I guess now the blacks know how we feel when Donald Trump gets up on stage and talks about how much he loves the Jews.

It is the ultimate race betrayal for a racial leader to get up on a stage and praise the Jews.

It’s sort of strange to have him admitting that the attacks are being done by blacks, however. The Jews must really be panicked if they’re okay with making a public spectacle of “blacks are doing this.”

Jerusalem Post:

A group of African-American clergy and civil rights leaders gathered by the Rev. Al Sharpton met with a New York rabbi in the wake of the attack on Jews in Monsey.

The African-American leaders met Monday with Rabbi Marc Schneier, president of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding, to condemn the spate of attacks on Jews in New York in recent weeks.

“I am terribly disturbed by the recent antisemitic attacks on Jews, and particularly because they were perpetrated by members of the African-American community,” Sharpton said at a news conference following the meeting. “Rabbi Schneier and I have worked together for many years to bring our respective communities closer together. Today, we must work together to start to repair the damage and terrible pain these acts have caused.

“We in the African-American community know all too well how abhorrent hatred, based on physical appearance or religious observance, is. We cannot now be a part of something that members of our community are doing to other people.”

Schneier said he discussed with the leaders “concrete ways the Jewish and African-American communities can come together to promote our common interests and stem the differences that lead to such violent acts of hatred.” He added that Sharpton’s leadership “will help us repair the damage these acts of domestic terrorism have caused our two communities.”

As I mentioned earlier this week in a piece about this brewing anti-Jewish pogrom by the blacks of the NYC metro area, Al Sharpton was a leader of the 1991 pogrom in Crown Heights.

He marched through the streets screaming about Jews, and had a banner reading “Hitler didn’t finish the job” at a funeral for a black boy killed by the Jews.

Al has got to be the only guy who became less masculine and more of a shill after losing weight.

He used to be BASED and REDPILLED (BNRP).

Now he’s a BLUEPILLED FAG who shills for the shekels against his own race.

“Hey I’m Joe Biden! I’m old and confused! Vote for me!”

The Democrats are doing exactly what they were supposed to do and are claiming that it is a racist hate attack to say the word “White” like Donald Trump did on Monday morning.

Joe Biden has come to the rescue of the proud negroid Al Sharpton.

.@TheRevAl is a champion in the fight for civil rights. The fact that President Trump continues to use the power of the presidency to unleash racist attacks on the people he serves is despicable. This hate has no place in our country. It's beneath the dignity of the office.

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) July 29, 2019

To be fair, a lot of Trump’s recent tweets have been racist (though there is nothing wrong with that!), but no “racist attacks” were unleashed on Al Sharpton. All Trump said was that Sharpton is a criminal and hates White people.

I have known Al for 25 years. Went to fights with him & Don King, always got along well. He “loved Trump!” He would ask me for favors often. Al is a con man, a troublemaker, always looking for a score. Just doing his thing. Must have intimidated Comcast/NBC. Hates Whites & Cops! https://t.co/ZwPZa0FWfN

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2019

What Joe Biden and the rest of the sickening Jewish media is saying is that it is “racist” to say “Whites” – that simply saying that WE EXIST is an act of pure hatred.

Of course, we already knew that they think this. But the average White American doesn’t know this. They are now becoming aware of the fact that it is considered immoral and evil by the Jewish media to be White and say that you are White.

When the normies begin to realize that they are openly being told that they don’t have any right to exist because of their race, we are going to see a major shift in the discourse.

I am very thankful to Joe Biden and the rest of the shills who are playing their role so well in this unfolding mega-drama.

The new princess nigger has made it a point to make it clear that she hates all white people, especially her white father and other white family members.

She didn’t even allow her father to attend her wedding, coming up with some nonsense health excuse. Her father has since said she’s a dumb bitch who thinks she’s better than everyone.

In fact, no member of her white family was allowed at the wedding.

