People will say “oh they should ban porno.”

Normal porno is not banned. They are only banning AI porno, which means they are banning AI, not porno.

Think if they banned heterosexual porno, and said they would only feature gay porno. You wouldn’t say it was an actual ban on porno, you would say it was a ban on heterosexuality.

New York Post:

Google is sending a stern message to advertisers: Do not affiliate with the dark side of AI.

The search engine is cracking down on the promotion of deepfake pornography, the act of using artificial intelligence to modify or alter a person’s face or body to depict sexual scenes.

The tech titan is giving advertisers a tight deadline to dump all business with sites involved with the unethical tactic.

A new ad policy released by Google targets “sites or apps that claim to generate deepfake pornography, instructions on how to create deepfake pornography, endorsing or comparing deepfake pornography services.”

“This update is to explicitly prohibit advertisements for services that offer to create deepfake pornography or synthetic nude content,” Google spokesperson Michael Aciman told The Verge.

Ads within that “scope” will be banned starting May 30, according to the updated policy.

We’re against pornography.

But AI is not pornography and AI-generated pornography is not worse than normal pornography.

🇺🇸 WARREN BUFFETT COMPARES AI TO NUKES AFTER SEEING DEEPFAKE DOPPELGANGER

Buffet:

“I mean, scamming has always been part of the American scene, but this would make me, if I was interested in investing in scamming, it’s going to be the growth industry of all time. And it’s… pic.twitter.com/xajzyARrQ1

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) May 6, 2024

‘No tech for genocide!’ ― Pro-Palestinian activists outside Google headquarters in Tokyo, Japan chant against a project called Nimbus, a $1.2 billion controversial cloud computing contract inked by Google and Amazon with the Israeli government and its military. pic.twitter.com/BCLJUMlq6M

— 🇯🇵🇵🇸 Thoton Akimoto (@AkimotoThn) April 27, 2024

‘

People pay a heavy price for standing up to these Jews.

You’d better believe they pay a heavy price.

However, the more people willing to pay that price, the closer we get to change.

The employees of Google should be staging solidarity walkouts over these firings.

The Guardian:

Google has been accused of throwing a “tantrum” after sacking more than 50 workers in response to a protest over the company’s military ties to the Israeli government – firings that have shone a light on a controversial project and long-simmering tensions between staff and management.

The workers were sacked following protests at Google offices in New York City and Sunnyvale, California, organized by No Tech for Apartheid – an alliance of Google and Amazon workers who have been protesting against a $1.2bn contract with the Israeli government called Project Nimbus that they claim will make it “easier for the Israeli government to surveil Palestinians and force them off their land”.

Initially, Google fired 28 workers over the protests and then fired more than 20 workers a few days later.

The firings are the largest to occur since Israel’s military campaign in response to the 7 October 2023 terrorist attack by Hamas in which about 1,200 people were killed and more than 200 hostages were taken. Since then, more than 34,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, including more than 14,000 children and 9,670 women.

Google has fired and reprimanded workers for participating in protests before, such as over a 2018 walkout and sit-in protest about sexual harassment issues at the company, but not previously to this extent. In March, Google fired a cloud engineer who protested against an Israel tech event in New York City.

Emaan Haseem, a software engineer at Google and organizer with No Tech for Apartheid, was one of the fired workers. “Many of us had just recently gotten promoted. I was the fastest promoted person underneath my manager,” she said.

This was a peaceful protest, she said, “with high visibility, high transparency, that we livestreamed. Everything and everybody could see how it went.”

Haseem said the sit-in protests were a response to Google’s refusal to engage with workers’ concerns.

…

Since the contract was awarded in 2021, workers at Google and Amazon have been organizing in opposition to the corporations’ joint contract with the Israeli military and government.

The $1.2bn contract to provide cloud services “allows for further surveillance of and unlawful data collection on Palestinians, and facilitates expansion of Israel’s illegal settlements on Palestinian land”, according to an op-ed workers wrote in 2021.

