Do you think he really pulled a gun on the cops?

Or you think they cops just murdered him for no reason?

Deutsche Welle:

Police say a man embroiled in the so-called “Pizzagate” conspiracy was shot dead after brandishing a gun during a traffic stop. The man was jailed in 2016 after firing his gun inside a Washington DC restaurant.

A man who became infamous for firing his gun inside a pizzeria in the US capital was shot dead by police in the state of North Carolina, US media reported late on Thursday.

Poor guy was arrested by a fat woman

The deceased man had become enmeshed in the Pizzagate conspiracy – wrongly suggested that former US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and other top members of the US Democratic Party were running a child sex ring from the eatery.

US news outlets said the North Carolina man had been killed in a traffic stop police shooting.

The man, who died two days after the shooting last Saturday, was identified as Edgar Maddison Welch, who became obsessed with the bizarre “Pizzagate” conspiracy.

Police in the town of Kannapolis stopped a car they believed was driven by Welch — a passenger in the vehicle — known to have an outstanding warrant against him for a felony probation violation.

As police tried to open the car and arrest him, Welch reportedly pulled a gun and refused orders to drop the weapon. Two officers then shot him causing wounds that later proved fatal.

Welch was arrested in December 2016 after he fired his assault rifle inside the Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant.

…

Welch, who was 29 a the time of the shooting incident, was sentenced in 2017 to four years in prison and released in March 2020.

Seeing as how he did appear to be mentally unstable, it’s not really unbelievable that he pulled a gun on the cops.

But why do we have cops?

They won’t stop the blacks and they never stopped Pizzagate.

What use are these useless cops?

Video from 8 years ago

Shit just got real.

Every other “Russian hacking” story the mainstream media brought out previously turned out to be some sort of hoax or blown way out of proportion.

But hacking our voting machines? Now that’s serious.

AOL:

The U.S. official in charge of protecting American elections from hacking says the Russians successfully penetrated the voter registration rolls of several U.S. states prior to the 2016 presidential election.

In an exclusive interview with NBC News, Jeanette Manfra, the head of cybersecurity at the Department of Homeland Security, said she couldn’t talk about classified information publicly, but in 2016, “We saw a targeting of 21 states and an exceptionally small number of them were actually successfully penetrated.”

Sure, contrarians might remind you that attribution of cyber-attacks is impossible, due to how easy it is to mask your identity as someone else through proxies, using code stolen from foreign agencies, and other methods.

And sure, Wikileaks demonstrated that the US intelligence community has developed procedures for masking their operations as originating from other world powers, including Russia.

Ok.

But now isn’t the time for that. Our democracy is under attack, and drastic measures are necessary.

Jeh Johnson, who was DHS secretary during the Russian intrusions, said, “2016 was a wake-up call and now it’s incumbent upon states and the Feds to do something about it before our democracy is attacked again.”

I agree 100%, Jeh, you weird Black bastard.

I’m going to assume his White genes pushing him to protect America, rather than his Black genes pushing him to attack Donald Trump are at work here.

The Feds definitely need to do something for the mid-terms, which are obviously at risk

“We were able to determine that the scanning and probing of voter registration databases was coming from the Russian government.”

Okay, sure, whatever.

Here’s what we need to do for the mid-terms.

1. Stop using electronic voting machines. You can’t hack paper ballots.
2. Get Homeland Security to count the votes. Local officials could be bribed by the Russians.
3. Check the identity and citizenship status of all voters (you wouldn’t want Russians to vote, right?)
4. Just for good measure, announce that you’ll put ICE agents at every voting booth in America. After all, if any illegal Russian immigrants try their luck, we’ll want to deport them ASAP, right?

Unfortunately, the Obama era Homeland Security wasn’t very serious about vote integrity. But in fact, this agency actually has the authority to completely take over the voting process, preventing voting fraud (uh, from the Russians, of course).

Alternet:

Even though President Trump disbanded his controversial election integrity commission in early January, its de facto chair, Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach, said the commission’s work scrutinizing the credentials of every voter could continue at the Department of Homeland Security. Kobach and his allies want to make documented proof of citizenship a new hurdle to registering—as opposed to signing one’s name on a registration form as a legal oath.

Kris Kobach is a great guy, and he’s now working at the DHS. If anyone is committed to preventing voter fraud, it’s him.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he had a hand in “discovering” the Russian hacking of the 2016 elections.

Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap was one of the few Democrats on the panel. In an exit interview with WhoWhatWhy.com, he went beyond recounting his battles with Kobach over disclosing the panel’s agenda to revealing why Kobach was so quick to say Homeland Security can continue its work. This excerpt starts with Dunlap noting that DHS citizenship databases and ID programs have been deeply problematic. That could serve voter suppressors by potentially preventing multitudes from having registration information verified and thus narrowing the electorate. While DHS has issued statements saying it wants no part of the voting process, Kobach has been promoting proof of citizenship for years and is likely to continue.

