Hello, reader. Today we will learn how to fight off mosquitos with poop.

Daily Mail:

These incredible images capture the South Sudanese Mundari tribe which worships cows as equals and whose culture centres around cattle and cattle-herding.

…

According to photographer Roberto Pazzi, 46, the tribe has a strong connection with animals, and each member has an estimated 10-12 cows.

‘They use their milk, urine, dung but never meat. They “worship” them but not as for example ancient Egyptian used to do.

‘It is an interconnection with nature that probably could teach something to the first world too.’

…

‘The children were collecting in the early morning the fresh dung in order to pile. Then it is mixed with dust so the dung becomes dry.

‘After that they put in a pile all around the camp and light on fire. The smoke coming out is used to keep off mosquitos.’

Yes, this tribe can teach something to the first world.

It can teach us how to keep mosquitos away by setting cow poop on fire.

It can also teach us to cover our skin with the dung too, in what could be considered a natural alternative to bug repellent.

They’re very wise, even though they all look like they’re miserable, for some reason.

The ones that look kinda happier are high.

They’re most likely smoking cow poop though.

To be fair, a few of them smiled for the magic machine.

So, now you know how to make cow poop bug repellent.

Consider yourself enriched.

And please take note that black people have finally, after thousands of years, contributed something to civilization.

Blacks in their natural habitat are peculiar animals.

They live kinda like chimpanzees, but not quite.

They are capable of using clothing-like items on themselves, but not quite.

They figure out how to benefit from other animals, but not quite.

They are kinda like humans, but not quite.

Daily Mail:

A boy squirts milk into his mouth straight from a cow’s udder and another lovingly caresses a bull’s horn – meet the cattle-revering Mundari tribe of South Sudan.

Photographer Mario Gerth, 42, captured their daily lives in this spectacular set of images after spending three months living among them.

…

Their lives are so intimately entwined with their cattle they even shower under the animals’ urine because they believe it protects them against infections.

In one photograph, a boy can be seen blowing air up a cow’s bottom to stimulate milk production.

Lips don’t lie.

Blacks, while in their natural habitat, are known to blow air into cows’ anuses.

Black scientists have developed the controversial technique while looking to increase milk production.

They have also figured out that they can wash themselves with cow urine, because cow urine is cleaner than they are.

Cow dung is also cleaner than they are, and on top of that, useful to keep mosquitoes away, so they cover their faces in it.

This kind of age-old wisdom has been lost in whites, which is one reason why whites are responsible for the planet being warmed to death, koalas dying and stuff.

Blacks live in harmony with nature, because they literally live covered in piss and dung — and what’s more natural than piss and dung?

It’s time to give up sewers, showers, water treatment systems, clothing, toilets, cars, planes, houses and buildings taller than a person, meat and all of the climate-changing foods, and pretty much everything whites have ever done.

The only way to save the planet from having a weather that isn’t exactly what we think it should be is to embrace blackness.

Actual picture used by one of the study’s authors.

Every human is the same, so any human with any skin color can accurately represent the Human Race.

Daily Star:

Monkeys have shown that they’re better than humans at ‘thinking outside the box.’

Julia Watzek, a graduate student in psychology at Georgia State University, set up a test involving a problem-solving video game and invited human volunteers and a few selected capuchin and rhesus macaque monkeys to play it.

Julia Watzek has this tweet pinned on her Twitter:

Humans can get stuck doing things "the way we've always done it" & miss out on easier solutions. Capuchins and rhesus monkeys don't. Find out more in our newest paper on cognitive shortcut use out in @SciReports! w/ @SezDoesScience & SF Brosnan @CogSciGSU https://t.co/uzYfH6yNfM pic.twitter.com/T7T40uA03g

— Julia Watzek (@watzoever) September 13, 2019

Is she saying that those four monkeys beat humans in the study or is she implying that the African female monkey is the human beaten by the monkeys?

I can see capuchin and rhesus monkeys beating the African black female monkey, so maybe Julia Watzek is really presenting that female as “human.”

This opens up the deeper question of “what is human though?” Is proximity to the human form enough to make a creature “human”?

