On the same day Donald Trump was indicted, they convicted a guy for posting a meme.

This country is spiraling out of control.

This is friggin outrageous.

Law & Crime:

Right-wing Twitter troll Douglass Mackey, better known by the handle “Ricky Vaughn,” has been convicted by a federal jury of interfering in the 2016 election.

“Mackey has been found guilty by a jury of his peers of attempting to deprive individuals from exercising their sacred right to vote for the candidate of their choice in the 2016 Presidential Election,” the Eastern District of New York’s U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said in a statement. “Today’s verdict proves that the defendant’s fraudulent actions crossed a line into criminality and flatly rejects his cynical attempt to use the constitutional right of free speech as a shield for his scheme to subvert the ballot box and suppress the vote.”

In a long-awaited reckoning on election misinformation, the Department of Justice readily agreed that most of Mackey’s antics before the election were protected First Amendment speech. He created memes of fake endorsements of then-candidate Donald Trump by celebrities like Lana del Ray, Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande, usually sporting “MAGA” hats. Prosecutors say, however, that Mackey crossed the line when he posted images encouraging Hillary Clinton voters, especially Black women, to “Avoid the line” of polling stations by texting the word “Hillary” to a five-digit number.

Giving the fake promo a deceptive veneer of legalese, the fine print read: “Must be 18 or older to vote. One vote per person. Must be a legal citizen of the United States. Voting by text not available in Guam, Puerto Rico, Alaska or Hawaii. Paid for by Hillary For President 2016.”

That phone number led to a real line, and the thousands who followed the instructions did not immediately receive error messages.

Shortly after President Joe Biden’s inauguration, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn charged Mackey’s case, claiming this wasn’t free speech but election interference.

On Friday, a federal jury agreed.

“Ricky Vaughn” took his name as the fictional Cleveland Indians pitcher played by Charlie Sheen in the movie “Major League.” In Mackey’s profile picture, Sheen wears a red “MAGA” hat, and anti-hate watchdogs noted that much of the content on the feed mainstreamed white supremacist ideas. One post included an antisemitic image of an octopus encircling the globe, with a Star of David over the creature’s head.

At this point, no one is safe from this government.

They’re treating the population like they treat the rest of the country: you’re a subject, a slave, and they can do whatever they want to you.

I’ve not said this often, but at this point, I’m going to tell you: if you can get out of the United States, you absolutely should. If you’re doxed online, or if you think you could be doxed, you should have already left.

wtf https://t.co/r56GBCnb25

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) March 31, 2023

Douglass Mackey was just found guilty of a federal crime he was charged with by the DOJ for tweeting the meme on the left during the 2016 election.

The lady on the right has never been arrested for her tweet that also came during the 2016 election. pic.twitter.com/pkCz6h669U

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 31, 2023

Most of you can’t leave, and I get that, and I wish you all the best, and statistically, you’ll probably be fine. But I have to suggest leaving if you can, because this is just the beginning.

With stuff like “memes are voter suppression” and “paying off a hooker is a campaign expense,” prosecutors are getting extremely creative, and this is just going to get more retarded.

They don’t want people to question the 2024 election. They want to make people afraid to say anything against this government, as it looses its place on the world stage and becomes more and more unstable, socially and economically. They especially don’t want you questioning the wars they have planned.

Things have gotten very extreme under Joe Biden, what with the forced child transsexualism and the attempts to start a world war. It’s just going to keep getting worse until the country collapses.

This is just ridiculous.

Fox News:

The jury on Tuesday found Michael Sussmann not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI in September 2016 when he said he was not working on behalf of any client, when he brought information alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. 

After a two week trial, and more than a day of deliberations, the jury found that Special Counsel John Durham’s team had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann’s statement was a lie, and that he was, in fact, working on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and technology executive Rodney Joffe when he brought two thumb drives and a white paper alleging a Trump-Russia connection.

Sussmann was charged with one count of making a false statement to the FBI during his meeting with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016.

In remarks following the verdict, Sussmann said that he had been falsely accused.

“I told the truth to the FBI, and the Jury clearly recognized this in their unanimous verdict today,” he said. “I’m grateful to the members of the jury for their careful thoughtful service. Despite being falsely accused I believe that Justice ultimately prevailed in my case. As you can imagine this has been a difficult year for my family and me. But right now we are grateful for the love and support of so many during this ordeal.”

Durham issued a terse statement expressing his office’s disappointment.

“While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service,” Durham said. “I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.”

So, what – he thought the piss dossier was real?

No one thinks he wasn’t guilty. It was a fake jury.

The jury included one federal government employee who told the judge they donated to Democrats in 2016 and another government employee who told the judge they “strongly” dislike former President Trump. Both of those jurors told the judge they could be impartial throughout the trial.

The jury also included a teacher, an illustrator, a mechanic and more. One juror had a child who was on the same high school sports team as Sussmann’s child.

The overwhelming majority of jurors selected told Cooper they had not heard of the case prior to jury service.

America is a failed state.

How are we going to force freedom values on anyone when we have a fake court system?

As we’ve written about extensively here on the Daily Stormer, on February 10, Douglass Mackey, who was known on the internet as Ricky Vaughn, was indicted by Joe Biden’s Justice Department for memes he made during the 2016 election cycle.

Ricky was among the most influential figures in the entire right-wing in 2016. He served as a bridge between normal Republicans and more legit information. He was a meme genius. He was ranked by MIT as one of the top 100 election influencers. He was responsible for so many of the great memes that got Donald Trump elected, and changed our internet culture so fundamentally.

He was the father of good optics, and played a major role in developing my strategic thinking, as well of that of Nick Fuentes, after Charlottesville. The contributions of this man cannot be overstated.

For what it’s worth, he is also a great guy. There are a lot of horrible scumbags on the internet, and I would be writing this same call to support Ricky even if he were an asshole, but I think it is important to mention that he is not an asshole. He was always respectful, and didn’t engage in weird behaviors.

Ricky was doxed by FBI informants in 2017, and wasn’t even in the game anymore. The reason he was targeted was for the purpose of creating a chilling effect. They want every single person on the internet to be scared to death to post anything criticizing the Democrat Party establishment, for fear they’re going to be swooped by the feds.

Fighting back against this is the single most important thing that any of us can be doing right now.

What we are absolutely capable of is putting forth a show of force, in terms of the defense for Ricky Vaughn.

I am hereby calling on all readers to donate to his defense fund.

What’s more, all of you people who whined about how you couldn’t send me money through a credit card or to a PO Box and then didn’t ever send me money – I want you to send all of that money to Ricky’s defense. He has a PO Box and a site that is processing credit cards, along with the now standard right-wing donation methods of crypto (this includes Monero, which is anonymous, and which we at the Daily Stormer are exclusively accepting now – you can read about that here).

If Ricky loses this case, it is going to pave the way for total prosecution of internet speech. If he wins, it’s going to at least slow it down.

Every single person who has ever been a part of anything right-wing has a duty to give something to this fund.

Here’s the link to the official website supporting Ricky’s defense.

Below is the full outline of all donation methods (GiveSendGo has the ability to process Visa/MasterCard at time of writing, but obviously that isn’t private, so unless you’re a public person, use one of the private options).

