I don’t understand what this is or why we’re reporting on it.

We apparently just report on completely irrelevant shit no one even understands now.

I guess.

The Guardian:

New research claims that exposure to outdoor light at night may increase the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease, especially in people under the age of 65.

The researchers who conducted the study, funded by a National Institutes of Health grant and published in the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience on Friday, said they have found correlations between areas of the US with excessive exposure to artificial light at night and the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease.

Actually, maybe this is relevant.

Andrew Anglin has talked a lot about the risks of artificial light, particularly the new forms of really shitty light.

You know, an old fashioned lightbulb was basically like a candle. Now with fluorescent light, LED light, and whatever else they have, you’re basking in a chemical glow.

Obviously this causes health problems.

How could it not?

In the US, at least 19 states have legislation in place aimed at reducing light pollution, but the authors of the study say that despite this, the “levels of light at night remain high in many parts of the country”.

While “streetlights, roadway lighting, and illuminated signs can deter crime, make roads safer, and enhance landscaping”, undisrupted light, however, “comes with ecological, behavioral, and health consequences”, the authors said.

Behavioral.

Note that.

For this study, the researchers evaluated Alzheimer’s disease prevalence by looking at the average nighttime light intensity by state and county in the US from 2012 to 2018, using satellite-acquired light pollution data and Medicare data reports of Alzheimer’s prevalence. They also incorporated medical data about variables known or believed to be risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease into their analysis, they said.

While conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and others were associated more strongly with Alzheimer’s disease prevalence than nighttime light intensity, the authors said that nighttime light was more strongly associated with Alzheimer’s disease prevalence than “alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease, depression, heart failure, and obesity”.

Wow, really?

Firstly, alcohol abuse is totally safe.

But it’s worse than obesity?

You have to wonder about these studies. Personally, I would not be surprised if fake light causes obesity. Or rather, contributes to it.

For people under 65, nighttime light exposure was more strongly associated with Alzheimer’s prevalence than any other disease factor examined in the study.

“This could suggest that younger people may be particularly sensitive to the effects of light exposure at night,” the researchers said.

…

Samuel Gandy, an Alzheimer’s researcher at Mount Sinai in New York, said the general findings of the new study made sense, as “light controls circadian rhythm and that controls sleep”, he said, adding that for Alzheimer’s, “bad sleep increases the risk”.

Living in an area with more intense outdoor light at night is associated with shorter sleep duration, increased daytime sleepiness and dissatisfaction with sleep quality, the study states.

This is not a small problem.

This is yet another reason why it is much better to live in a rural area than in an urban hellscape.

“Type 2 diabetes risk was higher in people exposed to brighter night light, and in people exposed to light patterns that may disrupt circadian rhythms. Avoidance of light at night could be a simple and cost-effective recommendation that mitigates risk of diabetes, even in those…

— ⚡️ The Blue Light Diet ⚡️ (@BlueLightDiet) June 6, 2024

The Europeans are going along with this global warming bullshit, but they’re also talking about the chemicals.

The Americans won’t talk about the chemicals at all. The American government is too corrupt, too indebted to these chemical corporations. And they don’t want to distract from the global warming bullshit, because they’re all getting rich off windmills.

But the Europeans will talk about it.

Dutch News:

Cases of people with Parkinson’s disease are exploding worldwide, with a 30% increase in the Netherlands over the past 10 years, a new study based on data contributed by hundreds of doctors has shown.

The research, published in the Lancet medical magazine, shows 11.8 million people now have Parkinson’s compared to 6.2 million only five years before.

The number of Parkinson’s sufferers has doubled over the last 25 years and it is expected to have doubled again by 2040.

In the Netherlands the number of patients has risen by 30% in the last ten years and incidences may be accelerating, Radboud teaching hospital neurologist Bas Bloem told broadcaster NOS.

There’s a very big increase in young people with Parkinson’s

“In the last four years, the number of diagnoses at five of the hospitals we are working with has risen by 25%,” he told the broadcaster.

Bloem said the new report, which he says may underestimate the number of sufferers, is “poignant”. “Parkinson’s is one of the most cruel things that can happen to people. It affects motor functions, you can’t think clearly, sex, peeing and pooing and sleeping become more difficult,” he said.

In another recent study, Bloem together with an American colleague, explored the link between Parkinson’s and pollution, particularly from the large scale use of pesticides in agriculture.

European research led by Wageningen University showed that 42% of Dutch farmland has excessive levels of nitrogen and phosphates, in addition to widespread contamination with pesticide compounds. Research is also ongoing into a higher incidence of Parkinson’s in the bulb growing areas in the Netherlands.

“I am convinced Parkinson’s is a man-made disease,” Bloem said. The introduction of extremely neurotoxic pesticides such as the now banned Paraquat in the 1970s probably marked the start of what is now an explosion of cases, he said.