Is a human-looking animal with the brain of a chimp “human” because it looks human?

The simple game involved recognising geometric shapes, whereby when a player clicked a striped square and then a spotted square, the game would display a blue triangle.

Clicking the blue triangle resulted in a ‘win’ – humans got a simple audio “cheer”, while the monkeys got a little banana-flavoured sweet.

Once the players had got used to the game, the experimenters varied the playing conditions. They would pop up a blue triangle at the beginning of the game – before anyone had clicked any squares.

Most of the monkeys took advantage of the new rules straight away, with 70% of the monkeys going for the blue triangle as soon as they saw it.

Maybe the monkeys never understood the rules, so they were never really following any rules. Maybe that’s why they are monkeys and live like monkeys, while humans able to understand and follow rules are able to build complex rule-constructs and establish societies and civilizations.

Or maybe those monkeys are really smarter than that black female from the picture. It all depends on whether or not the study’s authors used blacks as the “human” group.

Meanwhile, nearly all of the humans stuck doggedly to the original rules and ignored the “free gift” blue triangle. Only one human trial subject out of 56 took advantage of the new conditions.

“I am really surprised that the humans, a sizeable portion … just keep using the same strategy,” Julia told Live Science .

These are supposed to be scientists doing research on intelligence, yet they speak of “humans” as if all groups of people were the same.

Well, this is embarrassing: Monkeys exhibit greater cognitive flexibility to solve problems compared to humans @watzoever https://t.co/O4y4tPVJ2b

— Susan Maury (@SusanMaury) October 15, 2019

Turns out monkeys don't always follow the rules and neither should we! More about this series of developmental, cross-cultural, and comparative studies come to my talk at #SEEHB4 tomorrow at 2.45pm! https://t.co/PeX0CASvSe

— Julia Watzek (@watzoever) October 17, 2019

They throw the words “humans” and “we” around as if differences in IQ and creativity and good-will didn’t exist, as if there were no differences in proclivity to violence, as if everyone were the same as everyone else except for “cosmetic” differences.

In a further experiment, the same human guinea-pigs were shown a video of someone else using the shortcut and were told not to be afraid “to try something new.”

Even then, about 30% of participants stuck with the original “two squares first” method.

Julia said that perhaps our education system, which focuses on memorising facts rather than encouraging improvisation, might be the issue: “To set ourselves up for good decision-making, sometimes that means changing available options.

Who designed our education system and what are their objectives? What is the stated goal of our education system and what are the actual effects accomplished by it?

Why are kids sitting around all day doing inconsequent busy work?

What are recesses?

Blacks are physically very different from Whites. One of those differences is the consistency of their skin. It is much thicker and drier than White skin and does not cut or bruise so easily. It is therefore far more resilient to thorns and brambles and is perfectly suited for living naked in the wild under a hot sun.

From the Daily Mail:

From delicate swirls of raised flesh to intricate dotted patterns, the scars that decorate the bodies of Ethiopia’s Bodi, Mursi and Surma tribes are more than just the sign of an old injury.

For these aren’t just any scars: They’re an elaborate part of local culture and signify everything from beauty to adulthood or even, in some cases, are simply a mark of belonging.

But Ethiopian tribes aren’t the only ones to embrace scarification. In Uganda, the Karamojong are famous for their elaborate scar patterns, while across Ethiopia’s border with Sudan, Nuer men bear scarred foreheads and consider getting them a key part of the transition from boy to man.

Now the stunning scar markings of Ethiopia and Sudan are the subject of an incredible set of photographs by French snapper, Eric Lafforgue, who travelled through the country observing cutting ceremonies and meeting the locals.

During a visit to the Surma tribe, who live in the country’s remote Omo Valley, he witnessed a scarification ceremony, which involved creating the patterns using thorns and a razor.

‘The12-year-old girl who was being cut didn’t say a word during the 10-minute ceremony and refused to show any pain,’ he revealed. ‘Her mother used a thorn to pull the skin out and a razor blade to cut the skin.

‘At the end, I asked her whether having her skin cut had been tough and she replied that she was close to collapse. It was incredible as she didn’t show any sign of pain on her face during the ceremony as that would have been seen as shameful for the family.’

