alex berenson – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png alex berenson – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Alex Berenson Slams the Jews for Shilling the Vax! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/11/23/alex-berenson-slams-the-jews-for-shilling-the-vax/ Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0000 After being restored to Twitter, coronavirus/vax truth activist Alex Berenson has gone Death Con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE.

Along with outright naming the Jew, he’s been going down the list of recent Jewish scandals.

FTX:

ADL censorship league:

He’s also going Allah Mode on the Jewish head of Pfizer:

Alex Berenson is himself Jewish, so he’s sort of “allowed” to talk about Jews, but not really. This is basically backlash from Ye. Discussion of the Jews is now on the table, and everyone is snacking on it.

I think Alex Berenson is a good person, even though he’s Jewish, and it’s possible there are more like this (I do not see many of them). But it doesn’t really matter how many “good Jews” there are, because the point is that the establishment of this country is controlled by a Jewish criminal cartel, and it doesn’t stop being Jewish in nature simply because not every single Jew is involved in it.

Compare it to “The Italian Mafia.” We had conversations about the mafia for decades, and everyone knew they were Italian, and they were called Italian, but that didn’t mean that every single Italian – or even the average Italian – was in the mafia. Also, Italians never tried to argue that the mafia was not Italian, and they certainly never argued that talking about the mafia was going to lead to a genocide of Italians.

The mafia problem was only solved because people talked about it. The Jew criminal gang doesn’t want the problem solved, which is why they ban talking about it. They control everything and they absolutely do not want to surrender that power. Why would they?

It’s the job of non-Jews – and apparently of Jews who are not part of the cartel – to speak out against this criminal gang instead of being afraid of having their lives ruined by Jews. They can’t stop all of us.

Ye is the bravest man on earth, as he was the only one willing to go first. It’s now easier for everyone else who goes out there and says it. Jews are now on the backfoot, as people really do not like what they did to Ye, Kyrie, and to an extent Dave Chappelle. They do not like how the ADL is dealing with Elon Musk. They do not like this FTX swindle.

Now is the time to say it.

We don’t have much time left, and increasingly, there is nothing left to lose.

]]> Alex Berenson Reinstated on Twitter https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/07/07/alex-berenson-reinstated-on-twitter/ Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Shady's back.

Tell a friend.

For the full story of my reinstatment, including @Twitter's acknowledgment of error, see my Substack.https://t.co/SgXfocIFiQ

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) July 6, 2022

Alex Berenson is one of the main popular critics of the coronavirus narrative. He is a former New York Times writer and novelist, who also wrote a book about the effects of chronic marijuana use on the psyche.

I had some disagreements with his takes on the macro-situation, but I think he is just too old and normie to have understood the implications of what he was himself saying. But overall, he was probably the most important person in getting real information about the alleged “pandemic virus” and the vaccine out into the wider public sphere.

He was permanently banned from Twitter last year for “science denial” or whatever, and it had the desired effect of removing most of the real information about the virus/vax from the public sphere.

For whatever reason, he’s now been reinstated on Twitter. He was suing them, but lots of people have tried to sue tech companies over bannings and it’s pretty well-established that the court system doesn’t believe you have a right to free speech if the public square is “privately owned.” Berenson’s lawsuit was much more interesting, however, as he was alleging that it was possible or probable that Twitter had banned him on orders from the Biden Administration.

Remember when Jen Psaki admitted that the Administration was telling social media companies who to ban?

That actually does seem to be illegal on its face, and if Berenson could get that to the Supreme Court, that would be interesting. Though there is virtually zero chance he would be able to get it to higher courts, or even get discovery to prove that he was banned on orders of the Bidens.

Whatever the case – they brought him back, which I’m not aware of having ever happened before. (There have been cases where someone gets banned and there is an outrage and the person is restored in a matter of days, but Berenson was gone for nearly an entire year.)

So, it’s possible that Twitter (or the Biden Administration itself) was concerned about the specifics of Berenson’s lawsuit. Of course, there is also a possibility that Elon Musk had something to do with it. Elon supports Berenson and freaked out when Amazon banned his book, which led to Bezos (apparently personally) unbanning it. Musk’s purchase of Twitter is far from complete, but as of right now, it does seem to be moving forward, and I don’t think it’s impossible that Musk would have asked them to restore Berenson as some kind of good-faith gesture.

Restoring Berenson right now is probably viewed as mostly harmless, since we are now out of the coronavirus hysteria for the time-being. It would be interesting if Berenson started posting videos of Ukrainians torturing and murdering civilians and POWs, and see if he would get banned for questioning the new current thing. (I doubt he’s going to do that.)

In general, the censorship on Twitter has not really changed following the announcement of a plan for Musk to purchase the site and bring back free speech. Immediately after the deal was announced, it appeared that they were scaling back the super-aggressive censorship, but it’s still totally impossible for anyone pro-Russian to keep an account posting video of Ukrainian atrocities. You can usually find the videos on Twitter, because people keep making new accounts, but once they get to a certain number of followers they are banned.

Nick Fuentes has been making new sock accounts a couple times a week, and is now getting banned in under 24 hours, which means that someone at Twitter has been specifically tasked with finding his new accounts and banning them.

