Video from a year ago about the case

Misgendering is a smart way to get paid big money quickly.

Finally, trannies are found to be useful for some purpose.

New York Post:

An Ohio teacher who refused to use students preferred pronouns will take home $450,000 in a legal settlement with the local school district.

Vivian Geraghty brought the suit against the Jackson Local School District, about 20 miles south of Akron, in 2022 after she was told to resign from a middle school language arts position over her stance on the matter.

“The school tried to force Vivian to accept and repeat the school’s viewpoint on issues that go to the foundation of morality and human identity, like what makes us male or female, by ordering her to personally participate in the social transition of her students,” Logan Spena a legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, the organization representing Geraghty told local NBC4 Ohio.

“The First Amendment prohibits that abuse of power, and Jackson Local School District officials have learned that comes at a steep cost,” Spena added.

The settlement, reach last month, came after the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio ruled in August that the school’s pronoun policy was “not neutral” and that forcing Geraghty to use preferred pronouns was a form of “compelled speech.”

The brouhaha began in 2022 after Geraghty said two students request she use names that align “with their new gender identities rather than their legal names.” Another student had wanted to be called by different pronouns, citing a school policy requiring teachers to use students’ preferred pronouns.

The trannies are getting completely thrown under the bus now.

“Woke” isn’t going away, I can tell you that, and trannies will now be more accepted than they were before 2015.

But the forced tranny stuff is being dropped.

It will be fun to see what happens with the Captain Nigger movie. Bob Iger said he didn’t want to do this “woke” stuff anymore, but that movie was already made, so they reshot it like 17 times to try to make it not woke. But you still replaced Cap with a nigger, so the basic idea is woke no matter what.

But yeah trannies are done for. No one supports these freaks anymore. They’re all like “but I cut my dick off! You said it was popular!” and all these former wokes are like “I apologize, sir. I hope you froze your penis so the doctors can sew it back on.”

Teachers have been winning a lot of these lately, but it doesn’t seem to be helping much

Interview the parents gave to the ADF a few months ago

Look, this is a tranny country. It’s a tranny world.

If you’re not a tranny, you have to go to prison until you become one.

Christian Post:

The highest court in Switzerland has ruled that two parents from Geneva must embrace their 17-year-old daughter’s sex change or face potential criminal charges after she was taken from them.

The parents, who have remained anonymous, appealed to the 38-member Swiss Federal Supreme Court after two lower courts mandated that the girl’s documents must be handed over to change her sex, according to Alliance Defending Freedom International, which is providing them legal assistance.

After her parents declined to put her on puberty blockers and objected to their daughter’s school attempting to socially transition her, the school reportedly called the Swiss child welfare agency, and the school and the agency brought a case against the parents in court.

The girl was removed from her parents’ custody and placed in a government shelter when she was 16, according to ADF International.

This is The Science they used to deduce she needs to mutilate herself

Despite arguing that the Swiss Federal Constitution and international law allowed them to oppose their daughter’s gender transition, the high court maintained that they were not permitted to intervene in the case because of the country’s separation of powers.

“The situation complained of cannot therefore be remedied by interpretation. Nor can it be concluded that there is a loophole per se that would have to be filled by the courts,” the court said.

“It would therefore be up to the federal legislature, if necessary, to amend the system as it currently stands under the Act, from which the Federal Court cannot derogate, since it is not its role to interfere in matters that are the responsibility of the federal legislature. It follows that the complaint must be dismissed.”

The girl’s father said they were “heartbroken” over the court’s ruling, according to ADF International.

“We love our daughter and only want what’s best for her. We know this decision is not in her best interest,” he said. “That we could face criminal charges for simply trying to care for our daughter shows how deeply embedded transgender ideology is in Swiss institutions and the real harms it causes. We are considering our next steps.”

This situation might seem rare, but it can happen to anyone.

They can take your kid and turn it into a tranny, and put you in prison.

These Western societies are satanic and they simply are not safe.

There are no guarantees on anything.

They will just come and crush you.

It’s so retarded that the only right to free assocation you have in this gay country is a technicality: “it’s against my religion.”

How about “no, I’m not doing that”?

Why the hell should your choices of what to do be determined by the government, with the government needing to approve you have a religious “get out of jail” card for them to allow you to not associate with people you don’t want to associate with?