What’s more, he explained, despite the pain, the girl herself initiated the ceremony as Surma girls aren’t obliged to take part. ‘Scars are a sign of beauty within the tribe,’ he added.

‘Children who go to school or convert to Christianity don’t do it but the others see the ability to cope with pain as a sign that they will be able to cope with childbirth in future.’

Other tribes who live in the Omo Valley, among them the Bodi, also embrace scarification and often use sap or ash to make the resulting wounds more prominent when they heal.

But it seems that not everyone is impressed. ‘People wearing scarifications are seen as “primitives” by many urban Ethiopians and suffer from this,’ Lafforgue explains. ‘Those who have had them but have been to school as well often try to hide them.’

Others, such as the Mursi tribe, consider scars a sign of beauty and strength, although as Lafforgue relates, thanks to an influx of workers from other parts of Ethiopia, scarification is becoming an increasingly risky business.

‘Using shared blades is a huge problem in the south Omo region,’ explains Lafforgue. ‘Hepatitis is starting to become a problem as workers from other parts of Ethiopia arrive to work on the new giant [government-sponsored] plantations. AIDS is also becoming a threat.’

Despite the risks, scarification continues to play a huge role in tribal life, not least across the border in South Sudan where scars are a distinctive feature of life for the Nuer people.

South Sudan’s second largest ethnic group after the Dinka, the majority of adult Nuer men have ‘gaar’ markings – six lines carved on either side of their foreheads – as a sign of maturity.

Other Nuer, particularly the Bul Nuer of the Nile Valley, create a dotted version of gaar and women sometimes have them too. The neighbouring Toposa tribe, which lives in both Ethiopia and South Sudan has also embraced scarification but combine facial dot patterns with elaborate body etchings as well.

Although the Toposa etchings remain popular with younger generations, the Nuer’s gaar markings are becoming increasingly rare as conflict between them and other South Sudanese tribes becomes more frequent.

‘This tradition isn’t done as much anymore,’ explains Lafforgue. ‘Partly, it’s because of better education and the increasing number of people who have turned to Christianity but also because it is a too visible sign of tribal belonging in an area that has suffered many disputes.’

Traditions like this prove that Blacks are a different species to Whites. They do not feel pain in the same way that we do.

If a 12-year-old White girl was to try that she would faint with the pain.

I can’t wait for some Wiggers to have a go at this.

South Africa’s government has ordered sculptors to remove a bronze rabbit they hid in the ear of a Nelson Mandela statue, unveiled after the former president’s death last month.

It wanted to “restore dignity back to the statue”, a spokesman told the BBC.

The sculptors reportedly inserted the rabbit as a trademark signature and to denote the haste with which they had to complete the statue.

Rabbit in the Afrikaans language is “haas”, which also means haste.

“We don’t think it’s appropriate because Nelson Mandela never had a rabbit on his ear,” Mogomotsi Mogodiri, the spokesman for the Department of Arts and Culture, told the BBC’s Focus on Africa radio programme.

“We’d want people to see that statue as a symbol of hope, not about something like a rabbit.”

Mr Mandela, who died at the age of 95, was widely acclaimed for his role in fighting white minority rule and promoting reconciliation after being elected South Africa’s first black president in 1994.

The nine-metre (30ft) bronze statue was unveiled on 16 December, a day after Mr Mandela was buried.

It stands at the Union Buildings, the government headquarters in the capital, Pretoria.

Mr Mogodiri said the sculptors had apologised for any offence caused to the government and Mr Mandela’s family by placing the rabbit in the statue’s right ear.

“Discussions are on-going about when the rabbit will be removed. Government wants it removed as soon as possible to restore dignity back to the statue,” he said.

The sculptors, Andre Prinsloo and Ruhan Janse van Vuuren, said they had added the rabbit to the statue after the department refused to allow them to engrave their signatures on the trousers of the statue, South Africa’s Beeld newspaper reported.

They said it also represented the tight deadline they work under.

Read More

In Israel, the savage hordes of invading blacks are labeled ‘infiltrators,’ and either imprisoned or deported.

