This seems reasonable enough.

After all, we always have to remember: our values are who we are in a rules-based order of human rights democracy.

And basically, everything that existed before 2017 is against our values.

And things that are against our values are not who we are.

RT:

Several of the UK’s most respected television shows, movies and works of literature have been included in a list of works that could potentially encourage far-right sympathies, compiled by the taxpayer-funded and government-led ‘Prevent’ counter-terrorism programme, according to the Daily Mail.

Works by JRR Tolkien, Aldous Huxley, George Orwell and even William Shakespeare, as well as classic movies ‘The Bridge on the River Kwai’ and ‘The Great Escape’ were cited in a list published by the British paper on Saturday as being highlighted by the counter-terrorism watchdog, for their potential use by far-right agitators to promote troublesome viewpoints online.

In addition to movies and works of literature, television shows such as the original ‘House of Cards’ series and even the BBC’s ‘Great British Railway Journeys,’ presented by former Conservative politician Michael Portillo, are mentioned by ‘Prevent’ as being potentially attractive to people with far-right viewpoints.

It said in a recent report by its Research Information and Communication Unit (RICU) that far-right corners of the internet had promoted ‘reading lists’ and ‘important texts,’ as well as other media which could potentially stoke radicalism online.

The ‘Prevent’ counter-terrorism programme was set up by the British government in 2011 as a means to safeguard against “vulnerable people being drawn into criminal behaviour,” with an emphasis on combating ultra-right groups and Islamic extremism.

It could well be time to bring back these memes we all know and love.

At least today.

At least this one day, we’re bringing back those memes.

Currently, we as a race are being genocided.  As such, I don’t feel we should be bickering.

Sometimes, people get offended by articles on this site.  This week, one I wrote about Anglos offended both Anglos and non-Anglos, and I wrote about the biological inclination of women to mate with Arabs who are seen as dominating, and was accused of justifying this behavior.  Today, Ben wrote about Aldous Huxley, and offended many conspiracy theorists.   Over the last couple weeks, some disagreed with Michael’s strategy of trolling that towelhead woman, just as some had disagreed with the strategy of trolling Berger.  A bunch of people complain that I am too supportive of Putin or Le Pen or whoever.

Criticism is fine, and it usually is mostly criticism.  I believe people have a right to express their opinions, if they can remain civil.  I don’t expect people to agree with everything I say, and with the article on Anglos, I wrote something which I should have figured beforehand would be unnecessarily divisive.

For me, the idea of getting people agree with exactly everything I believe strikes me as nutty, and it is not one of my goals.  We all need to understand that it will probably never happen, ever in our lives, that we meet someone with whom we agree on every single issue.  Unless you join a cult.  Running this site, however, I have a responsibility to avoid things which cause unnecessary division, but I’m not always going to be perfect.

What I want to point out is that disagreeing about things should never get in the way of White Unity.  Because this is the thing we need most.

This is not just about the Daily Stormer.  It is something I practice myself.  I refuse to attack anyone who identifies as pro-White, even people such as Jared Taylor who refuse to address Jews.  I simply see no benefit in it.  I can criticize them, if they say something I disagree with, but I don’t believe it is appropriate to deny that they have a place in working to fix things.  Taylor wakes people up to the race issue, and I seriously doubt that anyone who is aware of the Jew issue hears him and is like “wow, I guess I should quit talking about Jews.”

Last year, I wrote a piece called “Infinite DramaQuest” about ongoing infighting, and I believe this had an effect.  People seem to be doing it much less now, and for this I am thankful, and proud to have played a part in demonstrating how dumb it is.

Besides the issue of personalities clashing with one another, there is also an issue of people trolling each other in the comments sections of every pro-White site in a way that is wholly unhelpful.  This is often related to religion, and it is silly.

What we need to understand is that not only do Jews not attack one another, no one on the left does.  I’m sure they do it sometimes, but it is very rare.  They understand they have a shared agenda, despite whatever details, and so they focus all of their rage on the enemy.  We must learn to do the same.

