Frankly, a lot of astrophysics just sounds like Kabbalistic gibberish.

The Independent:

There was an earlier universe before the Big Bang, and evidence for its existence can still be observed in black holes, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist has said.

Sir Roger Penrose made the claim after recently winning the award for breakthroughs in Einstein’s general theory of relativity and proof of the existence of black holes.

Sir Roger argues that the existence of unexplained spots of electromagnetic radiation in the sky – known as ‘Hawking Points’ – are remnants of a previous universe.

It is part of the “conformal cyclic cosmology” theory of the universe, and it is suggested that these points are the final expulsion of energy called ‘Hawking radiation’, transferred by black holes from the older universe.

Black holes are a region of space where matter has collapsed on itself, and has such a high gravitational force that not even light can escape.

Such an event may be occuring in the centre of our galaxy; Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez, who shared the Nobel Prize with Sir Roger, offered the most compelling evidence of a supermassive black hole in the middle of the Milky Way.

There is a possibility that the timescale for the complete evaporation of a black hole could be longer than the age of our current universe, and therefore could not be detected.

“I claim that there is observation of Hawking radiation. The Big Bang was not the beginning. There was something before the Big Bang and that something is what we will have in our future”, Sir Roger said, according to The Telegraph.

The “Big Bang,” black holes, alternate universes – there is no actual evidence for any of this stuff. It is all just basically made up whole cloth, then they claim there is theoretical math to indicate it might be true.

The basis for the theoretical math? Other theoretical math.

That theoretical math is based on the theoretical math of a… Jewish genius.

Who knows – maybe it’s all real. I doubt it, but sure, who the hell knows?

But the point is: they print this stuff in the news and even teach it in schools as if it is somehow factual, and it is very far from that.

Now they’re saying there was a universe before the universe, and they’re saying the guy who said it is a genius.

Roger Penrose is also Jewish. Just in case anyone is, you know, keeping score on that front.

I’m about to go out there and be like, “another universe was before the universe that was before our universe, but then there were too many black holes, so it got pulled into a vortex and then there was so much gravity that it created a proto-big bang to create the universe that was destroyed to make our universe.”

If I said that, they would give me money. Except actually they wouldn’t, because I’m not Jewish.

This is not serious science.

Frankly, all of this stuff is suspiciously aligned with weird Jewish occultism.

At the very least, all of this stuff is much closer to religious mythology than it is to anything resembling the scientific method of observation and falsifiable theories.

It’s time to start tearing down all these statues of Einstein.

New York Post:

Newly translated into English, Albert Einstein’s private travel diaries from the 1920s reveal that he was racist in his early life, especially toward Chinese people.

The journals, published as “The Travel Diaries of Albert Einstein” by Princeton University Press, reveal that Einstein, perhaps the most famous scientist of all time and known for his theory of general relativity and the equation e=mc2, was extraordinarily biased toward certain populations. This is a stark contrast to his stance later in life when he said that racism was a “disease of white people.”

Does it get any more JEWISH than THAT?

The diaries were written between October 1922 and March 1923. In one entry Einstein wrote that the “Chinese don’t sit on benches while eating but squat like Europeans do when they relieve themselves out in the leafy woods. All this occurs quietly and demurely. Even the children are spiritless and look obtuse.”

Speaking about the “abundance of offspring” and the “fecundity” of the Chinese, he continued: “It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.”

The likes of who?

“Us” being Jews?

Einstein also derided the people of Ceylon, which is now known as Sri Lanka. In Ceylon, he wrote, the locals “live in great filth and considerable stench at ground level,” before adding they “do little and need little. The simple economic cycle of life.”

That seems pretty much just like an observation, rather than a value judgement.

If we’re being fair.

Einstein also gave his thoughts on Japanese people, who he viewed in a more positive light, calling them “unostentatious, decent, altogether very appealing.” However, he also wrote the “intellectual needs of this nation seem to be weaker than their artistic ones – natural disposition?”

Oh dear.

Biological race differences.

Suggested by a famous scientist…. who is praised as a hero, because he was Jewish.

“Entries… contain passages that reveal Einstein’s stereotyping of members of various nations and raise questions about his attitudes on race,” a description of the book reads.

The journals were translated from the German and are described as “the first publication of Albert Einstein’s travel diary to the Far East and Middle East.”

Speaking with The Guardian, the book’s editor, Ze’ev Rosenkranz, said that Einstein’s views were not intended for public consumption and provide a shock to those who read them.

Jews not witch hunting and doxing their own dead heroes for thought crimes.

That’s lulzy.

“I think a lot of comments strike us as pretty unpleasant – what he says about the Chinese in particular,” Rosenkranz told The Guardian. “They’re kind of in contrast to the public image of the great humanitarian icon. I think it’s quite a shock to read those and contrast them with his more public statements. They’re more off guard, he didn’t intend them for publication.”

…

In 1946, speaking at Lincoln University, the first degree-granting historically black university in the US, Einstein said that racism was a “disease of white people” and added “I do not intend to be quiet about it,” according to a 2007 article in the Harvard Gazette.

