3M has reached a $10.3 billion settlement with a host of US public water systems to resolve water pollution claims tied to ‘forever chemicals,’ the chemical company announced https://t.co/J73EOjBIcm pic.twitter.com/Fx9qCbrNan

— Reuters (@Reuters) June 23, 2023

All of these corporations pay fines that are way, way less than their profits.

There is zero incentive, in America, for corporations to not kill people.

In China, if a corporation kills people like this, the CEO and all the top executives will be executed.

John Bolton, who is an absolute nigger, says China is the bad guy.

China doesn’t let corporations do things like this to their population.

You can figure that out, but if this happened in China, a lot of people would get executed.

You can figure out if you think corporations should be allowed to poison people and then pay fines that are less than their profits.

If you don’t think they should be allowed to do that, you’re a Chinese agent or a Russian or whatever.

Pure evil.

New York Post:

Chemical manufacturer 3M Co. will pay at least $10.3 billion to settle lawsuits over contamination of many U.S. public drinking water systems with potentially harmful compounds used in firefighting foam and a host of consumer products, the company said Thursday.

The deal would compensate water providers for pollution with per- and polyfluorinated substances, known collectively as PFAS — a broad class of chemicals used in nonstick, water- and grease-resistant products such as clothing and cookware.

Described as “forever chemicals” because they don’t degrade naturally in the environment, PFAS have been linked to a variety of health problems, including liver and immune-system damage and some cancers.

The compounds have been detected at varying levels in drinking water around the nation. The Environmental Protection Agency in March proposed strict limits on two common types, PFOA and PFOS, and said it wanted to regulate four others. Water providers would be responsible for monitoring their systems for the chemicals.

The agreement would settle a case that was scheduled for trial earlier this month involving a claim by Stuart, Florida, one of about 300 communities that have filed similar suits against companies that produced firefighting foam or the PFAS it contained.

3M chairman Mike Roman said the deal was “an important step forward” that builds on the company’s decision in 2020 to phase out PFOA and PFOS and its investments in “state-of-the-art water filtration technology in our chemical manufacturing operations.” The company, based in St. Paul, Minnesota, will halt all PFAS production by the end of 2025, he said.

The settlement will be paid over 13 years and could reach as high as $12.5 billion, depending on how many public water systems detect PFAS during testing that EPA has required in the next three years, said Dallas-based attorney Scott Summy, one of the lead attorneys for those suing 3M and other manufacturers.

The payment will help cover costs of filtering PFAS from systems where it’s been detected and testing others, he said.

Is this what you wanted?

Is this the kind of country you want to live in?

Personally, I would rather be Chinese.

I don’t think rich people should be allowed to poison the population with literally no consequences.

So the 3M company paying billions of dollars over years for the damage they are doing to Americas water supply with “ forever chemicals” won’t do us very much if we are all poisoned from their actions. Wake up America to big corporations and their greed and demands!

— Stella Parton (@StellaParton) June 23, 2023

I can’t believe that multinational corporations would do something immoral.

I was told by Ronald Reagan explicitly that this was impossible.

New York Post:

Babies with birth defects. Lab rats with enlarged livers. Dogs that died soon after exposure.

These and other dangers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as “forever chemicals,” were hidden from the public, regulators and even company employees, even while the makers of products containing PFAS continued to promote their benefits.

A new paper published in the Annals of Global Health highlights the nefarious tactics companies like DuPont and 3M used to cover up the dangers of PFAS chemicals.

The authors of the paper compared the tactics of DuPont and 3M to tobacco companies, which notoriously suppressed medical research that exposed their products’ link to cancer.

For example, as early as 1961, DuPont was aware that chemicals used to create its Teflon cookware coatings were known “to increase the size of the liver of rats at low doses” and that “contact with the skin should be strictly avoided.” This information was purposefully suppressed, according to the paper’s authors.

In 1979, DuPont discovered that dogs exposed to a single dose of perfluorooctanoic acid (a type of PFAS) “died two days after ingestion.” This information was also kept secret by DuPont.

Two pregnant employees who worked with C-8 (another type of PFAS) gave birth to babies with serious defects: One child had a single nostril and the other had eye defects. DuPont never communicated this information to employees.

In fact, the company later released a statement declaring that “we know of no evidence of birth defects caused by C-8 at DuPont.”

PFAS documentsDamning revelations such as these came to light when secret industry documents held for years by DuPont and 3M — the largest makers of PFAS — were examined by health experts at the University of California, San Francisco.

“These documents reveal clear evidence that the chemical industry knew about the dangers of PFAS and failed to let the public, regulators, and even their own employees know,” Tracey J. Woodruff, director of UCSF’s Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment and senior author of the paper, said in a news release.

The industry documents were released to UCSF researchers after attorney Robert Bilott, depicted in the 2019 film “Dark Waters,” gained access to the papers following his lawsuits against DuPont.

As public awareness of PFAS risks increased, DuPont tried to pressure the Environmental Protection Agency into adopting an industry-friendly stance.