Westword:

Eight years after a Colorado website designer sued the state to let her limit wedding services to straight couples only, the legal case has finally concluded.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the web designer, Lorie Smith, in June 2023, declaring that the First Amendment allows religious owners of creative businesses to refuse to serve same-sex couples. Now the state has agreed to pay Smith’s attorneys’ fees incurred during the lengthy legal battle.

The state will pay $1.5 million, according to the fee settlement, which was fully executed on Tuesday, November 19.

“This is a win not just for me, but for all Americans — for those who share my beliefs and for those who hold different views,” Smith says. “As the Supreme Court said, I’m free to create art consistent with my beliefs without fear of Colorado punishing me anymore. … I hope that everyone will celebrate the court’s decision upholding this right for each of us to speak freely.”

This is the latest victory for Christian legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom. In this state, the group is best known for defending Masterpiece Cakeshop and owner Jack Phillips in the Supreme Court in 2018, after the baker refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. More recently, the legal team went after Jefferson County Public Schools last year for its policy regarding transgender student accommodations on overnight trips.

In Smith’s case — 303 Creative v. Elenis — the court ruled 6-3 that Colorado could not apply its anti-discrimination law to make Smith provide an expressive service that runs contrary to her religious beliefs.

Smith had not been asked to make a website for any same-sex couple but claimed that the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, race, gender and other characteristics was unconstitutional. The state argued that the case should be dismissed because there was no actual instance of Smith being asked to express something she didn’t believe.

I’m not saying it’s not good she won. It’s fine.

But this whole “religious exemption” thing is the most Jewish thing ever. All of this lawyerism.

How about “I’m not doing that because I don’t want to do that”?

How are Americans so fat and retarded that they tolerate this?

It’s established law in these United States: you do not have to bake a poop cake.

It is a fundamental human right to eat poop, but a baker doesn’t have to assist you.

These are our top freedoms.

Reuters:

Colorado’s top court on Tuesday ducked the question of whether a Christian baker had the right to refuse to create a cake for a customer celebrating a gender transition by dismissing the discrimination case on procedural grounds.

Lower courts in Colorado had concluded that Masterpiece Cakeshop and the bakery’s owner, Jack Phillips, had violated Autumn Scardina’s rights by refusing to make her a pink cake with blue frosting because of her identity as a transgender woman.

“Autumn Scardina”

Phillips, whose prior refusal to make a wedding cake for a gay couple was at the center of a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court, had on appeal urged the Colorado Supreme Court to conclude that requiring him to make the cake would infringe his free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

Faggots are completely obsessed with this guy.

He beat them at SCOTUS, so apparently there are just faggots lined up outside his shop every day demanding poop cake.

But the state high court on a 4-3 vote avoided that issue entirely by instead concluding that under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, Scardina, a lawyer, was not permitted to sue the baker in 2019 following an earlier administrative process.

Scardina had initially filed a discrimination complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division after Phillips refused to make the cake she wanted to order to celebrate her birthday and her identity as a transgender woman. She said he refused her order because of her identity.

The commission reached a confidential settlement with Phillips, without Scardina’s participation. Justice Melissa Hart, writing for the majority, said Scardina should have challenged that decision in an appeals court, rather than file a new lawsuit.

Justice Richard Gabriel, in a dissenting opinion joined by two other justices, called the majority’s ruling “troubling” for how it “throws Scardina completely out of court.”

“I am concerned that Masterpiece and Phillips will construe today’s ruling as a vindication of their refusal to sell non-expressive products with no intrinsic meaning to customers who are members of a protected class (here, the LGBTQ+ community),” he wrote.

Why are homosexuals a “protected class”?

What does it mean that in America we supposedly have “equality” but also have “protected classes”?

How can both things be true?

How can you force a man to bake a cake?

In actual fact, based on the existing law in this stupid faggot country, the baker is legally required to make a poop cake. It’s in the Civil Rights Act that normal people do not have rights to freedom of association, and “protected classes” are allowed to order them to do things. This “protected class” vs. normal people Master-Slave dynamic is supposed to be counterbalanced by “religious freedom,” but you are expressly not allowed to say it is against your religion to bake a cake for niggers, so there is no reason you would be allowed to refuse to bake a poop cake.

America law is totally Jewish and does not make any sense. It is not based on a system.

That’s why the court didn’t want to make a real ruling and simply dismissed the case.