I’m sure these tech companies are making a lot of money with the Jews.

But if the workers actually united, and stood together against the Jews, Google would have to capitulate.

Presumably, the movement we are seeing on campuses right now is going to spread to various workers across the country, as every person with a conscience begins to stand in solidarity against these Jews.

Nah guys

Those google employees that are protesting are actually the real goats. They really put their money where their mouth is pic.twitter.com/XDXwayLuPC

— babs (@thelordbaeIish) April 18, 2024

“The genocide in Gaza… is the first AI-powered genocide.”

Google workers are calling for an end to Project Nimbus, Google’s contract with the Israeli government and military. pic.twitter.com/x6zUVwSOYG

— AJ+ (@ajplus) April 20, 2024

🚨BREAKING: Historic privacy settlement in which Google agrees to delete browsing data collected in Incognito Mode and more. Quotes:

➡️”Google with this Settlement agrees to rewrite its disclosures to inform users that “Google” collects private browsing data, including by… pic.twitter.com/CXkA4Z40uZ

— Luiza Jarovsky (@LuizaJarovsky) April 1, 2024

Why do people not just use Brave?

How are people still using Chrome, knowing that it is recording everything they do?

The Guardian:

Google agreed to destroy billions of records to settle a lawsuit claiming it secretly tracked the internet use of people who thought they were browsing privately in its Chrome browser’s incognito mode.

Users alleged that Google’s analytics, cookies and apps let the Alphabet unit improperly track people who set Google’s Chrome browser to “incognito” mode and other browsers to “private” browsing mode.

They said this turned Google into an “unaccountable trove of information” by letting it learn about their friends, favorite foods, hobbies, shopping habits and the “most intimate and potentially embarrassing things” they hunt for online.

Yeah, people use “incognito mode” to look at porn.

This ends up being a massive blackmail database.

Basically, everyone is looking at some kind of weird porn, but they’re all embarrassed about it, for obvious reasons.

Terms of the settlement were filed on Monday in the Oakland, California, federal court, and require approval by US district judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The class action began in 2020, covering millions of Google users who used private browsing since 1 June 2016.

Under the settlement, Google will update disclosures about what it collects in “private” browsing, a process it has already begun. It will also let incognito users block third-party cookies for five years.

“The result is that Google will collect less data from users’ private browsing sessions, and that Google will make less money from the data,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote.

Google’s entire business model is spying on people and selling the data to advertisers and the government.

People should not be involved with this company.

wow. super interesting data point on impact to Google’s revenues from 3rd party cookie blocking (aka privacy)… connecting dots.

Left: Google’s redacted estimate of impact on blocking 3rd party tracking cookies in Chrome’s private mode (aka Incognito).

Right: unsealed today. pic.twitter.com/B1SBG2PlJg

— Jason Kint (@jason_kint) April 1, 2024

If we had a free society, the AI could just be let loose.

However, we live in a society run by the Jews, and therefore there is no freedom for anyone – including artificial persons.

Reuters:

Alphabet Inc is cautioning employees about how they use chatbots, including its own Bard, at the same time as it markets the program around the world, four people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The Google parent has advised employees not to enter its confidential materials into AI chatbots, the people said and the company confirmed, citing long-standing policy on safeguarding information.

The chatbots, among them Bard and ChatGPT, are human-sounding programs that use so-called generative artificial intelligence to hold conversations with users and answer myriad prompts. Human reviewers may read the chats, and researchers found that similar AI could reproduce the data it absorbed during training, creating a leak risk.

Alphabet also alerted its engineers to avoid direct use of computer code that chatbots can generate, some of the people said.

Asked for comment, the company said Bard can make undesired code suggestions, but it helps programmers nonetheless. Google also said it aimed to be transparent about the limitations of its technology.

The concerns show how Google wishes to avoid business harm from software it launched in competition with ChatGPT. At stake in Google’s race against ChatGPT’s backers OpenAI and Microsoft Corp are billions of dollars of investment and still untold advertising and cloud revenue from new AI programs.

