Indians are not offended by being called “Indians.” They all identified by their tribal name anyway, so which word is used to distinguish them from white men is not important to them. They say this themselves.

“Native American” is not better anyway, as neither “Native” nor “American” are their own words.

CNN:

A location in Arizona’s Grand Canyon National Park is getting rid of its “offensive” name.

Indian Garden, a popular stop along the park’s Bright Angel Trail, will now be called Havasupai Gardens.

The name change is an effort to right a historic wrong. Members of the Havasupai tribe, who had been there for generations, were removed from the inner rim canyon area by the National Park Service’s policies nearly 100 years ago.

Yeah, because they were getting drunk and throwing trash everywhere!

They were turning a beautiful place into a big mess!

Afterward, the area the Havasupai referred to as Ha’a Gyoh became known as Indian Garden.

“The Grand Canyon National Park team was proud to work alongside the Havasupai Tribal Council in our joint effort to rename this culturally significant location,” Ed Keable, the park’s superintendent, said in a statement.

“The Havasupai people have actively occupied this area since time immemorial, before the land’s designation as a national park and until the park forcibly removed them in 1926. This renaming is long overdue. It is a measure of respect for the undue hardship imposed by the park on the Havasupai people.”

Yeah, okay faggot.

They are not letting the Indians move back in though.

Obviously, Indians don’t care what white people call their spot. What they would presumably want – if they want anything – is to move back in.

Once again, you can see clearly: political correctness is not about helping nonwhites, it is about hurting whites. In this case, it’s about harassing whites with guilt over what they supposedly did to the Indians.

As anyone who has read any of the old books about these Indians knows, there was no choice but to physically remove them.

They were absurdly stupid, violent, and cruel, like goblins. They did not have any military goals other than to kill, which made them totally impossible to negotiate with. When they signed treaties, they just immediately broke them because they didn’t understand the concept. I’ve read all these books from before 1930. I used to pay a lot of money for them. They’re not even available on the internet, from what I’ve seen, because whoever scans these books doesn’t want you to know what’s in them.

These Indians were simply outrageous. Like literal goblins, or worse – kobolds.

The Indians would cut a man’s guts open, pull out his intestines, and hang him from a tress by his own entrails while he was still alive. Indians invented scalping. They would very regularly burn entire groups of white prisoners alive. It was a circus of brutality.

Buffalo Bill was right. The only solution to the Indian problem was alcohol. That was the only thing that made them relax and stop murdering, kidnapping, and torturing.

If it wouldn’t have been for alcohol, we would have had to kill them all.

What are these people whining about now?

What does “expect us” even mean?

RT:

A statue of seventh US President Andrew Jackson that stands outside the White House was vandalized by activists on Indigenous Peoples’ Day, with the words “expect us” spray-painted in red onto its plinth.

Indigenous activists protested President Joe Biden’s administration outside of the White House on Monday, where they called for greater protections for the environment and an end to the use of fossil fuels.

On the same day, a statue of former Democratic President Andrew Jackson – which sits directly opposite of the White House – was vandalized with red paint. The words “expect us” were sprayed onto the side of the statue, along with red handprints, and protesters also reportedly chanted “respect us or expect us!”

Current View: Andrew Jackson statue in Lafayette Square, outside of White House, Washington DC pic.twitter.com/6g65y3wmUr

— Paul Farber (@paul_farber) October 11, 2021

The Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN) took credit for the vandalism, claiming in a statement that the graffiti was a “message” specifically for Biden and that the red paint was meant to symbolize blood “to represent the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women epidemic all over the statue of the genocidal President.”

The group said the action comes on the heels of “900 water protectors and land defenders arrested trying to stop Enbridge’s Line 3” – a planned pipeline expansion from Canada to the US. The statement warned Biden that indigenous Americans “are older than the idea of the United States of America” and they “will continue to fight for the natural and spiritual knowledge of our Mother who sustains our life-ways.”

“We carry the prayers and intentions of our ancestors and are unafraid,” the IEN concluded. “Another world is possible, may all colonizers fall.”

On Twitter, the group boasted that the statue had been “redecorated.”

“Today is #IndigenousPeoplesDay & don’t get it twisted, colonization is not over,” it wrote, adding that native people are “still fighting settler violence via fossil fuel extraction across Turtle Island!”