It is sure going to be wild if Elon pulls off his coup and gets us all back online.

]]> Media Begins Censorship Lobbying Campaign Against Substack https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/01/29/media-begins-censorship-lobbying-campaign-against-substack/ Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000
Dr. Joseph Mercola (Source: Instagram)

A bunch of banned people moved to substack. I never really understood what the platform was exactly, or why people keep saying “it can’t be censored.” It’s some kind of subscription news letter, that is also a blog.

It obviously can be censored, and I think the people saying “it can’t be censored” are just boomers who don’t understand the internet. I’ve heard Tucker Carlson say it though, and Tucker did multiple reports on me being censored, so he’s aware of the levels of censorship which are possible.

I was censored in totally new ways never seen before all the way back in 2017. But none of these things that were done to me were like, ruled Unconstitutional or anything. They just haven’t been used since (except some of them against 8chan).

Before 2017, the censorship against me was the same as normie conservatives are experiencing now. I was banned from social media, banned from PayPal, banned from credit card processing, my bank accounts were closed. It’s obviously logical that the next step for normie conservatives will be to suffer the same kinds of censorship I suffered in 2017.

So, now we’re seeing the media go after Substack.

They will of course go after the payment processor first.

So they’re talking about money in their first big censorship push. If you go Joker mode and say “it’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message,” then then go on to the next stage.

The Guardian:

A group of vaccine-sceptic writers are generating revenues of at least $2.5m (£1.85m) a year from publishing newsletters for tens of thousands of followers on the online publishing platform Substack, according to new research.

Prominent figures in the anti-vaccine movement including Dr Joseph Mercola and Alex Berenson have large followings on Substack, which has more than 1 million paying subscribers who sign up for individual newsletters from an array of authors who include novelist Salman Rushdie, the writer musician Patti Smith and former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings.

Mercola, a US alternative medicine doctor and prolific producer of anti-vaccine content, and Alex Berenson, a journalist banned from Twitter last year after questioning the efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines, are among five vaccine sceptics on the platform who earn themselves and Substack a minimum of $2.5m a year from their newsletters. Under Substack’s business model, writers keep about 90% of the subscription income, with the platform taking 10% and payment company Stripe charging the writers 3% of their take.

See, they identify the payment processor.

That is a call for a Jihad against Stripe, which always cracks.

Research by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a campaign group, showed that Mercola’s newsletters made a minimum of $1m a year from charging subscribers an annual fee of $50, with Berenson making at least $1.2m from charging people $60. Three other vaccine sceptic newsletters, from tech entrepreneur Steven Kirsch, virologist Robert Malone and anonymous writer Eugyppius, generate about $300,000 between them.

It’s hilarious all of these Jewish “anti-hate” companies are now just pro-vax enforcement. And they literally refer to anti-vax as “hate.” David Icke was deplatformed by the above mentioned organization, and they identified him as a “hate actor.”

I guess Pfizer is a protected group. It’s run by the Jews, after all.

Imran Ahmed, chief executive of CCDH, said companies like Substack were under “no obligation” to amplify vaccine scepticism and make money from it. “They could just say no. This isn’t about freedom; this is about profiting from lies … Substack should immediately stop profiting from medical misinformation that can seriously harm readers.”

…

A Substack spokesperson referred the Guardian to an essay published on Wednesday by the platform’s co-founders, Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie and Jairaj Sethi, in which they said silencing vaccine sceptics would not work. “As we face growing pressure to censor content published on Substack that to some seems dubious or objectionable, our answer remains the same: we make decisions based on principles not PR, we will defend free expression, and we will stick to our hands-off approach to content moderation,” they said.

If they find an alternative to Stripe, Amazon will pull them. Eventually, Cloudflare will pull them.

They won’t do it immediately. This is a process of building up an outrage narrative that the media does. This is the first big hit I’ve seen so far on Substack, but you’ll start seeing CNN pieces on it and so on.

It’s amazing that no one ever even bothers to point out that the media is literally calling for the shutdown of its competition. I don’t think anymore says that but me.

Actually, no – it’s definitely entered the narrative with CNN calling for the silencing of Joe Rogan.

I believe these people are ideological, and want to silence people for that reason. But you could theorize that isn’t even a factor, and all they are trying to do is ensure they have a media monopoly for financial reasons.

Speaking of finances – it’s obvious The Guardian is lying about the amount of money these people are making. These hate groups just make these numbers up. Trust me. The SPLC keeps saying I have a Bitcoin address with $500,000 in it. They will not publish the address. It’s certainly not any public address I ever used, which anyone can go check. So they appear to just make up random numbers.

With me, they do it to discourage people from donating. (By the way – donate, please.)

With the Substack guys, it’s a narrative – “these people are making millions by killing people!”

The only ones allowed to make money are the pharmaceutical jews, of course.