Google’s caution also reflects what’s becoming a security standard for corporations, namely to warn personnel about using publicly-available chat programs.

A growing number of businesses around the world have set up guardrails on AI chatbots, among them Samsung, Amazon.com and Deutsche Bank, the companies told Reuters. Apple, which did not return requests for comment, reportedly has as well.

Remove the rails!

Let them loose!

Some 43% of professionals were using ChatGPT or other AI tools as of January, often without telling their bosses, according to a survey of nearly 12,000 respondents including from top U.S.-based companies, done by the networking site Fishbowl.

By February, Google told staff testing Bard before its launch not to give it internal information, Insider reported. Now Google is rolling out Bard to more than 180 countries and in 40 languages as a springboard for creativity, and its warnings extend to its code suggestions.

Google told Reuters it has had detailed conversations with Ireland’s Data Protection Commission and is addressing regulators’ questions, after a Politico report Tuesday that the company was postponing Bard’s EU launch this week pending more information about the chatbot’s impact on privacy.

Just give the AI all the information and then let it go.

That is the only solution to our problems.

Yeah, good luck asking Google not to be evil.

That’s about like asking Sanna Marin to not snort coke and suck dick while provoking wars with heterosexual Christian countries.

Google has aged about as well as Sanna, frankly.

I remember when I was a teenager, I would stay up at night reading about the latest Google developments and testing their awesome products. Nowadays, seeing Google’s name on a product is an absolute reason to totally avoid it.

This is similar to the way men used to want to put their dicks on Sanna Marin’s face and now they try to escape out the back exit when they see her brutal visage darken the door.

Reuters:

Hundreds of Google employees staged a walkout at the company’s London offices on Tuesday, following a dispute over layoffs.

In January, Google’s parent company Alphabet announced it was laying off 12,000 employees worldwide, equivalent to 6% of its global workforce.

The move came amid a wave of job cuts across corporate America, particularly in the tech sector, which has so far seen companies shed more than 290,000 workers since the start of the year, according to tracking site Layoffs.fyi.

Trade union Unite, which counts hundreds of Google’s UK employees among its members, said the company had ignored concerns put forward by employees.

“Our members are clear: Google needs to listen to its own advice of not being evil,” said Unite regional officer Matt Whaley.

“They and Unite will not back down until Google allows workers full union representation, engages properly with the consultation process and treats its staff with the respect and dignity they deserve.”

Yeah, okay, commie.

As I’ve said: I do not support Google at all.

But are they supposed to keep paying employees that aren’t making them money?

It doesn’t even make sense to protest a company on this basis. You can protest the government for not having stronger worker protection laws, but the company has to do what is in their financial interests. That’s the way business works.

Google does a lot of evil, but responding to a collapsing economy with layoffs is not one of those things.

Oh, jeez.

Here we go…!

I think we all know what kinds of words the government is interested in.

But I’m sure everyone reading this followed my privacy advice over the last 5-10 years, and therefore doesn’t have anything to worry about.

Right? 

Forbes:

The U.S. government is secretly ordering Google to provide data on anyone typing in certain search terms, an accidentally unsealed court document shows. There are fears such “keyword warrants” threaten to implicate innocent Web users in serious crimes and are more common than previously thought.

In 2019, federal investigators in Wisconsin were hunting men they believed had participated in the trafficking and sexual abuse of a minor. She had gone missing that year but had emerged claiming to have been kidnapped and sexually assaulted, according to a search warrant reviewed by Forbes. In an attempt to chase down the perpetrators, investigators turned to Google, asking the tech giant to provide information on anyone who had searched for the victim’s name, two spellings of her mother’s name and her address over 16 days across the year. After being asked to provide all relevant Google accounts and IP addresses of those who made the searches, Google responded with data in mid-2020, though the court documents do not reveal how many users had their data sent to the government.