Guy’s been in and out of court for the past 12 years or so

I’m not sure how many of these would be Moslems, but I’m thinking probably zero. If you remove them from the math, the number of whites who want to do this – presumably all women – shoots up.

Christian Today:

Nearly a quarter of young Brits would ban the Bible if they felt its pages contained ‘hate speech’, according to a poll.

Last month, polling group Whitestone Insights asked 2,088 UK adults if they agreed with the following statement: “Unless the offending parts can be edited out, books containing what some perceive as hate speech should be banned from general sale, including if necessary religious texts such as the Bible.”

Young people aged 18 to 34 were the most likely to agree with this statement (23%), followed by 35 to 54 year olds (17%). Over-55s were least likely to agree (13%).

Video from a year ago

Lois McLatchie, of the Alliance Defending Freedom UK, expressed concern about the results in an appearance on GBNews.

She said the UK only needed to look to Finland to see the consequences of “shutting down Christians”. Former Minister of the Interior, Päivi Räsänen, was last month acquitted of hate speech charges for the second time after a four-year legal battle. She was criminally charged after tweeting a Bible verse on marriage and sexuality.

“We may no longer be a majority Christian population here in Britain. That’s even more reason to protect freedom of speech and belief for all,” said McLatchie.

She said that worrying steps towards censorship had already been taken under the Conservative government, including the arrest of street preachers for quoting the Bible in public and pro-life campaigners being taken to court for praying silently in their heads near abortion clinics.

These ideologies that poll at this level today are about 5-10 years from becoming official government policy.

What they will do with the Bible is have a team of “social justice experts” go through and change it to make it in line with their beliefs, removing the condemnation of homosexuality, making some of the characters gay, and of course creating women’s equality.

There will then be this new fake Bible that will be endorsed by the government and media, and then they will eventually ban the sale of the real Bible.

Though we might not get to that point.

The “Church” of England might ban the Bible before the state does

We’re just winning all over the place these days.

Christian Post:

A Christian photographer in Virginia won’t be forced to provide services to same-sex wedding ceremonies, according to a new settlement reached between himself and the Commonwealth.

Bob Updegrove filed a lawsuit against Virginia over a law that took effect in 2020 that expanded state anti-discrimination rules to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

Updegrove reached a settlement last Friday with Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares and the Virginia Office of Civil Rights, in which officials agreed not to enforce the law against the photographer if he refuses on religious grounds to provide services for a same-sex wedding.

Specifically, the defendants agreed not to force Updegrove “to offer or provide photography celebrating same-sex weddings” and not to prevent him “from asking prospective clients whether they seek photography services celebrating same-sex weddings or engagements.”

The settlement referenced the United States Supreme Court decision 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, in which the high court ruled 6-3 that Lorie Smith of 303 Creative cannot be compelled by Colorado law to create websites that violate her religious views.

Updegrove was represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that has successfully argued First Amendment cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

ADF Legal Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse said in a statement on Monday that “the government can’t force Americans to say things they don’t believe.”

Video from 2 years ago

“This victory for Bob underscores how the 303 Creative decision will protect countless Americans from government censorship and coercion. The U.S. Constitution protects his freedom to express his views as he continues to serve clients of all backgrounds and beliefs,” added Widmalm-Delphonse.

In April 2020, then-Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, signed the Virginia Values Act, a measure that added sexual orientation and gender identity to state civil rights protections.

Northam said in a statement released at the time that the law “sends a strong, clear message” that “Virginia is a place where all people are welcome to live, work, visit, and raise a family.”

“We are building an inclusive Commonwealth where there is opportunity for everyone, and everyone is treated fairly,” stated Northam in 2020. “No longer will LGBTQ Virginians have to fear being fired, evicted, or denied service in public places because of who they are.”

Shortly after the Act was passed, it became the subject of multiple lawsuits, with church and ministry groups arguing that the new legislation lacked sufficient religious protections.

For his part, Updegrove filed a “pre-enforcement” challenge against the Act, arguing that the new law would force him to go against his belief that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

In March 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Claude M. Hilton ruled against Updegrove, arguing that he lacked the standing to sue since the act “has never been enforced against” him.

I believe this ruling means that faggots will now be thrown off of roofs by the cops, though we’ll have to wait and see.

This really gave a respite to a lot of people

Good news, everyone!

The fed government wasn’t able to force the Christian school to bring in homosexuals to molest the boys!

Those boys might not know it yet, but they’re going to be happy they didn’t get jerked off and sucked off by homosexuals.