Meanwhile, in every White country, the Jews are on the forefront of pushing for mass invasion by every type of savage from anywhere.

Please note that these are not “different individual Jews” – the collective stance of Jewry as a whole is that the West should be overrun, while Israel is kept racially pure.  We can observe this in that Jews in Israel support the invasion of Europe, while the Jews in Europe promoting the invasion and denouncing anyone who opposes it as a hateful racist who deserves to be put in prison, do not speak out against Israel’s policy of expelling all ‘infiltrators.’

The Jew General Wesley Clark (Wesley Kanne) famously stated that “There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states.”

But there is a place in the Middle East for ethnic purity.  It’s called Israel.

From the Times of Israel:

The Knesset passed late Monday night a new version of the so-called “Infiltrator Law,” which allows for the detention of illegal African migrants for up to one year, and additionally provides for the detention of such individuals in what is termed an “open” facility.

The previous version of the law, which provided for detaining “infiltrators” for up to three years, was struck down as unconstitutional by the High Court of Justice in September.

The new law was passed by a vote of 30 to 15, after a fiery five-hour debate in the Knesset plenum which lasted into the wee hours. The legislation was sponsored by Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar of the prime minister’s Likud party.

During debate, Meretz party chief Zahava Gal-On called the proposed law “a disgrace which mars the law books” and predicted that it, too, would be invalidated by the High Court.

Sa’ar addressed the measure’s opponents, saying, “This law serves the interests of the state and her citizens, Jews and Arabs.”

“You say the law is shameful — not only are we not ashamed by it, we would be ashamed and embarrassed if faced with powerlessness in protecting the only country we have,” he added.

Does everyone have an intuitive understanding of The Golden Rule, that rule that forms the basis of all laws: ‘do unto others as you would have done unto you’? It is tempting to think that everyone does, but is there any evidence to support this, apart from just personal acquaintance with it? White Europeans have a history that is inseparable from this concept and without it, would never have been able to form the Nations and Empires that identify them throughout history. However, when you investigate African negro psychology and history, you find that they had no knowledge of this law until White Europeans came and attempted to teach them of the benefits it would bring, if they observed it.

The African Negro is unique for having based his entire economy on captive slavery as far back as we can tell, with the bigger capturing and enslaving the smaller. This ‘unjust’ treatment of each other even went so far as to include eating the weaker. This is still a common occurrence today for various purposes –  hunger, desire to obtain magical powers or just simply tradition.

The last state in Africa to outlaw slavery did so within the last ten years, and as it is still socially acceptable and goes on anyway, this was likely only in order to receive aid from ‘The International Community.’ Enslaving and eating one another, just because you can, would be the logical outcome of not being able to comprehend The Golden Rule.

A typical Friday night in the Congo.

The Black Mind

When we think, we think in words, and our language defines the limits of what we can think about. There are many words in different languages that cannot be accurately translated into another language, as they represent a unique thought process that is not replicated elsewhere. The English to Zulu language dictionary has only 250 pages, and like the other African Negro languages, does not include a working definition for any abstract concepts, as it is not possible for them to think that way.

Law is an abstract concept, just like promise, obligation, morality, time, consequences and remorse. Because of this, the thought of actually putting yourself in the position of another cannot be formulated by the African Negro. A semblance of the idea’s result can be taught, but only by way of doing something already specified, in order to gain an immediate reward, or to avoid an immediate punishment.

We see the effects of the black incapacity to think abstractly when we look at their technique for managing complex societies; since South Africa was turned over to the blacks, nothing has been maintained. You even have to bring your own equipment to the hospital if you want a Doctor to help you. The idea of preventing something from happening in the future by doing something now, like routine maintenance, is nonsensical to them.

Inability to Empathize

When we see someone in pain, or bleeding, our instincts are to help.  However, in Africa, the sight of someone in distress instils a bloodlust in the negro that spurs them on to increase the agony of the victim in horrific ways. This can be seen in the millions of Negroes with limbs lopped off in Rwanda, and in the infamous ‘necklacing’ where a tire full of gasoline is put around the victims neck, before torturing them so much that they set themselves on fire to make it stop. Much pride is taken in this savagery, with the torture and killings being videotaped so the incident can be relived and shown to friends.

