Morgoth’s Review
July 28, 2017

In this day and age it takes courage, fortitude and a great deal of individual will and self belief for a young white woman to put her face on a video set to be viewed by 10,000s of people and say, straight out:

I can’t stand the lies anymore, race is real and I want white people to have our own countries again. I’m a white nationalist now!

In order to arrive at that position the young woman in question, known as ”RageAfterStorm” has had to overcome a multitude of moral and psychological barriers, the entire weight of the liberal/ Globalist machine is tilted against her entertaining such thoughts, she’s literally committing ‘Hate Think’. The repercussions for her could be life changing, she could be fired and jailed. It’s objectively admirable and brave, even if you disagree with what she’s saying.

It would be nice to think that there’s a community on the internet besides white nationalists who’d rally behind her right to hold such thoughts. A community which hold enlightenment ideals of free thought, free speech and, well, scepticism of the wider moral fabric and accepted science. And in theory there is…..and they reacted to RageAfterStorm’s wrong think by mass flagging her video into censorship, unleashing a veritable swarm of ”free thinking” drone trolls to threaten and harass her and finally, contacting her boss in an attempt to have her fired from her job….

Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you the lying, hypocritical, cowardly vermin of the YouTube ”Sceptic Community”.

A community dedicated to ”individualism” and ”free thinking” but who will coalesce into an angry mob if you actually push those ideals beyond harvesting the low hanging, indeed, mouldy and putrid, fruit of SJW’s, feminists and Islam (not Muslims, that’s a stereotype, Islam!).

The problem is that there’s only so many videos to be made on mocking feminists before people begin asking who created feminism and Cultural Marxism and why they were created at all? the answers to these questions, at least truthful ones, are only to be found in the white nationalist Alt-Right, classic liberalism seems incapable of going there and when your Patreon account is raking in $600 a video it pays nicely not to rock the Hebrew boat.

The Sceptic Community have hammered the Social Justice Warriors into a pulp, but they’re surprised at how many within their ranks are probing further into the riddles of Cultural Marxism and mass immigration, when they laid the groundwork for it!. Cultural Marxism was invented to shackle and cage white ethno-centrism and racial awareness, one of the reasons for this is that white racialism cannot be contained by classic liberalism.

Every hammer blow struck against political correctness is a liberation for a white mind, within this context it is simply impossible for the so-called Sceptics to win a battle of ideas with the Alt-Right, indeed, it’s why the more intellectually honest within their ranks are converting to our cause.

This is why it was necessary for a cockroach such as ‘Kraut and Tea” to resort to this:

‘I disagree with what you say, so I’ll send a Tweet to your boss to get you fired.” -Voltaire

And it gets worse. After Kraut was caught sending this he removed it and offered an apology, but only because others witnessed what he was doing. This is a man so spineless he can’t even play the role of a backstabbing coward with integrity. Or as one YouTuber put it, he’s too cowardly to be ruthless.

But Kraut and the modern day heirs of the Enlightenment still weren’t satisfied and using no reason, logic or evidence whatsoever, carried on the campaign.

Including this cartoon:

The word ”triggered” is overused these days, but why or how did RageAfterStorm trigger this reaction? I think it can be put down to two reasons.

1. The Sceptics are vaguely aware that they’re a bunch of bullshitters who believe in nothing. That they’re liars and larpers milking their subscribers for as many shekels they can get as long as people continue watching hit-pieces on fat feminists and Social Justice dopes. To have a young girl from within their ranks point this out to them was deeply wounding, free speech be damned, they’d have to shut this bitch up or she’d ruin the subs and patrons!.
2. The Sceptics are also aware that they simply cannot compete with the Alt-Right as a counter cultural force, testament to this is that their own subscribers and followers on social media are festooned with memes and tropes emanating from the Alt-Right. What makes this interesting is that the combined reach of the Sceptic community in social media terms is probably far higher than that of the Alt-Right. However, the metapolitical potency of the Alt-Right means that it warps everything surrounding it, like a black hole its gravity pulls on any other objects within its reach. Indeed, racial thinking is itself like gravity and it has only been with supreme effort that the elites have managed to suppress it for so long.

In actual fact the very same phrases and power words Kraut used on RageAfterStorm have been used to pathologize racial thinking in whites for decades. He’s pitiful, a coward, a slave who mocks a free mind more courageous than his own, that’s also why he hates her. He’s a serpent.

Proving once again that the Sceptics are becoming intellectually ”cucked” by the Alt-Right, Kraut ends his ghastly justification video by lamenting that all the drama is preventing him from finishing a video on Adorno and the Frankfurt School. But honestly, who would want Kraut’s bland quorn burger when they could have Kevin MacDonald’s rib-eye steak?

Kraut’s non Nazi, non Anti-Semitic video on the Frankfurt School will run something like this:

 ”A bunch of random Marxist individuals funded by random individuals in High Finance drew up intellectual plans to undermine the West. No one group in particular was attacked, or benefited relative to any others”.

As if the Alt-Right hadn’t been through this entire history already.

RageAfterStorm could have enlightened the Sceptics as to what effects the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory had on the gentile European mind, the guilt, the awesome power of trigger words, the need to silence Hate Think.

She could have, but the enlightened Free Thinkers ran her off the internet before she had a chance…

When I first discovered the BBC would be airing a three part drama based on the Rochdale grooming scandal I prepared myself, what politically correct absurdities was the BBC about to inflict on us now? would the rapists be white? mixed? one thought that crossed my mind would be that the ‘groomers’ would be Polish and their victims young black girls.

I flipped open the laptop to take down notes and readied myself for another wave of psychological hornets stinging and gnashing at my mind.

As it turns out, I was completely wrong.

‘Three Girls’ drops the audience right into the heart of  white working class life as it is, the girls were not angelic but cheeky, coarse and foul mouthed, wandering the urban drudgery in ill fitting tracksuits casually spouting lines such as ”You off with those dirty Pakis again tonight?”.

The ”Pakis” themselves were portrayed as two faced sleazy scumbags, and they only became worse once the grooming and exploitation began.

The BBC had thrown political correctness, and a sizeable chunk of their own guidelines out and were facing this issue head-on. It was astonishing to watch.

As the drama progressed I found myself repeatedly expecting the PC trap to spring, such thoughts then changed to ‘they won’t go there….Oh, they just did!’. One aspect of the grooming issue which I expected the BBC to have particular difficulty with was the Marxian morality of the middle class whites in local government who found themselves ideologically paralysed in the face of a white victim-non white perp paradox, yet this too was slammed.
After the heroic ‘lone voice of sanity’ Sara Rowbotham (brilliantly played by Maxine Peake) confronted the ‘PC’ brigade’ and had to graphically explain that a 13 year old girl being anally raped by 6 men in one night was ”Not a fucking lifestyle choice!’ many a Social Justice buttercup may well have had a slight tingling sensation of realising just how far gone they are.

Another standout moment occurred during the trial when a Times journalist who’d been reporting on the grooming issue was confronted by a typical left liberal twat and accused of playing into the hands of the ”Far Right”;

Lefty Twat: ”You do know you’re playing into the hands of the BNP and Far Right? white victim, dark skinned oppressors? you just can’t resist it can you?”

Times Journo:”I understand it’s uncomfortable for you!’.