Do you know what happens when that happens to you when you’re a kid?

It makes you one of them*!

Life Site News:

A Colorado Christian school can continue to participate in the state’s universal preschool program without fear of reprisal, following a favorable federal court ruling on Saturday.

Darren Patterson Christian Academy won a preliminary injunction that will prevent state officials from taking action against it because of its religious beliefs and its support for the moral truth and biological fact that there are only two sexes.

The new statewide program funds early education for the school of a parent’s choosing across the state. The case continues in the federal court system.

Officials “raised concerns” that the school’s policies would violate Colorado’s “non-discrimination requirements,” according to the judge’s summary. But officials refused to grant a religious exemption beyond telling the preschool it was allowed to keep its school closed outside of its congregation. That would harm local Christians who are not part of the congregation – the academy is the only Christian preschool in the county.

The school requires “[a]ll employees” to “be a ‘born-again Christian’ and adhere to certain lifestyle requirements, including abstinence from sexual activity outside of the context of a marriage between a man and a woman,” District Court Judge Daniel Domenico wrote in his ruling.

The school also rejects gender ideology: it requires students to use sex-separated bathrooms based on their actual sex and it forbids “pronouns that do not correspond to a student’s or employee’s biological sex.”

The state is currently writing the final regulations, but in the interim is relying on rules from the Department of Human Services. However, officials “never provided a clear answer on whether they view Plaintiff’s policies as currently violating the statutory or contractual anti-discrimination provisions, even though they were given ample opportunity in briefing, declarations, and at the hearing,” Judge Domenico wrote.

However, he noted that Democrat Governor Jared Polis made several statements critical of the preschool and religious liberty, indicating future action could be taken against the academy.

Polis? Can I get an early life check?

Oh. They just put it all in his first paragraph.

Yeah, so… he’s a Jewish child molester.

You almost have to laugh.

This shit has gotten so out of control, it’s unbelievable.

“I’m not commenting on specific lawsuits, but obviously, if you run a preschool that doesn’t receive state money, you can run it the way you want,” Gov. Polis said, as documented in the court record. “But of course, when you are publicly funded, you have to agree with the basic values: We don’t discriminate, and you can’t say parents can’t come here because they are gay or they are not married or whatever it is.”

Soon after a hearing on the motions, Polis’ office weighed in again, indicating opposition to the preschool and similar religious education providers.

Jared Polis is both a kike and a faggot

“We’re saddened to see different groups of adults attempting to coopt preschool for their own ends and to discriminate, rather than ensuring that all kids are welcome,” his office stated.

“Voters were clear on their support for parent choice and a universal, mixed delivery system that is independently run, that doesn’t discriminate against anyone, and offers free preschool to every child no matter who their parents are,” the office stated. “We will continue to ensure that every Colorado child and family has access to preschool, meet the needs of all learners, and will vigorously defend this landmark program in court so that even more families can benefit from preschool.”

*Not always, of course. Maybe not even in the majority of cases. It’s not clear, because it’s illegal to research it.

100% of homosexuals were child-molested, but something less, maybe significantly less, of those who were molested become homosexuals.

It’s worthwhile research.

I went to a dissertation presentation in the Philippines, where they don’t have political correctness but have a pretty high number of homosexuals, and they had interviewed 25 homosexual men, and all of them had had homosexual experiences (molestation) before they were 11. If I recall, about half said before they were 6.

Then, of course, these kids grow up and do it to other kids.

The government is actively encouraging this cycle of faggotry. If you were to get them in a room and force them to explain, they’d say it’s about reducing the population to stop global warming.

In reality, they do it because they’re Jewish.

The kike faggot really likes visiting pre-schools

To be clear, the family did not have the ability to stop buyers of the apples from shoving them up each other’s assholes, nor did they require buyers of the apples to sign an agreement that they would not shove the apples into a man’s asshole.

People of Anus were always free to buy the apples.

It was the normal people who were being discriminated against.

Life Site News:

Catholic farmers can sell their fruits at a local market after a federal judge ordered East Lansing, Michigan to stop discriminating against the family for its opposition to homosexual “marriage.”

Judge Paul Maloney ruled that the city discriminated against Steve and Bridget Tennes of Country Mill Farms (CMF) when it passed a special law that excluded the family from selling at its farmers market.