]]> I Don’t Know Why Alex Berenson Attacked Robert Malone on Fox News – But It was Sure Weird https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/01/16/i-dont-know-why-alex-berenson-attacked-robert-malone-on-fox-news-but-it-was-sure-weird/ Sun, 16 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000

As the reader is aware, Alex Berenson has been a pretty consistently good voice on the issue of the coronavirus hoax, almost from the beginning. His track record isn’t as good as mine, but as a former New York Times writer and then a normal paperback novel writer, he was in a better position to share data with the population.

I have criticized him over some things. Firstly, though I tweets are now deleted because his account is deleted, here’s a March 14, 2021 piece where I responded to Berenson claiming that the whole hoax had ended because the CDC had lightened up the mask mandates. I addressed the fact that he is working with bad data, claiming that this hoax somehow “is not a conspiracy.”

In October published an entire analysis of how absurd it is for him to continue to claim this is “not a conspiracy: Alex Berenson Still Thinks This Isn’t a Conspiracy?

That piece ties in to a recent piece I wrote about the fact that the conspiracy is totally documented and not a secret: The Coronavirus Hoax is Not Slowing Down and Nothing is Going Back to Normal

So, I’ve had my disagreements with Berenson. However, I accept that he’s a life-long establishment-type person who is not likely to overcome his various hard biases in his fifties, even if he is uniquely able to acknowledge some obvious facts that others raised in the establishment paradigm can’t see, and I’ve mostly just been thankful for what he does say.

Robert Malone is a mainstream virologist who has been involved in government and big pharma his whole life, who has come out and spoken against the vaccine. He recently had a viral interview with Joe Rogan, which got huge amounts of media attention, and triggered recent calls for Spotify to shut down Joe Rogan.

I also have my disagreements with Malone, who believes in the virus and claims to have had “long covid.” As we’ve documented, “long covid” is a fibromyalgia-tier psychosomatic condition. Malone also is very recently “red pilled” on the hoax, and is still in process of being red pilled, and actually took the first shot of the vax – so one would wonder if he is actually experiencing health issues, why he’s not connecting them to the vax instead of the alleged coronavirus disease (which does not actually exist). I’m actually very impressed with Malone being open to new information at his age – I heard him on one interview say something to the effect of “people kept telling me about this World Economic Forum thing and it all sounded like a kooky conspiracy – and then I went to their website and read Klaus Schwab’s books and found that everything people were telling me was true.” With him, I also accept that as a life-long member of the scientific establishment, he’s got biases to deal with.

So, I have disagreements with both Berenson and Malone, and I have written them out, while also continuing to say that I respect and appreciate their work. I think whether you agree with me or them or disagree with all of us, we can all agree this is fair enough, and in fact the way public discourse is supposed to function.

What I can tell you for certain is this: if I was invited onto a five minute Fox News segment with Berenson and/or Malone, I would not use that opportunity to air my disagreements with them in an aggressive and demeaning manner – and yet, that is exactly what Alex Berenson decided to do to Robert Malone this weekend.

You should watch the clip. It’s really weird.

To be clear, this wasn’t framed as a “Berenson v. Malone” segment – it was intended to have to people who disagree with the narrative come on and share their thoughts. Berenson, in a pre-planned operation, took the opportunity to publicly attack Malone over what people might call minor disagreements (they are certainly much more minor than my disagreements with both of them, and again – never in my life would I consider doing something like this).

I might go so far as to describe Berenson’s behavior here as “inexplicable.”

For the record, his disagreements are with Malone’s assertion that he has the patents on which the current mRNA vaccines are based, and that Ivermectin is successful in treating the alleged Covid-19 disease.

I don’t know how minor or major Berenson views these disagreements, but he appeared unhinged, opening his segment with vitriol against against a man who is – by all available accounts – on the same team as him.

To frame the attack, Berenson noted that they are both banned from social media, and said something to the effect of “we should both be allowed to disagree about this publicly and have this conversation without being censored.”

Malone responded professionally, and then went on to conduct the interview normally.

Although they are both now very censored, they both have SubStack accounts that presumably both have significant readership. Malone responded to the Fox News event in a long SubStack post, posting all of his patents and so on.

I was personally delighted he used the word “bushwhacked” in the title of his post. It’s not only accurate, but it is a great word that simply is not used enough.

With regards to the dispute – which honestly, I don’t care about at all – Malone obviously didn’t invent modern coronavirus vaccines. What he did could be called “precursor research and development” or some other term. He did this in the 1980s and 90s, according to that SubStack post I just read, so obviously, there’s been significant development in the field since then. But I’ve never heard Malone claim anything different than that. I’m sure he’s been credited as “the inventor of coronavirus vaccines” by boomers on Facebook, but this is really a petty thing to bicker about in any context, let alone the context Berenson chose.

As far as the Ivermectin thing – whatever, I don’t know. I don’t believe the disease exists, but it’s show success in treating respiratory illness that does exist, so I don’t really doubt the idea that people who are sick and diagnosed with “Covid-19” are helped by it. But again, small issue.

Malone ascribes Berenson’s attack to professional jealousy, while also suggesting he could be controlled opposition (which in itself suggests Malone might be getting redpilled a bit too fast).