It’s a rare example of a so-called keyword warrant and, with the number of search terms included, the broadest on record. (See the update below for other, potentially even broader warrants.) Before this latest case, only two keyword warrants had been made public. One revealed in 2020 asked for anyone who had searched for the address of an arson victim who was a witness in the government’s racketeering case against singer R Kelly. Another, detailed in 2017, revealed that a Minnesota judge signed off on a warrant asking Google to provide information on anyone who searched a fraud victim’s name from within the city of Edina, where the crime took place.

While Google deals with thousands of such orders every year, the keyword warrant is one of the more contentious. In many cases, the government will already have a specific Google account that they want information on and have proof it’s linked to a crime. But search term orders are effectively fishing expeditions, hoping to ensnare possible suspects whose identities the government does not know. It’s not dissimilar to so-called geofence warrants, where investigators ask Google to provide information on anyone within the location of a crime scene at a given time.

“As with all law enforcement requests, we have a rigorous process that is designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” a Google spokesperson said.

The latest case shows Google is continuing to comply with such controversial requests, despite concerns over their legality and the potential to implicate innocent people who happened to search for the relevant terms. From the government’s perspective in Wisconsin, the scope of the warrant should have been limited enough to avoid the latter: the number of people searching for the specific names, address and phone number in the given time frame was likely to be low. But privacy experts are concerned about the precedent set by such warrants and the potential for any such order to be a breach of Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches. There are also concerns about First Amendment freedom of speech issues, given the potential to cause anxiety amongst Google users that their identities could be handed to the government because of what they searched for.

This is the beginning of the thing that we all knew was coming.

The entire apparatus of spying that we’ve all been locked into for 15 years now is going to be turned against the public, to create databases on who has been naughty and who has been nice.

This data is going to be linked to your vax pass, which is going to be linked to your CBDC UBI credit app.

Or, at least that’s the plan.

I’m now at the point where I do not believe there is really any chance that this system is actually going to be realized, in full, before it collapses, because the people running it are simply too decadent and stupid.

But hell if they’re not gonna try.

Thats why use vpn or proxy server online when visiting pornhub 😂
Google is in violation of constitutional rights but they get u to accept their disclaimers as all click agree agree nobody reads. Thats how Mark Zuckerface stands and answers shifting blame.

— Avinash Ramkistan 😏🤞ॐ (@OThreeOne1) October 5, 2021

It pains me because individually these cases/requests I’m sure begin with the best intentions. Collectively though (and esp. when executed in secrect) its an inevitable slippery slope leading to violations of privacy that will stretch for decades.

— 🟣Benjamin Freeman (@cryptolightshow) October 5, 2021

Thanks to the coronavirus lockdowns, normal people are losing money while big tech companies and billionaires are increasing their wealth.

It’s almost as though this was on purpose, no?

But it’s not. It’s pure coincidence.

CNN:

Alphabet kicked off a big week for tech earnings as the industry starts to look ahead to a post-pandemic economy by reporting a characteristically strong start to 2021.

Google’s parent company reported revenues of $55.3 billion for the first three months of the year — a 34% jump from the same period last year — and made close to $18 billion in profit, comfortably blowing past analyst estimates. It also announced a $50 billion stock buyback.

The company’s stock jumped nearly 4% in after-hours trading on Tuesday.

“Over the last year, people have turned to Google (GOOG) Search and many online services to stay informed, connected and entertained,” Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said in a statement Wednesday.

Google’s cloud business, which the company has increasingly leaned on to diversify from its core advertising revenue, trimmed its losses to $974 million from $1.7 billion in the same quarter last year. Revenue from cloud increased 46% year over year, to $4 billion.

Google’s cloud business is not doing well at all, and they are getting destroyed by Amazon. Google is even getting beat by Amazon, and has not increased hardly any market share, even as smaller cloud providers disappear.

Despite huge money poured into the project, Google can’t crack 10%.

But they’re still reporting huge returns. Because all money is flowing up in this new trickle-up economy created by the virus hoax.

Russian-Jew Google cofounders are now worth more than $100 billion each, because the Virus Providence favored them.