The couple offered their venue for weddings but told an inquirer in 2016 that they would not let a homosexual couple have a same-sex “wedding” on the property. The farm is located in Charlotte, Michigan, 22 miles from East Lansing.

“The City did not invite CMF because it decided to rent its venue for weddings but would not host same sex weddings,” Judge Maloney wrote.

The city has an ordinance that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, but the way it was applied violated the First Amendment rights of the family farmers.

The unbearable whiteness of the Tennes family

The manager of the farmer’s market could have granted an exception to the Tennes family based on its religious beliefs, the judge wrote. It chose not to do so, meaning its law “is not generally applicable because it permits secular conduct through exemptions while prohibiting the same conduct motivated by religious belief.”

The city failed to establish that its regulations were “narrowly tailored to meet a compelling government interest.”

“The City’s decision to exclude Country Mill Farms from the 2017 East Lansing Farmer’s Market constituted a burden on Plaintiffs’ religious beliefs,” the judge concluded. “Plaintiffs were forced to choose between following their religious beliefs and a government benefit for which they were otherwise qualified.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented the farm, praised the judge’s ruling.

“Steve and his family-run Country Mill Farms happily serve all customers as a valued vendor at East Lansing’s farmer’s market, and he’s grateful he can continue his longtime partnership with the city and its residents,” ADF senior counsel Kate Anderson stated.

“The district court’s decision rightly protects Steve’s freedom to operate his business according to his convictions,” Anderson stated. “Country Mill has continued to participate in the farmer’s market without issue during this litigation.”

“Tennes and Country Mill Farms are grateful for the court’s decision protecting religious liberty,” Anderson added. “At the same time, they are eager to mend fences with current city officials and get back to doing what Country Mill does best — as expressed in its mission statement: ‘glorifying God by facilitating family fun on the farm and feeding families.’”

Do you know that Barack Obama opposed anal marriage during the 2012 election?

Can you imagine getting from that to this in such a timeframe?

Honestly, I think the cellphones have a lot to do with it. People are handing over their brains to their cellphones.

Video from when the thing started

This guy isn’t so much a baker as he is a professional victim of lawsuits.

Washington Times:

Christian baker Jack Phillips asked the Colorado Supreme Court this week to reject a case against him after the Supreme Court affirmed the First Amendment right of artists who turn down work that would entail creating content that would contradict their religious beliefs.

Mr. Philips has been engaged in litigation for years after he refused to make a cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding. He was sued under Colorado’s public accommodations law that protects certain groups from discrimination, including those based on sexual orientation.

His case went to the Supreme Court more than five years ago where he had a narrow win — but ultimately, the justices sent his case back to lower courts for further evaluation.

Video from 5 years

In the meantime, an attorney issued another request to Mr. Phillips asking him to create a gender transition cake that was pink on the inside but blue on the outside. He refused and the attorney sued again under the same law.

Mr. Phillips’ attorneys, though, just won a challenge to the same Colorado law, representing a Christian web designer, Lorie Smith, who refused to build wedding websites for same-sex marriages.

The case was 303 Creative v. Elenis and it challenged the same state law plaguing Mr. Phillips. The win for Ms. Smith was viewed by court watchers as a landmark First Amendment victory against LGBTQ rights.

The high court in the 6-3 decision said the government can’t force individuals to speak or create messages in a way that runs afoul of their beliefs. The opinion, though, detailed Ms. Smith’s free speech rights to create expressive work.

Legal experts say lower courts will have to grapple with whether bakers and florists and other industries qualify as expressive work to enjoy the same protections as Ms. Smith.

Pointing to the new high court precedent, though, Mr. Phillips’ attorneys told the Colorado Supreme Court it must honor Mr. Phillips’ right to decline to make a gender transition cake.

“When citizens face speech choices they don’t like, ‘our Nation’s answer’ is ‘tolerance, not coercion,’” Mr. Phillips’ attorneys wrote in their Tuesday filing, quoting from the June Supreme Court’s ruling. “303 Creative controls here. Given its clarity, Petitioners ask this Court to grant review, vacate the decision below, and enter judgment for Petitioners.”

The Colorado Civil Rights Commission sued Mr. Phillips several years ago, arguing Mr. Phillips was refusing a service in violation of Colorado’s public accommodations law. The case made it to the court in 2017.

Mr. Phillips argued that his cakes amounted to First Amendment speech and that forcing him to create a cake for a same-sex wedding violated his religious rights.