Dunlap’s comments are a cautionary tale, as DHS has the federal authority to take over the voting process—a fact that is not widely known.

Why would anyone be against “narrowing the electorate” by eliminating foreign agents (you know, Russians and stuff) from the voting process? Only Russian shills could possibly be against this.

And while the Daily Stormer is often accused of being Russian shills, even we have to draw the line somewhere. We fully support having Kris Kobach’s patriotic DHS taking over the voting process to protect us against foreign meddling.

And hey, if a few million illegal spics are prevented from voting as a side-effect, that’s a price I’m willing to pay.

Sorry Jose, but you might just be a Putin agent, so you can’t vote.

It’s not bribes, goyim. I’m just encouraging these women to come forward with the truth – in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Totally different.

As has been transparently obvious from the start, the whole farcical set-up where over a dozen women accused Trump of raping them is being shown to be a dirty hoax.

Not only have these women been put up to it by the Jew lawyers Lisa Bloom and her mother Gloria Allred, and not only was this accomplished by giving them huge sums of money, but it’s now coming out that all this funding was coming from people with ties to the Clinton campaign.

In other words, it’s looking more and more like pussy-grab-gate was a complete fabrication by Clinton operatives engineered to smear Trump and somehow wrestle victory away from him.

And best of all, the stupid bitch Bloom has just admitted to all this to her fellow kikes at the New York Times for some reason. Maybe her new year’s resolution was to stop Jewing the goyim?

Fox News:

One of Hillary Clinton’s wealthy pals paid $500,000 in an unsuccessful effort to fund women willing to accuse President Trump of sexual misconduct before the 2016 election, The New York Times reported Sunday.

“Unsuccessful” only insofar as Trump actually still won.

Over 20 lying sluts still came forward with hoax allegations, and those were given prime coverage in the media.

All the tear-less crying was pretty entertaining though. Props for that.

Susie Tompkins Buell, the founder of Esprit Clothing and a major Clinton campaign donor for many years, gave the money to celebrity lawyer Lisa Bloom who was working with a number of Trump accusers at the time, according to the paper’s bombshell report.

Bloom solicited donors by saying she was working with women who might “find the courage to speak out” against Trump if the donors would provide funds for security, relocation and possibly a “safe house,” the paper reported.

In other words, they’d get a paid vacation to the tropical resort of their choice.

Are we supposed to believe that these women feared for their lives and safety just because they would claim to have been raped by Trump? That’s an obvious lie.

Falsely accusing men of raping them is unfortunately a consequence-free crime in America, and every woman knows this.

Former Clinton nemesis turned Clinton operative David Brock also donated $200,000 to the effort through a nonprofit group he founded, the paper reported in an article entitled, “Partisans, Wielding Money, Begin Seeking to Exploit Harassment Claims.”

Bloom told the Times that the effort was unproductive. One woman requested $2 million then decided not to come forward. Nor did any other women.

Suuuuuuure.

These 21 women, who did make accusations against Trump, were totally unrelated to all this and never received a dime from these kikes.

If you believe that, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

Bloom said she refunded most of the cash, keeping only some funds for out-of-pocket expenses accrued while working to vet and prepare cases.

The lawyer told the paper she did not communicate with Clinton or her campaign “on any of this.”

And we should totally take her word on all this.

She also maintained that she represented only clients whose stories she had corroborated and disputed the premise that she offered money to coax clients to come forward, the paper reported.

“It doesn’t cost anything to publicly air allegations,” Bloom said. “Security and relocation are expensive and were sorely needed in a case of this magnitude, in a country filled with so much anger, hate and violence.”

In other words, it’s true that she proposed paying these women huge sums of money in exchange for coming forward with their stories, but it’s false that those are bribes, since she calls it something else than a bribe.

The Times article expanded on a report in The Hill two weeks ago that said that worked with campaign donors and tabloid media outlets during the final months of the presidential election to arrange compensation for the alleged Trump victims and a commission for herself, offering to sell their stories.

In one case Bloom reportedly arranged for a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempted to score a six-figure payout for another woman.

The woman with the mortgage ultimately declined to come forward after being offered $750,000, The Hill reported.

These freaking kikes were offering women hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for them claiming that Trump did a grope on them? And only 21 actually came forward?

That’s got to be the most clear cut refutation of these rape hoaxes I’ve ever seen. I’m surprised more women didn’t take the bait, tbh. You’d think hundreds would be ready to take up that offer. I bet the only reason some of these women turned Bloom and Allred down, is because the lawyers are such greasy kikes that they couldn’t even inspire basic trust in these gentile women, who probably feared being scammed out of their money.