On social media a common criticism of Three Girls came from the Alt-Lite, Civic Nationalist, Counter Jihad camps because Islam was never mentioned at all. But this is just a sign of their own cowardice, what was frequently mentioned was race and ethnicity, but they’re afraid to mention that, their anger needs to be mandated by them rolling out their fave collection of violent passages from the Koran yet again. These ‘Pakis’ are not devout Muslims raping for Allah, they’re a coke snorting , vodka swilling hostile racial group degrading and destroying the females of ”The Other”.

One concern I had that the BBC might be deploying their usual trickery was that the Rochdale grooming case was dealt with but portrayed as an isolated case and not part of a wider pattern, and once again I was mistaken. As the Greater Manchester Police were called in to deal with Rochdale the top brass alluded to Rotherham, Burnley and Oxford ‘‘It’s going on everywhere!” they whispered behind closed doors. And the three part drama ended with this blasting out onto the TV screens of the general population:

Why Did They Do It?

For three consecutive nights the BBC showed a politically correct free drama portraying the brutal realities of multiculturalism, grooming, neglect of the white working class, the idiocy of the liberal left, the general rot brought about by Cultural Marxism, and they used their most treasured TV slot (21.00 – 22,00) to do it, why?.

It’s almost three years since the Alexis Jay report broke the Rotherham grooming scandal, not just the issue of numbers (1400) or the Muslims, but of the utter indifference of the councillors, police and child protection services. Before the Jay report only the ‘Far Right’ were talking about grooming gangs, after the Jay report the issue became somewhat mainstreamed, but even then the excuses and counter accusations flowed from the liberal left as a torrent.

Jonathan Bowden once quipped that the left deal with their atrocities by ”stepping over them and moving on”. And this certainly seemed to be their reaction to the grooming scandals being exposed across England. After the Jay report many expected angry mobs of pitch fork wielding vigilantes to begin burning out Pakistanis and Muslims, but nothing happened. The left stepped over it and waded on, seemingly unstoppable.

But the reason there was no mythical ‘backlash’ against the Muslim community was illustrated very well in Three Girls, to put it simply, there is no longer a white ‘community’ left, the working class white men can’t round up the lads from the pub and go ”Paki bashing” because there’s no longer even a pub. Life now centres around buying some drink from the supermarket and watching the telly with little knowledge of, or interaction with, a wider community.

Isolated and atomised, forgotten and dumped by their own politicians they sit in their council houses trying to make sense of it all, but what they do have, except reality television, is the internet and social media.

The anger and resentment about Islamic grooming had not been forgotten or forgiven, it had gone underground. As the leftist beast strode on over the buckled and pain stricken bodies of 13 year old girls from Yorkshire, millions of people were sharing memes and Tommy Robinson YouTube videos, collating the data, putting together the pieces of the puzzle, it was happening everywhere!, and the ‘lefties’ were facilitating it, certain catchphrases and terms were being whispered across the land:

 1400 in Rotherham
 Paki paedos protected by PC 
 Lefties covered it up!
 Too politically correct, they let them get away with it.
 Labour is the party of child rape
 Didn’t do anything because the girls were white.
 300 white girls raped in Oxford
 Guardianistas
 It’s happening everywhere!
 The police knew! 
 BBC…….

The liberal left in Britain thought they had stepped over the grooming epidemic but they hadn’t, they’d been infected by it, shackled to it. Their disgusting little secret came out with the Jay report but rather than it being the head-shot we all hoped for it turned out to be a poison dart. Every time they prattled on about ‘inclusion’ and ‘tolerance’ they alienated yet more of their base, every accusation of ‘racism’ and every grand standing speech on ‘vibrancy’ simply served to spread the infection further.

The liberal left in England became a sick joke, preaching their own virtue from their pedestals in the mass media with a ten ton granite block inscribed with ”Rotherham 1400 white girls” dangling around their neck. Every Labour activist, every liberal snowflake and every media luvvie has been hounded by the grooming issue countless times, the situation was untenable.

And so the time had come for a cleansing, for a ”Ok, look…” for the liberal establishment to purify themselves before the nation, that’s what this BBC 1 drama was all about, for three nights last week the most watched media outlet in the land handed itself over to a prolonged act of liberal left catharsis, to cleanse themselves of their sins against us.

It’s a good start, I suppose, but we don’t want to spend the next ten years listening to the liberal left say sorry as they continue agitating for more immigrant rapists, we just want our country back thanks, and until we get it this war doesn’t end.

As the liberal elites, banks, (((rootless cosmopolitans))), and Islam celebrated their glorious victory over poor French people, Harry Potter feminist Emma Watson took to the stage at the MTV awards to accept the first ever ‘gender free’ acting award, according to Watson:

“[Belle’s] curiosity and passion for knowledge and her desire for more in life were ground for alienation,” Watson explained. “I loved playing someone who didn’t listen to any of that. I’m so proud to be part of a film that celebrates diversity, literacy, inclusion, joy, and love the way that this one does.”

The sharp end of that diversity and inclusion shtick are the African men landing on Italy’s southern shoreline at the current rate of 11,000 a month. I have no idea what those African men think about gender free acting awards, but I do know what they think when they see Emma Watson and it ain’t ”gender-free”. But it doesn’t really matter to Emma Watson what the Africans think of her or her boilerplate morals, she belongs to the emerging Higher Caste of Western Civilisation, the people who’ll have to deal with the African men are the poor French people who’ve just had their peasant rebellion crushed.

There are people in France now who understood what was happening, were appalled by the 250 French people murdered by Muslims and sought to change things via their vote, and some of those people will die because they lost, it’s that stark.

For Europeans expressing a will to live is called a ”populist scourge” and ”hate”, indeed, the European will to life and love of kind is regularly likened to a disease which must be eradicated at all costs, and upon victory the Globalist establishment will crow about maintaining ‘stability’ while needing 50,000 armed policemen to patrol the streets of France on election day.

Macron brings into sharp relief the deepest fears of the Nationalist, he isn’t a ‘safe pair of hands’ like Theresa May, he’s a hitman, he’s going drive the agenda forward to it’s logical conclusion and does not hide the fact. Indeed, he’s almost a cliche, a Rothschild banker with an ‘exotic’ love life who wants sanctions on uppity Eastern European countries who defy the Elders of Zion by wishing to maintain their identity and people-hood.

Emma Watson and Macron share a common set of ideals, Watson believes she’s challenging the status quo, what she represents is a pretty face to sell the Globalist order to the general population. Watson will not lament that a white male banker prevented France from electing its first ever female president, she doesn’t know or care that a woman in Sunderland can be kidnapped and raped for 3 days and that the guilty men and rape culture walked free. Her feminism knows its place.

Macron’s European vision is a continent wide hellscape from Portugal to Poland, riven with terrorism and ethnic strife, the native Europeans scuttle from one white flight bolthole to the next trying to avoid casual savagery and barbarism. An effete, vulgar and pompous celebrity culture feeds our moral code to us, which always reinforces and further empowers the Globalist narrative.