Fox News:

Meghan Markle’s half-sister, Samantha, celebrated the Duchess of Sussex’s birthday by comparing her to Disney’s “101 Dalmatians” villain Cruella de Vil.

According to E! News, the 53-year-old tweeted on her private account that she was disappointed that the Duchess of Sussex had not wished her own father, Thomas Markle, a happy birthday on his recent big day.

Samantha tweeted, “Happy Birthday Meg! It would be so lovely and appropriate of you to send DAD a BELATED birthday card for his July 18th [cake emoji] @KensingtonRoyal Cheers!”

A day before the duchess’ birthday, Samantha shared an Elle Magazine article about Markle and her husband “taking a step away from the media spotlight,” on Twitter and wrote, “OK so Cruella Deville is retreating LOL…Let me know how that works out for you [sic].”

Samantha’s recent tweets are not the first time the sibling has called out Markle for not supporting her family.

Last month, while the duke and duchess paid a visit to a Nelson Mandela tribute exhibition in London, Samantha called out her sister once again.

She tweeted, “How about you pay tribute to your own father?! Enough is enough. Act like a humanitarian act like a woman! If our father dies I’m holding you responsible, Meg! @KensingtonRoyal.”

She has said that she has no connection at all to her white family, and only ever felt her bluegum baboon mama was her “real family.”

I don’t even blame the monkey bitch for feeling odd in a family of humans.

I just blame her for being a dirty African nigger.

There are many, many signs that Meghan Markle hates all white people, straight up, and is only involved in this marriage scam for the fame, money and most importantly to promote the negroid people.

Al Sharpton has stated this plainly, saying that the marriage of a negroid into the royal family is a direct attack intended to harm the white race.

Meghan Markle’s white brother actually took the time to write the pervert Ginger Prince a letter telling him that his nigger sister is a bloodsucking whore.

This marriage to a nigger in the royal family is just another sign that reality itself is collapsing.

The idea that anyone could think this was normal shows that there is no point of normalcy by which to judge anything that happens.

People were using the term “new normal” to refer to tranny bathrooms and Somalian rape gangs and so on and so forth – but that isn’t even a very good term. There isn’t a “new normal,” because we are in a constant state of flux, meaning that the very concept of normalcy becomes impossible.

There is no standard, because everything changes so rapidly.

And no one even has any idea what to expect next!

I don’t think anyone expected that following the gay marriage wave, we would be talking about trannies and nigger princesses.

This is the reality implosion.

So, is “ending white supremacy” a codeword for “replacing white people with mulattoes”?

The Hill:

Rev. Al Sharpton said Saturday’s nuptials between the U.K.’s Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, a biracial American actress, show that white male supremacy is “on its last breath.”

“When you got little white girls in Wales saying, ‘I want to be like Meghan,’ there’s a shift worldwide that white male supremacy is on its last breath,” Sharpton said.

Sharpton was speaking during his weekly National Action Network rally in Harlem as the couple were wed at Windsor Castle, The New York Daily reported.

The reverend said Markle’s new platform on the world stage will give young girls a role model to look up to, joining the ranks of women like former first lady Michelle Obama.

“When you have little white girls in Arkansas look up and say, ‘I want to be beautiful and smart like Michelle Obama. I want to dress like the Obama girls (Sasha and Malia),’ that’s where that white supremacy is questioned,” Sharpton said. “White parents in their living room say, ‘We’ve got to do something.’ That’s what Trump played on. ‘We’re losing control of our own children.’”

There are no little white girls in Arkansas wanting to be Michelle Obama, Al.

You know that.

I’m not sure there are little white girls in Wales wanting to be mulatto Meghan – [citation needed] on that one – but if there are, it’s because she’s half white and has had a bunch of plastic surgery to look more white.

This worship of mulattoes continually strikes me as itself a form of white supremacy.

Sharpton went on to say white supremacist groups are “losing their minds” over the royal wedding.

“They’re losing their minds because the world is passing away where they are the standard,” Sharpton said. “Where they decide what is beauty, where they decide what is of intellectual depth.”