With this new information out, the Justice department needs to immediately start investigating these rape hoaxes as a criminal conspiracy to slander the President. I’m no lawyer, but I’m pretty sure paying people hundreds of grand in order to make false criminal accusations is somehow illegal.

Lisa Bloom definitely needs to be locked up. She’s one of the people trying to redirect all of this #MeToo energy away from the kikes. This is easily shown by the fact that she’s defending fellow Jew Harvey Weinstein against the grope accusers, all the while continuing with her agenda to sue every last gentile man for sexual harassment.

Investigate the rape accusers, Trump. America demands it, and screams for vengeance.

The hacker becomes the hackee.

Ho ho ho, so Putin doesn’t want America hacking his elections, now?

He should have thought of that before he did a hacking on Hilldog and published all that crap on Wikileaks, his personal twitter account.

Ever heard of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth?” This is how we roll around here.

Now, Putin will lose and presumably Hillary will become the president of Russia.

Don’t play the game if you can’t take the heat, nigga!

Washington Post:

Russian President Vladi­mir Putin on Thursday accused the United States of trying to interfere with Russia’s presidential campaign in retaliation for what the Kremlin dismisses as unfounded U.S. allegations that Moscow interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential vote.

“Hack it.”

On the eve of a possible meeting with President Trump at an economic forum in Vietnam, Putin suggested that the United States is pressing for the disqualification of Russian athletes at the 2018 Winter Olympics as a way of creating discontent with his tenure as president.

The International Olympic Committee recently banned six Russian cross-country skiers, including two 2014 Olympic medalists, from future competition in an ongoing doping investigation based on a damning 2016 report. With fewer than 100 days before the beginning of the 2018 Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea, the IOC has still not made a decision about whether to let the country that hosted the 2014 Games participate.

“What worries me is that the Olympic Games are due to start in February, and when is our presidential election? In March,” Putin told workers at a Ural Mountains factory, according to Russian news agencies. “There are very strong suspicions that all that is done because someone needs to create an atmosphere of discontent among sports fans and athletes over the state’s alleged involvement in violations and responsibility for it.”

The United States, he said, “wants to create problems in the Russian presidential election in response to our alleged interference in theirs.”

Real talk here: all Olympic athletes take performance enhancing drugs. In fact, all pro-athletes take them as well. Anyone who thinks American athletes aren’t taking HGH and other drugs probably also believes in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy.

If you believe these guys are all clean, I have a bridge to sell you.

The fact is that it’s basically impossible to screen all athletes for everything. The tests take too long, are too expensive and the logistics don’t add up. So as long as the coaches know about the testing procedures that a given competition will adopt, they can easily choose which drugs to use (and what timing protocol to adopt) in order to pass them.

No competitive organization is going to be willing to spend 95% of its budget on drug testing. And unless they do so, then all athletes are going to be juiced up in one way or another.

But this also means that if an organization is willing to spend a few million dollars to make more extensive testing on a given set of athletes after the fact, they will always turn out to be on some sort of drugs. I don’t know what the details of the case against the Russian athletes is, but I’m 99% sure that if the same tests are conducted on the other athletes competing against Russia, they’ll turn out just as guilty. In other words, this targeted testing of Russians is a scam.

And I have a sneaking suspicion that Jews are behind it.

Keep crying, Jose. Before we send you back to Mexico we’ll get you working on that wall.

Half of the US Supreme court is composed of subversive commies and Jews. The other half isn’t much better, but apparently good enough to put a stop to Obama’s maniacal scheme.

Game: Can you guess which 4 of these 8 upstanding citizens voted for unlimited Mexicans?

Vox:

In the most consequential 4-4 deadlock of the term, the Supreme Court has all but killed President Obama’s most significant attempted reform of immigration policy — which would have allowed up to 4.5 million immigrants to apply for protection from deportation and work legally in the US.

Unlike other cases on which the Court’s deadlocked since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, this one can’t simply be taken up again once the ninth seat is filled — Obama will no longer be in office.

In other words, the judge which will have the deciding vote on this case will be the one appointed by President Trump.

Mexicans BTFO.

In the medium term, the future of immigration policy will be decided by the winner of the 2016 presidential election: Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has promised to get rid of the existing program offering protections to young unauthorized immigrants, while presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has promised to find a way to expand protections even further than Obama did (which means she’d have to use a different justification than the one offered in the now-abortive Obama programs).

It’s clear that this election is the last possibility of turning things around legally and democratically. If the witch is elected, the invasion will accelerate to such an extent that it will be impossible for right-wing politicians to ever be elected again.

This bitch is unhinged.

This is what’s at stake here. If Trump is prevented, by the forces of darkness, from accomplishing the will of the heavens, then a popular uprising is inevitable. And that won’t be pretty.

Is this what you want, lefties?