Things That are Not Okay 

This week I also got this comment on an article I wrote about Bill Nye the Science Guy denying the existence of race:

With this post Andre clearly shows us that he’s a tool (or worse psyop) being used by his so called enemy “the Jews”.

Ask yourselves this question: What is the most important notion that “the Jews” need everybody to believe?

Answers: That race exist and that one race is superior to another (i.e. the “Jews” are superior and the chosen one). Without our belief of race, they (the “Jews” would lose all power and legitimacy over their fictitious claims of being “chosen”.

Jew is not a race it’s a religion; a dangerous mind f*ck.

Only one race: the human race. All the rest is cultural differences. Yes there are big differences in cultural traits, and yes this can cause serious social difficulties, but NO this is not a question of genetics or even problems of phenotype (i.e. the superficial manifestation of genes).

Andre cannot see that he is playing in the hands of the “Jews” by fully supporting their racial agenda.

Either Andre is a tool or he knows what he is doing…

The real fight is not race, but emancipation of mental slavery and this includes being brainwashed by ALL forms of political and social agendas.

Fear will always hold you back… No matter how you justify it!

Presumably, the vast majority of all readers disagree with this, and I believe this is the type of sentiment that needs fought against.  This is not only objectively wrong – Whites alone pioneered race theory and Jews alone pushed “race does not exist” – it is completely incompatible with working towards any type of solution to anything at all.

This is something, then, that we can say is not okay.  Holding such a position as this removes any room for common ground.  This is something categorically different than what religion you have or what your opinions on various politicians are.

You Don’t Have to Like Me or Anyone Else

What we are doing is not about being friends and liking each other.  If you don’t like me, or some other pro-White figure, that’s fine.  Don’t like them.  Don’t go to their website, don’t share their website with your friends.  There are plenty of people involved who I don’t personally like, and whose websites I don’t recommend to people.  That’s the way it goes.

But there is no need to attack.  That is simply foolish.  Comments sections are now often getting out of control with attacks on various people, and I am considering simply shutting them down.  It is one thing to attack me and my people on the site, but to begin attacking others who are working in the White cause on my site is really unacceptable.  That pulls me into the whole ordeal, and as I have said, I’ve no interest in any of it.

I understand that the internet breeds anger.  I believe this is due to the tendency to completely misunderstand where people are coming from, due to the written word being a relatively low form of human communication when it comes to emotional content.  So we all need to be aware of it, and take heed.

I created the second biggest White Nationalist website in the world (SF is number one and always will be) by continually saying what I believed to be true, and surrounding myself with people who agreed.  As the longtime reader is aware, there are people I used to associate with and then broke-off from because they refused to stop focusing on attacking others working for the cause.  These people now have few followers because people are much more interested in goal-oriented operations than those which are drama-based.

So, I ask you, please ask yourself what it is you want, and if what you want is for the White race to continue, stop attacking others with the same goal.  If you see someone saying something you don’t like, ask yourself if there is something you can positively contribute to the discussion in a civil manner before you start typing up a comment.  If there isn’t, and you are just posting to negatively contribute, then don’t post at all.  I am sure there are other places where your energy can better be spent than by creating drama among people you agree with on 95% of the issues.

Learn to agree to disagree.

A few days ago, we reported on some interesting remarks that the brilliant British author/philosopher Aldous Huxley made about our eternal Jewish enemy.

These revelations motivated me to go back and reread his seminal work Brave New World, as it had been many years since I had done so. Much to my surprise, and completely unexpectedly, I found myself noticing what seemed like obvious anti-Jewish and pro-White undertones in the book, such as the Jewish nature of the villains and the Aryan nature of the heroes (the “world controller” character is described as having a “hooked nose” and the hero as a blonde European, for example).

Upon doing a bit of internet research to put together a piece about this, I discovered that I was not the first to come to these conclusions after stumbling across an article at the website Jett and Jahn that says essentially the same thing.

The article basically encompasses all of my observations and could hardly be improved upon, so I will just quote it in full.

In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley Warned About Jews:

British author Aldous Huxley wrote “Brave New World” in 1931.

