abraham lincoln – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png abraham lincoln – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 New “Documentary” Asks the Most Important Question of Our Time: Was Lincoln a Faggot? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/09/13/new-documentary-asks-the-most-important-question-of-our-time-was-lincoln-a-faggot/ Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Who knows if Lincoln sucked cock, but he was definitely a faggot for letting all those niggers loose on the streets.

I think he probably did suck cock, given that no normal person would ever think letting a mass of millions of blacks out into the wild was a good plan.

Breitbart:

The left’s queering of Abraham Lincoln has begun in earnest.

Lover of Men — a new documentary currently in select cinemas, and coming to VOD on October 8 — seeks to answer the question: Was Abraham Lincoln gay? The answer it comes up with is: kind of, maybe, sort of.

In addition, the current Broadway comedy Oh, Mary! depicts Lincoln as gay, with First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln serving as his “beard.” The play, which features drag performances, was written by a gender “non-binary” person named Cole Escola, who uses”they/them” pronouns, and plays Mary Todd.

Speculation over Abraham Lincoln’s sexuality has long been a niche obsession among LGBTQ historians and activists. But it has never been regarded as a serious line of historical inquiry — until now, as LGBTQ activism and woke identity politics have taken over the liberal arts.

Lover of Men: The Untold Story of Abraham Lincoln focuses on Lincoln’s relationships with four men, including his close confidant Joshua Speed, arguing that the friendships were intense and emotional enough to qualify as “homosexual” by today’s standards.

Along the way, the filmmakers trot out a series of “experts” — some of them gay and transgender — to push the speculation forward. One even claims that Lincoln was attracted to a certain type of male — dashing and daring.

…

On Broadway, Oh Mary! has received rave reviews from establishment media critics, including The New York Times, which called the farce “dragtastic” and “one of the best summer comedies in years.”

It seems like you should be able to sue from beyond the grave if people accuse you of being a faggot after you’re dead.

They should probably try to clone Lincoln so he can sue. And then put the clone in prison or have him executed for letting these niggers loose on the unsuspecting public.

]]>
Outrage After Trump Says Civil War Could Have Been Avoided Through Negotiation https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/01/08/outrage-after-trump-says-civil-war-could-have-been-avoided-through-negotiation/ Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Which part of the Civil War “could have been negotiated”? The slavery part? The secession part? Whether Lincoln should have preserved the Union? Question for members of the GOP—the party of Lincoln—who have endorsed Donald Trump: How can you possibly defend this? https://t.co/83N1RFze0w

— Liz Cheney (@Liz_Cheney) January 6, 2024

It’s sort of a weird thing to be outraged about.

Maybe weird to have brought it up in the first place.

I guess most fatmericans literally believe that the Civil War was about slavery? If people are that uninformed, and also believe they have a right to a public opinion, then we really need some kind of brutal Stalist agenda in this country.

I don’t see any other option.

CNN:

Former President Donald Trump on Saturday suggested the Civil War could have been avoided through “negotiation,” arguing that the fight to end slavery in the US was ultimately unnecessary and that Abraham Lincoln should have done more to avoid bloodshed.

“So many mistakes were made. See, there was something I think could have been negotiated, to be honest with you,” Trump said at a campaign event in Newton, Iowa. “I think you could have negotiated that. All the people died. So many people died.”

…

After describing the wounds soldiers sustained on the battlefield, Trump said, “There’s nothing nice about it,” adding the war was a “tough one for our country.”

He also suggested that Lincoln would not have the same historical cachet “if he negotiated it.”

GOP former Rep. Liz Cheney slammed Trump’s take on social media, asking how Republicans who have endorsed the former president can “possibly defend this?”

The states actually had a Constitutional right to secede, so you wouldn’t even need negotiation. You would just look at the paperwork and say “yup, this checks out – alright, peace out, homies.”

]]>
Chicago: Lincoln Statue Vandalized to Demand “Colonizer” White People Give “Land Back” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/11/27/chicago-lincoln-statue-vandalized-to-demand-colonizer-white-people-give-land-back/ Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0000

I have a hard time believing this was done by the Indians. I’ve never seen Indians do anything other than drink.

It’s more likely white Antifa.

Antifa’s agenda is sex with children. They do not have any other agenda that we’ve identified.