The Supreme Court ruled that the commission showed undue animosity toward Mr. Phillips and sent the case back to a lower court, but the justices shied away from a broad ruling on constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court is useless.

This whole government is useless.

It is fully impossible for this government to say “come on, guys – just leave the old cake guy alone.”

There is no longer any system in this government to say that.

Newest case is from a tranny

I cringed when I heard “single mother of 5,” but the article claims she’s a widow

If you don’t say that anal and trannies are the highest moral value, then you are against our values, and you do not belong in our society.

Move to Russia or China, you filth.

This is a democracy country, and in this place, we worship anus and we cut up kids genitals, because that’s who we are.

Christian Post:

A new lawsuit accuses the state of Oregon of imposing an “ideological litmus test” for those seeking to adopt children from foster care, which requires adherence to progressive ideology on LGBT issues.

The law firm Alliance Defending Freedom announced in a statement Monday that it had filed a lawsuit on behalf of Jessica Bates, “a single mother of five wishing to adopt siblings from foster care.” As noted by the law firm, Bates “seeks to adopt a sibling pair, who are generally harder to place.”

The complaint names Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Fariborz Pakseresht, Deputy Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Liesl Wendt, Interim Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services Child Welfare Division, Aprille Flint-Gerner, as well as Malheur County officials Rebecca Garrison and Cecilia Garcia as defendants. It was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton Division.

This is Fariborz Pakseresht, because they now have Pakis in Oregon for some reason

The lawsuit follows the Oregon Department of Human Services’ refusal to grant Bates the certification required to become an adoptive parent after she informed the state that her religious beliefs prevented her from complying with a state law requiring prospective adoptive parents to “respect, accept and support” the “sexual orientation, gender identity, [and] gender expression” of the children they seek to adopt.

As she underwent the necessary training to become an adoptive parent, an instructor informed Bates that “adoptive and resource parents must use a child’s stated pronouns and affirm a child’s gender identity if the child’s identity does not align with their biological sex.” Additionally, the instructor provided an example of how a parent could “support a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity” by “allowing a child to dress however they want and taking them to a Pride parade.”

Upon completing the instruction, Bates raised her concerns with Garcia, the certification officer for the Oregon Department of Human Services office in Malheur County. “One of the things the training really emphasized is SOGI (sexual orientation gender identity) and that the host must respect, accept, and support children whose preferred pronouns & identity don’t match their biological sex,” she explained.

“I don’t know how many children there are out there under the age of 9 who fall into this category (and to me it’s kind of crazy that society is wanting to get kids thinking about this stuff at such young ages; I think we should let them keep their innocence), so this may not even be an issue, but I need to let you know I cannot support this behavior in a child,” she added. “I have no problem loving them and accepting them as they are, but I would not encourage them in this behavior.”

Jessica Bates

Bates shared her belief that “God gives us our gender/sex and it’s not something we get to choose,” stressing that “my faith conflicts with this & I just felt that I needed to let you know.”

Garcia did not initially respond to Bates’ email outlining her concerns and did not reply to a follow-up email she sent a month later. When she contacted Bates via telephone a month-and-a-half after she sent the original email, Garcia informed her that she “was ineligible to adopt due to her religious beliefs.”

The lawsuit contends that the Oregon Department of Human Services is violating Bates’ First Amendment rights to Freedom of Speech, Association and Assembly as well as the Free Exercise Clause. It also cites the state and local officials’ behavior as violations of Bates’ right to “equal protection of the laws” under the Fourteenth Amendment. The complaint is seeking an order declaring the Oregon state law unconstitutional, preventing the state from enforcing it and awarding Bates attorney’s fees.

ADF Senior Counsel Jonathan Scruggs decried the Oregon state law as “an ideological litmus test” where “people who hold secular or ‘progressive’ views on sexual orientation and gender identity are eligible to participate in child welfare programs, while people of faith with religiously informed views are disqualified because they don’t agree with the state’s orthodoxy.”

According to Scruggs, “The government can’t exclude certain communities of faith from foster care and adoption services because the state doesn’t like their particular religious beliefs.”

Well, in fact, actually, they just did.

Maybe get over it and stop whining.

If you don’t like it, move to a fascist dictatorship, where they don’t respect gay anal fisting and licking among infants.

In America, we stand with the values of who we are.

Disturbingly, not a single one of her kids appears to be a tranny