In an email to the EPA labeled “Urgent,” DuPont vice president Susan Stalnecker wrote: “We need EPA to quickly (like first thing tomorrow) say the following: That consumer products sold under the Teflon brand are safe and to date there are no human health effects known to be caused by PFOA.”

What are PFAS?PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals, widely used in packaging, clothing, carpets, firefighting foam and even toilet paper since the 1950s.

Because of the strong molecular bonds found in PFAS, they don’t break down easily, and levels of PFAS build up over time in humans, animals and the environment, earning them the name “forever chemicals.”

PFAS are used in dozens of different industries and are now found in water, soil and in the air all over the world, according to the National Institutes of Health.

And because there are thousands of different types of PFAS, there’s much that scientists don’t know about them, such as how best to detect and measure these minerals, remove them from air and water or determine their long-term effects.

Effects of PFASResearch into the health risks of PFAS is ongoing, but studies conducted to date reveal possible health effects including altered metabolism and fertility, reduced fetal growth, increased risk of being overweight or obese, increased cancer risk and weakened immune systems, according to the NIH.

In 2004, the EPA won a $16.45 million settlement against DuPont for the company’s failure to disclose its internal findings on PFOA. But, the new paper’s authors note, that amount was just a fraction of DuPont’s $1 billion annual revenues from PFOA and C-8.

It really just makes you sick that this is happening and all these stupid women who claim to be “environmentalists” are rallying around that retarded Swedish girl and her convoluted gibberish about the weather.

Unlike an industrial society powered by windmills, a world without PFAS is achievable. The government would just have to make laws. It’s very simple.

Maybe this’ll work? Or maybe it’s too late?

Just like Donald Trump is the only president in history that celebrities can publicly call for the assassination of, he’s the only president in history who can be openly defied by corporations after invoking war powers.

The calls for assassinations are allowed for the same reason what would otherwise be labeled treason is allowed: because Donald Trump is a racist and racism is pure evil.

The devil doesn’t exist, and people who believe that there is any meaning to human existence are pathetic and stupid, but there is an evil that goes beyond the physical realm: hatred for the color of the skin.

Celebrities and multinational corporations are the last line of moral defense against true metaphysical evil.

New York Post:

Manufacturing giant 3M pushed backed against President Trump in a statement on Friday that suggested it would not comply with a White House order to stop exporting masks to Canada and Latin America.

The Trump administration on Thursday invoked the Defense Production Act, compelling 3M to prioritize orders for desperately needed N95 respiratory masks for the US government’s national stockpile.

The Minnesota-based company, one of the largest manufacturers of the masks, said it was looking forward to implementing the order and had already been going “above and beyond” in recent weeks to churn them out as quickly as possible amid the coronavirus pandemic.

But 3M criticized a previously unreported request from the White House that it also stop sending any N95 masks to Latin America and Canada, citing “significant humanitarian implications” given the great need for them in the US and complaints from governors around the country, including New York’s Andrew Cuomo, that they wind up in bidding wars for supplies against each other and other countries.

“The Administration also requested that 3M cease exporting respirators that we currently manufacture in the United States to the Canadian and Latin American markets,” the Friday morning statement read.

“There are, however, significant humanitarian implications of ceasing respirator supplies to healthcare workers in Canada and Latin America, where we are a critical supplier of respirators,” it continued.

This is all going to change, very soon.

You are going to see the media, the Jews, the celebrities, the corporations – all of them – do what will appear to be a 180 once it becomes clear what we’ve done to the economy. They are all going to switch to absolute ultra-jingoism. Just like they did after 9/11. It is actually going to be the exact same thing, with the target of hate being the Chinese.

The “conservative” media will go all out, saying that the slant-eyed zipperheaded dog-eaters in Beijing should be nuked, while the currently liberal media will take a line similar to what the conservative media is taking now. They will sound like Tucker Carlson, basically word for word.

Most of you are too young to remember that after 9/11, the allegedly anti-racist Jew media was on the front lines of promoting the wars. The number one reason given for invading Iraq was that they were building a nuclear bomb and were going to preemptively launch it at the US because they hate freedom. And that narrative was forwarded by none other than the New York Times.

Jewish fake news journalist Judith Miller worked with the Bush Administration to hoax intelligence about how Saddam Hussein was buying uranium from Nigeria and building an invisible nuclear bomb. She would write these articles and then later in the day Dick Cheney would appear waving them around and saying we have to invade immediately.

It’s going to be the same Jewish sandwich situation, exactly, as the Jews force us into a war with China.

The Daily Stormer is probably going to be the only site covering this with any degree of honesty or accuracy, so I really hope you all will pay us for what you read here. It doesn’t have to be much. But right now, I’m very worried that I might have to get some kind of other job, because even after laying off most of the staff and cutting everyone else’s pay, I’m still in the red and am not sure how I am going to make this work given the insane costs of just keeping the site online after all of the bannings.

Please do consider paying for what you read here.