Please donate via GiveSendGo, or, if you prefer to give crypto or physical check or cash, by one of the following methods:*

GiveSendGo: Click here

Bitcoin: bc1qjsjryz7l0wm6tyacj4s68n28dmhatfa88tve07

Ethereum: 0x060A10BD329D79b17F63f7e7aE13eDA19e87Bfd8

Monero: 44FyzKfdAyWR873fbTquWSgJvVXBcXZr7AuNopEAkS4Hf3sH2NthaBBT74Bu9ohizNMDdjsiH9tEvANNiNpRZSAQ799Musm

ZCash Private Wallet: zs1s2n352w3w33y7v5pe9k7z30z59mss2j49mjevahsmhujpyj78dyv3rq04wvylp2xw754v6hg6a3

Dogecoin: DKoR9Q5yEWMVRPvog47CGxfWEauqbubnKj

HOW TO DONATE ANONYMOUSLY: Send cash to the P.O. box listed below, or send an anonymous, shielded Zcash transaction to the Zcash private wallet. Or, send cash or check to the P.O. box address. All donor info will be kept private. 

Send cash, or send a check made out to Douglass Mackey to:

Douglass Mackey Legal Defense Fund
PO Box 6332
Delray Beach, FL 33482

A new book claims that a top Biden aide said the coronavirus was the best thing that ever happened to him, claims the media.

The most interesting thing about this story is that the blackout on saying anything that could possibly be construed as negative about the Biden Administration has apparently been lifted.

It was a toss-up as to whether or not the media was going to pretend to be acting critically, or if they just went full North Korea.

Most of the media thus far has been pure North Korea, and they probably focus grouped that, or got data from their computer simulations that use algorithms to categorize social media chatter, and decided that some bit of criticism was more effective than full North Korea.

The Guardian:

A senior adviser to Democrat Joe Biden in his campaign for president believed “Covid is the best thing that ever happened to him”, a new book reports.

It was, the authors add, a necessarily private comment that “campaign officials believed but would never say in public” as the US reeled from the impact of the pandemic amid hospitals stretched to breaking and with deaths mounting and the economy falling off a cliff.

The remark, made to “an associate” by Anita Dunn, a Washington powerbroker who the Atlantic called “The Mastermind Behind Biden’s No-Drama Approach to Trump”, is reported in Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes.

The first major book on the 2020 election, a campaign indelibly marked by the coronavirus, will be published next week. The Guardian obtained a copy.

This week, President Biden commemorated the 500,000th US Covid death with solemn ceremony and a request that Americans “remember those we lost and those we left behind”.

At least he didn’t commemorate it with an IED designed to blow out blue smoke.

Unfortunately, I can’t take part in the commemoration, because no one I know died from the coronavirus, nor did anyone I know know someone who died of the coronavirus.

My best friend from grade school died of a fentanyl overdose while in lockdown, however. But I decided against building the blue smoke bomb for him. I just don’t know enough about explosives.

I don’t actually know who these authors are, but apparently they’ve written things that are considered to have been accurate by someone.

Allen and Parnes, of NBC News and the Hill, also collaborated on Shattered, a similarly speedy history of Hillary Clinton’s White House run in 2016. In their new book they record Biden’s view of his predecessor in her defeat by Trump – he thought her a “terrible candidate” – and the views of Barack Obama, whom Biden served as vice-president from 2009 to 2017, as the 2020 campaign unfolded.

Obama first “seemed to be enamored with a former Texas congressman, Beto O’Rourke”, Allen and Parnes write, then later told Biden’s aides he feared his friend, aged 77 when the primary began, would only succeed in embarrassing himself and tarnishing a distinguished Washington career.

But Dunn’s reported comment points to what became the dominant theme of the election. As the pandemic capsized Trump along with the economy Biden, through a much more cautious approach to campaigning and basic public health concerns, appealed to voters as the right man to manage a recovery.

Look: no one knows if anything in these books, or virtually anything at all in the New York Times or the Washington Post, is actually true. There is zero consequences for saying “anonymous source said” and then just making something up. It’s 100% trust-based, and frankly, I’m not a big Jewish journalist truster.

The thing is: if you just think about something someone would have said, it’s very easy to just make it up.

It doesn’t matter if Dunn actually said it or not. “Coronavirus is the best thing that ever happened to Joe Biden” is effectively a tautology.

Here are some similar statements:

• “Cocaine was the best thing that ever happened to El Chapo.”
• “Music was the best thing that ever happened to Elvis Presley.”
• “Ships were the best thing that ever happened to Christopher Columbus.”

The election was obviously fake, but without the coronavirus, they wouldn’t have been able to commit the amount of fraud they needed to win. The bulk of the fraud was in the mail-in ballots.

Furthermore, without the media mantra that “Trump mishandled the coronavirus and created the pandemic,” Biden would have 30% of the vote instead of the 40% he actually likely got, which would have made the logistics of the fraud that much more difficult.

And without “people voted for him because of the virus,” not even the Democrats would be able to look themselves in the mirror and say Biden won.

Everyone knows this, so whether or not some Jew woman said it makes no difference.

The intelligence agencies have “above top secret” think tanks that come up with all kinds of various social engineering plans. Some of them they enact, some of them they don’t. Some of them we find out they enacted, some of them we’re left to speculate. Usually, if you suspect something was an intelligence agency plot, it probably is. Maybe when you’re in your old age, they’ll release the documents showing that everything you believed in your whole life was a CIA social engineering operation, as a way to mock you.

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:

Exhibit C:

Exhibit D:

No, no. Of course I’m certain the Moon landing was 100% legit.

But psychedelic drug culture, feminism and modern art are all admitted to have been CIA cultural operations to, you know, fight communism or something.

As I discussed earlier this week, an X-Files spin-off show that aired months before the 911 attacks featured the exact story of the 911 attacks, and the star of the show told Alex Jones it was a result of CIA guys hanging around the set of the X-Files and just shooting the shit with people about the kinda kooky stuff the CIA thinks up.

The implication was that some CIA agent said that “there was some kooky plan to fly a plane into the World Trade Center in order to justify a global war on terror, but like most of these kooky plans, it never manifested.” Obviously, if whoever told the producers of the show that this was something that had been planned had known they were actually going to do it, he probably would not have told them about it.

He just thought it was something like this:

The point I am circling back to here is that it is very likely that this whole “the flu is actually a new kind of flu and it’s killing everyone” plan was just lying around in some lunatic’s folder, and they decided to do it BECAUSE Donald Trump got elected president.

If you actually look at everything that they are heading towards with this coronavirus, it is all stuff that we’ve been hearing that we were going to have to do because of global warming anyway:

• Creating a global government to fight a global problem
• Deindustrializing and thereby effectively abolishing the middle class
• Ending global travel
• Restricting private property rights
• Creating a government “allowance” system for the peasants (“Universal Basic Income”)
• Moving people into “walking city” compounds where they live and work inside of an enclosure that is effectively sealed (I’ve explained that these will be something like Hudson Yards)

Slowly easing people into this via the global warming hoax would have been a lot less insane and dangerous to the agenda than doing this wacky flu hoax.

Hillary Clinton was supposed to win the election in 2016, and this was all going to roll along according to plan. Trump’s election was a total system failure, and this “pandemic” hoax was used to destroy him.

If things were going according to plan, we’d be in Hillary’s second term, and Joe Biden would be playing with his dogs on a lawn at Martha’s Vineyard, not the White House lawn.

And he wouldn’t be wearing a mask.