There is nothing more intrinsic to human life than diversity. Our splintering humanity has to reunite to protect our future. The bizarre and regressive utopias of extremists – whether they are drawn from a pre-civil rights America or a medieval caliphate – risk drawing us into a global civil war. We must refocus on a more modest vision of a utopia, based on a recognition that what makes us different is what makes us the same.(The Guardian)

Like all genocidal tyrannies the EU Globalist project needs a group to scapegoat as ‘The Other’, a group to be demonised and hounded, to be watched and feared, and that group is the Europeans themselves, not coincidentally the only group who, if sufficiently motivated, could kill the great scam and its architects. Under the new tyranny the mildest murmur of objection can lead to a person’s life being destroyed, the defeat of a party such as the National Front is lauded as a stupendous victory against incalculable odds ”Phew, with only the help of every supra-national body, every MSM outlet, our imported Third World vote and the entire liberal elite political class, we managed to pull it off!.”

In his essay ‘The Fascist Dream’ French philosopher Maurice Bardeche wroteof liberal democracy:

The anarchic freedom of democracy does not just permit the diversion of the popular will and its exploitation for private interests, it has still more serious consequences. It opens life on all sides to every inundation, to every miasma, to every foul wind, without barriers to decadence, exploitation, and above all mediocrity.

It makes us live on a steppe that everyone can invade. There is a word for purely negative order: the defense of freedom. But this freedom is like a drug you try once, it is a chrism one receives, and then man is abandoned defenseless on the steppe. Monsters make their nests on this steppe: rats, toads, serpents turn it into a sewer. These swarms have a right to grow, like nettles and crabgrass.

What the yelping mass media call ”the scourge of populism” is simply a mild attempt by white people to shield themselves from the dangers which stalk the steppe of modern Europe, but the Talmudic tyranny sees ‘wreckers’ and plotters organising and agitating against the common good, a disease, a pox, a plague, evil, racists, haters, anti-Semites…

Every border must be broken, every wall bulldozed, every white school diversified, every village enriched, every Hate Thought punished.

”Admit your racism, my dear, just admit it for us all!”

Europeans must be dragged out of anything resembling sanctuary and safety, home and kin, they will be forced out onto the barren steppe of the ‘New Europe’ to be easy pickings for whatever protected predator drifts by. All they have by way of moral and spiritual sustenance is a bunch of cynically engineered Jewish slogans peddled by dead eyed feminists and soulless media zombies.

The Empire of Mud is upon us.

As time passes I become increasingly convinced of the role, or lack thereof, of spirituality in the modern epoch. Throughout all of our history Europeans have striven toward beauty and elegance, bravery and virtue, and it is here we notice that the emerging Empire of Mud is not born of the European mind or soul at all, indeed, it is its polar opposite in every conceivable manner. It does not elevate or seek wisdom or greatness, it, via its doctrines of equality, renders man down into a compliant fatty blubber.

It is born of a mind so cruel, so vindictive yet unrelentingly tenacious, that it is simply incomprehensible to most of our people, but in order to see the evils in others, we might well have to first understand the beauty within ourselves…

It’s a curious and deeply frustrating experience to see public intellectuals, journalists and academics chat among themselves about how you, your people, do not deserve to even constitute being ”a people” with interests, rights, to be, in effect, removed from the discussion entirely. All you are left with is to watch, to peep through the window as the powerful and not so great decide your fate and the morality within which your group should exist.

Such were my thoughts this week when a fellow patriot sent me a message alerting me to a discussion taking place on Twitter between three Jewish men, David Aaronovitch, a far left Zionist who writes for the Times and the Jewish Chronicle. Jonathon Portes, who works for various Big Money think tanks and Globalist outlets, he was the architect of Tony Blair’s mass immigration project and now spends his career developing economic based arguments for mass migration into Britain and Europe in general. The third is Eric Kaufman, a professor at Birkbeck University, London.

The story begins with the Financial Times publishing an article by Professor David Goodhart, Goodhart works with Kaufman at a think tank which has been, quite correctly, coming to the conclusion that the recent surge in ”anti-politics” and ”populism” are an expression of white racial self interest. Goodhart, and an upcoming book, contend that policy makers will have to accept that white people have racial interests and will warp the politics if those needs are not being met. In the Financial Times Goodhart writes:

 The question of legitimate ethnic interest is complex. Multiculturalism is premised on the rights of minorities to maintain certain traditions and ways of life. But liberals have usually been reluctant to extend such group rights to majorities.

They have justified this reluctance on two grounds. First, the white majority in the US and Europe is itself so diverse it makes little sense to talk of a culturally homogenous majority (though the same might be said for most minorities too).

Second, majorities have been so numerically dominant that their ways of life have felt threatened only in a few small pockets.

The latter is clearly no longer the case, especially in the US where the non-Hispanic white population is now only a little over 60 per cent. In several UK cities, the white British are now a minority too.

David Aaronovitch, who last year wrote an autobiography called ”Party Animals:My Family and Other Communists”, was non too happy with this way of thinking and interrogated Kaufman on Twitter, the whole exchange is fascinating, and pay attention to Aaronovitch’s use of ”they” when referring to white people:

So three Jewish men, Kaufman being the least worst by far, discuss whether it should be legitimate for white people to have racial interests, and when a genuine white person intervenes and compares the situation to that in Israel, which Aaronovitch endorses! they are told ”Fuck You!” and then blocked. I tried myself to join the discussion and I too was completely ignored. They simply don’t want to know what actual white people might have to say on the issue, they discuss us as scientists discuss rats in a laboratory.

It seemed that that would be the end of the matter, until a few days later…

The Times is behind a paywall so I shan’t link to it, but in any case Aaronovitch spends much of his article explaining the FT article so I’ll simply extract the more relevant and interesting points Aaronovitch makes.

Notice that right in the sub-headline it is stated pointblank that white people can never be allowed ethnic self interest without it being inherently ”racist”. Aaronovitch himself has magically transformed his ethnicity, white people are no longer ”they” but ”us” and ”our”. Talking on Twitter with other Jews, white people are ”they” switching back to his day job at The Times and addressing a predominately white readership, Aaronovitch is reborn as a white man:

Let’s talk about whites. Readers of other colours are welcome to listen in, but this is really about us and our legitimate white self-interests, which are not at all the same thing as racism.

Kaufmann cites some revealing responses when American voters were asked whether it was racist or “just racial self-interest, which is not racist” to want an immigration policy that “maintain his or her group’s share of the population”. Nearly 73 per cent of Clinton supporters and 11 per cent of Trump supporters opted for “racist”. You may already have spotted the flaws in this argument. The first is, how do we define “white”?

To an extent, Kaufmann and Goodhart are guided by people’s own description. But if “white” is the classification, does that mean that “setting the tone” is literally the skin tone? Which, for many whites, could be expressed more honestly as “too many blacks”. Or by “white” do we mean “English-speaking”? Or “Christian”? Or “non-Muslim”?

Whether or not Kaufman and Goodhart will ”go there”, when we talk about ”racial interests” we are discussing what is advantageous or disadvantageous for a racial or ethnic group. As Kaufman correctly points out, non-white immigrants have a vested interest in increasing their numbers in white countries via more immigration, whites have a vested interest in reducing that number.

A clue comes when, in Goodhart’s new book (published this week) he talks of “white British people, especially those from lower income and educational backgrounds, [who] do still wish to retain a non-supremacist ethnic identity”. He assumes that this conveniently benign identity is threatened by the presence of others who are not regarded as sharing it. And since the top signifier is colour of skin it follows that the main threat to this group comes from non-white people.