Do they think that an America run by Indian tribal law would let them turn children into trannies and have sex with them?

New York Post:

For the second time in under two months, a statue dedicated to former President Abraham Lincoln statue was defaced in Chicago.

On Thanksgiving, a statue of a young Abraham Lincoln in Senn Park in Chicago’s Edgewater neighborhood was found covered in splotches of red paint along with the words “COLONIZER” and “LAND BACK,” the Chicago Tribune reported.

According to the outlet, the statue also had “Dakota 38” written on it, in reference to the Dakota Sioux members who Lincoln ordered to be executed following the Dakota War of 1862.

Lincoln commuted the sentences of 264 Dakota fighters but sentenced 38 to be hung in Minnesota, which became the largest mass execution in US history.

…

A similar message was written across another statue of the 16th president in Lincoln Park, roughly six miles away from Senn Park, on Oct. 11.

The vandals, who remain unidentified, allegedly wrote, “Dethrone the colonizers,” “Land back!” and “Avenge the Dakota 38.”

The Indians were completely savage, and the only reason we had to take their land is that they simply would not chill. We tried to make treaties with them and so on, but they couldn’t understand the concept or they just didn’t care.

The idea that history is stagnant and you have a permanent claim to any land that your ancestors lived on however many hundreds or thousands of years ago doesn’t make any sense at all. Of course, if you support Israel, you pretty much also have to agree that the US should be given back to the Indians – this is one of many reasons that so-called “Christian Zionism” has baffled me.

]]>
Black Woman Uses Gorilla Glue in Her Hair, Now Suing the Company https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/02/09/black-woman-uses-gorilla-glue-in-her-hair-now-suing-the-company/ Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:57:16 +0000

Well, a black woman ran out of hair product and used Gorilla Glue.

She’s going to have to have it removed by a celebrity plastic surgeon, TMZ reports.

She’s now suing the company, apparently. Her lawyer says the term “multi use” on the label is misleading.

Gorilla Glue has issued an official apology for this mix-up.

Black people with blue checks are claiming the situation is the result of racism. (In other news, black blue checks are picking up on my capitalize all the letters of BLACK bit.)

You can laugh at this.

You can watch the video above.

Some of you maybe don’t understand: about 3/4ths of black people are at that level. There are some legitimately intelligent black people here and there, and there is a so-called “talented tenth” that is ostensibly capable of being able to integrate into white society. In my experience, it’s more like a “talented fiftieth,” but I had a black kid at my high school whose difference from the white kids was literally “the color of the skin.” He had the same general behavior, the same likelihood to get bad grades, the same likelihood to get in trouble, etc.

I can understand why privileged middle class millennials have this idea that inside every black person, there is a white person just waiting to emerge. Because we all had a kid like that in high school.

Sometimes I think about the kid from my high school, and feel bad, because the media has portrayed me as though I like, want to kill black people or something. Meanwhile, many on the right have accused me of not hating black people enough.

I remember back about a decade ago, when I was first familiarizing myself with race realism, I was on a call with a semi-famous KKK type guy. They all started coming around with their hands out when I ended up with a popular blog writing about race issues. I said to this guy, “well, it really all comes down to the Jewish problem,” and he told me “well, if we dealt with the Jewish problem, we’d still have a nigger problem.” And I was like, “wait, what?”

The overwhelming majority of black people are somewhere around the level of the woman who put Gorilla Glue in her hair. We lived alongside blacks for hundreds of years successfully, first under slavery, then under Jim Crow. In South Africa, whites lived successfully alongside black people for centuries as less than 10% of the population of the region. Both relationships collapsed when Jews arrived on the scene.

The Jew Joe Slovo led the Nelson Mandela communist uprising in South Africa. In America, Martin Luther King was trained by Jewish communists, and all of his advisors and speech writers were Jewish communists. (Note: Mandela was a seriously deviant, violent psychopath and a terrorist who advocated and probably invented the practice of “necklacing,” which is filling a tire full of gasoline and putting it around someone’s head and lighting it on fire. Conversely, King was a sexual degenerate with a low IQ who was fully a tool of the Jews around him.)