Rick Vaughn, the legendary Twitter poster, has been indicted by the US federal government for memes posted in the run-up to the 2016 election.

New York Post:

The man behind pro-Trump Twitter troll account “Ricky Vaughn” was busted in Florida on Wednesday for spreading disinformation during the 2016 presidential election in a scheme to limit black turnout, officials said.

Douglass Mackey, 31, was arrested in West Palm Beach on one charge of conspiracy against rights, for which he faces up to 10 years in prison.

Between September and November 2016, Mackey allegedly conspired with others to use social media messaging to encourage blacks to cast their votes via text message so their ballots wouldn’t count, according to Brooklyn federal prosecutors.

On Nov. 1, one week before the presidential election that ushered in President Donald Trump’s term, Mackey allegedly tweeted an image of a black woman in front of an “African Americans for President Hillary” sign. Written on the photograph was the message, “Avoid the Line. Vote from Home. Text ‘Hillary’ to 59925. Vote for Hillary and be a part of history,” the complaint states.

More than 4,900 people, encouraged by the misinformation campaign, cast their vote via text, officials said.

“There is no place in public discourse for lies and misinformation to defraud citizens of their right to vote,” said Acting US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Seth DuCharme.

…

MIT Media Lab ranked him as the 107th most important social media influencer of the presidential election, coming in ahead of NBC News and the Drudge Report, officials said.

I’ve read some other news articles about this, and most of them are just worded more confusingly. As far as I’m able to tell, he was indicted on the single meme. However, I’m sure many memes that he posted will come up in the court, as they try to convict him for “conspiracy to joke around” and “first degree horseplay.”

I feel like the word “insane” is used too often, but this truly cannot be classified as anything other than “insane.”

The Bad Times are Here, Kids

We are officially through the looking glass, across the threshold, or whichever idiom pleases your fancy. A man was just federally indicted for a meme. Probably, I should spend a few thousand words going through the background, and just how we found ourselves in this very unfortunate situation.

This is the big revenge spectacle, that we talked about before the election. What they are going to try to do is ensure the masses of people remain quiet, and accept their masters. They do that through fear.

The 2016 election was an unimagined disaster for the ruling elite. You probably have no actual capacity to understand how this was viewed by them: it was a total failure of their established systems, on the very highest level.

I would always get frustrated at people who try to claim that Trump being elected was a part of some kind of conspiracy, and that he was meant to fail, and it was all some sort of a show of some kind (put on by the elite for some non-specific reason). I’ve never come into contact with an intelligent person that made this argument, but there are a lot of really aggressive morons on the internet.

Saying that Trump was a secret Jewish agent is actually the exact same thing as the QAnon thing, saying that Trump is secretly some kind of invincible messiah and he will fix everything, all his screwups are actually part of the plan. Both theories hinge on a very simple premise that explains everything, and this appeals to simple-minded and/or emotionally fragile people. All holes in these theories are easily filled with “that’s all part of the plan.” The problem with both theories is that they are not viable heuristics for understanding what is actually going on. The same kind of person believes in both of these theories, as you can easily see on the internet: they’re aggressive and stupid, believing that they are very smart and have secret information that everyone else is too stupid to understand.

The whole Dunning-Kruger thing makes it so that dumb people believe they are smarter than they are, while smart people aren’t aware of how dumb other people actually are, and you really run into a lot of that sort of thing when you deal with certain especially fantastical conspiracy theories on the internet. The reason that people believe them is because they provide a comforting, simple explanation for everything. Saying “it’s just all controlled, everything is controlled and fake” is much easier than trying to understand what is actually going on, and it means you have an easy answer for everything.

The “Trump is secretly a part of a Jewish plan” and “Trump has his own secret plan” theories both collapsed when Trump supposedly lost the 2020 election and was replaced by the pretender Joe Biden. If Trump was a secret Jewish agent, they wouldn’t have needed to steal the election from him. They either could have let him have another term, or they could have instructed him to do something really stupid just before the election that would cause him to lose (or at least, for it to be plausible that he lost). QAnon obviously was proved false by the fact that he was removed from the White House.

I’m sure the “Trump is a secret Jewish agent” are still making that argument, and trying to explain away this bizarre spectacle of election fraud. With them it’s always some kind of “it’s because they want you to think [x thing] because of [x reason].” (Remember that the overwhelming majority of the population will believe whatever the media is saying, either Fox News or CNN, so this elaborate hoax would have to be targeted at a tiny percent of the population.) I haven’t seen what these people are claiming the Jews were trying to make people think by failing to produce enough fake ballots with the mail-in fraud to cover the Trump Landslide Victory, and being forced to stop the count in multiple swing states and bring in suitcases full of fake ballots. The only thing I can figure they would be trying to make people think is that the entire American government is a fraud, but I can’t think of what the reason would be that they would want people to think that. However, I guarantee there is someone, somewhere on the internet who has an explanation as to how that fits into the conspiracy.

There were QAnon people streaming the inauguration who were still trusting the plan, and thinking that Trump was going to jump out of a trapped door are have everyone executed for treason. QAnon gets more focus in the mainstream media that people who think Trump is secretly working for the Jews, so I have heard what Q is saying: they’re saying that Joe Biden is not really the president, and that Donald Trump is secretly controlling him. If they don’t get banned from everywhere completely, someone will be on the internet, explaining everything that Biden does as part of a secret QAnon plan to stop the cannibalistic pedophiles.

The actual reality doesn’t provide the easy comfort that either of the “secret plan” theories provide.

President Trump: A Plan Interrupted

The actual reality is that Trump’s 2016 victory was the single worst thing that has happened to the ruling elite since World War Two. Primarily, the reason it was so bad for them is that it was a total failure of the system at the single highest level, and part of the core ideology of the system is that it is invincible. This is how they get people to believe in it. The servants of the system need to believe they’re following an invincible system, and the masses of people need to be led to believe that change is impossible.

The elite plan has always been to slowly, step by step, move people along without agitating them. You can see this going all the way back to the end of World War Two, when Jews first started to gain meaningful control of all of the institutions in America. They slowly, step by step, moved people in the direction they wanted them to go in. It was feminism and free sex, rights for blacks, homosexuals, mass immigration – one after the other, in a march toward a new society.

The end goal was always a global government, run by Jews. People were marching towards that, without much more resistance that a grumble here and there, and Trump created this huge disruption.

Probably, Trump was not trying to actually win the 2016 election. Most likely, it was “a publicity stunt gone wrong.” Certainly, the media treated it as a publicity stunt. It created massive ratings for them, to the point where Jewish CNN head Jeff Zucker actually called Trump’s Jewish former lawyer Michael Cohen and offered to give Trump a show “after the election” (the context of the call was the assumption that Trump was going to inevitably lose, obviously). When he did win, however, his pride led him to try to do the best he could do please the people, and stay popular. And just due to his personality, he refused to fall in line. I remember when he was flirting with falling in line, and he eventually backed out of it. He continued to refuse to adopt the normal party line, and continued to introduce chaos into the ordered systems that rule us.