Once we recognize that with ”race” we are talking about distinct biological groupings then it becomes obvious that the central threat posed to a biological group, settled on its own soil for millennia, comes when a foreign, rival biological group, is introduced into their living space against their will. And indeed, Aaronovitch is going to give us a perfect example of the nature of that threat in the very next paragraph:

As it happens I agree with Goodhart and Kaufmann and plenty of others that the soubriquet “racist” has been horribly overused. When a mild-mannered don is accused of racism for feeling that, on the whole, a statue of Cecil Rhodes is no great threat to humanity, then that’s an abuse of language. And it is also true that fear of being labelled racist has inhibited weak-minded public officials from doing their jobs, from the Victoria Climbié case to the British-Asian grooming gangs. Furthermore, as over The Satanic Verses, I support a robust defence of democratic values and rights — rights that have been hard won.

And so in this case the biological threat, Asian grooming gangs, has actually materialized. The true number of English girls who’ve been horrifically violated is unknown, perhaps as many as 100,000, we simply do not know. But what we do know is that not one of these girls would have been gang raped and tortured if the biological out-group had not been introduced into their towns and cities in the first place.

It cannot possibly be argued that these Asians are advantageous to white racial interests, so if white racial interest was allowed to flourish these Asians would be removed from the areas where they now live. The white girls of England are literally carrying within them the genetic interest of the white men of England, when Asians rape and pimp out English girls they’re destroying, mocking and eradicating our genetic interest, I’d even say it isn’t even subconscious, as the reports often cite that the girls are called ”white sluts” etc.

It is of course true that the politically correct local governments are partly to blame, but after the fact, the primary problem is having the out-group there in the first place.

But when they talk about legitimate white “racial self-interest” in a society where 86 per cent of the population is white, I struggle with their argument. Kaufmann, for example, is indignant in claiming that “whites” must have their own interests if other racial groups have theirs. He cites a Zoroastrian (an ancient Persian religious group) as arguing against “marrying out” to preserve the existence of the ancient religion.

But this is an absurdity. There are nearly no Zoroastrians left.

So now Aaronovitch is telling an outright lie, he’s citing the census statistics from 2010 for the 86% figure. This is a common and deeply dishonest tactic of people who support mass immigration. The census figure is already seven years old, and since then the immigrants already here have multiplied and we allow north of 500,000 new immigrants in each year, into a country which has a below replacement level birth rate. And yet they tell us the obvious lie that the demographics will remain static, despite doing everything they can to radically change them and at the same time crushing any discussion that would actually achieve some sort of demographic stability.

Even if we take the 86% number his argument is deceitful rubbish, does it matter to a 15 year old girl in Bradford, which is dominated by Pakistanis, that Berwick is still overwhelmingly white?. Do the Last Whites Of The East End feel more at home knowing that people in York are of the same ethnic stock as themselves? If not then how can they be disallowed  their own politics of racial and ethnic interest?, under Aaronovitch’s own logic they’re a minority group who should be encouraged to think of themselves as such.

There are quite a few white people. And a similar read-across doesn’t work for minorities. Take my black nephew and my white nephew. My black nephew inhabits a society where he can witness us having an argument about whether there are too many of him. My white nephew has never encountered such a thing. My black nephew has an interest in dealing with prejudice. My white nephew doesn’t. Of course, if he were poor he would be disadvantaged and still white, but it would be the poorness that marked him out.

It is here where we begin to see Aaronovitch’s true concern beginning to reveal itself, he’s worried about what a politics of white racial interest will mean for minorities. But the lot of a minority in another people’s land is to live according to the whims and ”tolerance” of the host population, if his (convenient) black nephew is unhappy then there are countries where he will be in the majority, Africa and the Caribbean for example.

It is a feature of the times, of course, that a multi-millionaire aristocrat think-tanker, daughter of a 15th earl, can write to the Financial Times (as one did last week) complaining about a “liberal animus against whites” and not be thought eccentric.

White males were declared “an endangered species” in the same week that University Challenge managed a programme on which every person appearing was white and male. We are living through a moment of cultural reaction that has little to do with reality.

Given that it is an indisputable fact that the white demographic is decreasing at a rapid rate, at what point will white people be allowed to have racial interests? Even if we begin with the false 86% statistic and work our way down, when will people such as David Aaronovitch bequeath us their blessing and say ”Yes, now you can form politics based on ethnic interest”?. Will it be when we’re 70% or 50% or 40%? when white people are at 25% of the population in Britain will we then be able to organize ourselves for our own ethnic benefit?.

Ah, but wait a minute, will the then new majority populations, allow us to? You see, as Aaronovitch acknowledges, minority groups have a hard time of it, but at the same time he strives to create the physical and mental conditions which will reduce us to a minority….while staunchly supporting the ideal of a Jewish ethno-state!.

So let me spell it out. I find it very hard to imagine any “racial self-interest” that whites might have (in a country where they are, after all, in the majority) which wouldn’t have a negative impact on minorities. If, for example, we fashion an immigration policy that embodies the desire to “maintain” a white share of the population, then that policy will have to be racially discriminatory. Since we are never worried about white people moving into “ethnic” areas, a housing policy reflecting white self-interest could be aimed at keeping others off the list. More of my white nephew, less of my black nephew, just so that some people don’t feel “uncomfortable”.

And here we come to it at last, Aaronovitch’s true motivation, the reason he flipped out on Twitter, the interrogation, the ”Fuck You and your white countries”, the use of his black nephew as a proxy, it comes down to one issue: The politics of white racial interest makes Jews ”uncomfortable”, when Aaronovitch writes ”which wouldn’t have a negative impact on minorities” he should have been honest with his Times readership and instead written:

”You can’t be allowed white racial interest, because it might be bad for us, and so we, are not going allow you, to have it!”.

In other words, it would be detrimental to their ethnic and racial interests, I just wish they were more honest about it.

If like me, you’re frequently subjected to commercial radio, or worse still, BBC Radio 1, then it’s extremely likely that you’ve also been subjected to the wobbly warbler known simply as ”Adele”. Last year Adele was the third highest earning pop star on the planet raking in a cool $85 Million, Alt-Right icon Taylor Swift was number one with a boy-band number two. The fact that Taylor took the top slot is a sign that not all is lost, it tells us that there’s still a vast market for white beauty and a, in theory, traditional, gentle conservatism.

So, okay, fine, but why is Adele so popular? what is it she’s selling and why are so many(#not all!) western, white, women connecting with it?

Adele has found a rich vein, female heartache, loneliness, despair and anxiety, and she mines that vein relentlessly. Adele’s songs are all constructed similarly, initial pain and hurt moving into a crescendo of power ballad laden agony, and you too will feel that agony as your teeth shatter to the power of her vocals.

Take for example, one of her most popular hits ”Set fire to the rain”:

And if that’s not depressing enough, one of Adele’s more recent hits ”Hello”,  edging toward 2 Billion(!) views on YouTube, features an African man as Adele’s ex. Meaning that topping off all of Adele’s other sorrows, she is now what some people might call a ”Mudshark”.