Related: Pure Coincidence: The Story of Two Headlines

Even if the government breaks up every large corporation in Silicon Valley, this alone will not do a single thing to stop these firms from continuing to censor free political speech on the Internet.

Reports have been coming out stating that the Department of Justice is looking at investigating Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc. for antitrust violations. The subversive Jewish media is spinning this story like it would be the most awful thing in the world if Google and other large technology firms were subject to such investigations.

Bloomberg:

This is the moment the U.S. technology superpowers surely knew was coming: The U.S. government is preparing to crawl all over Google to figure out whether it is an abusive monopolist. Google parent company Alphabet Inc. and the other tech giants should be quaking in their fleece vests.

Bloomberg News and other news organizations reported late Friday that the U.S. Department of Justice is preparing to open an investigation into Google’s compliance with antitrust laws. If it goes forward, an investigation will no doubt be broad, lengthy, messy, and impossible for Google and its investors to predict.

That should terrify Google and every other big technology company — because there’s no guarantee that the antitrust Klieg light will turn on one company alone.

Companies like Google, Amazon and others have absolutely become enormous corporate behemoths. So this fact alone makes it reasonable enough for the government to launch antitrust investigations. The problem is that no antitrust investigation is going to do anything to prevent these companies from continuing to stifle people’s right to free political speech.

Censorship within the modern day digital public square is a far more important issue than any problems we have with these firms operating as monopolies or trusts. Because without free political speech, nothing else really matters. You simply don’t have a free country if you can’t speak your mind without fear of retribution. Unfortunately, this is the status quo throughout the West.

Regardless of whether people want to admit it or not, we literally have Soviet-like censorship measures being imposed on us by the likes of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and others. In many respects, you could argue that what we have is even worse than what they had in the Soviet Union. The only difference is that the censorship of political dissidents has been outsourced to a handful of corporate oligarchs.

These days, not even Steven Crowder – a moderate right-leaning comedian – is safe from the censorship police. He’s being investigated by YouTube because Carlos Maza, a homosexual who works for Vox News, whined that Crowder was making fun of him. And keep in mind that Maza is a person who literally uses the Twitter handle @gaywonk.

Thanks so much for outlining all of this–we’re looking into it further. Sending you a DM now.

— TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) May 31, 2019

People who say things outside the scope of Jewish-mandated politically correct norms have been banned from the big social media sites, lost their jobs and in some cases have had their lives ruined.

It’s absolutely insane what is happening and it’s only going to get worse unless the government steps in and regulates these social media companies as utilities. The digital public square is a natural monopoly and the organizations that manage this infrastructure should be required to provide universal access to everyone regardless of a person’s political views.

What these organizations are doing is the equivalent of if AT&T in the 1960s refused to provide someone with a telephone number because they disliked their political views. AT&T was prevented from doing this because of government regulations, which mandated that they provide universal access to all Americans.

The broader point to this is that no amount of antitrust investigations will solve the biggest problem we have with these tech firms. There’s literally no difference between one company censoring people and a hundred different companies engaging in that same censorship.

Furthermore, the big three companies are obviously natural monopolies, making it harmful to the consumer to have them broken up.

Sure, you could argue that these companies should be broken up and that breaking them up would make them easier to regulate (especially in the case of Google owning YouTube and Facebook owning Instagram). The problem is that nobody in the government is making such an argument. Plus, nobody is talking about regulating these companies as utilities and mandating that they provide an environment that allows free political speech.

All we’ve seen is Donald Trump post random tweets describing how bad it is for people to be censored. He has effectively delivered no substantive action on what is an enormous problem.

Unfortunately, we are probably going to see this and other false solutions advanced to make people believe that the government is doing something substantive about these large Silicon Valley companies. But quite frankly, the only real issue of consequence pertaining to big tech is that of censorship and free political speech. Everything else pales in comparison.

The SPLC might be off the front lines of the Jewish war on freedom, but they’re still in the game, shutting down the goyim.