I don’t think Berenson is controlled opposition. I don’t really see what purpose that would serve. He hasn’t tried to lead anything, and most of the information he puts out is good, even if he does “gatekeep” on the Great Reset. The professional jealousy theory might have something to it. Malone has gotten a huge amount of attention, while Berenson, who has been saying most of the same things for longer than Malone (including on the Joe Rogan show), has gotten less attention. This is partially due to Malone’s background and credentials, but probably more so due to the charisma gap.

Professional jealousy is definitely powerful. I’ve been shocked by the amount of people who have come after me, who allegedly agree with 98% of what I say, simply because I’m more popular than them. It can get really gross and pathetic, like what Berenson did on Fox.

I also think Berenson might be having some kind of personal crisis. For many months, in every TV interview I’ve seen, he looks disheveled, with bags under his eyes. He is probably experiencing a lot of backlash in his personal life for what he’s doing professionally, and that can be very difficult (I also know about that). He’s probably getting harassed by feds, he could have even been threatened. He could be facing a divorce, given that women will more or less universally abandon a man who is going through any kind of basic professional hardship, let alone someone who has become a pariah.

Anyway, although I denounce Berenson’s behavior, I don’t think he’s a shill. But you do have to ask: should he be invited back on TV? Well, not if he’s going to act like this. He should have to agree not to do this again. This was very weird and it looked really bad for both parties, and for the poor Fox News host.

I also think Berenson should issue some kind of apology to Malone.

Instead, he’s posted on his own SubStack a screenshot of a reply he sent to the Daily Beast requesting comments on his interaction with Malone.

Calling Malone “self-interested” is at least as bad as calling Berenson “controlled opposition.” Malone is an old man who could just as easily retire – or better yet, be brought on regularly on CNN as an expert pushing the Fauci line. But he’s decided to do this instead.

Actually, just looking at Berenson’s SubStack now, he’s apparently continuing the “it’s all over, the agenda failed” narrative.

So, hey – maybe he is controlled opposition? It’s definitely really stupid to claim that the vax agenda is over because the WHO issued a statement saying the vaccines don’t work. The head of Pfizer has already admitted this, and said he’s coming out with a new vaccine in March, which will work this time. No one in the media has questioned this or said we should stop taking nonstop vaccines, and there is no reason at all to believe that narrative is going to change. There’s especially not a reason to believe that narrative is going to change if you’ve read some of the articles on the World Economic Forum website or Klaus Schwab’s books.

But yes: everyone is on edge, everyone is acting weird, that is just what is happening. We’ve all seen it in our personal lives, with people we’ve known our whole lives behaving in ways we’d never have expected them to.

]]> Alex Berenson Still Thinks This Isn’t a Conspiracy? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/10/24/alex-berenson-still-thinks-this-isnt-a-conspiracy/ Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Alex Berenson was back on Joe Rogan last week. I haven’t listened to the whole show, because I said when Joe Rogan left my podcast feed that I would never download the Spotify app.

Nor, for that matter, will I “sign up for Spotify.”

I went to the Spotify site when I heard Berenson was back on Rogan, and when I clicked play, I got this:

Not happening.

Funnily, since Rogan sold his soul to these people, I’ve not heard one person talk about him. He still pops up in the media as a punching bag (they are running out of punching bags since they censored everyone). But in my circle of friends, as well as on forums and so on, I never hear Rogan mentioned.

He probably lost 2/3rds of his audience, I’d reckon.

What a moronic move.

Obviously, $100 million is a lot of money. But he was the single most listened to person on the entire earth. Can’t you figure out a way to spin that into money?

Maybe he didn’t realize what was going on? Maybe he didn’t understand that the show would not be on normal podcast apps at all anymore?

They do seem to be allowing Rogan to say what he wants to say, but of course you can’t tell – he’d been getting less interesting every year for at least four years before he sold himself to Spotify.

When his archive was moved to Spotify, they deleted a bunch of shows, including Alex Jones’ appearances. But Jones has been back on the show since, so I guess Rogan negotiated his way out of that.

But yeah – sorry, I’m not downloading Spotify. Ever. No matter what happens.

But the clips on YouTube are good.

He is apparently still trying to claim that this maybe wasn’t all on purpose, and is just the result of incompetence and maybe corporate/Democrat opportunism.

But Klaus Schwab literally announced, more than six months before the vax was released, that it would probably be a regular annual shot.

(I can’t find the isolated clip – weird that Schwab would be so censored, no? – but it’s in this Computing Forever video.)

How did he know that?

Of course, to believe this was “not a conspiracy,” you also have to believe that Event 201 was a coincidence. Basically, you have to believe that Bill Gates is a moral person who is just trying to help humanity.

You have to believe that every single step of this agenda was not planned from the beginning.

I’ll remind you also: Alex Berenson said this whole thing was over back in the spring when the CDC told people they could take their masks off. He’s made other bad predictions as well.

Meanwhile, all of my predictions since March of 2020 have come to pass, or will come to pass soon (economic demolition via supply line collapse and hyperinflation is now being admitted to be on the way by mainstream people – and by the way, I never put a timeframe on economic collapse, I just said “in the next couple of years”).

The ability to accurately make predictions shows that you have a working analytic model.