Ultimately, they were able to nullify the threat. As you can see, Trump didn’t accomplish anything at all that can’t be rolled back by Joe Biden. Trump did screw up the timeline of a lot of different projects, slowing both the wars and the immigration. But the biggest problem was the effect he had on the psyche of the population: he riled people up by making them believe they had some kind of say in the way things are going. As we have seen, the people don’t have any say in anything. They voted for the Trump 2016 platform, which was basically a brand of populist white nationalism, and what they got was a nonstop Russian conspiracy theory that didn’t even make any sense. With the Biden election hoax, normal people can no longer believe that the system is the result of voting patterns, they can no longer believe that the things that are happening in our country are the result of the votes of their countrymen.

What this ultimately means is that the government now has to rely on terror and brutality in order to maintain power. They don’t have any choice, because they gave up all of their legitimacy by first allowing the game show host Donald Trump to somehow win a presidential election, and then having to steal the second presidential election from him because he was so popular. He was so popular, in fact, that they had to stop the election after it was over and do more fraud, removing any doubt that any honest would have had that it was a fraudulent election.

This is much less comfortable, and there are many more risks involved with ruling a country where half the population that believes the government is illegitimate. Democracy, where people believe that they are voting for the government, is effectively zero risk. Elections, typically, are real. It is simply that no one can get to the level of being on a ballot without being approved by the system. (This is largely done through the primary system, which is very easy to swing – look at what happened to Steve King.) They make sure that all of your options are pre-approved, then you go vote. Obviously, the system intended for Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, but if Jeb Bush would have won, no one in the system would have lost their mind.

You Won’t Believe This One Weird Trick That Permanently Damaged Democracy

Remember the story of the fake shower rooms at Auschwitz? The Jews claimed that the Nazis would sit them all down, shave their heads, tell them to take off all their clothes, and march them into a fake shower room. Then, when the wooden doors were sealed shut, instead of water coming out of the shower heads, it was poison gas. When I was first getting into historical revisionism, and learning about the fact that “The Holocaust” is war propaganda that became a religion, one thing that really stuck with me was when someone said: “Why wouldn’t they just shoot them? What was the purpose of this complicated and expensive shower hoax if you were going to kill them anyway?”

Sometimes, Jews will explain that the Nazis didn’t want people to panic. But according to the stories from the same Jews, everyone at the camps knew that everyone who was sent to the showers was killed and cremated, so what was the point of the elaborate shower ritual, if everyone knew “taking a shower” meant you were going to be killed? Furthermore, what difference would it make if they panicked? What are they going to do, when they’re already at a “death camp”? There are examples throughout the 20th century of large groups of people being taken out to fields and shot. Historians claim Pol Pot ended up killing a third of the population of Cambodia, and he didn’t have any fake shower rooms – he used bullets (I also question the numbers given for Pol Pot’s death count, but unlike in Poland, they have excavated mass graves of people with bullet holes in their skulls, so someone was taken out into a field and shot).

Doesn’t the element of “fake shower room gas chambers” just make the story dumber, and less believable?

The explanation is simple: it was Jews making these stories up, and in their minds, when you do something brutal to people, you do it as some kind of trick. At the Nuremberg Trials, Jewish lawyers got together with Jews who had been interned at the camps, and decided on a story to tell, and this thing about gas chambers is what they came up with.

It is possible that the coronavirus scam was devised as a way to manage the chaos that Trump introduced into the system. It’s such a chaotic bizarre thing, to all of the sudden start claiming that all these hundreds of thousands of people that no one has ever met are dying of a flu, while so many people we know have been diagnosed with the virus and it was simply a normal flu, which they recovered from in a week or so, which is the normal pattern of a normal flu.

What the coronavirus has done is present a context for stripping people of their rights, in this rapid, aggressive fashion. If it were not for Donald Trump, there is no reason the slow march, the slow loss of freedom and humanity, couldn’t have continued up until the point they are trying to take us to (world government, cyborg brain implants, new satanic world religion, etc.).

The fact that Trump was unable to accomplish any of his goals, and the fact that the election was stolen, disrupted this entire historical process. The army of bureaucrats that run everything had to recalibrate, and devise a new way forward.

Even if Trump had lost outright, this idea of populism and nationalism was going to remain. It hadn’t been there before Trump. What Americans might not realize is that nationalists across Europe were looking at Trump is a hero. I have an Italian friend who says the entire country was in mourning after the election.

This is what European Commission President Ursula Van Der Leyen was talking about when she made the seemingly bizarre and cryptic statement (to the Davos Agenda Forum, of course) that Donald Trump had “permanently damaged democracy.” I don’t know how any normal person can hear that statement and not be both perplexed and intrigued. She is effectively saying: “the jig is up.” Because of this “damage” to democracy, she said that the world requires more extreme restrictions on what people are allowed to say on the internet, and she called on America to pass laws regulating speech. She was effectively saying that because the internet monopolies are based in America, America needs to pass laws against speech in order to control what people are allowed to say, because speech damages democracy.

I never experienced any serious censorship before Trump became president. In fact, I was regularly covered by the media along the lines of: “Look at what the bad guys are saying! It’s so silly and evil!” Longtime readers will remember that. Here’s the thing: they were not afraid of a few people on the internet saying things they’re not supposed to say. Of course, they’ll try to recruit you as an FBI informant (I was proposition by an informant before Trump announced his candidacy – I posted the email communications to the site at the time), and several “far right” individuals were prosecuted for crimes that they either didn’t commit or weren’t actually that serious, but the idea of completely censoring speech was not considered necessary. You could still say “nigger” on Twitter, YouTube, etc. before Trump was elected.

There would have been a push to implement “hate speech” laws in America, and they would have eventually done it, as part of the above mentioned slow march. However, it wouldn’t have been like what we’re seeing – this massive shutting down of everyone in an egregious, belligerent, absurd manner. The speech was never really particularly dangerous as long as the majority of people believed that the system was more or less fair, and represented the wishes of the people, for the most part.

What they are afraid of is mass movements against their agenda, and that is what Trump created. His election victory gave legitimacy to the ideas, it showed everyone that their fellow countrymen agreed with them on the issue of these brown people running around everywhere being a problem.

After Trump’s election victory, everyone in the system said, before anything else: “we have to make sure this never happens again.” Everything you have witnessed follows that line of thought.

As I told you all along: the Justice Department bureaucrats spent the last four years putting together indictments for all of the people blamed for Donald Trump getting elected in 2016. Over a period of time, possibly a relatively short time, they are going to roll out indictments for all of them. This is sadistic, and it is about revenge, but it is also a practical matter: we are no longer living under the illusion of freedom. We are now living under a tyrannical regime.

The good news is that openly tyrannical regimes have never been particularly stable. The bad news is that the name of the game under a tyrannical regime is that you must rule through fear, which means this is all going to get pretty scary. Fear is the only tool of a government that rules without the consent of the people.

Because understand: their power is all in your head. They know that. They know that there are more of us than there are of them – by a lot.

Democracy, before Donald Trump broke it, worked so well because people genuinely believed that they were voting and electing leaders, and the leaders were just flawed or stupid, so things got screwed up, or whatever. So, they maintained power over your mind, by making you believe that they held power legitimately.

When people don’t believe the government has legitimate power over them, the government has to get in their head some other way, and the only real way to do that is fear. (And brainwashing camps, of course, and I’m sure those are coming – but that takes time and doesn’t work on everyone.) They have to make you afraid to speak to speak out, they have to make you afraid to even speak to one another. They have to make you afraid to even listen to what anyone else is saying.

They can’t arrest 74 million people, so they need to make targeted arrests, to make examples of people, so that the rest of the population understands that people who oppose the regime end up with very serious problems.