None of this is coherent, even by brown people standards.

It’s just a mish-mash of Jew-implanted narratives about “muh colonizers” and “muh genocide,” topped up with some gibberish about how injuns care about the environment (and whites presumably don’t).

If injuns care about the environment, they should start by cleaning up their reservations, which are always filled with trash.

Very disrespectful.

Well, here’s something that no-one could have predicted.

Some Californians decided to rent out a large teepee using the popular rental site, Airbnb, and a bunch of Red Indians managed to sober up enough to get out of bed, shuffle to their computers and whine about it on social media.

Daily Mail:

Airbnb apologized this week after being accused of committing an act of cultural appropriation stemming from an ad for a weekend rental property in California consisting of a ‘Sioux-style’ teepee.

The Facebook post, which has since been deleted, featured a photo of a mother standing with her two children in front of a large Native American-style tent, situated in a rugged landscape.

…

Native American activists quickly seized on the ad, accusing the online rental marketplace of promoting age-old racist stereotypes to make a profit, as BuzzFeed News first reported.

I’m not even sure where to begin with this one.

Firstly, the primitive dwelling we call a “teepee” was used (with certain structural variations) by numerous other groups before the Indians. Since Indians never evolved beyond hunting and gathering, however, the dwelling (and their name for it) became associated with them.

Secondly, Indians are Asian mongrels that have no claim to either the American continent or the First World nation that Whites built on top of it. The Solutrean hypothesis also shows that White people roamed the continent before them. Therefore, Indians are neither “Native” nor “American.”

Thirdly, there was a war between Indians and Whites, and Whites won. We had every right to exterminate them after our victory, but we decided to give them free everything instead while the true descendants of this nation, White people, lead lives of constant stress and financial worry.

In other words, they should shut the fuck up about everything.

‘Folks want to be us with the “comforts of a master bedroom” but don’t want to deal with the actual consequences of being Native,’ tweeted Dr Adrienne Keene, a professor at Brown University, the author of the blog Native Appropriations and a member of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma.

As soon as I read this paragraph, I thought to myself, “I bet that’s a White woman larping as an Indian.”

A few seconds of research on Google and BOOM:

This “squaw” is almost as unconvincing as those blonde Australians who claim to be Aborigines.

Actually, it wouldn’t surprise me if most of the critics were White liberals with their “muh 1/16th Cherokee” nonsense. Unless the government threatens to cancel their welfare checks, real Indians are unlikely to rise up for anything.

“Mffggffgfhgfh” – An actual Indian, when asked for his opinion on the Airbnb ad.

Of course, niggers joined in too. Any opportunity to attack the race that gave them electricity.

Nick Papas, a spokesperson for Airbnb, released a written statement to the Daily Mail on Tuesday that read: ‘We should not have used this language and we want to apologize to everyone for our poor judgement. We have deleted these posts.’

Yet another soft, cucky response from a White beta faggot. Just tell the Indians to go back to Mongolia on canoes, Nick, it would be much funnier and business will flourish.

In fact, this should be the strategy of all White businesses during the next decade or so: openly declaring themselves White Supremacist. Yeah, security costs will increase, but the media coverage will attract a huge number of White customers that will remain loyal forevermore.

Whites are getting sick of this nonsense and are craving sanctuaries from it.

If Indians – real Indians from India – can build Neo-Nazi businesses, we can too.

A history lesson from our friend weev.

The Injun people are at one with nature.  But they need shekels for firewater like the rest of us.

Yahoo Travel:

It almost sounds like a joke — a mall in the Grand Canyon? But a company called Developers Confluence Partners has proposed building a $1 billion entertainment complex on the east rim of the Grand Canyon that has created an uproar.

Called the Grand Canyon Escalade, the developers refer to the project as a “tourism destination development” that will include shopping, an IMAX theater, multiple hotels, and an RV park. It’s all centered around a Gondola Tramway, designed to take travelers “from the rim of the Grand Canyon to an elevated Riverwalk on the Canyon floor.”

An action group called Sum Of Us is having none of it and has started an online petition to fight the development, which has reached 90,000 supporters — 10,000 people away from its 100,000 goal. According to the petition, the tram is being built in a “sacred place for the Navajo.“

But members of the local Navajo Nation support the development, claiming that it will create jobs — and even plan to put $65 million toward infrastructure surrounding the project, NBC News reported.

