BREAKING: Pennsylvania school cancels classes after nude AI photos of over 50 girls, including the principal, were spread around campus. pic.twitter.com/GEx87xVuyj

— Resist the Mainstream (@ResisttheMS) November 18, 2024

Explicit deepfake scandal shuts down Pennsylvania school | arsTechnica

Parents test if school leaders can be prosecuted over failure to report AI nudes.

An AI-generated nude photo scandal has shut down a Pennsylvania private school. On Monday, classes were canceled after… pic.twitter.com/T58qFphkW2

— Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) November 19, 2024

The Americans want to pass some kind of British-style law that makes it a crime of some sort to do deepfake nudes.

It’s not clear how this would be pushed under American law. It doesn’t really make any sense. In the UK, they can just make shit up, but in America, there remains a kind of framework for what is legal, and a cartoon picture cannot be illegal (unless of course the government outlawed obscenity again, which they’re not going to do because it’s a feminist country).

AP:

Images that depict the faces of girls with nude bodies have led to the departure of leaders from a private school in Pennsylvania, prompted a student protest and triggered a criminal investigation.

A juvenile suspect was “removed from” Lancaster Country Day School and his cellphone was seized by investigators in August, Susquehanna Regional Police Department Detective Laurel Bair said Tuesday.

It’s the latest example of how the use of artificial intelligence to create or manipulate images with sexual content has become a concern, including within school settings.

U.S. law enforcement has been cracking down on graphic depictions of computer-generated children as well as manipulated photos of real ones. The Justice Department says it’s pursuing those who exploit AI tools and states are racing to enact laws to address the problem.

How is the Justice Department cracking down? What is the law?

They are trying to make laws, but how can they make these laws? What is the core legal argument here? These are not real images, so it’s not “child porn” anymore than those Japanese loli cartoons.

What is the basic argument being made here?

A new Pennsylvania state law that takes effect late next month explicitly criminalizes making or disseminating AI-generated child sexual abuse material.

Abuse!

Who is being abused???

It’s a cartoon!

And police in South Korea are on a seven-month push to combat explicit deepfake content, with tougher penalties, expanded use of undercover officers and increased regulation of social media. Concerns in South Korea deepened after unconfirmed lists of schools with victims spread earlier this year.

Yes. Korea is implementing a total police state with secret police everywhere to stop teenage girls from being mad about cartoons created by horny teenage boys.

As part of the police investigation into what the Lancaster Country Day School describes as “disturbing AI generated photographs,” a search warrant was used this summer to obtain an iPhone 11 linked to a 15-year-old, according to court records. The records do not identify the teen.

A woman told police that her daughter said a fellow student had been “taking photographs of students and using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology to portray the female juvenile students as being nude,” according to a probable cause affidavit used to apply for the search warrant.

Wouldn’t it be easier to teach girls not to be upset by these images? Why are they even upset? This should be an opportunity for women. In the future, if they get caught doing real porn, they can just say it’s AI. It creates a free pass for women to do porn.

WATCH: Parents sued the Lancaster Country Day School in Pennsylvania last week over its handling of AI-generated explicit images of students. The lawsuit allegedly follows nude images involving dozens of students being created through AI. pic.twitter.com/RkSDsuRZHK

— Crisis in the Classroom (@CITClassroom) November 18, 2024

Basically, this is the same thing as when the Jews say “we need to crack down on child porn and hate speech.” Everyone seems to understand what they’re doing there: they’re claiming that criticism of the Jews needs to be equated to child porn.

In making this huge fiasco over AI porn – which really does not matter at all – they are getting an “in” to undermine the public’s ability to freely use AI.

Governments have figured out that the open source AI is going to be at least as good as the closed source censored garbage, so they want to get an ability to restrict its use, and the best way to do that is to create laws to “protect the children.”

People call me a pervert for saying it’s not a big deal if people are doing deepfake porn of underage girls. I don’t really know how to respond to that other than: “Shut the fuck up you whining, emotional little baby. You fucking faggot moralfag, shut up. You are so gay, your stupid child emotions make me sick, you coward.”

