trying to empower women?

Instead of a course to unite people and empower women, KU has decided to offer a class that divides the student population and could pose a Title IX violation by creating a hostile campus environment based on gender. #ksleg https://t.co/XhUNfpFUcW

— Rep. Ron Estes (@RepRonEstes) April 3, 2019

Yeah, that’s what we need, Ron – more empowered women.

It’s not like that’s exactly what led us here.

It case you didn’t notice, I’m being sarcastic.

Empowered women are all angry, which is why they are making hate courses against men. People know this. Do you know any white women who you wouldn’t describe as “angry”? Black women are actually even worse somehow.

This isn’t serious at all, and any serious person should be able to immediately laugh it off as ridiculous. And by “this,” I mean the entire concept of removing white men from the societies they built.

“There’s nothing more frightening in America today than an angry White man,” reads a CNN headline.

You come into a country of white men. You take everything from white men, you take their country, their work, their money, their women. You then attack and abuse them, say they need to be removed from society. Then you start talking about how dangerous they are because they’re angry you did all those things to them.

This agenda to demonize white men is getting a big boost in the wake of Kyle Rittenhouse getting boosted up out of the jail.

Embittered negro John Blake writes for CNN:

The specter of the angry Black man has been evoked in politics and popular culture to convince White folks that a big, bad Black man is coming to get them and their daughters.

I’ve seen viral videos of innocent Black men losing their lives because of this stereotype. I’ve watched White people lock their car doors or clutch their purses when men who look like me approach. I’ve been racially profiled.

It’s part of the psychological tax you pay for being a Black man in America — learning to accept that you are seen by many as Public Enemy No. 1.

But as I’ve watched three separate trials about White male violence unfold across the US these past few weeks — the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, the Ahmaud Arbery death trial and the civil case against organizers of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville — I’ve come to a sobering conclusion:

There is nothing more frightening in America today than an angry White man.

It’s not the “radical Islamic terrorist” that I fear the most. Nor is it the brown immigrant or the fiery Black Lives Matter protester, or whatever the latest bogeyman is that some politician tells me I should dread.

It’s encountering an armed White man in public who has been inspired by the White men on trial in these three cases.

I’m not suggesting we start racially profiling White men. The vast majority of White men are no menace to society.

Countless White men swallowed tear gas and braved rubber bullets while marching with demonstrators during last year’s protests over the murder of George Floyd. Plenty of White men — like the Rev. James Reeb, a White Unitarian minister — died for Black people during the civil rights movement.

…

This angry White man has been a major character throughout US history. He gave the country slavery, the slaughter of Native Americans, and Jim Crow laws. His anger also helped fuel the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

It’s this angry White man — not the Black or brown man you see approaching on the street at night — who poses the most dangerous threat to democracy in America.

And it just goes on and on and on.

Here are few quotes from the rest of the article:

• “Angry White men have damaged democracy”
• “We have enough problems with White male violence as it is”
• “Mass shootings in the US are committed more often by White men than by any other group”
• “Top law enforcement officials now say the nation’s biggest domestic terror threat comes from White supremacists”
• “Trump’s rise to power is inconceivable without his ability to tap into White male anger and embody it”
• “White male anger could prove to be one of the biggest roadblocks we face in building a successful multiracial democracy”

There are no examples of successful multiracial democracies anywhere in history, but somehow John Blake knows that the road to his utopia is only being blocked by white men.

These people think that the most frightening thing in America is the kind of people who built America.

They can look at child trannies without uttering a single word in opposition.

But the moment they see a white man representing the true spirit of America, they lash out with gibberish.

Maureen Callahan, a forty-something White woman with a vendetta against White boys

The sheer contempt that White women have for young White men is absolutely staggering.

They’re sociopaths hell-bent on demeaning and degrading their own boys.

All of us have encountered this in the wild in the schools, universities and the Bed Bath & Beyond parking lots: the vicious middle-aged hag. This is what they write about us, given half the chance.

The Gilroy Garlic Gunman celebrated being half-Iranian and attacked “white twats” on his social media, but hey – he’s White enough to provoke a tirade against young White men and call for a crackdown on them.

Maureen Callahan writes for the New York Post:

Less than 24 hours after yet another mass shooting in America, the youngest fatalities a 6-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl, authorities said they were still seeking a motive.

It seems the 19-year-old shooter gave us one.

“Why are you doing this?” a witness heard someone shout.

The response:

“Because I’m really angry.”

From those mass shooters who have attacked the innocent before, we know it’s a specific strain of anger — deep, repressed, biblically vengeful — felt most commonly by young men, almost always white, who report feeling alienated, dispossessed, misunderstood, victimized and all too often rejected by women.

Go off, Queen! Tear into these ungrateful incels some more!

Little is known yet about this shooter’s history — and I refrain from using his name, since infamy is part of what these shooters seek — but so far, he fits the profile of those who’ve come before, the rage-induced young men we first encountered through Columbine and later Sandy Hook, Aurora, Charleston, Virginia Beach, the STEM school shooting in Colorado, Charlotte, the Poway synagogue shooting in California, the Louisiana shootings in two parishes, the Sebring shootings in Florida (those last six this year alone), the Mercy Hospital shooting, the Thousand Oaks shooting, the Tallahassee yoga studio shooting, the Jacksonville Landing shooting, the Art All Night shooting in New Jersey, the Santa Fe HS (Texas) shooting, the Nashville Waffle House shooting, the Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS shooting — and far too many more to mention, but all with one thing in common.

Some of these weren’t even done by Whites but by rando Latinos and Arabs. The Stoneman Douglas shooter was Jewish.

The ever-incubating mass shooter, these young men nurturing their anger through first-person shooter games, violent pornography, through racism and a fascination with guns and violence, is our greatest, most stubborn and pressing threat — more so, I would argue, than Islamic terrorism or Russian hacking or immigration or trade wars.

I’m holding my breath as I read this because it is a real deep dive into how a liberal hag thinks. See, she has no interest in actually understanding why young Whites – the most stigmatized members of our society – are starting to get mad. It’s all about dismissing their concerns and forcing attention away from the staggering stats surrounding non-White crime rates and poo-pooing the actual problems our society faces.

Blacks commit most of the mass shootings.

They shoot up their schools and their projects and their local IHOPs all the time. But we’re assured by the same hags that’s because of poverty and is more like a general cry for help that they periodically give off so that affluent White women can adopt them and bring them into their White neighborhoods.

White boys, on the other hand, can’t be sympathized or empathized with.

Last week, the nation celebrated one of humanity’s greatest triumphs — the moon landing, something once commonly believed couldn’t be done. Perhaps our next moon shot should, paradoxically, be more earthbound: a collective dedication, from the White House on down, to figuring out why young men in the world’s greatest, most prosperous country are so goddamn angry. 

First, she draws a link between mass shootings and white boys that doesn’t exist, then she says that this made-up problem is the biggest threat that the country faces. And then, of course, she demands that the White House (which is to blame, of course) do something about it.

Fat chance.

The truth is that while young men are angry, they’re not exactly popping off at random people.

Most of them are just biding their time.