The book is a parody of utopian novels he had read that predicted a “glorious future”. Huxley was skeptical of modernization and worried about the social effects of the Industrial Revolution.

His novel actually describes a dystopia, a liberal society controlled by a small group of people.

Most of the negative characters from the book are named after famous Jews:

Bernard Marx: Named after Jewish revolutionary Karl Marx

He has an inferiority complex since he is shorter and thinner than other males. He is very critical of society out of jealousy because he doesn’t feel accepted.

Lenina Crowne: Named after Jewish revolutionary, Vladimir Lenin

She is very attractive, popular, and charismatic. She has sex with many different men in the story.

Morgana Rothschild: Named after Rothschild Jewish banking family

Bernard accidentally sits next to her at the orgy ceremony in Chapter Five. He immediately regrets it because she has a unibrow…

Polly Trotsky: Named after Jewish revolutionary, Leon Trotsky

She is a young girl who briefly appears at the beginning of the book. She makes a sexual advance at a young boy but he gets upset and rejects her.

Mustapha Mond: Named after Jewish Zionist Alfred Mond

He is the World Controller for Western Europe (how fitting?).  He is very intelligent but uses his knowledge to manipulate people.

In Chapter Three, he is desribed as “a man of middle height, black-haired, with a hooked nose, full red lips, eyes very piercing and dark”. (need any more proof?)

Meanwhile, the noble characters in Huxley’s story are clearly not Jewish:

Helmholtz Watson: Named after German physicist Herrmann Vonn Helmholtz

He is a professor at the College of Emotional Engineering. He is tall, strong, athletic, and handsome but his intelligence isolates him from others. He is unsatisfied and feels emptiness but doesn’t know what to do about it. He gets in trouble when the government discovers a poem he has wrote about being introverted. Eventually, he is deported to a stranded island but views the punishment as an opportunity.

The main character of the story, John “The Savage” was not named after a specific person but symbolizes the traditional idea of a “hero”. He grew up on a Native Reservation in America but didn’t fit in because he was a blonde European. He is chivalrous, disciplined, and intelligent but introverted and feels isolated.

Huxley’s predictions are fascinating to read from the modern perspective.

For example, the word “God” has been replaced with “Freud”, the Jewish psychologist behind the Sexual Revolution.

In Huxley’s story, Freud is honored as “the first to reveal the appalling dangers of family life”. In the future society, the family has been destroyed and the state raises children.

If you haven’t read this book, I strongly recommend it. (Here is a link to a free online copy).

The beginning is confusing but necessary to help build the story.

(Unfortunately, there are no movie versions that follow the actual  storyline from the book. The Jews in Hollywood obviously wouldn’t let that happen…)

It’s impossible for anyone to know what was going through Huxley’s mind when he wrote Brave New World, but it is hard to believe that this wasn’t intentional. And, if it wasn’t, that means he subconsciously envisioned a dystopian future as being a struggle between Jewish oppressors and Aryan victims, which is in itself pretty fascinating.

Aldous Huxley, the prolific British philosopher and writer, most notably of the classic (and frighteningly prophetic) dystopian novel Brave New World, made some interesting remarks about the parasitic Jew.

From an article originally published in William Pierce’s National Vanguard magazine:

[I]n Do What You Will [Huxley] wrote of the Jews: “Their mission, in a word, was to infect the rest of humanity with a belief [in materialism] which . . . prevented them from having any art, any political life, any breadth of vision, any progress. We may be pardoned for wishing that the Jews had remained not forty, but four thousand years in their repulsive wilderness.”

In 1943 he told his brother Julian that the Jews are a “monied, influential, and pushing minority” who are themselves responsible for ill-feeling and anti-Semitism (The Letters of Aldous Huxley).

In Antic Hay one of Huxley’s characters complains of “hideous red cities pullulating with Jews, sir. Pullulating with prosperous Jews. Am I right in being indignant, sir?” Huxley apparently thought so.

Here is a rather interesting 1958 interview with Huxley on Brave New World coming into view.

And the entire 1988 BBC film version of Brave New World.