Primarily, they have to target intelligent people, who might pose a threat of organizing some kind of resistance to them. Peasant uprisings are an annoyance they certainly want to avoid, but a popular uprising lead by a charismatic member of the upper class is the true threat. That’s why they indicted Ricky Vaughn first. Everyone who is intelligent, and has been involved in right-wing politics for a long time knows who he is, but most normies, though they likely saw his tweets, don’t know the name and won’t understand the significance of his arrest.

The FBI Needs to Issue a List of Things You’re Not Allowed to Joke About Now

Ricky Vaughn is a legend in our circles, of course. Not only was he the most famous right-wing face on Twitter for getting news of the Jews and other cryptoids out to the public, he was also at the forefront of pushing out the weirdos after Charlottesville, when we realized we’d been infiltrated by overweight male feminists (neo-Nazis).

Here’s the other thing: after being kicked off Twitter in 2017, he WAS doxed by cowards whose names should be forgotten forever, and he stopped posting on the internet. So, the first “meme criminal” in American history is not a clear and present threat, but someone how hasn’t been active online for more than three years. That is also intended to send a message: “no, we don’t ever forget.”

Furthermore, the specific meme he was indicted on was incredibly popular. I won’t post it here, as apparently that meme is illegal, but they were posted everywhere. I don’t recall, but I think there was more than one version.

What’s more, it was very obviously a joke. This indictment says that nearly 5,000 black people (who are totally exactly the same as whites in every way, including intelligence) tried to vote by text. I haven’t read the indictment yet, but one interesting question is: “where did they get that number?” If they somehow gained access to the phone number included in the meme, and saw that 4,900 people sent the word “Hillary” to that number, that doesn’t actually prove that those people thought it was real.

This was a joke poking fun at the intelligence of black people, the idea that they would be dumb enough to think they could vote by text is funny. Actually coming out and saying “yes, black people really are this stupid, and this is no different than standing at the polling station with a gun and a sign that reads ‘no niggers allowed’” seems more racist than the meme, frankly.

Finally, the “conspiracy” charge is vague, and suggests that others who posted this meme have indictments hanging over their heads. Everyone who was on Twitter at the time is going back through their thoughts, trying to remember if they posted this meme.

The underlying point here is that this a federal indictment for a joke image posted on the internet. We all know it was a joke, and more importantly, we all know that they know it was a joke. We all know that indicting a Trump supporter for a joke is intended to instill fear in the rest of the Trump-supporting population.

I told you hell was going to open up. I spent all summer telling you that. I stopped telling you that a few weeks before the election, because I wanted to make sure everyone voted.

But the Mouth of Hell is now open. This indictment is the Tongue of Hell sticking out and licking the Lips of Hell. It won’t be long before the Teeth of Hell start taking bites.

Things are already just about as weird as anyone could ever imagine anything being, but they’re about to get a whole lot weirder.

They have a full stack of indictments, ready to go. If you’re not a public person, well, that doesn’t mean much: they’ve also announced that they are now buying data directly from big tech companies. That means that anything you ever said on Facebook, including in the messenger, anything you ever wrote in an email using Gmail or any of the other big providers, anything that you ever typed into Google – all of that is now available for the FBI to comb through.

When people used to ask me “will going to this site get me on a list?” I would say: “no, but posting that comment probably will.” I don’t think they’re going to go after people who just looked at things, but there is a strong likelihood that if you were a big tweeter, or did any other kind of media, they’re going to come visit you, and they’re trying to figure out something to charge you with.

Hopefully, you all followed my constant advice about VPNs, Tor, etc. and there’s no trace of you.

(This is the part where the edgy holdouts start thinking “yeah, maybe I outta reconsider that whole Jesus thing…”)

Remain Calm.

The number one most important piece of advice I’ve ever given you (aside from the Jesus part and the part about not talking to cops) is these most simple two words: remain calm.

The longer version of that is “remain calm at all times.”

All you can do is what you do is all you can do. Worrying about things never put anyone in a better situation. Worrying actually limits, if not totally prevents, your ability to act rationally. There is nothing that is worth worrying about. You must simply do what you can to protect yourself from these men, but remember that they are but men, and accept that God is in control of the rest.

Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

You’re still an American (or a European or Australian or whatever the hell you are – this same thing is going to happen everywhere), and you still have rights. They can’t take those rights away, they were given to you by God.

Fear God alone. He’s the only one who can kill your soul and send you to hell.

If you start fearing men, then that’s when you get on the hell train.

Stay on the gravy train of justice, which we ride towards freedom.

Don’t talk to the cops.

Do not. Talk. To. The Cops.

Whatever your do.

Don’t talk to the cops.

Don’t talk to the cops.

Don’t talk to the cops.

We might be entering, right now, into just total and complete lawlessness. I thought it wouldn’t be until Kamala took over, but it could come at any time, and it might already be here.

But even if they establish that they don’t have to give you a court appointed lawyer (which is probably still at least a year away), you still gain nothing by talking to them.

For the time being, we still have a court system, and if they’re going to indict you for memes or whatever else, any information you give them will just be used against you. Please, get that into your head. It’s going to be intimidating when the FBI shows up at your house – or more likely your work – and asks to talk to you.

Remember:

1. “Am I free to go?”
2. “I will only speak to a court-appointed lawyer.”

Don’t forget it. It could be the difference between a few uncomfortable days and years in prison.

Ricky Vaughn is a hero, and he is a martyr.

He’s the first of many, I’m sure. But he is the first of the gang to be indicted for memes.

History will remember that.

Wait, sorry – wrong song.

I meant this one.

Along with the Daily Stormer, there were two big internet forces in Donald Trump’s 2016 victory: 4chan’s /pol/ and reddit’s r/The_Donald.

The Stormer and 4chan were places for younger people, while reddit was a place for boomers and younger people who act like boomers.

After Charlottesville, reddit began banning things, and they restricted and ultimately banned r/The_Donald. That community moved to TheDonald.Win.

The day after the inauguration, that community moved to Patriots.win:

Today is a big day – after five years, The Donald has rebranded to Patriots.win.

The first reason goes without saying… we’re in a period of transition with yesterday’s fraudulent inauguration. It will likely be some time before Trump gets back to actively communicating with his base, but we intend to do what we can to keep our part of this movement as active as ever.

We’re not turning against Trump – not at all, our branding and our rules will remain the same for the immediate future. If Trump moves forward with the rumored Patriots Party, then we’re perfectly positioned to fully support him in that endeavor.

It is our duty to step up and call out the disaster that this administration will be.

This rebrand does not indicate a change in moderation policy.

I have not been a reader since 2016, but I’d imagine that it is currently fertile grounds to spread information about Our Greatest Ally to these folks. They are looking for someone to blame, and they certainly can’t blame a senile old man. As hard as they are trying, I don’t think blaming China is really going to be sustainable.

Maybe, they’re finally ready to hear about who is responsible for our problems?

They might not be.

Who knows.

I don’t know.

But I do know this: It’s worth a shot. Not just on The Forum Formerly Know as The Donald, but anywhere that you’ve tried to spread the truth about Jews among right-wingers and eventually given up or been banned.

We’re in a new era here now, folks.

Go back around. Don’t act like a moron. Don’t be too aggressive. Use a Christian angle. Be gentle.