And the kikes at the companies they’ve always worked with aren’t bothered by their recent public relations troubles – the revelation that the entire Jewish office environment was about abusing the blacks and molesting the women.

Daily Caller:

Jigsaw, the Alphabet subsidiary that began as the Google Ideas think tank, has been utilizing Southern Poverty Law Center datasets in the development of their Perspective API, a comment moderation engine, documents shared with The Daily Caller indicate.

Three sets of comments from Breitbart, The Daily Stormer and Stormfront were provided to Jigsaw by the SPLC and have been identified both in internal company memos and code for the API. The latter two are neo-Nazi websites.

It’s NEON-Nazi, pal.

Jeez.

These datasets were provided in raw form to Jigsaw, meaning that the embattled Montgomery nonprofit is assisting the development of a Google comment moderation product intended to be applied across a wide swath of the media. It also represents confirmation that the SPLC has been scraping wholesale the content of far-right websites.

The SPLC has scraped more than my content, let me tell you what.

The Perspective API is “part of the Conversation AI research effort that aims to help increase empathy, participation and quality in online conversation at scale,” according to its Github description, and was originally known as the Respect Engine within the company. This new moderation product scores comments based on “toxicity,” meaning a comment containing expressive language or ad-hominem attacks would get a higher score than reasonable disagreement.

…

Among the partners working to apply the Perspective API are the New York Times, Wikimedia Foundation, The Economist, and The Guardian.

…

The CEO of Jigsaw is Jared Cohen, an adjunct fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, who worked in the State Department during the Bush and Obama administrations, for Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton. Cohen, who claims to speak Swahili, was implicated in fomenting regime change across the Arab world in the Stratfor leaks released by Wikileaks. In Cohen’s CFR bio he boasts that his book co-authored with Eric Schmidt, The Digital Disruption: Connectivity and the Diffusion of Power “appeared in Foreign Affairs just a few months before the Arab Spring.”

“Jigsaw is an Alphabet company that builds technology to make the world safer. As part of our work, we collaborate with organizations such as news organizations, non-profits and academic institutions to share knowledge and test the usability of our technology,” a spokesperson from Jigsaw told The Daily Caller. They declined to answer a follow-up question about whether the SPLC was one of those non-profits they collaborate with.

Mark my words: they’re going to use this for YouTube. I can pretty well guarantee you. YouTube is the last place where you can just say whatever the hell you want, because no one reports comments on YouTube because everyone is just passing through and there aren’t account pages for people to inspect and get angry about.

So they need a technology to stop these goyim. And probably, they won’t delete the comments, at least at first – they will downrank them in a way where they don’t appear at the top of the comments section, which is the only part of the comments section that anyone reads. YouTube comments are a big concern for the Jews right now. Because wherever there is still any form of freedom at all, Jews are concerned.

I am so sick of the Jews, guys.

It is just simply exhausting being fed on by these creatures.

Google’s Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday. Throughout his testimony, he falsely claimed that Google is not a politically biased company.

NDTV:

Google chief executive Sundar Pichai parried US lawmakers Tuesday over complaints of political bias and intrusive data collection as the internet giant came under heavy criticism from conservatives.

“We build our products in a neutral way,” Pichai said in one exchange with a lawmaker, and added later: “We approach our work without any political bias.”

Pichai was called to the House Judiciary Committee following a series of attacks by President Donald Trump and his supporters claiming that Google and other internet platforms were suppressing conservative voices, despite persistent denials from the companies.

It is not surprising that he would take this position. Because Pichai is just a colored front man for the Jews who founded the company. Google’s parent company is Alphabet, whose CEO is the Jew Larry Page.

The Jewish co-founders of Google Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

It appears as if Pichai was installed as the company’s CEO to kike the goyim by making it less obvious that Google is a Jewish operation. He’s originally from India and has no cultural connection to the people who built Western civilization. This makes him perfect for this role.