Here is the official page outlining the Injun plot to turn the Grand Canyon into a sacred mall, where the Pale Man is invited to smoke an electronic peace pipe before watching the latest offering of Pixar in crisp 3D with surround sound which makes you believe you are actually inside a story of toys.

The Kali Yuga is consumerism.

Above is a 1911 poster entitled “The Five Races of Man,” originally printed as an illustration for a Dresden-based magazine.  Because, yes, there was a time not all too long ago when people were allowed to acknowledge the existence of distinct races of mankind, which not only look completely different, but behave in vastly different ways, maintaining vastly different character traits.

Simply looking at this image, where the features of these races are accurately portrayed in an aesthetically pleasing fashion, we see that this idea of “race doesn’t exist” is utter nonsense.  It is akin to saying “dogs don’t exist, they’re all just wolves.”

The sixth race is the one which told us none of the other five exist, and that is the Jew.  The Jew is not actually a race, but a mixture of the different races (well, a mixture of the lower three – I don’t think he is mixed with Abos or Injuns).  Alfred Rosenberg referred to the Jew as an “anti-race,” and it appears that by its own nature as a non-race, it is inherently opposed to all races, and thus seeks to sow discord between them.

The funny thing is, it is only the European man which has accepted this idea that “race doesn’t exist.”  None of the other races on earth are so driven by idealism as to be willing to accept such utterly nonsensical gibberish.

I am not really sure how I feel about the “White people are the new Indians” meme, given that I don’t really care that Whites displaced the Indians to make room for our civilization.

That said, it does seem like a very workable analogy, which can be useful for propaganda purposes.

I think the above image makes our point in a way that other arguments may not, especially to a certain segment of the population which would otherwise be difficult for us to appeal to.

A new study conducted by professor Anne Stone, of Arizona State University, suggests to us that White people have no need to feel guilty about the alleged killing of the majority of American Indians with diseases.

Professor Stone studied the strains of tuberculosis found on the bones of seals and sea lions in Peru, and concluded that sea creatures traveling from Africa to South America carried the tuberculosis that wiped out many American Indians.

The theory is that animals in Africa, or most likely humans, passed tuberculosis on to sea lions and seals which then swam across to South America, infecting humans on the coast with the disease.

The researchers believe that once tuberculosis spread into South America, it was carried up into North America.

“What we found was really surprising. The ancient strains are distinct from any known human-adapted tuberculosis strain,” said professor Stone.

“We found that the tuberculosis strains were most closely related to strains in seals and sea lions.”

“Our results show unequivocal evidence of human infection caused by sea lions and seals in pre-Columbian South America.”

“Within the past 2,500 years, the marine animals likely contracted the disease from an African host species and carried it across the ocean to coastal people in South America.”

The team looked at human skeletons from Peru, dated 750 AD to 1350 AD, and found that people back then already had tuberculosis.

Also, the team looked at the DNA strains of the disease. They confirmed that some American Indians died of European diseases, but that was nothing compared to tuberculosis which was already well established.

Anti-Whites love to guilt-trip White people for things like this, and as usual, science and history ends up disproving most of what they say.

They want us to hate ourselves so that White genocide can go full steam ahead. If we hate ourselves, it’s easier for them to flood us with millions of non-White immigrants, and force us to accept “diversity”, or in other words, make it illegal for a place to be “too White”.

Originally published February 28, 1988

The problem with some of our accounts of history is that they have been manipulated to fit conclusions not borne out by facts. Nothing could be more intellectually dishonest. This is about a vivid case in point.

Congress recently passed a bill, later approved by President Reagan, to memorialize as a National Historic Trail what both professional and amateur historians call the Cherokee Indian Trail of Tears. The trail is the route by which the Cherokees moved west from their Georgia-Tennessee-Carolinas homeland into what is now Oklahoma.

The act caused a spate of articles about how the Cherokees lost 4,000 or more dead on a terrible trek, described as a “forced” march, presumably indicating they were prodded by bullet and bayonet as they moved during the hard winter of 1837-38.