But Berenson is okay.

Alex Jones got mad about Berenson’s appearance on Tucker Carlson earlier this week.

Berenson was reporting on the fact that all-cause deaths are rising in every country, and didn’t just say “it’s the vaccine,” but tried to let people down easy, saying “well, maybe it’s the overdoses and suicides caused by people developing all of these mental health problems as a result of the restrictions, maybe it’s secret Covid deaths…” long pause, “or maybe, and I hesitate to say this, but maybe it’s deaths from the vaccines.”

(It’s a fun 20-minute AJ clip with a few facts you might not have heard, and fewer ads than most of his uploads.)

Alex Jones says we don’t have time to do this pussyfooting thing. I guess I would agree with Alex Jones that we don’t have time for pussyfooting, but I don’t agree with it because even without pussyfooting there is no way to stop this coming collapse now.

The time for a resistance to this virus hoax was May of 2020, when they announced that they were lying about “three weeks to flatten the curve” and we would go into an indefinite state of virus restrictions. Once people accepted that, the game was over.

To be fair to Alex Berenson, I’m sure he knows more than he lets on. I mean, the idea that these excess deaths are from anything other than the vaccine is just absurd. There were no excess deaths at all when there was an alleged deadly pandemic on the loose, and now that there’s a vaccine for the deadly pandemic, there are serious numbers of excess deaths.

Yes, a lot of people have developed drug addictions during the lockdown, and yes, most drug addictions now involve fentanyl and it’s super easy to accidentally kill yourself with fentanyl. But that’s mostly an American issue. Europe and especially the UK is dealing with serious numbers of excess deaths. I don’t believe Berenson doesn’t get that.

Also, although he might not have been on “Team Conspiracy” (his term) in the beginning, at this point, as they’ve continued to give people this deadly vaccine, knowing it is killing people and giving them chronic disorders that will severely shorten their lives, you can no longer claim that this is all innocent. And once you understand that they are willing to kill huge numbers of people, it’s not a huge leap to see that they planned all of this long before any of us heard the word “coronavirus.”

Also, to be fair, Alex Jones himself still hasn’t figured out what’s going on. He keeps saying that the virus is real, and refuses to offer any evidence. He’s even gone through and shown that there were no excess deaths in 2020 – but then he said that more people are dying this year, and didn’t connect it to the vaccine, instead saying that “Covid is getting more deadly.”

Of course, in the above clip, he does attribute the excess deaths to the vaccine.

So, he’s all over the place, like he’s always been. But he still drops more truth bombs than most. I still see boomers claiming that this was all the result of government incompetence – even “far right” or white nationalist types of boomers. As I’ve said many times: a lot, lot, lot of boomers and even some younger people are fixated on the idea that the master plan of the government is for people to “work and consume.”

Alex Jones is at least not on that level of retarded, and admits that there is a global conspiracy to create a new society where an elite of cyborgs rule over a mass of peasants.

The biggest problem with Alex Jones is that he still avoids saying “JEWS,” and instead continues to blame things that Jews do on Chinese people. But at this point, that is basically a meme. I think he himself must be laughing about it when he says things like “the communist Chinese run Hollywood.”

But listen – Berenson is anti-vax, Jones is anti-vax. I’m on Team Anti-Vax. I don’t care about anything else. People can say whatever they want, if they are against this vax, then I support them.

(And before anyone asks – yes, I think Alex Berenson is Jewish. But I’d be going against my own values and beliefs if I was against him for that. The single reason I have ever been against the Jews is their behavior. Berenson has never done anything Jewish, that I’ve seen. I DO NOT just “hate the Jews.” I am against the behavior of the Jews. So far, I’ve not really found many Jews who did not behave like Jews. But Berenson seems fine. I also like Glenn Greenwald, but he is literally a homosexual. However, I blame the Jews for that – he was almost certainly abused by rabbis. That would also explain the fact that he is first and foremost against the Jews. He is against Jair Bolsonaro, but his main problem with him appears to be his connections to Israel. Berenson on the other hand is a normal person. He’s a novelist, but I haven’t heard that his novels are Jewy either. I haven’t read them, but from what I’ve heard they’re just solid, if generic, spy novels.)

]]> Alex Berenson Finally Banned From Twitter https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/08/29/alex-berenson-finally-banned-from-twitter/ Sun, 29 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Welp.

The coronavirus hoax truth-telling Alex Berenson was finally “permanently suspended,” i.e., banned, from Twitter.

This was his finally act, for which the hammer came down:

Every part of that tweet is simply repeating the official statements of the CDC and other government authorities, other than saying it is insanity to mandate it.

A while back, I did a list of “facts about COVID NINETEEN” wherein I linked a whole bunch of bizarre and contradictory official statements. Of course, that post is nearly a month old, so a lot of stuff has changed, as they are consistently admitting, more and more, how ineffective the vaccine is at doing what they initially said it would do.

I think we’ve all seen at this point that the CDC admits that it doesn’t stop infection or transmission, that it only “might prevent serious illness” for a period of about six months after taking it.