Saying Parkinson’s is “man-made” is pretty hardcore.

I think it’s true. It seems true. Most of these diseases are manmade.

I don’t believe any of this shit.

His son’s dead, but he still makes sure to inform us he’s not an anti-vaxer.

Don’t worry, we already figured out you’re not an anti-vaxer, because if you were your kid wouldn’t be dead.

Life Site News:

Toronto resident Dan Hartman testified to the Toronto City Council on Tuesday that he believes that the Pfizer jab killed his 17-year-old son, Sean.

Hartman explained that his son experienced a bad reaction to his first shot, and just over a month later was dead.

The grieving father said that an autopsy for his son showed a “slightly enlarged heart,” but that the cause of death was “unascertained.” Hartman says that a doctor who has viewed the autopsy told him that he believes the COVID shot killed his son.

“I know in my heart and soul, I believe the second pathologist that the vaccine killed my son,” he said. “It’s not rare as everyone thinks it is. It’s happening; it’s on Twitter every day, people dying from this. I’m not an anti-vaxxer at all, I’m really not, but I think there is something wrong with this one.”

The Board of Health of the Toronto City Council gathered for a virtual meeting to discuss the city’s response to COVID-19 on Tuesday. The meeting was open to the public and included scheduled speakers from the public who gave their opinion on the municipal government’s handling of the declared pandemic.

“My son played hockey… since he was eight years old,” Hartman told those present at the meeting.

“He took a year off for COVID and he got extremely bored sitting in his bedroom. He decided to go back to hockey this year, and to do that he had to have a vaccination to play hockey,” Hartman continued.

“He got his first shot of Pfizer on August 25,” he continued. “Went to the hospital on August 29 with a bad reaction, he got sent home with only a prescription for Advil, he had a rash all over his neck and face and brown circles around his eyes.”

Mr. Hartman then described his son’s death following his reaction to the Pfizer shot: “On the morning of September 27 his mother found him dead on the floor beside his bed.”

“All he wanted to do was play hockey.”

Mr. Hartman explained that after his son died suddenly, an autopsy was done and found the cause of death in his son to be “unascertained.” Only two percent of autopsies have that conclusion.

However, the autopsy found a “slightly enlarged heart,” but no diagnosis of a heart condition was given at that time.

Not satisfied with the results of the first autopsy, Hartman sought a second opinion and sent the autopsy report to “a second well-known pathologist in Canada who wants to remain anonymous for fear of losing his job.”

…

Hartman explained to the council as part of the January 17 meeting that his teenage son had ultimately received the jab in order to play hockey, due to proof of vaccination requirements that were put in place by minor hockey associations across the Province of Ontario. Players aged 12 and older were required to show proof of an experimental COVID jab in order to play, even though the provincial government at the time did not require those under 18 to do so.

He then questioned “how safe this is, and why no deaths are being reported… nobody ever talks about deaths, and it is happening, more than anyone knows, and it is just being denied and silenced.”

Hartman was asked about what his next steps would be after hearing from the pathologist that it was believed that the vaccine killed his son. “I’m not allowed to sue Pfizer for some reason,” he said, and “that in itself tells me they knew people were going to die and they are just immune from any accountability.”

Dan Harman has a Twitter account where he shares memories of his son and where other people who have experienced a lost loved one due a vaccine complication can share their stories.

Yeah well, he’s not going to have a Twitter account for long.

The Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective, and killing people doesn’t change that. Everyone dies, okay? He would have died a lot worse from coronavirus had he not died from the vaccine.

At the escape room. Another fun day 😭😭😭💔💔💔 I love you Sean. pic.twitter.com/XUFbJ2Ew2i

— Answers4Sean (@Answers4Sean) January 10, 2022

Wut? pic.twitter.com/lT2ScE4gpS

— Richard “Dick” Whitman ∞/21M (@DWhitmanBTC) October 25, 2021

I don’t usually talk to computers, but the one time I did he said: “if you’re on the train and they say ‘portal bridge,’ you know you’d better make other plans.”

I nodded solemnly and continued to carry on.

That's what I thought I was hearing but it didn't make any sense. Now that I see it written down, the grammar makes sense but it's like the words don't mean anything

— w0606168 🌱🚲 (@w0606168) October 25, 2021

I’m pretty sure his writers were trying to make a joke that the locals would know.

‘Computer’ is probably ‘commuter’. He just says what he thinks he sees, Ron Burgundy style. Nevermind that it doesn’t make sense.

— Stephen Dunleavy (@SteveDunleavy) October 25, 2021

It’s almost like they want us to see it…to let us know he’s not the one in charge

— Richard “Dick” Whitman ∞/21M (@DWhitmanBTC) October 25, 2021

Interesting theories about the origins of Portal Bridge.

My running theory is that the people behind The Biden think this is funny. They’re humiliating us. It’s a continuation of this Emperor has No Clothes mass joke.