Understand: anyone who doesn’t understand the Jewish problem at this point in the game is not suffering from stupidity, but an actual mental disorder. They are in denial of a problem which exists right in front of their faces.

There are two main reasons for the denial.

Childhood Brainwashing and Trauma-Based Psychological Abuse

Every child is taught that the Holocaust was the worst event in history, and they are continually traumatized with it, throughout their childhood. Along with watching an endless number of films, and reading books about this alleged historical event, small children are shown pictures of piles of corpses. The bodies are often naked, and before the internet and pornography, this was usually the first time that a child has seen an image of a naked body – or a pile of corpses. I remember seeing those pictures, I remember the triggers that went off the first time I saw a Holocaust denial post on the internet.

Every single person raised in the Western education system is programmed with these triggers, and unless they have some sort of anti-social disorder, they have to deal with these triggers. When a person who is programmed like this as a child hears things against the Jews, it will elicit the emotional intended response. The person either has to deal with the emotional response, or not.

The Daily Stormer’s first mission was to use various forms of shock humor and spectacle to break through this mental conditioning. The facts were all widely available, and I understood that it was a psychological problem that was preventing people from looking at the Jewish problem, and that this was largely related to the idea that anyone who speaks of the Jews is evil.

Here we are, all these years later (nearly 8 years, in fact), and every single person on the internet has been exposed to shock humor relating to Jews and the Holocaust. Many people have confronted and dealt with the triggers, due to the humor breaking their spell, or just the bombardment of facts. But others retreated back into the childhood fantasy of the Holocaust and the Jews as good but persecuted people.

I think that the recruiting capacity of shock humor is mostly exhausted. Most of the jokes are old. Seeing someone joke about a gas chamber now feels a bit like seeing someone make a reference to Ace Ventura or dance the Macarena. The fact that it is this played out means it no longer has the intended effect.

However, this being said: I think that the election fraud and subsequent takeover by Joe Biden is enough to traumatize these people into looking at what is right in front of their faces. What’s more, they already have the background, the knowledge that there are huge number of people that believe the Jews are a serious problem, that they’re not really going too far into the fringe at this point.

Evangelical Christian Heresies

Evangelical Christians have devoted themselves to believing that the Jews are the people from the Bible. As we’ve talked about on this site in detail, “the Jews” are not the people of the Bible: they are the remote decedents of Israelites who rejected Christ.

Most of the people of Palestine after the time of Christ became Christians, obviously. So even if you believed in the heresy that the covenant of Abraham was not transferred to all Christians after Christ came, then you would still be dealing with the fact that the majority of Abraham’s descendents are Christians (or atheists or Moslems for that matter), and not Jews. Jews are “children of Abraham” in the same sense that blacks are “children of Thomas Jefferson.”

The Wikipedia page about supersessionism (the traditional Christian view on the Abrahamic covenant, established 2000 years ago by Saint Paul) actually mentions that the view that modern Jews are “God’s chosen people” were invented as a response to the Holocaust:

Supersessionism has formed a core tenet of the Christian Churches for the majority of their existence. Christian traditions that have championed dual-covenant theology (including the Roman Catholic, Reformed and Methodist teachings of this doctrine), have taught that the moral law continues to stand.

Subsequent to and because of the Holocaust, some mainstream Christian theologians and denominations have rejected supersessionism.

The entire concept of a Jew is “a person who rejects the divinity of Christ.” That is how they are defined and how they define themselves. Each and every Jew wakes up every day and denies the divinity of Christ. They go through their day – banking, running the government, organizing Antifa, making Hollywood films or producing pornography – denying the divinity of Christ. They go to sleep at night, denying the divinity of Christ. The logic that God has “a special place” for the people who rejected and murdered Christ, and to this day define themselves as rejecters of Christ, is obviously nonsensical on its face, and the fact that these people believe it means that they have deep spiritual problems.

The boomers have brain damage from all of the lead paint and LSD, and they’re probably not going to come around on this issue. But the boomers are really old, and most young people raised in the Christian church didn’t develop the same psychological attachment to the Jews as the boomers.

Presumably, a lot of Christians who believe in this heretical and satanic doctrine that God loves the satanic, Christ-killing Jew communists, bankers and pornographers more than he loves His own followers are not aware that this doctrine was invented after the Holocaust as a way to justify the establishment of a Jewish state inside of Palestine. So, simply telling them that might have an effect.

“What gives you the right to throw out 2000 years of Christian history, and say you know better?” is a line that I’ve found effective.

It’s a shame we don’t have any real Christian leaders alive to refer these people to. Obviously, there are a few, but none of them are particularly good. But it is trivial to establish that dispensationalism and “dual covenant theology” were invented in the 20th century and primarily promoted by televangelists, most or all of whom were directly funded by Jews.

Donald Trump was Brought Down by the Jews

It’s simply a fact that from the media to the Democrats to Jared Kushner, the people who destroyed Donald Trump’s presidency were Jewish.

That should be the theme of everything, moving forward.

If the presidency of Donald Trump taught us anything, it’s that you can’t beat the Jews without addressing them directly. You can’t maneuver around the Jewish question.

What America and the entire West needs is a Christian movement that rejects Jews and Jewish domination. If Donald Trump would have addressed this problem, he would have wouldn’t have been forced out of office by Jews.

What Not to Do

Don’t go around talking about how Trump was a “traitor” or whatever. Whether or not he betrayed us there at the end is now irrelevant. Clearly, he did betray us, insofar as he denounced his own supporters, repeatedly, after having incited them to riot.

But that was a sad thing, where he was in a state of confusion and fear, and trying to keep from going to prison. Frankly, we need to just forget about that. It is not the behavior of an adult male to get all emotional about this. Trump, no longer having any power, is no longer relevant. What is relevant now is the story of Trump, the myth of Trump, and we should use that to our advantage, not act like a bunch of crybabies or teenagers who are angry with their father.

There is zero strategic value in talking about Donald Trump as anything other than a tragic figure: a brave patriot who tried to save America but was thwarted by satanic Jews.

Hillary tells @karaswisher "So there is an air of illegitimacy that surrounds Trump’s presidency, and that just infuriates them….Because I was the candidate that they basically stole an election from." https://t.co/NovSU9xxyo

— Alex Thompson (@AlxThomp) October 26, 2020

The real ride that never ends is the Hillary Clinton Blame Train.

She is still out there blaming people! On the eve of the next election!

RT:

Failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is claiming Trump “basically stole the election” from her four years after her loss, a statement that is earning her plenty of ridicule on social media.

In an interview with journalist Kara Swisher’s podcast for the New York Times Opinions network released on Monday, Clinton spoke about losing in 2016 because of a “disinformation campaign” run by then-Republican candidate Donald Trump and “Russian media.” She even claimed the election was “stolen” from her.

“I think that Trump and a lot of the people around him know that his victory was not on the up and up. They had an extensive campaign to suppress black voters. We now know much more about that than we did,” the former secretary of state said.

.@HillaryClinton: There’s “no doubnt” I would have handled Covid better than @realDonaldTrump

“I was born for that" pic.twitter.com/3kUu02KIBc

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 26, 2020

She also blamed third party voters who handed Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein historic results for their parties and claimed they were “boosted” by “Russian media.”

“They had third party candidates boosted, particularly by Russian media. And the lies and ridiculous stories made up about me were meant to either keep you at home, or drive you third party if they couldn’t get you to vote for Trump,” she said.