Yes.

That is to say, you’re replacing us in our own countries while assuming positions of authority over us.

Meanwhile in Africa, black supremacy seems to be doing very well.

Did you know there is an entire continent ruled by your people, Al?

They aren’t kangs, but they are definitely there.

So is the goal here “global black supremacy,” Al?

We aren’t allowed to have anywhere to run to?

The biggest thing to understand about black people is that unless you can restrain them and keep them from doing it, they are going to act like black people.

And that includes killing.

Killing is one of the main things black people are into.

Killing and having sex. And doing drugs. And stealing.

Those are the big black activities.

Daily Caller:

Rev. Al Sharpton’s half-brother was charged with murder in a Sunday shooting death in Alabama after participating in Saturday’s anti-gun “March For Our Lives,” according to a report.

Kenneth Glasgow, 52, was arrested along with another man after Breunia Jennings, 23, was shot in the head in Dothan, Ala. Authorities said Glasgow, an ex-convict, was the driver of the car linked to Jennings death. The passenger of the car Jamie Townes, 26, was also arrested and is reportedly the alleged shooter, the Dothan Eagle reported.

Dothan Police Chief Steve Parrish said that Glasgow and Townes were reportedly searching for Jennings because they thought she had stolen Townes’ car. When they spotted her, Townes allegedly fired several shots into the vehicle Jennings drove, leaving her dead.

Sharpton and Glasgow have protested together in the past, joining forces to protest the 2013 murder of Trayvon Martin in Florida. Glasgow also started a ministry called “The Ordinary People Society.” His group participated in a Saturday anti-gun march in Dothan, one day before he was charged with murder, The Washington Examiner reported.

Glasgow’s website shows a picture of him with 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Yeah so I mean.

What’re you gonna do?

That’s just the way it goes with these particular folks.

If you wanted to get all big-brained about it, you could say that they have a drive to commit murder because of the environment they evolved in in Africa, where it was kill or be killed. The most erratic and impulsively violent people lived to pass their genes on. Their violent environment is why they evolved more fast-twitch muscle fiber and higher testosterone. They are literally natural born killers. This is just kind of an obvious thing that I don’t really think anyone can make an argument against. I’ve never seen anyone try to make an argument against it.

If you didn’t want to get big-brained though, you could just say that niggers act this way because they are niggers. I’m pretty confident no one could make a very moving argument against that either.

Al never imagined there could be consequences for stealing 16 grand.

The tireless Black activist and paragon of virtue Al Sharpton is up to his hijinks once more.

The Daily Mail:

Civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton has been accused of swindling an Arizona trucker out of $16,000 after he agreed to take on his discrimination case, according to a lawsuit.

Reggie Anders Sr. is suing the outspoken preacher after he claims Sharpton took no action in his discrimination dispute with Verizon, the New York Post reports.

Anders claims that he agreed to pay Sharpton $16,000 – in cash – in exchange for him publicizing the dispute in the media and on his weekly radio broadcast, as well as setting up mediation meetings with the communications giant.

Give the man a break! He’s just a confused Negro. He probably just forgot. He was busy swimming in $16,000 in CASH, after all.

LOL, paying someone 16 thousand dollars in cash is such a Black thing to do. Right up there with selling loose cigarettes by the road side or getting golden rims for their Ford focus.

It was only later he read a report in the New York Post claiming that the preacher, and his National Action Network (NAN), received thousands of dollars in donations from Verizon and other large corporations in what the newspaper alleged what ‘protection money’.

Firms that didn’t pay up were threatened with bad press or boycotts, it reported last year.

Is this nigga serious?

So Al Sharpton is not only running a weird mafia-style protection racket, where those who don’t pay get mired in Negro whining, but he also steals money from his fellow Blacks instead of helping them out.

What a scumbag.

Al Sharpton is just a hoaxer, stealing everyone’s money to pimp his ride with sick rims and get gold encrusted hats.