I’m not defending black people here. I’m just telling the truth. The history exists. In a society without Jews, blacks will follow rules, they will be polite, they will entertain you. They are more prone to violence and crime, due to their lower average intelligence and higher testosterone, but they are not naturally driven to be evil.

Slavery was also not evil, frankly. It was for the most part a loving relationship. The blacks were part of the family. Under slavery, white women allowed their infant children to be breast fed by the likes of that woman in the video above. If there had been a white woman in the house with this woman, she would have said, “Miss Karen, can I put there here glue for in my hair, make it be look all perty like?” and Miss Karen would say “oh no, dear – this is not for hair!”

Granted, our relationship with the blacks has at this point deteriorated so much that it maybe cannot be restored. But we shouldn’t lie. Historically, blacks and whites were both innocent, and we are both victims of the same groups of bloodsucking Middle Eastern cultists.

The exercises where right-wing people on the internet lay out their plan for their future society are, I believe, moronic, and the people doing it are fundamentally unserious. But just to be clear, I’m not arguing for some kind of a return to slavery or something. I’m just talking about the reality of the history, and the reality of black people.

By the way: did you know that Abraham Lincoln exchanged letters with Karl Marx? 

Many people don’t know that. But it is factually true. Frankly, I’m having a hard time finding the full letters on the internet. (I can only find this one here, but there are others somewhere. This censorship is out of control. You just can’t even find anything on the internet anymore.)

The Washington Post wrote an article about it in 2019. So there’s your Jewish connection to the whole “free the slaves” thing. This is not some urban myth. Read the article. And the Post is arguing that Lincoln was a “regular reader” of Marx.

Every single time, lads.

Every.

Single.

Time.

]]>
Kamala’s Lincoln Story was Yet Another Hoax https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/10/09/kamalas-lincoln-story-was-yet-another-hoax/ Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0000

When Kamala Harris told this weird story about Abraham Lincoln during the debate, even I said, “surely, there must be some truth to it.”

But it turns out there actually isn’t.

When you start getting called out by the WaPo for liberal hoaxes, you’re in a real bad way.

Washington Post:

“There have been 29 vacancies on the Supreme Court during presidential election years from George Washington to Barack Obama, and the presidents have nominated in all 29 cases,” Pence said, failing to mention his party refused to vote on Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland. “But your party is actually openly advocating adding seats to the Supreme Court, which has had nine seats for 150 years, if you don’t get your way.”

“I’m so glad we went through a little history lesson. Let’s do that a little more,” Harris responded. “In 1864 … Abraham Lincoln was up for reelection. And it was 27 days before the election. And a seat became open on the United States Supreme Court. Abraham Lincoln’s party was in charge not only of the White House but the Senate. But Honest Abe said, ‘It’s not the right thing to do. The American people deserve to make the decision about who will be the next president of the United States, and then that person will be able to select who will serve on the highest court of the land.’”

So, is that true?

Harris is correct that a seat became available 27 days before the election. And that Lincoln didn’t nominate anyone until after he won. But there is no evidence he thought the seat should be filled by the winner of the election. In fact, he had other motives for the delay.

On Oct. 12, 1864, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney died at the age of 87. He had been chief justice for nearly 30 years but will always be best-known — or rather, notorious — for writing the majority opinion in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, in which he declared that Black people were inferior and “had no rights which the White man was bound to respect.” (The House voted to remove a bust of Taney from the U.S. Capitol over the summer amid the George Floyd protests.)

Baste Chief Justice Roger B. Taney

Taney had been sick for years, so it didn’t come as a surprise to Lincoln that he might have the opportunity to name his own chief justice, according to Michael Kahn, the former head of the board of directors of President Lincoln’s Cottage. But Lincoln was preoccupied with both his campaign and the Civil War — Sherman’s troops had just captured Atlanta and would soon march to the sea. He told his aides he wouldn’t nominate anyone immediately, because he was “waiting to receive expressions of public opinion from the country,” according to historian Michael Burlingame in “Lincoln: A Life.”

But that didn’t mean he was waiting for ballots so much as the mail. Letters flooded in from all over the country. What about Secretary of War Edwin Stanton? some suggested. Or Associate Justice Noah Swayne? Francis P. Blair recommended his son Montgomery, the postmaster general. Attorney General Edward Bates recommended himself.