But diversity box-ticking aside, there’s obviously a massive market for Adele’s female orientated misery, most of whom will be white females.

As one online news outlet explains:

SINGING sensation Adele is back with a bang with new single ‘Hello’, which has been warmly welcomed by women who enjoy sitting alone with some wine and their own tears.
The new album, which the singer described as a ‘make up album’ rather than a break up album, had left fans worried it would contain next to no suitable songs for crying to after having too many glasses of wine.

“I was a bit worried, but once I heard ‘Hello’ I was bawling after about 30 seconds, and that’s without touching any alcohol or thinking of my prick of an ex,” confirmed huge Adele fan Alannah Higgins.
Many ardent Adele lovers have cancelled any plans they may have had for this Friday evening, favouring instead to surround themselves with thoughts of mistakes, tough break ups, failed relationships, and a glass of Savignon Blanc while playing ‘Hello’ on repeat.

“I’ve waited for this song for a good few months now, so I’ve a build up of sorrowful thoughts, and I popped round to Lidl last night and bought a couple of bottles after hearing the song would be released this morning,” explained serial Adele listener Mary Hughes.

Quite.

It could of course be argued that Adele is simply filling the cultural niche which was occupied by Celine Dion or Whitney Houston a generation ago, that of the howling diva. And while there’s certainly some truth to that, Celine Dion’s most famous hit ‘‘My Heart Will Go On” which featured in the Titanic movie, was actually a rather sweet love song about two people who genuinely love each other but have become separated from one another in a physical sense.  Celine longs for the day her man will travel back across the ocean to embrace her once again.

In 2017 Adele’s brand of power sadness makes Celine Dion’s bittersweet romantic ditties seem incredibly mawkish, sentimental and old fashioned. Adele’s music depicts an emotional wasteland inhabited by the humped and dumped, the finished via Facebook messenger and text, the cheated on, abused and betrayed wandering the broken heart dystopia of revenge porn and dating sites. It’s the chart topping pop song equivalent to Mad Max 2.

The more pertinent question to ask is not ”why is Adele so popular?” but rather, ”why does the well of female gloom run so deep?”.

After all, hasn’t ”The Modern Woman” got it all?. The modern white woman in Europe or North America, today, inhabits a culture and society which places hardly any restrictions on her behaviour at all! and yet alcoholism in women is at an all time high, women are beset with mental health issues: 20% of women in Britain are clinically depressed, they’re on pills for their nerves, pills for their insomnia, pills for their ADHD, it’s a veritable boom time for the pharmaceutical market.

One report in The Daily Mail claims:

In what has become the ‘dark side of equality’, their drinking habits now resemble those of men, according to the study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.One in five woman graduates regularly drink ‘hazardously’ compared with one in ten for those with lower levels of education.

The Jewish led Feminist movement threw European women into the world of men while proclaiming ”You are free now! we have freed you from oppression, be happy!”. It’s similar to snatching a swan from its lake and ”liberating” it by dumping it in the middle of an arid desert. The swan wanders the void and ponders ”I’m free, but I’m unhappy, why?”.

The overly dramatic tone and bombast of Adele’s songs offer something of an ”out” to this confusion. Adele’s message is not just one of being used and thrown away like trash, it’s also one of stoicism, she’s saying/screaming ”Yes, it’s tough, but you will become stronger for it, you’re a strong woman! you will get through this!”.

But this isn’t really a solution, it gives succour to atomized women individually, but does nothing to address the wider problem of our women being thoroughly miserable and borderline mad in post-modernity.

Almost all pop culture does this, unless it’s a liberal cause celebre, such as inviting Muslims to live with us by the million, pop culture will zoom in at the individual level, not the group.

So each woman, individually, believes she’s in her own personal struggle and all will be well in the end, but when we zoom out and look at this as a group issue we see millions of women thinking the exact same thing. However, pop cultural icons cannot address these issues because once they begin to comment on wider societal problems they become ”political” and the solutions to this particular problem do not belong within the ”liberal” zone of thought and our masters are more than happy to sell out European women to a life of dead eyed promiscuity and loneliness as long as they stay true in their roles of indentured servitude to the Money Power.

As a genre the ”Power Ballad” is an interesting one, even though most of the songs are crap, because it points to a romanticism, it’s attempting to elevate the mundane into something more grandiose.

Every girl can be a princess and prince charming is always on his way with a magic kiss.

A few decades ago Julie, the girl from the supermarket checkout, would have the Eurythmics ”Miracle of Love” as her personal soundtrack to her ”courtship” with Dave, the local mechanic. The mundane became something more, the cheeky infatuation at the local pub became something epic, love, to be loved and have somebody love you back, the sheer wonder of it all!.

Adele inverts this and hands it back to the women of the current year. Grandiosity is used to conceal and elevate the humdrum lives of modern women, but the reality is that Julie is pulling up her knickers and heading out to catch the bus before Dave kicks her out, because he’s set to play Call Of Duty 7 Online later. And the ”lovemaking” was not much more than skinny-jeans wearing, Nu-Male Dave, trying to get Julie to agree to all the stuff he saw on the Jewish run porn channels.

Two bottles of wine and Adele’s new album is the solution, then Julie is no longer running for the bus to Sunderland in stained tights, she’s defiantly walking through rain in Manhattan, in slow-motion and expensively filmed black and white cinematography. Dave is a stubbly hunk driving off in an Aston Martin.

It was a grand drama played out between two strong and independent people…except it wasn’t.

Adele isn’t enough for our women, neither is the wine or the pills. It’s often pointed out that white women are the most vociferous opponents of our movement, of traditionalism and Nationalism, but, as Donald Trump said to the blacks, the question must be asked:

”What do you have to lose?”

With Trainspotting 2 hitting the cinemas it’s been something of a nostalgia fest for me to see the famous ”Choose Life” monologue return into the public consciousness and now, with the new Trainspotting film, receive something of an update by including social media and zero hour contracts into its sardonic description of the current zeitgeist.

I’m of a similar age and background to the characters in Trainspotting and recognized as much when it came out 20 years ago. Perhaps when I actually get to see the film I’ll write a post on it. For now, however, I thought I’d offer my own slant on the famous ”Choose Life” monologue as it should be updated for 2017……

Choose Life, Choose Cosmopolitan Liberalism…. 

Choose a consumer identity to make you free!.

Choose a fucking smart phone with 500 gadgets you’ll never use.

Choose an Afghani brother in law.

Choose gender neutral toilets.

Choose open borders for Global Capital but tell yourself you ”Love Humanity”.

Choose no go zones and Shariah law.

Choose skinny jeans for men and front line combat service for women.

Choose trendy know-it-all atheism.

Choose a girlfriend who’s screwed 20 other men, choose to tell yourself you don’t care.

Choose DVD box set binges.

Choose Jewish media ownership, but choose not to notice.

Choose liberal celebrities who hate your guts.

Choose diversity quotas and never ask how it actually enriches you.

Choose black crime.

Choose Pakistani grooming gangs and the sexual slavery of white girls.

Choose white flight and telling yourself  it’s all about ”good schools”.

Choose a half-caste grandchild and a Nigerian son in law.

Choose trying to work as hard and as long as Poles and Bulgarians.

Choose to watch your ”liberated” woman with ”equal rights” work 12 hour night shifts in a fucking box factory.