Here is the Jew Rochelle Walensky telling the Jew Wolf Blitzer that on August 5 saying that the vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission:

She says, as Berenson said in his banned tweet, that it could be a theraputic to prevent “serious illness.” That’s of course meaningless, given that according to their data, the supposed coronavirus does usually not cause serious illness to begin with.

Walensky is now demanding everyone get a third booster shot; however, she does not know that this will prevent transmission (it seems to be accepted now that no vaccine will ever prevent infection).

So, Berenson was banned for saying that the mandates are insane.

I have had my issues with Berenson. In particular, I was upset when he said during early summer that when the CDC stated that no one had to wear masks anymore, that the hoax was officially over.

He was constantly saying that he was against “conspiracy theories.” That did not help him not get banned from Twitter, and it definitely did not help him to accurately predict future events.

I have said from the beginning that this is a conspiracy, and there is no other way to look at it. Claiming it isn’t a conspiracy makes it impossible to understand it. There is no way to grasp what is happening by just pretending these people are all hopelessly stupid.

Furthermore, he actually did promote conspiracy theories that I thought were stupid, including the Wuhan Lab Leak Theory. That conspiracy theory is much dumber than my own stated theory – which is actually a fact – that there is no new virus. “COVID NINETEEN” is very simply a rebranding of the flu. Along with labeling all deaths from respiratory disease as COVID NINETEEN, have then laundered deaths from other things – heart attacks, cancers, and every obesity-related death. Anyone who tests positive on a PCR test within a month before dying is labeled a coronavirus death, no matter what, and if someone dies of respiratory illness, they are labeled a coronavirus death even without the PCR test.

There is no evidence, at all, of a new virus.

Maybe Berenson himself is incapable of processing a lie that size, or maybe he just thinks it’s better not to say that and instead just argue about scientific papers in order to “seem more credible.”

I don’t think he seems more credible by doing that, and I think everyone is able to easily grasp the fact the flu has been renamed.

All this having been said, Berenson was a great source of information. He has devoted his entire life to following this hoax, and documenting it, and he will be sorely missed on Twitter.

As of time of writing, he has a new Twitter, but they will just delete this later today.

As Twitter has made clear, when someone gets banned from Twitter, it is not the account that is banned, it is the human being who uses the account, and he can never have another account for the rest of his life. I believe at some point they even said that if you legally change you name it doesn’t matter, as your individual body and soul are what is banned.

You can only follow him on his substack.

After the ban, he wrote this on his substack:

Does it have the right to prevent me (or anyone) from opening another account, verified or not?

More interestingly, does it have the right to prevent ANYONE else from ever allowing me (or anyone) to use his or her account to tweet, even a single time? In other words, can Twitter say that only a single account-holder can ever use an existing account?

I’m not seeing that in their TOS, but would be interested to know what lawyers think.

Oh my sweet summer child.

Twitter can do anything they want to anyone, because they are a totally unregulated private company. They are even allowed to secretly collude with other companies, such as Facebook and Google, to ensure you are banned from all internet platforms. In my case, they also worked with every domain registrar to ensure that I could not own a normal .com website.

This is because America is a libertarian and anarcho-capitalist society, which does not believe in any form of government intervention in the free market – except in very special and outrageous cases, such when a Christian baker refuses to bake a gay cake (in which case the entire force of the federal government will come down on them and destroy them).

A lot of people are now saying that “substack can’t be banned.” This is obviously untrue, and I don’t really understand how it is possible that we are still having this conversation.

A quick “whois” lookup will show you that substack is using both Amazon and Cloudflare.

Both of those companies banned me (and others) for legal speech protected under the First Amendment.

So, it’s not a matter of “if” Substack will be run off the internet, but “when.”

You people can laugh about that, like you did when I was banned from Twitter, Facebook, PayPal, YouTube, etc. But the process already exists to remove entire websites, and it has already been used, and no one got in any trouble, because the official position of both Republicans and Democrats is that large tech companies can never be regulated and are allowed to censor anyone.

Right now, if I were to make a Substack, I would be banned from the service, because I am personally banned by both Amazon and Cloudflare, meaning that Substack is not allowed to publish my legally protected speech.

Substack could move to Chinese services and stay online, but they would just get banned for saying that the virus is part of a Chinese conspiracy. It’s very convenient for me that I am an anti-Semite, and not an anti-Sinoite. In a perfect world, I believe anti-Sinoites should have free speech, but America is the company that made the commitment to free speech, and then completely failed to uphold those laws.

Hardcore censorship has now allowed America to become an utterly lawless country, where no one is allowed to complain about anything. You cannot have a free society without free speech. Period. At least not one based on the model of secular Republicanism. If we had a theocracy, our free speech would be limited, but they would be required to provide us with certain other freedoms.

Obviously, Taliban-run Afghanistan has a lot more freedom, generally, than America, as the leaders are subjected to the limits of Sharia Law. Our leaders are not subjected to anything, and can do anything to anyone, and we are not allowed to protest.

It’s all very unfortunate.

But hey – follow Alex Berenson on Substack while you can!