And then there was Salmon P. Chase. Chase was a former senator, governor of Ohio and treasury secretary who, according to Burlingame, thought he was destined to be president. He had vied unsuccessfully against Lincoln for the Republican nomination in 1860. Though Lincoln disliked him, Chase had a lot of supporters. Chase’s opponents told Lincoln all the nasty things Chase had said about him behind his back.

The overarching effect of the delay is that it held Lincoln’s broad but shaky coalition of conservative and radical Republicans together. And it kept rivals like Chase in line. Chase, who had often been critical of Lincoln in the past, immediately began stumping for the president across the Midwest, sparking rumors of a secret deal, according to Kahn.

Congress was in recess until early December, so there would have been no point in naming a man before the election anyway. Lincoln shrewdly used that to his advantage. If he had lost the election, there is no evidence he wouldn’t have filled the spot in the lame-duck session.

Lincoln was, of course, reelected. And the day after the Senate was back in session, he nominated Chase for chief justice. He hoped the august appointment would “neutralize” Chase’s designs on the presidency. (It didn’t.)

So Harris is mistaken about Lincoln’s motivations in this regard.

Harris obviously knew this story she told was a lie.

Or rather, the people who wrote her lines for the debate knew it was a lie.

They probably didn’t expect the WaPo to call them out on it, but even so, most people will not read this article.

What an evil bitch.

It was so sick how she sent that fly at Pence that way.

Truly beyond the pale.

]]>
Poll: Trump More Popular with Republicans Than “Negro Respecter” Lincoln https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/12/01/poll-trump-more-popular-with-republicans-than-negro-respecter-lincoln/ Sun, 01 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 1, 2019

“I am not a nigger lover.” –Abraham Lincoln, world’s most famous nigger lover

This just shows that politics are 100% personality. Donald Trump hasn’t done anything, he doesn’t appear to be planning on doing anything, but he sure is funny.

The Hill:

A majority of Republicans say President Trump is a better leader than former President Lincoln, according to this week’s Economist/YouGov weekly tracking poll.

Fifty-three percent of Republicans said Trump was a better president than Lincoln, while 47 percent chose the Civil War-era leader.

Lincoln still overwhelmingly beats Trump among all Americans, 75 percent to 25 percent, with the vast majority of Democrats and independents choosing the former president.

While impeachment and other controversies surrounding Trump continue to dominate headlines, polls have shown the president maintaining a strong approval rating among Republicans.

The Economist/YouGov poll found that 87 percent of those in the GOP either somewhat or strongly approve of the job he’s doing as president.

Trump in the past has boasted of his approval rating within the party, comparing his popularity to Lincoln’s.

“You know, a poll just came out that I am the most popular person in the history of the Republican Party,” Trump said in a July interview with The Sun newspaper in the U.K.

“Beating Lincoln,” Trump added, without clarifying to which poll he was referring. “I beat our Honest Abe.”

Trump is very popular, but this is a weird question that seems to be designed to frame Republicans as nigger-haters who are going against the history’s greatest nigger-respecter.

I can’t really imagine that Abraham Lincoln is all that popular. They brainwash you in school with this stuff, but the fact is, the guy started what was at the time one of the biggest wars in European history and then said he did it because he really loves black people.

Certainly, people in the South do not think fondly of Lincoln, who invaded and slaughtered them, but people in the North shouldn’t be too fond of him either, as we were the ones sent to invade and be slaughtered.

Average people – especially Northerners – don’t really know anything about him, it was so long ago. He is just “the slavery guy.” So the question is basically “do you prefer Donald Trump’s tweets to black people being freed from slavery?”

]]>
Abraham Lincoln: American Hitler https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/10/30/abraham-lincoln-american-hitler/ Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Diversity Macht Frei
October 30, 2017

In the popular imagination, Abraham Lincoln is the patron saint of racial brotherhood. But the reality was very different.

For much of his life Lincoln was a member of the American Colonization Society, an organisation whose purpose was to facilitation the expatriation of negroes to Africa or Latin America.

Here, during the Civil War, Lincoln meets a group of prominent blacks and tries to persuade them to lead their “soul brothers” away to a black ethno-state where negroes could live free from the oppression of whites.