Choose to ignore the demographic horror story.

Choose to convince yourself there’s a difference between the political parties.

Choose to check your white privilege.

Choose to feel bad about the holocaust.

Choose to be happy when your little boy tells you he’s a non-binary, non cisnormative, genderqueer wanker.

Choose to support #RefugeesWelcome one day and #PrayForTheVictimsOfTerrorism the next.

Choose to sink your sweat into a debt based economy which will always be in debt no matter how many hours you work.

Choose X-Factor and choose to forget you were being ironic when you began to watch it.

Choose blacks and Asians in historical costume dramas.

Choose to celebrate diversity and choose to ignore that you have to.

Choose multiculturalism and choose to tell yourself you have a choice.

Choose to sip herbal tea and feel ethical as your racial family is purposefully erased off the face of the planet.

 Choose Life, choose liberal values……

Many people have been taken aback by the seemingly endless amounts of ”Executive Orders” and major new policies being implemented by Donald Trump in such a short period of time. No sooner has one order been given than another appears, and then another. Discussion of one policy, for example the wall, begins to hit the headlines and social media, only hours later, or perhaps a day later, to be succeeded by something else, for example the ”Muslim Ban” or a 5 year ban on lobbying. It’s all rather bewildering, even to people who’re delighted by what Trump is doing.

But is there method to it? is driving so many ”controversial” policies through in such a short period of time itself part of larger tactic? and if so what is its purpose?

Pondering this over the last week or so I started to see certain similarities between Trump’s announcements and the manner in which his enemies, the liberal press, media and political establishment, were constantly left reeling and playing a game of ”catch-up”. It seemed as if Trump was engaged in Blitzkrieg warfare against his enemies. Now, I have a suspicion many people reading this will be well aware of what Blitzkrieg is as a method of warfare, but nevertheless, let’s take a look the Wikipedia explanation:

Blitzkrieg (German, “lightning war” is a method of warfare whereby an attacking force, spearheaded by a dense concentration of armoured and motorised or mechanised infantry formations with close air support, breaks through the opponent’s line of defence by short, fast, powerful attacks and then dislocates the defenders, using speed and surprise to encircle them. Through the employment of combined arms in manoeuvre warfare, blitzkrieg attempts to unbalance the enemy by making it difficult for it to respond to the continuously changing front and defeating it in a decisive Vernichtungsschlacht (“battle of annihilation”)”

The term had appeared in 1935, in a German military periodical Deutsche Wehr (“German Defense”), in connection to quick or lightning warfare. German manoeuvre operations were successful in the campaigns of 1939–1941 and by 1940 the term blitzkrieg was extensively used in Western media. Blitzkrieg operations capitalized on surprise penetrations (e.g., the penetration of the Ardennes forest region), general enemy unreadiness and their inability to match the pace of the German attack. During the Battle of France, the French made attempts to re-form defensive lines along rivers but were frustrated when German forces arrived first and pressed on.

Donald Trump is keenly aware that his policies are going to be savaged by hysterical liberals in the lugenpresse, so he appears to be moving forward with his policies as fast as possible so his opponents are unable to form a coherent counter narrative because another policy will be dropped before they do.

Let’s just take a moment to explore what would happen if Trump were to make a policy announcement, his wall, for example, and then not make any other announcements or issue any other Executive Orders for a week. The legacy media and liberal political class would be able to deploy their full strength against the policy, the editorials would be churned out for days, the TV screens would be awash with ”Libshits” pulling Trump’s plans apart. Both Trump and his supporters would then be in a position of reacting to the lugenpresse and defending their ground. In other words, the issue would become entrenched, and trench warfare is by it’s very nature far more wasteful and time consuming with a less certain outcome in terms of public opinion.

Remember the ”Women’s March” when feminists from across the West dressed up as tampons and wandered around in the rain all day? only just, but that was only a week ago. The abortion issue which set them off has been buried under other announcements, and more ”controversial” policies which have themselves been superseded by yet more policies.

All of this has had the effect of sending the MSM and liberal classes into state of nigh on chaos, complete disarray as they try and push one narrative into the public consciousness only to be hit from another front, and then another, and always before they can get their most powerful batteries into the field of public discourse.

Blitzkrieg is not infallible, however:

A few weeks ago I was out walking the fields with my dog when she bolted after a rabbit grabbing it before it managed to escape into the hedge. With her jaws locked across the rabbit’s back my terrier then proceeded to vigorously shake the rabbit from side to side, breaking its spine and rupturing its internal organs, the rabbit squealed and went limp, the dog then dropped the rabbit and watched, amused with a slowly wagging tale, as life left the rabbit. The whole spectacle took about 15 seconds to play out and after I watched the dog to see if the killing had made and impact, did the dog understand what it had done? did it ‘feel’ anything at all?. The answer of course is no, it did not ‘care’ in any way shape or form, indeed, it is incapable of caring.

The reaction of many white people to the ”#BLMKidnapping” in which 4 blacks tortured a handicapped white man has been one of sheer incredulity at the cold barbarism of the blacks. It wasn’t just the fact that these blacks were capable of such an atrocity, it was the dumb, moronic laughs and delight with which they scalped and slashed the young white man. The Muslim terrorist will behead you, but before he does so he’ll chant prayers and offer you up as a sacrifice to Allah, he’s aware of the importance, the significance of his act and wraps it up with a degree of pomp and ceremony. There is no pomp and ceremony to black violence, there’s shits n giggles, and while it’s tempting to add a ”not all blacks” get out clause..lets face it, the crime stats are well known, the propensity of blacks to extreme violence is a fact of life.

Thanks to our ((entertainment industry)) most white people have been conned by the kindly grandfather figure of Morgan Freeman or too-early-for-Bond Idris Elba style black figureheads, what they saw this week was the reality. The reality is one in which you sit tied up with a gag around your mouth, you can meet your Negroid oppressor’s eyes and try and give him the ‘Hey man, come on, don’t do this” treatment and discover to your horror that nothing comes back, no empathy, no warmth, no humanity, you are the rabbit looking for sympathy in the eyes of the dog.

A poster on Stormfront succinctly explains why blacks behave in this way:

If we posit altruism and group cooperativeness as the evolved trait and selfishness and lack of empathy as the default (most animals do not exhibit altruistic tendencies outside their own family) then it follows that as populations of humans expanded globally out of Africa, they would have encountered environments where a cooperative personality gave differential selective advantage to those populations who could set aside their personal well-being for the benefit of the group and pull together for a hunt, then assure group cohesion by sharing the spoils and not raiding the winter larder and taking everything for oneself. This would have been especially true in the harsh temperate northern climes where Europeans and Asians evolved. Over time, in Europe and northern Asia you would expect to see greater degrees of group cooperativeness evolve as a survival strategy in a difficult environment with scare resources and small unstable populations. In warmer tropical climates where there is no need to prepare for winters and food and resources are plentiful all year long, an individual could get by without the high degree of empathy and altruism necessary in temperate zones.