The oddities are: 1) Voluminous records, including those of the Cherokee nation itself, show no loss approaching 4,000 (an actual figure of about 840 deaths was bad enough); 2) The word “forced” insults the Cherokees because they conducted their own march, paid for by Washington; 3) The phrase “Trail of Tears” was never used by a Cherokee in the 1830s, but came into existence under other circumstances some 70 years later.

How could such distortions have become embedded in accounts of a publicly debated episode with loud political overtones? Approaching that question requires some background.

Cherokee removal was part of the enforcement of U.S. law and policy.

Years before, President Thomas Jefferson had advocated removing Indians out of reach of rapidly oncoming white settlement. In 1802, the United States had guaranteed Georgia it would wipe out Indian title to lands in that state.

Congress finally enacted, effective in 1830, a law decreeing the transfer of all eastern Indians to open lands west of the Mississippi River. Some Indians had already gone there.

Those in favor of the policy, led by Presidents Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, held that this was the only way to prevent white settlers from exterminating the Indians. Those against, mainly Whig Party opponents of Jacksonian democracy and eastern Protestant religionists, said it was simply a case of land-hungry whites stealing Indian lands.

With much political help but no success, the Cherokees, one of the major Indian tribes, delayed their own removal until the United States sent the military to round up their members from their hill-country homes in preparation to going west.

The Cherokees were a mixed lot. Their chief, John Ross, was only one-eighth Indian. A 1835 census showed 23 percent of the tribe had white blood. The Cherokee elite kept black slaves, as did leaders of other advanced southern Indian tribes. The Cherokees had adopted their own constitution, a move their opponents said violated the U.S. Constitution.

Ross gave up the fight after some 5,000 Cherokees had gone ahead, many at their own request, some with military escort, and made a deal with Gen. Winfield Scott. Under the agreement, the remaining Cherokees would move themselves, under their own leadership, hiring their own help, using money advanced by the United States.

The Cherokees employed doctors for each group. One was Elizur Butler, a resident medical missionary who worked for the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), a Harvard-based Protestant group.

Back from his own effort, and before the last parties had even reached western Indian territory, Butler reported to the ABCFM the 4,000 deaths figure, which he said was “not extravagant.” His letter is on file at Harvard.

An ABCFM history published in 1840 picked up Butler’s figure, which Butler himself stated was based on hearsay and guesswork. From there the figure started on its way to historic gospel.

Cherokee removal was investigated by Congress to an extent that can be believed only by reading the Congressional Record. Some reports run to hundreds of pages. The written military record exists in detail in U.S. archives. Nothing like an extravagant death toll among the Cherokees exists. Butler is the sole source for such a conclusion. No historian mentions that.

In the Cherokee nation’s own files, now on deposit in the Gilcrease Institute in Tulsa, the number of Indians departing the East in 13 main parties is recorded at 12,623, the arrivals West at 12,783. Some stragglers joined on the way. American military counts are almost the same. The Cherokees were being paid per Indian moved.

T. Hartley Crawford, head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, reported on Aug. 6, 1840, in a private communication to the secretary of war that the death toll among the 13 groups was 447. He also said that Lewis Ross, John Ross’ brother, who was supplier to the movement, made a large profit. Historians have never used the Crawford document or, for that matter, the Cherokee documents.

Other deaths, raising the total to more than 800, took place in parties outside the main groups and were carefully reported to the U.S. government. John Ross never made unusual claims for deaths, although he returned to Washington repeatedly after 1838 seeking more money.

The phrase “Trail of Tears” entered the story much later. In 1958, Gaston Litton, former archivist at the University of Oklahoma, attributed it to a remark by a Choctaw Indian to a Baptist preacher about an Indian Territory road. It reached print for the first time in 1908, 70 years after the exodus, when all the participants were dead.

From then on it spread like an advertising slogan, as if it came from the mouths of the 1830-40 Cherokee Indians who had never heard or used it.

Indian outrage at removal is understandable. So, too, is opposition to the policy on moral or political grounds or out of sympathy for the Indians. The Cherokees were well-paid. Actual removal costs ran $2.9 million and by 1849 had gone up another $3 million. In today’s money that would be billions.

The Cherokee removal episode seems to need some historic revision.

I, who have spent more than 20 years researching it, doubt anyone will bother. It is too good a story as it stands and too well-fixed to disturb. That makes it all the more dishonest.