On Aug. 14 1862, Abraham Lincoln hosted a “Deputation of Free Negroes” at the White House, led by the Rev. Joseph Mitchell, commissioner of emigration for the Interior Department. It was the first time African Americans had been invited to the White House on a policy matter. The five men were there to discuss a scheme that even a contemporary described as a “simply absurd” piece of “charlatanism”: resettling emancipated slaves on a 10,000-acre parcel of land in present-day Panama.

Lincoln immediately began filibustering his guests with arguments so audacious that they retain the ability to shock a reader 150 years later. “You and we are different races,” he began, and “have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races.” The African-American race suffered greatly, he continued, “by living among us, while ours suffers from your presence.” Lincoln went on to suggest, “But for your race among us, there could not be war,” and “without the institution of Slavery and the colored race as a basis, the war could not have an existence.” The only solution, he concluded, was “for us both … to be separated.”

The president next turned to what he wanted from the five-man delegation. It was selfish, he suggested, that any of them should “come to the conclusion that you have nothing to do with the idea of going to a foreign country.” They must “do something to help those who are not so fortunate as yourselves,” for the colonization effort needed “intelligent colored men” who are “capable of thinking as white men, and not those who have been systematically oppressed.” In asking them to “sacrifice something of your present comfort,” Lincoln invoked George Washington’s sacrifices during the American Revolution. He then asked for volunteers. “If I could find twenty-five able-bodied men, with a mixture of women and children,” he said, “I think I could make a successful commencement.”

Source

Frederick Douglass, the former negro slave who became a prominent anti-slavery campaigner, said this of Lincoln after his death.

It must be admitted, truth compels me to admit, even here in the presence of the monument we have erected to his memory, Abraham Lincoln was not, in the fullest sense of the word, either our man or our model. In his interests, in his associations, in his habits of thought, and in his prejudices, he was a white man.

He was preeminently the white man’s President, entirely devoted to the welfare of white men. He was ready and willing at any time during the first years of his administration to deny, postpone, and sacrifice the rights of humanity in the colored people to promote the welfare of the white people of this country.

Source

]]>
The Alt-Right Represents True American Nationalism https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/10/01/the-alt-right-represents-true-american-nationalism/ Sun, 01 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Benjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
October 1, 2017

I can almost hear the snickers and jeers over the title of this article, from left and right alike.

For those who think the idea that the Alt-Right is the only true representative of American Nationalism is far-fetched, here is my challenge to you:

Show me where I am wrong.

Show me how the Founding Fathers weren’t race realists.

Show me how America wasn’t a White Patriarchy prior to 1920.

Show me where the Founding Fathers said women should have the right to vote.

Show me where the Founding Fathers said blacks should have full citizenship.

It’s really rather simple:

We, the Alt-Right, are White Nationalists, and we want to reinstate the Patriarchy.

America was founded – in the words of the ever-insightful Fash McQueen – as “a moral, patriarchal, limited-franchise Republic. – A White Ethno-State.”

The traditional family was seen as the backbone of the nation and was revered above all else.

Women were considered property. They were taught to obey their husbands and that their world was exclusively home, hearth, and family. They were not to hold office, vote or mix in the meetings of men or public affairs in any capacity. Sluttery was seen as an unforgivable sin.

Women were cherished for this; they were not oppressed. In fact – without any room for debate – they were much happier back then when they were fulfilling this sacred and natural role than they are now after having allegedly been “liberated.”

Here are a few quotes from the most important and celebrated Founding Father of all, Thomas Jefferson:

“Women, who to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, could not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men.”

“A lady who has been seen as a sloven or slut in the morning will never efface the impression she has made.”

(To his daughter on her wedding day): “The happiness of your life now depends on the continuing to please a single person. To this all other objects must be secondary, even your love for me.”

Anti-America is a codeword for anti-White.

Jefferson was horrified by seeing women in public roles while visiting France, where liberalism had been birthed and then unleashed in a fury after the Revolution of 1789. He wrote to Washington that this meant that France was in a “desperate state” and that fortunately, for the happiness of men and women alike, this phenomenon did not “extend itself” to America as well.

Unfortunately, the words he wrote in the Declaration of Independence would later be twisted from their original meaning and used to justify that which he was staunchly against:

“All men are created equal.”