Thus, those who stayed behind in Africa were not under increased selective pressure to be altruistic and could afford more self interest to be sure they get the resources they need and achieve social standing. An individual in this society would not be rewarded for altruistic behaviour and may indeed be taken advantage of by more ruthless members of the tribe who view him as an easy mark, reducing his selective advantage. In the modern world, you have thrown together disparate human populations which have evolved very different social survival strategies over millions of years. Whites are often shocked at the lack of remorse and shamelessness displayed by blacks when they are confronted with evidence lawless or immoral behaviour. Indeed, the black reaction to being caught embezzling or stealing is often denial or anger at the victim or what they perceive as “unjust” and “racist” system of white law. Seemingly average blacks seem to take any opportunity to proudly loot stores and are often angry at having to pay for anything during normal operation. Whites are also astonished at the speed at which blacks resort to violence over what whites see as trivial matters. Black men rape nearly 40,000 white women per year in the US alone. Rape cannot be attributed to economics, historical oppression, the nebulous “white privilege” or any other progressive excuse.

Joseph Conrad’s novel ‘Heart Of Darkness’ which was later turned into a Vietnam war movie,  ‘Apocalypse Now’, both feature ‘Kurtz’ as the main protagonist. Kurtz is the European man who’s charged with bringing European organization and civilization to the third world. However, he eventually comes to the conclusion that this is an impossible task and ‘goes native’ eschewing all European moral codes and virtues. Indeed, in Apocalypse Now there’s a good deal of left wing relativism too, Kurtz, played by Marlon Brando, has gone further and declared that Western civilization is itself based upon lies and hypocrisy. In one famous scene Kurtz explains ”We train young men to drop fire on people but they’re forbidden to write ”fuck!” on their airplanes because it’s ”obscene’‘.

The point Kurtz is making here is that Western civilization is no better than the primitive savagery of the third world, it’s just that we are more sophisticated about it, again, you can sense the leftism seeping in. However, Kurtz is wrong. European man might build elaborate war machines held up by complicated bureaucracies, and the end result will be death, but it is simply a means to an end, you can argue about  the validity of that end, but death and destruction is not the end in itself, the policy is. Contrast that to the African warlord who randomly slaughters and then eats! his enemies:

Cannibalism has been reported in several recent African conflicts, including the Second Congo War, and the civil wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone. A UN human rights expert reported in July 2007 that sexual atrocities against Congolese women go “far beyond rape” and include sexual slavery, forced incest, and cannibalism.[107] This may be done in desperation, as during peacetime cannibalism is much less frequent;[108] at other times, it is consciously directed at certain groups believed to be relatively helpless, such as Congo Pygmies, even considered subhuman by some other Congolese.[109] It is also reported by some that witch doctors sometimes use the body parts of children in their medicine.[110] In the 1970s the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin was reputed to practice cannibalism

After the Battle of Waterloo the Duke of Wellington did not eat Napoleon, he wasn’t even shot.

The African temperament ensures that the policy is death, violence and barbarism, like the blacks in Chicago, it’s done for the shits n giggles and it is this completely alien characteristic, which would be classed as psychotic in a European, which has so shocked so many white people over this last week. Our people are simply unaccustomed to viewing what amounts to an empathetic nullity, a void of unfeeling brutality.

The solution of course, is to segregate ourselves from these people, to live as far away as we reasonably can. And when we do so, it will be organized and implemented by well dressed white people using computers, schematics and spreadsheets, hell, we’ll even give the Africans a bottle of water for the journey. It is after all, just a means to an end, and the end is to have our people live free of these dark hearts.

In the aftermath of Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S High Priestess of SJW’s, Anita Sarkeesian, lamented that left wing ”Social Justice” had ”taken a beating”. And she was correct, they had and they have nothing to look forward to but yet more beatings in the future, their punishment must be more severe.

In the heady days leading up to the election, and after the similarly seismic Brexit vote, it seemed like pretty much everyone was lining up to kerb-stomp the Social Justice Warriors, but nobody did it with more relish than a slew of high profile YouTube channels run by popular libertarianesque polemicists, some, such as Stefan Molynuex and Paul Joseph Watson, appeared to drop fully into the Alt-Right camp, with PJW running for cover when he realized that all those Anne Frank gags and White Genocide memes weren’t being played for laughs, that the Alt-Right really was a ”racist” movement.

I’ve recently been paying far more attention than usual to the more left-leaning members of the YouTube libertarian celeb circuit, such as Sargon of Akkad, Kraut and Tea and a little Dutch cutey called ”Gryffix”.

Many of us out here in the badlands of White Nationalism became quietly pleased with where all of this was going, these YouTube channels have considerable reach, probably on a par with a Guardian full page spread, they were mercilessly attacking the mad SJW’s and anti-white dogmas, feminists, highlighting the Muslim menace and their rape waves, the liberal lugenpresse and generally undermining the anti-white, especially anti-white male narrative at the heart of the modern left. There was the odd backhander about ”racists” and ”Neo Nazis” but ok, we can’t scare off the normies.

The problem is these pundits consistently explained that weren’t ethnic nationalists at all that they’re more left leaning social libertarians, and yet here they were seemingly giving us an easy ride and ruthlessly attacking what most people think of as the leftist orthodoxies of 21st century, so what’s going on?.

The simple fact is that they’re on the (now) winning side of a civil war raging within the left, by attacking the people who’re attacking whites, they were speaking truth to power, defending the oppressed and persecuted, it’s a perfectly sound stance to have. They also recognized, with some justification, that the insanity of the hyper-PC Social Justice left, with their drivel of ”White Privilege” and ”Safe Spaces” was severely detrimental to the larger leftist cause. As they saw it, again, correctly, the triumph of Brexit and Trump was down to the white working classes lashing out at the left who betrayed them, sneered at them and derided them.

But non of this means that these people are on our side, they’re in the business of reforming the left (again) and they’ve also found themselves a popular and easy to defend  middle ground, they can hit both left and right and present themselves as the sane middle man, the referee between two warring camps of collectivist lunatics.

There’s quite a bit of overlap and agreement between these channels but it helps to zoom in on one of them in particular, in this case we shall look more closely at the German YouTuber called Kraut and Tea.

The Alt-Right/SJW Dichotomy 

A recurrent theme within this community, almost as prevalent as the skillfully exaggerated voice inflections, is the idea that the Alt-Right, White Nationalism, and its present rise in popularity, is simply a reflection of and reaction to, the Social Justice Warrior left. This is a bizarre claim because as I understand it the very term ”Social Justice Warrior” came from within their own community, before that term spread White Nationalists used the far more honest, and brutal sounding ”Cultural Marxist” which is what they are, we all agree upon that.

Mass immigration into Europe began immediately after World War 2 and the native Europeans have consistently opposed it at every stage but running parallel with that immigration was the establishment’s increasing hostility to any resistance, nationalistic feeling was there, it’s just that it was purged, suppressed and nigh on outlawed. The mad rambling SJW of today is the logical conclusion of 70 years of forced indoctrination against policies which were despised from the outset

To create the false dichotomy of SJW’s and White Nationalists being a reflection of each other is a baseless lie, but it is necessary if one wants to create popular content in which one sits upon a pile of straw-men and calls it the ”middle ground” because this middle ground is supposedly one in which Europeans are quite happy to be reduced to minorities in their own lands just as long as they aren’t demonized and persecuted for their ‘privilege’ as they dwindle away into nothing.