Yeah, it’s almost like Jews know race is real, but use this whole “racism” thing as a way to hurt white people.

But that would be a conspiracy theory.

Even though it is just an observation.

Einstein also played a role in the foundation of the alleged “state” of Israel, which was founded by Jewish terrorist groups who went into villages and slaughtered the local brown folk. He was offered the role as second president of Israel after the first one died.

Wikipedia:

When President Chaim Weizmann died in 1952, Einstein was asked to be Israel’s second president, but he declined, stating that he had “neither the natural ability nor the experience to deal with human beings.” He wrote: “I am deeply moved by the offer from our State of Israel, and at once saddened and ashamed that I cannot accept it.”

Silly goose.

You weren’t being asked to deal with human beings – you were being asked to deal with your fellow rats!

The Einstein genius lie is yet another Jew hoax.

Einstein ripped people off and made up a bunch of nonsense.

National Geographic aired a new show, “Genius” focusing on the life of Einstein, claiming he solved the mysteries of the universe despite being hated by Germans for being Jewish. In reality, Einstein was a plagiarist, communist, Zionist and a fraud. He is a constructed myth.

He was just another tricky Jew rat.

Verdict: Not a genius.

Albert Einstein: Your standard kike scam-artist.

People who think the hard sciences are the last free intellectual pursuit should try and question the orthodoxy of the “theory of relativity.” It’s a theory that mainly only Russian and Chinese scientists have questioned in recent years, largely because Jewish control over Western academia has made it taboo to question it. Because of this, the field of physics has remained quite stagnant of the last several decades (compared, to say, the Aryan and East Asian dominated field of computer science).

Unsurprisingly, much of the deference to Einstein is based not on the brilliance of his work, but on his biography and the myth created around him.

Einstein left Germany in 1933 when Adolf Hitler took power, and this was when – according to the narrative we’ve all been taught in school – German science collapsed as Jews began to emigrate. Scientists in the Third Reich heavily criticized Einstein’s theory of relativity in particular, which is why there is a latent notion among scientists that if you question it today you’ll be branded an “anti-Semite” or blacklisted in intellectual circles (and you will).  But maybe, just maybe, these German “anti-Semites,” who gave mankind rocket propulsion, had empiricism on their side, while Einstein relied on Judenpresse mythologists and academic censorship to bolster his shots in the dark.

But who am I – I’m no Einstein. You see, Einstein was the world’s most brilliant and infallible mind to ever live, just like Sarah Silverman is funny, Lena Dunham is hot, and Israel is a bastion of human rights-based democracy.

But lo, some bold physicists beg to differ.

The Guardian:

The newborn universe may have glowed with light beams moving much faster than they do today, according to a theory that overturns Einstein’s century-old claim that the speed of light is a constant.

João Magueijo, of Imperial College London, and Niayesh Afshordi, of the University of Waterloo in Canada, propose that light tore along at infinite speed at the birth of the universe when the temperature of the cosmos was a staggering ten thousand trillion trillion celsius.

It is a theory Magueijo has being developing since the late 1990s, but in a paper published on Monday he and Afshordi describe for the first time how scientists can finally test the controversial idea. If right, the theory would leave a signature on the ancient radiation left over from the big bang, the so-called cosmic microwave background that cosmologists have observed with satellites.

“We can say what the fluctuations in the early universe would have looked like, and these are the fluctuations that grow to form planets, stars and galaxies,” Afshordi told the Guardian.

The speed of light in a vacuum is considered to be one of the fundamental constants of nature. Thanks to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, it was stamped in the annals of physics more than a century ago at about 1bn km/h. But while general relativity is one of the cornerstones of modern physics, scientists know that the rules of today did not hold at the birth of the universe.

Magueijo and Afshordi came up with their theory to explain why the cosmos looks much the same over vast distances. To be so uniform, light rays must have reached every corner of the cosmos, otherwise some regions would be cooler and more dense than others. But even moving at 1bn km/h, light was not travelling fast enough to spread so far and even out the universe’s temperature differences.

To overcome the conundrum, cosmologists including Stephen Hawking have proposed a theory called inflation, in which the fledgling universe underwent the briefest spell of the most tremendous expansion. According to inflation, the temperature of the cosmos evened out before it exploded to an enormous size. But there is no solid proof that inflation is right, and if so, what sparked such a massive period of expansion, and what brought it to an end.

Magueijo and Afshordi’s theory does away with inflation and replaces it with a variable speed of light. According to their calculations, the heat of universe in its first moments was so intense that light and other particles moved at infinite speed. Under these conditions, light reached the most distant pockets of the universe and made it look as uniform as we see it today. “In our theory, if you go back to the early universe, there’s a temperature when everything becomes faster. The speed of light goes to infinity and propagates much faster than gravity,” Afshordi said. “It’s a phase transition in the same way that water turns into steam.”

Scientists could soon find out whether light really did outpace gravity in the early universe. The theory predicts a clear pattern in the density variations of the early universe, a feature measured by what is called the “spectral index”. Writing in the journal Physical Review, the scientists predict a very precise spectral index of 0.96478, which is close to the latest, though somewhat rough, measurement of 0.968.