Those five words, without a doubt, have been the most devastatingly consequential words in our entire history.

Both the suffragettes movement, which began in earnest in 1848 at the infamous Seneca Falls Convention and ended after winning women the right to vote in 1920, and the Negro “civil rights” movements borrowed heavily from Jefferson’s Declaration – but the historical record speaks loud and clear on what his views on these matters actually were.

Idealistic liberals and outright enemies of America have blatantly twisted Jefferson’s seemingly abstract words – as well as the words of other Founding Fathers – to push their own agendas.

This is not the Founders’ fault, and given that these agendas run counter to American history and American interests, they are on their face an insult to these very men who are cited as their justification.

The 1848 Seneca Falls “Declaration of Sentiments” quotes Jefferson virtually word for word, and then dishonestly applies it to women.

The above-stated views on women have only been overturned recently, really only since the second wave of feminism took off in the 60s.

For a while, those who still held these views were ridiculed for being “old-fashioned.” Now that liberalism has so thoroughly taken hold, those of us who still hold these views – which, again, are the same as the Founding Fathers – are called “radicals.” “Extremists,” even.

What these views really are are normal. They are American. They are White.

The Founders were staunch proponents of Western Civilization (i.e. White Civilization). All of their political ideas were formulated around what they thought was the best way to proceed with and advance Western Civilization while giving people as much freedom as possible and also keeping them morally upright and industrious.

As liberal policies based on “equality” are now clearly destroying Western Civilization, it stands to reason that the Founding Fathers would be on our side fighting against them, despite whatever abstract quotes can be cherry-picked from them to try and justify said civilization-wrecking policies.

They were not malicious people. They really did want freedom for all, to the best extent that that is possible.

What they certainly would’ve never stood for, though, is freedom for others, at the expense of their own.

With that in mind, we can safely say that any abstract ideas found among them – and there are some – about freeing blacks and then bringing them up to our level are now irrelevant, because the data is in and it shows that this is not possible and that even attempting to do so severely harms whites.

And for every one statement of an early American Founder pondering the possibility of peacefully integrating blacks that can be found – and these were just ideas, nothing close to freeing or integrating blacks en masse was ever practiced in their time – one could readily find a hundred saying that this would never work and that they must be removed.

We can debate over which aspects of America’s founding ideology were flawed, and some of it without a doubt was, but what is not debatable is that America was set up for the ‘posterity’ of the Founders and the white founding stock that settled, conquered and built it.

Race was the binding force of early America. One of the first acts of Congress, the Naturalization Act of 1790, restricted immigration and citizenship to “free white persons of good character.”

By fighting to protect the well-being of the white stock of America, we on the Alt-Right are merely carrying on what the Founders tilled, toiled, fought and bled for – while those who are not with us are complicit in throwing it all away.

The amount of broken homes of white families of the innocent victims who have been raped, murdered and maimed by black and other non-white criminals among us is absolutely heartwrenching once you become aware of the statistics, which are actively covered up by our alien-occupied media and academia.

The Alt-Right is aware of these ugly racial realities, and we just want to put an end to them, yet for this we are called evil “haters.”

We’re not allowed to say these things in polite society because it might hurt the feelings of non-whites.

That is the reality of the feminized, liberalized and Judaized system and society we now find ourselves living under.

It wants us silenced. It wants us dead, even, simply because we tell the truth.

But we’re not going to be silent, and we’re not going to back down because we know that what we are doing is right.

Innocent whites raped and murdered by non-whites by the tens of thousands annually is what is truly evil to us, and no amount of epithets is ever going to intimidate us into denying that.

We know for a fact now that blacks are incapable of functioning in civilization. They are only capable of destroying it. Therefore we want them out. We want to send them back, regardless if it hurts their feelings.

That is the mature, adult way to handle this.

That’s how the hard men who initially built this nation would’ve handled it.

Just go ask the Indians – if you can find any.

Our government is now anti-white, meaning it is unAmerican. We, the people, therefore have the right and the duty to fight to take it back so it will again serve our interests, as it was originally intended.