Some tribes of Red Indians were similar, skinning women and children alive and staking captives out and starting fires on their chests. Far from feeling compassion for their victims, once the pain was apparent, it would encourage and excite them all the more. This is all well documented.

Even in the so-called ‘civilized world,’ this still goes on. There are many accounts of Negroes becoming excited at the sight of someone being assaulted and random bystanders not helping, but actually joining in the attack. Many of these attacks have little or no apparent reason behind them. There was a recent case in America where after shooting a mother in the leg, the gunman then shot her new born baby in the face. This is similar to what happens in Liberian cities, where young men boast of killing pregnant women – only over there, they then eat the body parts too.

A typical day out to the shops in Kenya.

An Alien Being

It may be said that White Europeans used to use torture to gain confessions, but this was done to criminals, not just because people were weaker, and they were not tortured to death for sadistic pleasure, but tortured to the end of gaining information from them. They had already been found guilty and the torture was to get the exact truth of what had happened out of them. After the interrogation they were always given the chance to retract their confession, in case they had just given it to make the pain stop.

We have a history of building civilizations, and this ultimately comes back to our intuitive understanding of The Law. There is no history of Negro civilizations, and I think this is due to their inability to understand The Law. It may be beneficial for them as a group to obey it, but it does not come naturally to them, it is not a part of their instinctual make-up.

When they feel they have been wronged, they take vengeance regardless of whether it is justified or not. A recent example of this is in the Trayvon Martin case. This teenager was shot in self-defense by Neighborhood Watchman George Zimmerman, while Trayvon was pounding his head into the pavement. The court case proved beyond any doubt that George Zimmerman was innocent, yet this did not matter to the American Negro. They believed they had been wronged and they wanted to take revenge. The law was seen by them as a means to obtain vengeance, not as a means to obtain justice. When Zimmerman was found innocent and not guilty, there were demands to try him again and threats to kill all white people on twitter. Predictably, many revenge attacks on random white people followed.

They are What They are

I am not trying to simply insult the Negro race, but rather to objectively review their behavior in a detached manner. It is only when comparing them to other races through a mistaken belief in equality, that the statement of facts appears derogatory. The relative lack of capacity for abstract thinking does manifest in positive ways as well as negative. Depression and neurosis used to be virtually unheard of in Negroes, the same with schizophrenia and suicide. When among their own people, their ways are not seen as being problematic for them.

There is a video online of African Negroes hunting, killing and eating one another. It does not appear as if they have any conscience about doing this, and from their own explanation in other videos, it seems to just be natural behavior for them. It is the way they have lived for thousands of years and the idea of changing it makes no sense to them, unless they are to be immediately rewarded with guns or food for doing so.

Is it fair to force people to go against their own nature and traditions in their own country? I don’t think we should be forcing Negroes to conform to the White man’s law (their own term for it) in their homelands. Is it fair to make the White man live alongside someone who does not have the law written in his heart? I don’t think that is fair either. Like the negro, I do not believe in universal laws; we are under our law, we know what it is, and we can rightly judge our own people’s actions through it. But we have no moral authority to judge another race’s actions, as we can have no personal understanding of their standards by which they deserve to be judged.

When we talk about being under The Law, and the obligation to others that it entails, we are not just encouraging it to avoid punishment, we intuitively know that it is the correct way to live, but there is no evidence to show this is the same for all other races. We are either much better at internalising the golden rule of ‘do unto others,’ or it is something that is inborn within us. This does not appear to be so for the negro though, and we are showing a dangerous lack of imagination in thinking otherwise, as well as committing an injustice by judging their actions according to it.

The ideology of racial separatism, far from being a ‘supremacist ideology,’ is a means of recognizing the fundamental importance of the differences between races, and acknowledging that for any race to fulfill itself, it must be allowed to determine its own destiny.  The truth is, the ones who are violating the rights of Negroes are those who believe they are capable of forcing the moral laws of the White man upon them.