These sorts of scandals are really good for us, obviously. They expose the true nature of these Black public figures who build a career out of shaming Whites. What do you think happens, at a psychological level, when our people see that these Negroes are just criminal scum?

They lose their guilt, and learn to hate instead.

We’re getting shot and raped left and right by these Blacks, and told that they’re our victims. This whole notion is a house of cards, and this evidence of Negro dysfunction is the bellowing wind needed to blow it away.

As we move into South Carolina, we will soon get the answer to one of the most interesting questions of the 2016 presidential campaign: will the blacks #FeelTheBern or will the black vote sink the SJWs and the “political revolution”:

“CONCORD, N.H. — Hillary Clinton’s got until South Carolina to prove this is all a fluke. Bernie Sanders has until the end of March to prove it’s not.

If Sanders is truly going to become a Barack Obama-style Clinton-slayer of 2016, he knows he’s going to need to start racking up Obama-level support among non-white voters, and quickly, because the Democratic primary is about to come down to race.

The Sanders campaign understands this, which is why the first campaign stop after his blowout victory in New Hampshire is a breakfast meeting Wednesday with the Rev. Al Sharpton in Harlem’s iconic Sylvia’s restaurant.

Sanders, who represents the overwhelmingly white state of Vermont in the Senate, has yet to prove he has the ability to win minority voters — a critical component of the Democratic Party coalition. He’s said he’s confident non-white voters would come to him once they heard his message — and aides consistently repeat that claim – but his close defeat in Iowa and landslide win New Hampshire, two states that are just as white as Vermont, haven’t answered any of the questions.

The next two early states to vote, Nevada and South Carolina, have much larger Latino and African American populations, which means he no longer has the luxury of appealing to his base of white liberals. …”

I agree with Rush Limbaugh:

“I mean, it’s almost the exact demographic. We go through all this. I mean, Hillary was humiliated yesterday. What is it, a 22-point loss? She lost virtually every group. Trump, on his side, won every demographic. It’s uncanny. Every demographic group Trump wins, and wins big, and Hillary lost practically every demographic group. Bernie Sanders today went to Sylvia’s in Harlem to have breakfast with Al Sharpton. Bernie knows that he’s out of this race once we get to South Carolina.

The Clinton machine is gonna kick in. The New Hampshire population doesn’t in any way mirror what the Democrats and Republicans are gonna find in South Carolina, and Bernie knows this. That’s why his first stop was Al Sharpton. Bernie’s only hope is to promise reparations. It’s the only way he has a chance of wresting the black vote away from Hillary Clinton. That’s what makes this kind of comical. I mean, to look at the leftist establishment media, they’re in panic. …”

This might explain why Ta-Nehisi Coates has thrown his support behind Sanders. Even if reparations for slavery were to become an issue though, it would never get past Congress.

The Rev. Al Sharpton is in full-on psychological breakdown mode following the announcement of all-White nominees for this year’s Oscars (there are probably some Jews as well, I haven’t looked into it – but Blacks can’t tell the difference).

He has called an emergency meeting to address this greatest of offenses. Seriously. An emergency meeting. Real thing.

Business Insider:

“The movie industry is like the Rocky Mountains, the higher you get, the whiter it gets,” Sharpton quipped in a statement released later in the afternoon.

…

“I have called an emergency meeting early next week in Hollywood with the task force to discuss possible action around the Academy Awards,” he said.

…

Sharpton praised the Oscars for nominating the civil-rights film “Selma” for best picture, but said it was “ironic” because the film is based on Dr. Martin Luther King’s marches.

Said Sharpton: “The lack of diversity in today’s Oscar nominations is appalling and while it is good that Selma was nominated for ‘Best Picture,’ it’s ironic that they nominated a story about the racial shutout around voting while there is a racial shutout around the Oscar nominations. With all of the talent in Selma and other Black movies this year, it is hard to believe that we have less diversity in the nominations today than in recent history.”

Note that he doesn’t bother to suggest a Black actor who deserved a nomination.