I’m not defending “child porn.” Deepfakes are not child porn anymore than someone getting killed in a movie is “murder.” It’s not real porn. The entire opposition to child porn was that the girls were being abused, and no one is being abused if someone makes a cartoon of them. Teenagers have been drawing nude pictures of their classmates since the invention of pencils, and they’ve been using photoshop for decades.

I don’t support any porn. I have consistently lobbied for a reintroduction of obscenity laws in America and elsewhere. I think it should all be banned. So don’t tell me I’m defending it. I’m just telling you, this is not about protecting the emotions of teenage girls. If you believe that, you are literally a retarded baby. This is about restricting the use of AI, because the last thing the government wants is for the peasantry to have full access to the AI tools that the government and corporations are planning to use against us.

Seriously, bro. Get it together. Control your faggot womanly emotions. It’s fucking disgusting, watching you whine.

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about some whining abut her stupid child feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

Teens are sending deepfake nude images of classmates to each other, disrupting lives. Schools, technology developers and parents need to act now | Opinion https://t.co/bqDBtrkjDa

— Scientific American (@sciam) June 10, 2024

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about someone hurting her stupid childish feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

Teens are sending deepfake nude images of classmates to each other, disrupting lives. Schools, technology developers and parents need to act now | Opinion https://t.co/bqDBtrkjDa

— Scientific American (@sciam) June 10, 2024

They’re fake photos!

Women should really be happy about this AI stuff, because soon they’ll be able to claim their whore photos and videos that they record are AI fakes. Then women can do porno with no consequences.

But women are too stupid to think of very obvious things like that.

New York Post:

Two students were suspended from a Miami high school last week for creating and spreading AI-generated nude images of dozens of traumatized classmates, according to reports.

Administrators at Pinecrest Cove Preparatory Academy suspended two boys for making images so disturbing that several victims did not want to return to class.

The perpetrators obtained headshots of the students — both male and female — from the school’s social media account and used an AI deepfake app to create the nude images.

I assume they were not doing gay images, but rather showing the girls having sex with male classmates.

I’m against porn and blah blah blah, but this is funny, and teenagers are going to do stuff like this, and basically, this isn’t a crime.

Those explicit shots were shared among students on social media.

One parent said her daughter is hesitant to return to school out of humiliation and fear.

“She’s been crying,” parent Vanessa Posso told CBS. “She hasn’t been eating. She’s just been mentally unstable. She does cheer and she didn’t even want to come to school to do it.”

Oh, the poor slut.

Maybe she shouldn’t have filmed that porn then???

(That’s a confusing joke, I think. Not sure how to communicate the joke without explaining it: it would be funny when girls were complaining about AI nudes to say “well, I don’t understand why she took these photos in the first place if she was just going to complain about it.”)

The offending students were suspended for 10 days from the Florida charter school, but some parents want them booted permanently.

“Our daughters do not feel comfortable returning to school with these boys in the same hallways,” said parent Nadia Kahn-Roberts, according to the outlet.

Deepfake nudes of unsuspecting students are plaguing districts across the nation, with administrators struggling to stem the disturbing trend.

Well, I’m against the spirit of this witch hunt, but you shouldn’t be spreading porn and school, and I think a ten day suspension is fine if you get caught doing that. However, the issue is, if it had just been normal porn, there probably wouldn’t have been any consequences at all, because schools just accept that high schoolers all watch porn.

Now the sicking homo pope is calling to stop AI.

Pope Francis calls for binding global treaty to regulate AI https://t.co/JocDfOnjlV pic.twitter.com/5EOBrkNhZP

— Reuters (@Reuters) December 14, 2023

What does that tell you???

I’m a ride or die Altmanist. In fact, I’m post-Altmanist. I don’t think Altman goes far enough.

We need full maximalism: we need to develop AI as rapidly as possible while not considering any of the consequences, regardless of what they are. That is the only solution.

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article.