Trump, she said, holds a presidency that has an “air of illegitimacy,” something she has said many times over the past four years.

She now drives Trump and Republicans “crazy” because “I was the candidate that they basically stole an election from.”

What is wrong with women?

How are they not capable of understanding that a world exists outside of their bodies, and people are looking at them?

How do they not feel shame?

Happy Birthday, honey… pic.twitter.com/4VMDkhSDkB

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 26, 2020

Jews don’t seem to care very much about partisan politics.

They mostly just push a Jewish agenda.

Daily Mail:

CNN president Jeff Zucker told the president’s disgraced lawyer Michael Cohen that he wanted to give Donald Trump a weekly show during a March 2016 conversation. 

The exchange between Zucker and Cohen took place just hours before the GOP primary debate on March 10, which CNN was hosting. 

In audio obtained by Tucker Carlson Tonight, the CNN head told Cohen that ‘you cannot be elected president of the United States without CNN’.

‘You guys have had great instincts, great guts and great understanding of everything,’ Zucker explained to Cohen. ‘But you’re missing the boat on how it works going forward.’

Zucker would later express worry with corresponding with Cohen by email, adding that he couldn’t risk the possible chance that Trump would mention the nature of the conversation at a rally.

‘I’m very conscious of not putting too much in email, as you’re a lawyer, as you understand,’ Zucker asserted.

‘And, you know, as fond as I am of the boss, he also has a tendency, like, you know, if I call him or I email him, he then is capable of going out at his next rally and saying that we just talked and I can’t have that, if you know what I’m saying.’

He later added: ‘It’s not that I don’t want to talk to [Trump] every day. I’ve just got to be careful, because, I’ve just got to be careful … I just don’t want him talking about it on the campaign trail … But you know what? I’m going to give him a call right now and I’m going wish him luck in the debate tonight.’

Tucker has more tapes he’s gonna run.

It’s pure anti-Semitism.

This claim that the Jews who control the media and the political system are unethical is a trope and a canard.

Tucker is truly the ultimate enemy of democracy. Like a ninja with double swords, he wields a trope in one hand and a canard in the other, swinging them against our values.

This is not who we are.

We are a bunch of Jew lovers.

Did you know the Russia hoax is still going?

Because it do.

New York Times:

For years, President Trump has derided the assessment by American intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to assist his candidacy, dismissing it without evidence as the work of a “deep state” out to undermine his victory.

But on Tuesday, a long-awaited Senate review led by members of Mr. Trump’s own party effectively undercut those allegations. A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment, pinning blame on Russia and outlining its goals to undercut American democracy, was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.

“The I.C.A. reflects strong tradecraft, sound analytical reasoning and proper justification of disagreement in the one analytical line where it occurred,” said Senator Richard M. Burr, Republican of North Carolina and the panel’s chairman. “The committee found no reason to dispute the intelligence community’s conclusions.”

The endorsement by Mr. Burr’s committee comes at a key moment for the intelligence agencies. Not only has Mr. Trump moved in recent months to install a loyalist in the top spy position, but Attorney General William P. Barr has also blessed a broad review of possible misconduct by investigators examining the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia, apparently including work by intelligence officials.

The federal prosecutor whom Mr. Barr appointed to review the government’s response to Russian election interference, John H. Durham, is examining whether the C.I.A. or other intelligence agencies overstated President Vladimir V. Putin’s support of the Trump campaign, a central finding of the 2017 assessment. His team has interviewed intelligence analysts, questioning whether Obama-era intelligence officials hid evidence or manipulated analysis about Moscow’s covert operation, people familiar with the Durham inquiry have said.

Like all New York Times articles, this just goes on and on and on without giving you any information.

I want to know why and how the committee came to this conclusion. I am very well informed on the Russian hacker conspiracy theory that the intelligence agencies and the media invented out of thin air, and I want to know what these people found that Robert Mueller failed to find.

But no such luck. In 1,500 words, the Times fails to deliver.

The Senate Intelligence Committee had already given the work of the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. an interim stamp of approval, but the 158-page report released on Tuesday presented new detail about the government’s attempts in late 2016 and early 2017 to make sense of Russia’s attacks. Much of the report’s contents were considered highly sensitive and blacked out by the Trump administration before release.

In their report, senators essentially said they had asked the same questions that Mr. Durham is now examining and found that the intelligence agencies’ work stood up, even if it was conducted in a compressed time frame to be finished before President Barack Obama left office in January 2017.

“The case is closed,” said Senator Angus King, independent of Maine. “I don’t know how you could have a much more credible source than a three-year study by a bipartisan committee that came to a unanimous conclusion.”

Critics of the assessment have focused on the fact that the National Security Agency had a lower level of confidence than the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. on the conclusion that Mr. Putin supported Mr. Trump’s election. Mr. Durham, they believe, can provide proof.

But the committee found that the differing confidence levels among the intelligence agencies were “justified and properly represented.” The report said that both John O. Brennan, then the director of the C.I.A., and Adm. Michael S. Rogers, then the director of the National Security Agency, both “independently expressed to the committee that they reached the final wording openly and with sufficient exchanges of views.”

Senators said their inquiry found that intelligence analysts who worked on the assessment were “under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.”

“All analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper for the analytic process,” the report said.

It also examined the inclusion of material from a well-known dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer whom the F.B.I. referred to by the code name “Crown,” showing purported ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. The document included unverified, salacious accusations about Mr. Trump and has become a focus of Mr. Trump’s allies, who have sought to conflate it with the much broader Justice Department investigation into Russia’s election interference.

Though elements of the dossier were included in an annex to the intelligence assessment, it “was not used in the body of the I.C.A. or to support any of its analytic judgments,” the senators found.

Even the decision to include it in the annex was made reluctantly, the senators wrote. The F.B.I. did not want to vouch for its veracity but felt that because Mr. Obama had ordered the assessment to include all relevant material, his directive required the dossier’s inclusion.

The Senate report stood in contrast to the conclusions in 2018 of the House Intelligence Committee, then under Republican control, which took issue in its own report on Russian election interference with intelligence officials’ conclusion that Mr. Putin had tried to harm Hillary Clinton and help Mr. Trump. The House committee cited breakdowns in “proper analytic tradecraft,” but many House Republicans who were involved later disavowed that conclusion.

Earlier volumes released by the Senate committee chronicled Russia’s active measures campaign to interfere in the 2016 election and outlined potential policy measures to blunt future attacks on election infrastructure, examined the use of social media to sow political divisions in the United States and critiqued the response by the Obama administration and Congress to Russia’s attacks in the run-up to the last presidential election.

The committee is expected to release a final bipartisan installment in the coming months evaluating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. A draft runs over 900 pages but has yet to be submitted for classification review by intelligence agencies, a process that could take weeks or months.

…

“Russia and its imitators increasingly use information warfare to sow societal chaos and discord,” Mr. Burr said. “With the 2020 presidential election approaching, it’s more important than ever that we remain vigilant against the threat of interference from hostile foreign actors.”

Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the committee’s top Democrat, concurred and warned that Russia’s success in 2016 would embolden the Kremlin to continue to interfere in American democracy.

You can read as many New York Times articles about this as you want, you will never have it explained to you what they are talking about when they say that Russia “interfered” with the election. They will say hacking, they will say meddling, they will say sowing chaos. But they will never say what any of that actually means.