It’s possible that Magueijo and Afshordi could be incorrect in their counter-theory, but nevertheless, the passive resistance they are getting for practicing basic testing is telling. Stephen Hawking, who is an actual genius, is himself handcuffed by his beta male itch to follow the herd. The fact that he would come up with a new theory just to obfuscate a proven inconsistency in the theory of relativity – as if it was some self-evident truth – is a testament to his weak character and lack of respect for the principle ethic of science: ideological neutrality.

I am of the opinion that if all Jews were barred from administering Western universities, grants, and research centers, science and technology would be 100 years ahead of where it is now. One look at the marvels of human achievement in barely 12 years of Nationalsocialism.

My theory of Aryan proclivity: free an art of the retarding force of pathologically politicized Jews and watch it flourish. We can prove it by busting every last Jew myth.

As the reader is likely aware, the agenda to purposefully infect the United States with the deadly African doom virus, Ebola, has been forwarded nearly exclusively by Jews. By pressing this obvious issue, we can surely alert many of our countrymen to an infectious virus much more deadly than Ebola: Jews.

The original outbreak of ultimate African doom was a result of decisions made by the Jew CDC Chief, Tom Frieden. After this Jew successfully infected the country with the disease by refusing to engage in basic, standard safety procedures, the Jew-operated Monkey Puppet Barack Obama appointed another Jew, Ron Klain, as “Ebola Czar.” The ratfaced terrorist Klain has vowed to continue the Frieden policy of aggressively Jewing over the United States with the deadly virus.

On top of this, many Jewish publications, including the Daily Beast and Salon, have been on the front lines of trying to convince the gullible goyim that a deadly virus won’t harm them, even if it will, and they must let it into their country to prove they’re not racists.

The barbaric Jewish rat David Ignatius, in a Washington Post column, called everyone who fears being infected with the disease paranoid and hysterical, even though people are already being infected with the disease.

Yesterday, the Daily Beast, in one of their weird apologetics for the policy of deliberately bringing a plague to America, cited yet another prominent Jew, Natalie Eisenbarth who supports their agenda of saving the African economy by infecting Americans with a deadly virus on purpose.

Natalie Eisenbarth, Policy & Advocacy Officer for the International Rescue Committee, says that if the goal is to protect the U.S., a travel ban is the worse possible decision. “It’s important to look at humanitarian and moral implications,” she says. “Stopping the spread of it in West Africa is in our best interest and that means getting the right people and the supplies in as fast as possible. The idea of issuing a travel ban runs against that.” On top of hindering the IRC’s ability to deliver supplies and essential medical equipment to the area; Eisenbarth says a travel ban would have a dramatic effect on people’s willingness to travel to these countries and help.

And if a travel ban were imposed, the help would be needed more than ever. The potential economic consequences that could arise from a travel ban on West Africa, says Eisenbarth, could be catastrophic. In addition to reducing trade, the ban would increase fear and suspicion of residents of this region, hindering the work of businesspeople, further sinking the economy.

So, wait.  It starts out with “if the goal is to protect the US…” then goes on to say how not banning travel would benefit Africans, without ever saying how it would protect the US.  Typical Jewspeak.  The quintessential Jewspeak, one might even say.

The International Rescue Committee is an international scamming organization designed to facilitate the invasion of every White country by subhumans from anywhere (read: everywhere), as well as funnel money into the third world cesspits and the bottomless pockets of conniving Jews.  It was founded by the Jewish plagiarist and sneaking liar Albert Einstein, and is run by scurrying rat Jews to this day.

Here is one of their propaganda videos, wherein they demand that White people serve as protective father figure to billions of unevolved savages who cannot manage any singular aspect of their own lives:

The first line in the Wikipedia article on the Liberian Economy reads:

Liberia is one of the poorest countries in the world, and its economy is extremely underdeveloped.

This is because the country is run by Black people, who are a race incapable of doing anything other than killing each other, having sex and playing basketball.

This idea that there is something to save in their economy is so obviously retarded that it makes me physically ill to even imagine that these Jews are able to make the claim without cracking up laughing.  That shows the level to which the collective mind of the American people has sunk – they used to have to come up with these complex lines of confusing reasoning when they wanted to Jew us over, now they just say the first thing that pops into their deviant Jew brains.

We need to stop travel in and out of Africa, immediately.  That includes any aid which cannot be dropped from the air.  They don’t want our help, and this disease is ultimately what is best for them anyway.  They have a population crisis, and Ebola-Chan is an angel of God sent to solve it.

If Africans were doing their best to solve this, and were openly begging us to help them, I would still be against helping them.  However, the actual situation is the diametric opposite of that.  Africans are actively engaging in spreading the virus, by leaving bodies laying on the streets, refusing to pick up medical supplies from the dock where Westerners dropped them off, and literally attacking Western aid workers, accusing them of being involved in dark sorcery.  That is the reality.

This Ebola situation – purely a Jewish operation – proves just how unhinged and out of control the Jews are.  There are an alleged six million Jews living in the United States.  They are not only bringing this hell on us, but on themselves.  But they can’t help themselves.