This is maximum stupid. Like the Jews who run Hollywood aren’t on the forefront of promoting the anti-White agenda. If it wasn’t for Hollywood, people would still look at blacks the way they did in the 1930s – as lower lifeforms, evolutionary throwbacks. It is Hollywood that has given this monkeys the position in society they now hold.

Sharpton is biting the hand that feeds.

Oscars, General Notes on

Here is a full list of the nominations, for anyone interested.

Though I don’t watch many movies, for some reason I did see Grand Budapest Hotel and the first half of Birdman. They are both completely pretentious films, totally devoid of content though very high in stylistics.

This does seem to rightfully embody the modern paradigm – style over content. There is sort of a parallel in the way modern man is using more and more advanced technologies to do stupider and stupider things.  Sixteen megapixels to send a picture of your iced coffee to someone on the other side of the planet who is also paying six dollars for a similar fructose-filled iced coffee.

A Black guy complaining that there need to be more Negroes involved in this pretentious circle-jerk that is the modern film industry really adds another meta-layer on top of it.  Though yes, Hollywood is Jewish, it is only White people who could ever be drawn in by Birdman or Grand Budapest Hotel.  Seriously, if you have seen either of these movies, try and imagine a Black guy sitting there and watching them – it is an utterly ridiculous concept.  But these apes are somehow so naturally jealous of us that they want some part in the existential crisis of the western mind that the production and popularity of these two films represents.

Facepalm, meet Möbius strip.

So now it appears that House GOP Whip Steve Scalise did not after all speak to David Duke’s EURO group, although the news is disseminating suspiciously slowly [Steve Scalise spoke to civic association meeting, not white nationalist conference, David Duke adviser Kenny Knight says, by Julia O’Donoghue, NOLA.com, December 31, 2014]. This presumably means that the Main Stream Media will be thwarted, for now, in its obvious intent to spread the smear to Senator Rand Paul via his father [If you’re a politician and your chummy past with neo-Nazis resurfaces, don’t worry. Ask Ron Paul, by Jeb Lund, The Guardian, December 30, 2015]. But there can be no doubt that, if Paul had been brought under more pressure, he would have groveled. Perhaps the most ominous trend on the American Right today is libertarians’ adoption of prevailing “anti-racism” dogma, to the point where they can increasingly only be interpreted as overtly anti-White.

“Three out of four people in jail for drugs are people of color,” Paul wrote late last year. “In the African American community, folks rightly ask why are our sons disproportionately incarcerated, killed, and maimed?” [Rand Paul: The Politicians Are to Blame in Ferguson, TIME.com, November 25, 2014]

Unfortunately for Paul, two assassinated NYPD officers were the predictable subsequent result of the ongoing Leftist agitation to which he was pandering. He had opened the door for his intra-party rivals to run against him on the traditional Republican issue of “law and order.”

Yet even apart from Paul’s tactical misstep, if he had merely reviewed crime statistics issued by Eric “my people” Holder’s Justice Department—or even his father Ron Paul’s old newsletters—he would have seen that black crime is committed at a shockingly disproportionate rate, triggering a massive response from police.

Paul is too intelligent not to understand this. But we’re talking about the shameless politician who knowingly hired the erstwhile “Southern Avenger” Jack Hunter only to later accept his resignation. Paul patronizes the historic American nation that he is one of them until he is secure in office. But the record shows that once targeted by the MSM Megaphone, he buckles.

Instead of grassroots conservatives, Paul is aiming at a fickle but critical component of his support base—the Beltway based anti-statists whom VDARE.com calls Libertarianism, Inc. Libertarianism Inc., funded significantly by the Koch brothers, is comprised of the Left-libertarians who so annoyed Murray Rothbard because they put their social liberalism ahead of the goal of confronting the state. The defining element of left-libertarianism seems to be utter contempt for the historic American nation, especially those voters who make up the Republican base.