I am not going to read this Senate review, because I have vowed to never again read a government paper on the Russian hacking conspiracy theory. I read the Mueller report, and I do not believe that this can possibly be any different. As you see above in the NYT report, the Senate came to the decision to believe the intelligence committee based on the fact that they thought John Brennan was telling the truth. They based that on the fact that he didn’t seem to be politically motivated. John Brennan, who is currently employed by MSNBC as a virulent anti-Trump pundit is not motivated by politics, so everything he says must be true. That was their stated methodology in coming to this conclusion.

“We can trust this unhinged lunatic. He’s an honest man and has no agenda.”

I couldn’t resist skimming the report – which you can find in full here – and it just says that Russia did WikiLeaks and they know that because the intelligence agencies said that. There has never been any evidence for these claims. It was always just wild speculation. When Congress asked for proof of the DNC being hacked by Russia – or even hacked at all – James Comey said that the private security company hired by the DNC, Crowdstrike, which has been caught faking information on Russian hacking, said it was hacked by Russians. That was the methodology to come to the initial claim, and everything after that has just been people saying that they believe that.

The report also goes into a huge thing about RT and how it’s evil for Russia to run a media outlet that says Russia isn’t evil.

And there was a whole lot about Russian trolls in this QAnon level conspiracy theory document. Again, the assumption is that everyone on the internet making fun of Hillary Clinton, or supporting Donald Trump in any way, was either a Russian or under the psychic control of Russians.

Honestly, I don’t even know what purpose these quarterly reports serve at this point. No one who doesn’t believe in the Russian hacker theory is going to start believing it because of yet another report saying “oh yes, it’s true alright.” I guess it’s become a kind of ritual.

And I suppose that now, Barr is out there talking about investigating the investigators. But that isn’t actually going to happen. Everyone knows it isn’t going to happen. The best that might happen is that Barr’s people will release a report saying that the claims of Crowdstrike were never independently confirmed. And just like no minds are changed by people saying it’s real, no minds will be changed by someone saying it isn’t real. No one is going to go through the details of this like I spent three years doing, reading all of these stupid reports, watching endless hours of congressional hearings. Everyone is just going to decide what they think based on where their political affiliations lie, and based on how much they believe the Jewish media.

It’s dumb and I just wish it would end.

A couple days ago, the lawyers of Julian Assange in the UK claimed that Dana Rohrabacher, a former Congressman from California, came to him and offered a pardon from President Trump if he gave proof that Russia didn’t hack the DNC.

Rohrabacher for some reason decided to talk to none other than Yahoo’s Michael Isikoff about this. Isikoff, you will remember, was in contact with Christopher Steele, author of the #pissgate dossier. Isikoff’s articles were used by the FBI to confirm the validity of the piss file to FISA courts to get warrants used to spy on Donald Trump. The FBI knew that the information was being fed to Isikoff by Steele, and this constituted felony fraud.

No idea why Rohrabacher would do an interview with him of all people, but he probably just didn’t know who he was.

Yahoo News:

Former California Republican congressman Dana Rohrabacher confirmed in a new interview that during a three-hour meeting at the Ecuadorian Embassy in August 2017, he told Julian Assange he would get President Trump to give him a pardon if he turned over information proving the Russians had not been the source of internal Democratic National Committee emails published by WikiLeaks.

In a phone interview with Yahoo News, Rohrabacher said his goal during the meeting was to find proof for a widely debunked conspiracy theory: that WikiLeaks’ real source for the DNC emails was not Russian intelligence agents, as U.S. officials have since concluded, but former DNC staffer Seth Rich, who was murdered on the streets of Washington in July 2016 in what police believe was a botched robbery.

A lawyer for Assange in London on Wednesday cited the pardon offer from Rohrabacher during a court hearing on the U.S. government’s request to extradite the WikiLeaks founder.

White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham immediately denounced the claim about a pardon discussion with Assange as a “complete fabrication,” adding that the president “barely knows Dana Rohrabacher” and has “never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject.”

Rohrabacher said that not only did talk of a Trump pardon take place during his meeting, but he also followed up by calling then White House chief of staff John Kelly to discuss the proposal. He did not, however, ever speak to Trump about it, he said.

“I spoke to Julian Assange and told him if he would provide evidence about who gave WikiLeaks the emails I would petition the president to give him a pardon,” Rohrabacher said. “He knew I could get to the president.”

When he spoke to Kelly, the then chief of staff was “courteous” but made no commitment that he would even raise the matter directly with the president. “He knew this had to be handled with care,” Rohrabacher said, and that it could be spun by the news media in ways that would be “harmful” to the president. In fact, Rohrabacher said he never heard anything further from Kelly about the matter, nor did he ever discuss the subject directly with Trump.

Rohrabacher, who was defeated when he ran for reelection in 2018 and is now a consultant to the cannabis industry, long had a reputation as one of the few members of Congress willing to defend Russian President Vladimir Putin.

He also was a strong defender of Trump on the Russia investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. He said the president personally called him to thank him for one of his TV appearances during which he said that Trump was right to be angry with then Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself about all matters relating to the investigation.

Rohrabacher also emphasized in the interview that he only wanted “truthful” information from Assange and never suggested that he “lie.” But he said he believed then — and even more so now — that the information he was seeking would prove that WikiLeaks got its DNC emails from Seth Rich, a claim that if true would undercut the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies and Mueller’s prosecutors that Russian agents had hacked the Democratic Party and stolen the emails.

Isikoff wrote a headline like this changed something, but it’s actually the same thing that was in the original news story: he told Assange that he would ensure Trump gave him a pardon if Assange proved Seth Rich – or at least someone other than the Russians – was the source of the DNC emails.

Of course, as I’ve written six bajillion times, there is zero evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC. A private company called Crowdstrike, run by a Putin-hating Russian, is the only one that examined the server. The FBI never saw it. James Comey testified to Congress that he simply took Crowdstrike’s word on it, and decided not to try to arrange for the government to examine the server. And that was the basis for the entire Russian theory.

Crowdstrike said that there were “fingerprints” on the server. No one has any idea what that means. But we do know that the same company said the same thing about missile systems in the Ukraine that they said were hacked by Russians, and it turned out they were lying.

Voice of America, March 24, 2017:

U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year’s American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented data published by an influential British think tank.

In December, CrowdStrike said it found evidence that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, contributing to heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s war with pro-Russian separatists.

VOA reported Tuesday that the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which publishes an annual reference estimating the strength of world armed forces, disavowed the CrowdStrike report and said it had never been contacted by the company.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense also has stated that the combat losses and hacking never happened.

That is the actual series of events. The entire basis for the claim that Russia hacked the DNC is “this company said they did,” and that same company has gotten caught lying about Russian hacking. And they used the claims from the thing they got caught hoaxing in their report on the DNC server.

This is all just hand-waved.

And if you just say “yeah but I mean, the FBI didn’t see the server, and this company was caught lying about Russian hacking…”, Foreign Policy and New York Times will call you a “fringe conspiracy theorist.”

Imagine the nerve of these people, after the Mueller hoax, to call anyone saying anything along the lines of “maybe it wasn’t Russia” a “conspiracy theorist.”

All of this Russian stuff is a hoax.

As soon as someone says “Russia is…” you can pretty well guarantee they’re lying to you.