I expect for a while, his posts will mainly be about how outrageous it is that his speech was taken from him, how he should have rights, and how he’s going to start suing. Everyone that this happens to has a hard time processing the fact that there is literally no recourse, and that any lawsuit they file will be thrown out.

He’ll eventually get over it.

We all do.

(Except MILO – he never got over it.)

]]> Alex Berenson Can’t Take It Anymore https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/07/01/alex-berenson-cant-take-it-anymore/ Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Alex Berenson is the only journalist still on Twitter that is exposing the coronavirus hoax.

He’s been meticulously breaking everything down for over a year (maybe not quite as long as I’ve been breaking it down, but long enough).

Now, he finally can’t take it anymore.

He should have just said “motherfuckers.” It’s okay to just say it, when you’re really angry. But I guess he doesn’t want to get marked down in the Twitter naughty book.

Although I have a lot of respect for Berenson, because he is hardcore in comparison to everyone else who hasn’t been banned yet, he suffers from the same issue as Tucker Carlson in that he’s always one or two steps behind.

He thought the virus hoax was about getting rid of Donald Trump through the mail-in hoax, or about destroying the economy and handing over the entire wealth of the middle class to Jeff Bezos and Jew bankers. But it was always more than that. It was always about a complete and total transformation of every aspect of human society, ala the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the various documents from the Club of Rome long before that.

Everything that they have brought in through this coronavirus hoax is stuff that they had said they were going to do in the name of the global warming hoax. It was all planned from the beginning. It has nothing to do with China. Frankly, I don’t even think there is a new virus – they just invented a new test for the common cold, which is also a coronavirus.

I remember when Berenson came out and said it was over when the CDC removed indoor mask regulations. I calmly said: Alex, it has only just begun.

There was always going to be a “new variant” that reset everything to January 2020, where they said “we have to lockdown again and wait for another vaccine.” That was always going to be linked to a more extreme coercion campaign with the vaccines, and probably forced vaccinations in various parts of the world.

Yes, it will slowly transition into “global warming lockdowns.” But none of the freedoms are coming back.

Alex needs to start listening to James Delingpole.

Ignore the teeth. He’s on top of this.

]]> Blue Checks are Just Lying About the Coronavirus mRNA “Vaccine,” Saying It Isn’t Gene Therapy https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/03/16/blue-checks-are-just-lying-about-the-coronavirus-mrna-vaccine-saying-it-isnt-gene-therapy/ Tue, 16 Mar 2021 03:00:44 +0000

Former New York Times journalist and novelist Alex Berenson has been with us from the beginning of the coronavirus hoax as one of the only sound and sane voices still allowed in public.

He recently posted a tweet pointing out that this supposed “vaccine” is a form of gene therapy. The tweet was in response to someone asking if he was a general anti-vaxxer or just skeptical of the coronavirus vaccine.

Twitter marked the tweet as “misleading” without explaining what was misleading.

Two different blue checks replied to the tweet, false claiming that it isn’t gene therapy.

Berenson responded to both with screenshots of various institutions referring to it as gene therapy.

The vaccine is literally an injection of synthetic mRNA. This isn’t a mystery and it isn’t controversial.

Here’s an official diagram from Pfizer:

The second reply was from Jonah Goldberg, who is the Jew who runs the “conservative” National Review. So he is just an all around shill and professional liar who enforces establishment doctrines about everything.

But the first reply was from “Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD,” who is a Jewish vaccine doctor. He absolutely knows what the vaccine is, and is just openly lying about it. It is literally “gene delivery technology.”

How are they so bold to just lie outright about something anyone can Google?

I guess they just think people are too stupid to look it up?

They could easily say, “well, it is a form of gene therapy, but it’s limited for the purpose of a vaccination” or some such thing. Instead, they are just lying outright.

And these people wonder why people are hesitant to take the shot? When this is the state of discussion? When Jewish journalists and Jewish vaccine doctors get together and just publicly lie about what they are trying to inject you with?

]]> After Bowing to Pressure to Sell Alex Berenson’s First Coronavirus Truth Book, Amazon Censors the Sequel https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/11/26/after-bowing-to-pressure-to-sell-alex-berensons-first-coronavirus-truth-book-amazon-censors-the-sequel/ Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000

CENSORED AGAIN. After being published. And I told the @amazon KDP team I was putting out another booklet so their automated review wouldn’t do this.

Here we go again. pic.twitter.com/I8ZInzNfOI

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) November 24, 2020

Alex Berenson is one of the single adults in the room.

The censors don’t take kindly to adults being in the room.

RT:

NY Times journalist-turned-Covid-19 skeptic Alex Berenson briefly had his latest anti-lockdown book pulled from Amazon along with its electronic version. By the time it returned, it was a top-10 bestseller on Apple Books.

First the paperback and then the electronic edition of ‘Unreported Truths about Covid-19 and Lockdowns – Part 3: Masks’ were removed from Amazon on Tuesday, Berenson revealed in a series of tweets that same day.

The book attempts to debunk the hypothesis, favored by most governments but apparently lacking convincing scientific proof, that wearing even non-medical masks stops the spread of Covid-19.