Needless to say, as Ann Coulter has pointed out, none of these people will stand by the libertarian position on employment discrimination—any more than Rand Paul himself. Instead, both Libertarianism Inc. and Paul are championing their opposition to the militarization of the police.

Rather than stopping the riots that were destroying private property and endangering productive citizens in Ferguson, the Libertarian Party went so far as to tell police to “stand down” and pretended the issue had something to do with drugs. [Libertarian Party: Police Should Stand Down in Ferguson, MO; End Failed Drug War, LP.org, August 14, 2014] Despite their pro forma condemnation of rioting, they’re essentially defending Anarchy — telling police to “stand down” as race riots rage does nothing to help the civil liberties of black Americans and only encourages agitators.

Besides, why do libertarians even care about police militarization? Like selective immigration enforcement, the militarized police is a tool of a state that practices “anarcho-tyranny,” using extreme force to terrify ordinary Americans while giving rioters a pass. None of that massive force that has been assembled is used, as it should have been, to ruthlessly coerce the “protesters.” The militarized police presence is a sign of weakness, not strength, because there is no will in the Establishment to use it against black rioters.

The more menacing the State’s facade, the weaker its execution. The more pointless a show of force, the more libertarians can comfortably complain about it. And no libertarian discussion of police militarization is complete without claiming the State is riddled with institutional racism.

“Sure, you and I were not there the night Michael Brown died,” Students For Liberty writer Suzanne Schaefer begins in her analysis. “We cannot say with certainty what happened.”

However, given even a basic understanding of police (mis)conduct in the United States, policemen’s current and historical tendencies towards fist and trigger-happy brutality, and Darren Wilson’s less than life-threatening state of physical well-being following his “attack,” I feel pretty damn confident that it is reasonable to conclude that Brown’s murder was unmerited.

[Reflecting on Ferguson, Students For Liberty Blog, November 25, 2014. Links in original]

In other words, because Schaefer read bad things about other police departments, she’s trusting her prejudice to inform her conclusions about Ferguson.

Why is this outrage expressed on behalf of criminals who would never vote anything but straight Democrat? Because rather than wrestle the Megaphone from leftists and risk the “racist” label, libertarians cuddle up to the Left in hopes that one of the elites will slip a favorable word about them into the latest Narrative script.

While Libertarianism, Inc. recoils from institutions not yet conquered by the Left like the military, they openly telegraph to Leftists their willingness to cooperate, even if it means putting social liberalism ahead of fighting for free markets.

Thus Stephen Horwitz of Bleeding Heart Libertarians writes:

What is promising about this opportunity is that it gives libertarians a way to talk about race that does not fall into the trap that snares so many conservatives as well as too many libertarians: blaming the victim. One reason that progressives (including the media) think libertarians cannot talk seriously about race is that progressives assume, and they are correct disappointingly often, that libertarians think blacks are responsible for the problems in their own communities.

Horwitz instead says that libertarians can change the conversation to the “structural racism” created by government policies like local police forces getting military gear. But this specific policy is actually tied to statist policies that mandate more “Politically Correct and pro-criminal polices upon local law enforcement.”

Other examples of “structural racism” cited by Horwitz: “occupational licensure and zoning laws,” “government-run schools,” and “minimum wage laws.” [The Calling: Libertarians, Victim Blaming, and Structural Racism, by Steven Horwitz, Future of Freedom Foundation, August 28, 2014]. Thin stuff.

So what is the actual purpose of Libertarianism Inc.? To prevent the mostly white grassroots conservative base from actually taking action to defend their own interest against attacks by what is a de facto Minority Occupation Government. Every time conservatives begin to defend themselves, Libertarians rush in to tell them that what they want is Not Allowed. Beltway Libertarians function like Occupy Wall Street— “Radicals for the System.”

But the amazing fact is that Rand Paul and Libertarianism Inc. stand a distinct chance of blundering into political power. On current form, the Establishment GOP and Conservatism, Inc. will collapse in much the same manner as the Soviet Union they once nominally opposed. More importantly, they will die without heirs. Recently, I was shocked to learn that a prominent, D.C.-based organization depended on donors whose average age was well over 75 years old. Libertarians will simply plunder what remains.