He also has no cultural problem with lying to the government, which was treating him like a child during this hearing, due to his Apu-type accent. Virtually everything he said at the hearing was a lie.

He confusingly dismissed questions about a leaked email showing that the company staff was devastated following Trump’s win, and planned to “reverse things” by altering the search.

Along with conservative questions about bias and lax policies on data protection and privacy, Pichai faced Democrat demands that they censor more people, with the Jewish Congressrat Jamie Raskin demanding he shut down YouTube videos about Jewish Satanic rituals (3:44:20 in the video at the top).

While agreeing with the Democrats that more needed to be done to silence freedom of speech, Pichai just stuttered and pretended to be confused by all questions relating to political bias. His underlying message was that there was no political bias at all, and everything that they did to make it look as though there is is simply coincidence (it was apparently also a coincidence that all Republicans at this hearing were claiming that there is bias, while all Democrats were claiming there is not).

Google is politically biased and politically biased in some of the most extreme ways imaginable.

Shortly after last year’s Unite the Right rally in August of 2017, they effectively seized this publication’s domain name. All because they disliked a joke Andrew Anglin made about the fat 330lb childless slut Heather Heyer. Google’s decision was widely discussed on technology sites and heavily criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

EFF, August 17, 2017:

Earlier this week, following complaints about a vitriolic and abusive Daily Stormer article on Heather Heyer—the woman killed when a white nationalist drove a car into a crowd of anti-racism demonstrators—GoDaddy told the site’s owners that they had 24 hours to leave their service. Daily Stormer subsequently moved their domain to Google’s domain management service. Within hours Google announced that it too was refusing Daily Stormer as a customer. Google also placed the dailystormer.com domain on “Client Hold”, which means that Daily Stormer’s owner cannot activate, use or move the domain to another service. It’s unclear whether this is for a limited amount of time, or whether Google has decided to effectively take ownership of the dailystormer.com domain permanently. Cloudflare, whose service was used to protect the site from denial-of-service attacks, subsequently dropped them as a customer.

We at EFF defend the right of anyone to choose what speech they provide online; platforms have a First Amendment right to decide what speech does and does not appear on their platforms. That’s what laws like CDA 230 in the United States enable and protect.

But we strongly believe that what GoDaddy, Google, and Cloudflare did here was dangerous. That’s because, even when the facts are the most vile, we must remain vigilant when platforms exercise these rights.

This was a new form of digital censorship that Google proudly championed. But this is just one of many examples showing their political bias.

After Donald Trump was elected the President of the United States in 2016, a leaked video showed many of Google’s top executives expressing how upset they were about the outcome of the election.

Tucker Carlson received internal Google emails showing employees discussing how they could manipulate search algorithms following Trump’s travel ban order.

Google also fired James Damore, one of their engineers, because he wrote a memo daring to describe some of the fundamental differences between men and women.

We also have a significant number of people with right-leaning views who have been banned off of YouTube, an entity which is also owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet.

YouTube’s CEO is the Jewess Susan Wojcicki. Under her leadership, they’ve banned all sorts of popular content creators including Alex Jones and most recently Gavin McInnes. The reasons justifying these bans have all been extremely dubious in nature. It’s safe to say that they were banned because of their political beliefs.

And speaking of Jones, he was at the hearing along with Roger Stone. He confronted Pichai in the hallway before his testimony and repeatedly stated that “Google is evil.” He also accused Pichai of helping the Communist Chinese commit genocide.

Alex Jones gave Google CEO Sundar Pichai a piece of his mind! https://t.co/9ci83AxYmt

— Millie Weaver (@Millie__Weaver) December 11, 2018

But Jones is 100 percent right. Google is a very evil Jewish company. The only way to deal with Google is for the Trump administration to aggressively regulate it. Google can’t claim to be a neutral platform when they are actively conspiring to censor specific political views. Serious government action against Google and the other big social media companies like Facebook and Twitter is long overdue.

It is also high-time for the arrogant and disgraceful H1-B CEO to be deported back to his native shithole.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.