This anti-white/unAmerican nature of our society is more transparent now than ever. Black sportsball players who get paid millions of dollars to throw a ball around are purposefully disrespecting our National Anthem – and they’re being celebrated in the media for it. Meanwhile, those of us who have been trying to protect the toppling of our historical statues and monuments, in Charlottesville and elsewhere, are being aggressively demonized and persecuted from all angles.

And while the Alt-Right is being censored and shut down at an alarming rate, the so-called “right-wing” in America is doing virtually nothing to support us, and in many cases is even joining the ranks of our enemies in opposition to us.

At least the liberals, Jews, blacks and other anti-whites who are actively tearing down our statues and monuments and disrespecting the National Anthem and American Flag instinctively, if not consciously, realize that an attack on America is an attack on White people in general.

That’s why they’re attacking America in the first place.

It’s a racial attack against us.

Mainstream Jewish/liberal media outlet.

Mainstream Negro media outlet.

The so-called “conservatives” – cuckservatives – who want to bury their head in the sand and run away from the race question are some of the worst, most pathetic, sniveling cowards ever to walk the face of the earth.

They are a disgrace to the Founding Fathers that they claim to revere. They have conserved nothing and instead have already lost just about everything that this nation once held dear, and in their cowardice they will only continue losing until even their own genetic legacy is wiped off the map and then scrubbed from the history books.

They are #FakePatriots, and they need to be bullied – mercilessly – until they either join our side or get the hell out of our way.

The main reason these modern-day “conservatives,” patriotards, and the like either take the view that our Founding Fathers weren’t actually racist, or that their racism was just an unfortunate part of our history that thankfully we have now moved past, is because they have been gaslit by the media into thinking being “racist” is the worst thing one could possibly be.

“Racism” has become the absolute moral standard for evil.

This has not been accomplished by logic and debate, but by emotional manipulation and abuse.

The media constantly shows images and sends messages that are meant to induce whites into feeling guilty.

If we controlled the media we could just as easily use pictures of victims of non-white crime and swing people in the exact opposite direction.

In fact, it would be much easier to condition people toward our way of thinking rather than the current way, since racism is the natural and healthy, default position of humans.

Convincing people to go against their own nature requires almost nonstop brainwashing on all fronts, day after day, from cradle to grave – which is what we’ve had in America since the Jews have taken control. Certainly since before I was born; probably before my parents were.

I sympathize with my white brothers, who have all undergone this intense brainwashing, and I understand that playing on guilt feelings is a powerful weakness of whites that has been exploited by our enemies to the fullest – but it’s time to grow some balls. The clock is ticking. We don’t have time to pussyfoot around anymore.

Come over to reality and just admit that America was never intended to be a “proposition nation,” a “melting pot,” or any other such gibberish.

It was never intended to be a multicultural experiment. That crazy idea came much later and is a blatant perversion of what this country was originally envisioned as, and a slap in the face to the great white men who built it.

The “melting pot” idea comes from a play written by the Jew Israel Zangwill in 1908 – well over 100 years after Our Nation’s founding.

Even if the multicultural experiment was created in good faith: at what point do we admit that the experiment is a failure?

We won’t admit it though because now it has become a moral imperative. We are expected to hand over our country to foreigners. Those of us who object to this idea are now unironically referred to as “nazi terrorists.” That’s how far we’ve fallen: “nazi terrorist” is now a legitimate euphemism for “those who don’t want to be replaced by people who hate them in the country that their ancestors built.”

Part of the stated justification for this moral imperative is payback for slavery. Well, the Founding Fathers did not invent slavery – they inherited it. And most of them were against it.

Just about all of the main forgers of America, up to and including Abraham Lincoln, advocated ending slavery and then sending the blacks back to Africa in a humane fashion – not to try and make them our “equals.”

This is also what the Alt-Right wants. Nobody in the Alt-Right is pro-slavery. We just want to be separate so we can live our lives in peace.

Lincoln, Jefferson, Franklin and Washington were all White Separatists – White Nationalists.

That is what we who fall under the moniker of “Alt-Right” are as well.

There are inevitably many small differences between us and them, of course, as technology has drastically changed the world since their time and we now have the hindsight to see what worked and what didn’t – but the core tenets remain exactly the same.