What happened to the old libertarianism, especially those anti-state libertarians who understood that immigration fueled the growth of the state? To quote exiled National Review editor Joe Sobran, it’s “partly the mystery of a soul.”

Libertarians used to be a self-selected group of quirky Jewish and European intellectuals who enjoyed goading the gatekeepers of Conventional Wisdom (See Prof. Walter Block’s classic book, Defending the Undefendable) in between clobbering one another in speed chess matches.

But younger libertarians, brought up under the watchful eyes of Leftist institutions, can’t imagine an alternative to the current system. Their educations, from kindergarten to college, emphasized white guilt and white privilege as a critical, core concept necessary to understand America’s trajectory. These new recruits never express much interest in anything beyond racial hectoring—the famous warmth of Rothbard never emanates from their writings and speeches. They have internalized the Left’s Narrative, and take its presuppositions for their own.

The ultimate irony is that these supposed rebels have turned a once-proud, brilliant, and dogged minority into part of the System’s Volunteer Auxiliary Thought Police, ready to abuse the Historic American Nation like a cisgendered white male during freshmen orientation.

And if there’s one thing most American voters are tired of, it’s being lectured on race: Only nine percent of whites see race relations as a problem [As a Major U.S. Problem, Race Relations Sharply Rises, by Justin McCarthy, Gallup, December 19, 2014].

Yet it’s at this moment that Libertarians have decided to ape the electoral strategy of the Democrats: mobilize the fringes of American life against the core. Unfortunately for this strategy, however, it’s the core American population—the married, content, and patriotic—who are most likely to support the values of property ownership and limited government.

Rand Paul and his Left-Libertarians have turned their back on their natural supporters at the very time they most need a champion.

Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik says race-hustlers Bill de Blasio and Al Sharpton both share blame for the murder of two police officers at the weekend, statinging “they have blood on their hands” Newsmax reports.

The two officers were sat in their marked car, when a Black Moslem walked up to them and shot them both dead execution style, before moving to a Brooklyn subway platform and shooting himself.

Ismaaiyl Brinsley left messages on Instagram boasting about how he was doing this to avenge the deaths of two fat Black criminals, who as it turns out were as responsible for their own deaths as Brinsley.

“This guy’s intent — based on that Instagram post — was retribution for Eric Garner and Michael Brown,” The former Police Commissioner explained “The people who encouraged these protests — you had peaceful protesters who were screaming ‘kill the cops’ — the so-called peaceful protesters.”

“Who was encouraging these protesters? De Blasio, Sharpton and other elected officials and community leaders. They encouraged this mentality. They encouraged this behavior.”

“They encouraged it — and these two cops are dead because of people like them,” Kerik continued. “They don’t owe the cops an apology. An apology isn’t good enough. They have blood on their hands.”

“What I want to see is a day of outrage, I want to see protests for the two cops that are lying dead tonight,” Kerik told Judge Jeanine on Fox News following the shooting, “I want to see those protests.”

(Kerik appears at around 5:05, but the whole news report is good.)

Kerik questioned the capacity of the childlike Mayor De Blasio to lead the city.  De Blasio has not apologized for having stood against his own police force over the death of Eric Garner.  Police officials have stated explicitly that they were baffled by the Mayor’s unprecedented behavior in refusing to listen to their position and instead standing with protesters who were literally out in the streets calling for them to be murdered.

I would add here that even more than De Blasio and Sharpton, the Jew-controlled media establishment is responsible for these deaths.  If it were not for them, none of these protests would be possible, and De Blasio and Sharpton would not be “respected authorities” representing a political force, but simply individual deranged madmen who’s fringe revolutionary views are a curiosity at best.

It is the media that gives these people power.  And it is the Jews behind the media.

If we want to stop the Blacks, we must first ban the Jews.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.