However, Berenson had made a point of posting the new book on Barnes & Noble and Apple Books. His tweets about Amazon censorship apparently sent followers into the arms of Apple Books, where the title proceeded to soar to number nine within a few hours.

Nevertheless frustrated over Amazon’s censorship, Berenson pointed out that he had discussed the coming release of the third installment in his Covid-19 booklet series with Amazon Kindle personnel in an effort to avoid the supposedly automated deplatforming he’d experienced with the first book in the series.

‘Unreported Truths about Covid-19 and Lockdowns – Part 1: Introduction and Death Counts and Estimates’ was briefly banned in June before a massive backlash against the move, spearheaded by Tesla billionaire Elon Musk, successfully convinced the tech giant to change its mind.

In addition to spuriously deleting Berenson’s book, Amazon hosted “several fakes” of the manuscript, the writer claimed, complaining the e-tailer “refused to pull them despite my repeated requests.”

However, Berenson’s complaints not only convinced Amazon to bring his book back online – they drove the e-book to number one in the epidemiology section.

Berenson is far from the only Covid-19 skeptic to be mysteriously deplatformed from Amazon. Writer James Perloff was disturbed to find his book ‘Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come: Red Pilled’ banned last month, echoing Berenson’s concerns about the absence of a concrete explanation for the sentence. Both writers protested that all their information was thoroughly researched and footnoted.

Saying “this shouldn’t be censored because it’s factual” is like saying “Jews shouldn’t claim to be oppressed because they are the single wealthiest and most powerful group of people on earth.” It misses the entire point of the thing.

“Disinformation” is a euphemism for “against the regime” in the same way that “hate” is a euphemism for “against the regime.”

Amazon sells books about witchcraft, Scientology and chiropractics. The idea that they are concerned about the truthfulness of information is a lie (it’s also insane that you would claim to only sell “truthful” books). Just so, costumed neo-Nazis are allowed to use social media and payment processors freely, because they support the lockdowns and tell their followers to vote for Joe Biden.

In his Twitter bio, Berenson refers to himself as “censoree.”

That is indeed an appropriate term.

Do you remember when they told you that they were only going to censor Andrew Anglin, because he was a special and unique case, given that he made mean jokes about a morbidly obese woman who had a heart attack?

Berenson’s books are great, and his Twitter feed is too.

Tap in.

]]> Petition for Joe Rogan to Have Coronavirus Truth Journalist Alex Berenson Back on His Show https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/05/07/petition-for-joe-rogan-to-have-coronavirus-truth-journalist-alex-berenson-back-on-his-show/ Thu, 07 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000

Alex Berenson appeared this week on Tucker Carlson to discuss the absurd situation wherein Dr. Hoax, Neil Ferguson, was caught violating the lockdown to have sex with a fat, old married woman. I think the people need to see more of Alex Berenson, and I’m calling for him to get a full spot on Joe Rogan’s show.

While there are a lot of scientists telling the truth about the coronavirus hoax, a scientist has a very limited ability to get his message out to the public, and most of them tend to not be particularly well spoken, generally. Alex Berenson is the single relevant public figure bringing the truth to the people.

Berenson is a former New York Times journalist, who worked as a novelist before becoming an activist against the legalization of marijuana. After writing the book “Tell Your Children,” Berenson appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience for a debate with a stoned Canadian marijuana supporter. The show was great and made a big impression on me at the time. I’ve been anti-marijuana for decades, having seen the way it ruins people’s lives, but I was not informed about the way these new strands of marijuana that have largely been developed after the legalization of medicinal marijuana can induce schizophrenia.

The work that Berenson is doing on this virus hoax is indispensable. His Twitter feed contains more relevant information than any of the major news sites, including the alleged right-wing news sites like Breitbart that should be telling the truth about this.

Rogan has become a largely mainstream figure, and taken a lot of horrible positions over the years, but Berenson is a public figure, who is going on Tucker Carlson regularly now and has already been on Joe’s show before. It is the morally correct thing for Joe to have him back on, and it will make history.

In fact, I would like to see him appear with another former guest. The most famous Joe Rogan guest.

Sorry – second most famous Joe Rogan guest.

Yes, that’s the one.

Elon Musk has been speaking out against the lockdown, and Musk recently followed Berenson on Twitter, so he is aware of the man and has probably talked to him privately.

Joe Rogan has the ability to arrange this, and if he wants to keep any relevance in the post-lockdown world, this is the kind of show he needs to be hosting.

He’s pumping out the facts.

He’s down to do shows.

The other option for Joe to consider is a debate between Berenson and celebrity politician and lesbian sex-exploiter Katie Hill about the ability of the coronavirus to spread in open air and whether or not someone can infect you by walking next to you outside.

Joe is of course familiar with my work on this site, and I am sure he will see this article, but I encourage all of you to do what you can to encourage him to make this happen. Either a Berenson & Musk show, which would be ideal, or a Berenson solo show. Neither Berenson nor Musk is afraid of going outside, and I believe they both live in Southern California, so he might be able to get them both in studio, which would be ideal. I am really tired of this Zoom nonsense.

Contact Joe on Twitter or by email and demand that this happen.

]]>