If they could see this mess we’re in today, I’ve no doubt they would go back and put measures in place to prevent it all as best they could. They would draft legislation designed to safeguard us – their posterity – from all of this degeneracy, from the dysgenics, from the Jews taking over and from the hordes of non-whites spilling across our borders.

But, of course, they were merely men and not prophets.

They did the best they could.

Now it’s up to us, the only ones who are still truly fighting for the Founders true vision of America, to fix this mess – or die trying.

Anything less and we wouldn’t even be worthy of the title “American.” At this point, unfortunately – most aren’t.

Hopefully, one day soon, they will join us though.

We are the only option left.

These are the undeniable facts:

The Alt-Right is White Nationalism.

White Nationalism is Americanism.

Deal with it.

]]>
Abraham Lincoln, Jew Lover https://www.anglinarchive.com/2015/07/19/abraham-lincoln-jew-lover/ Sun, 19 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000 Daily Stormer
July 19, 2015

Lincoln should be removed from money for having Jewed over absolutely everyone.
Lincoln should be removed from money for having Jewed over absolutely everyone.

Some interesting facts here in this Jew research.

I knew Lincoln loved him some Jews, but didn’t realize the extent.

The Edwardsville Intelligencer:

A groundbreaking exhibit on Abraham Lincoln’s relationships with the small but growing Jewish population of Civil War-era America opens at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum on Aug. 3.

“With Firmness in the Right: Lincoln and the Jews” examines Lincoln’s role in paving the way for acceptance and inclusion of Jews in America. It also tells the story of how a number of Jews, as a group and as individuals, affected Lincoln deeply and became his neighbors, friends, colleagues and allies.

The exhibit gathers Lincoln documents, photographs, letters, Bibles and other artifacts from many different sources. The Shapell Manuscript Foundation, the Chicago Historical Society, Brown University, the Library of Congress, the National Archives and the Lincoln Presidential Library all contributed. Some items have never been exhibited publicly until now.

Inspired by the book “Lincoln and the Jews: A History,” by Jonathan D. Sarna and Benjamin Shapell, the exhibit opened at the New-York Historical Society earlier this year. A significantly revised version will open at the Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum on Aug. 3 and run through Nov. 15.

“Abraham Lincoln befriended Jews and would not tolerate bigotry toward them, even from his most vaunted general. His acceptance of Jews set a pattern that made acceptance a bit easier for other minorities coming to America in the years ahead,” said Eileen Mackevich, executive director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum. “We hope this exhibit brings new attention to this part of the Lincoln story.”

By the time of his death, Lincoln had had more Jewish friends and acquaintances than any president before him. They included Julius Hammerslough, who owned a Springfield clothing store; Samuel G. Alschuler, a photographer who produced portraits of Lincoln in 1858 and 1860; Abraham Jonas, a Quincy attorney whom Lincoln described as “one of my most valued friends”; and Issachar Zacharie, a doctor who operated on Lincoln’s feet.

The exhibit will display correspondence between Lincoln and Jonas, photos by Alschuler, and Lincoln’s hand-written praise for the treatment provided by Zacharie. It also includes Lincoln’s appointment of the U.S. military’s first Jewish chaplain, the commissions of Jewish officers and eulogies written by rabbis after Lincoln’s assassination. The exhibition is guest curated by Dr. Ann Meyerson.

“This exhibit does more than shed light on Lincoln’s views of a specific group. It tells us about his heart, his fundamental sense of fairness,” said Daniel Stowell, the Lincoln Presidential Library’s curator for the exhibit. “He was always willing to look past old prejudices. Lincoln’s broader view for America found expression in his Second Inaugural Address, segments of which will appear in the exhibit in Lincoln’s own hand.”

This fits right in to discussion about the Confederate Flag, no?

]]>
What the Heroes of the Left had to Say About Negroes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2014/06/26/what-the-heroes-of-the-left-had-to-say-about-negroes/ Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000 Daily Stormer
June 26, 2014

Though the far left is presently obsessively fixated on coddling the Negro race, it were not always this way.  Generally, most everyone looked at these people as completely ridiculous and annoying.

Here you have statements from four of the heroes of the left (who, granted, excluding Che were probably not considered “left” at the time) giving the straight truth about the Negro and his ridiculous and annoying manners and methods.

Spread it around.

The Left on Black People

]]>