You see, according to Kraut and Tea it’s perfectly fine for, say, Danes, to disappear into a mulatto mix of Africans and Asians, just as long as nobody recognizes that it is happening because nobody is viewing the world through a collectivist lens. Instead this nondescript mass of mush should strive for what really matters, which always seems to amount to decent pay, free speech, porn, smoking dope and playing video games.

The Return of the Working Class Hero?

Deploying his usual tactic of overly dramatic tones and too much emphasis, Kraut and Tea invokes working class solidarity by saying (roughly) ”When you’re down on your knees scraping shit off a toilet for a living you don’t fucking care what race your colleague is!”. That may or may not be true, but it’s grounded on the false assumption that the individual’s identity is based on the work they do, or the wealth they have.

The white toilet cleaner is not just a toilet cleaner, he also has a sense of belonging and a life beyond cleaning toilets, he’s rooted and settled within a group and culture, a group and culture which is threatened by ”The Other” who likewise do not define themselves as toilet cleaners. The Somalian immigrant does not first and foremost think of himself as a menial slave.

And the left have been here before, it was the dismal failure of working class whites to embrace the universal proletariat ideal which led Marxists to cast around looking for other oppressed groups to lionize, and eventually the creation of the Cultural Marxist which Kraut and Tea loathes with such passion. Kraut and Tea’s solution to the left’s woes is to turn the clock back 100 years and breathe life into yet another left wing ideological corpse.

That Question!

For a German who’s highest ideals are individual liberty and freedom of speech the Holocaust denial laws in Germany should logically be of paramount interest, yet Kraut and Tea hardly seems interested in the subject at all. Germany is a country where an 87 year old woman languishes in jail for expressing an opinion on a historical event. And what’s more, the Holocaust denial laws are the result of intense lobbying by influential Jewish groups.

So here we have a group acting as a collective and exerting power to suppress the rights of the individual, surely this most be the most triggering issue of the day? surely the YouTube videos should be being pumped out one after the other detailing each case, drawing attention to this outrage!. But zilch, the problem with speaking truth to power, genuine power, is that that power is liable to kick your down and arrest you or have your YouTube channel whacked.

At the end of the day speaking truth to power by hounding a dopey feminist or Tweeting  inter-racial porn to the Alt-Right is the safer option, and anyway, only Nazis talk about the Holocaust and Jews.

 The Multi-Racial Police State

At present the multi-racial nation is possible because of Cultural Marxism which suppresses, hounds and vilifies the natives who’re being enriched. The idea that some future left wing state will be comprised of mere individuals who no longer look upon each other as the racial other is a curious one. Firstly, how is it to be enforced? in such a state the Crime Think cops would not simply be looking for white racism, but for racism, or ethnic networking and bias, from and within every group.

And so if , for example, a bunch of Turks got together and formed some sort of Turk group to push forward their interests, then how could that be prevented? This holds equally true of Muslims and Jews, is this benign state based upon individual liberty and freedom of speech going to ban people of similar ethnic or religious background from organizing themselves? Surely they’re merely just individuals making choices?

But furthermore…why even try to do this in the first place? why bother?

What interests me about these big hitting YouTube channels is they allow us a glimpse into what is happening in the enemy camp. The Social Justice white hating left has proven to be a liability and it is indeed funneling unprecedented numbers of our people into our ranks. If the ideas of people such as Kraut and Tea win then they’ll be peddling more class based arguments to our people, it’s still bunkum but it is a better sell than ”White Privilege” and guilt. Under the guise of ‘speaking truth to power’ these lefties, having settled matters in their own camp, will turn their guns fully on the Alt-Right.

From a purely tactical perspective the best outcome is that these warring factions within the left fight each other until we have reached full strength and can take them both down. Luckily that is probably what will happen, or at least they’ll carry on warring, the simple fact is the Globalists have spent too much time and effort cultivating white guilt and self loathing, their whole project rests upon it so they’ll likely carry on producing SJW drones for the foreseeable future. That’s depressing because it means another generation of white teenagers having their brains fried with Marxist gibberish, but it buys us time before the left are destroyed as a whole.

On the same day national newspapers launched a manhunt against Millennial Woes The Guardian carried a piece by somebody called ”Pandora Blake” in which Blake lamented the draconian online censorship laws in Britain:

I’m no stranger to censorship. Last year, Dreams of Spanking was unsuccessfully targeted under the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, because my consensual BDSM videos depict spankings that leave marks. After a traumatic, invasive investigation, I was forced to take my site offline – and I was left in no doubt that the law considers kinky sexualities such as mine to be obscene.

Acts that are legal to perform in the UK, but not legal to depict in porn, which includes fisting, watersports and female ejaculation (if the fluid lands on another person, or is consumed).

What message are we sending to young women by criminalising porn that depicts a visual, undeniable representation of female sexual fulfilment? Do we really want girls to think that the way their bodies naturally respond to pleasure is obscene?

Attacking online porn is a cheap way to score political points – and it’s a distraction from the real issues.

The Guardian didn’t just carry the story, they allowed this insane pervert to write her own article on why it’s wrong for her to be unable to make money from peddling ”fisting’ videos to young girls under the guise of ”education”. To the left this is what constitutes a ‘free speech’ issue worth fighting for, if the opportunity arises to ram Western civilization further into the sewer than it already is then the most prominent left leaning broadsheet in the land will embrace it with gusto.

Indeed, they’ll invoke libertarian arguments to back up their case, if you don’t like this woman being able to flog squirting and fisting videos then nobody is forcing you to watch them, we’re all free to watch and pay for, and read what we like, it’s a free country isn’t it?

On the other-hand, if you sit at home in your dressing gown, smoking cigarettes and ruminating on where the left’s morality is taking us then you’re likely to have an anti-fa thug group call their friends in the media and you’ll receive a punishment beating for simply having an opinion, an opinion which nobody is forced to agree with on a platform nobody has to watch, we being free individuals and all….

The article in The Daily Record which was then wafted up to the Mirror parent paper, which is nationwide, is so gobsmackingly retarded that it isn’t even worth dissecting, here are a few quotes:

A RACIST Scots video blogger spouted his hatred on stage at an infamous US event where far-right extremists shouted “Hail Trump”.

Millennial Woes NPI speech was actually a rather heartfelt warning to a 19 year old white girl on the dangers of atomization, it can be seen in full here.

The vile mystery man – believed to be from Edinburgh – gave a speech at a white nationalist conference in Washington DC that has sparked a political firestorm.

…

It has now emerged the Scottish hatemonger, who has managed to keep his identity a secret, also appeared at the annual conference of the National Policy Institute on Saturday.

Using the moniker ‘Millennial Woes’, the vlogger has posted around 600 videos to his YouTube account, racking up 18,000 subscribers and nearly 2.4 million views.

Some anti-fascist campaigners have spent more than a year trying to identify the man – believed to be in his 30s – as he continues to deliver hate online.

Talking straight to camera with a well-spoken Scots accent and often smoking cigarettes, he pours out a stream of sordid venom.

His whining invective can run up to an hour in length as he bleats about his ignorant views. But campaigners say the man has developed a growing “fanbase” among other deluded far-right supporters.

Asked if he fears YouTube will shut down his channel due to his hateful speech, the vlogger said he plans to launch his own website instead to reach his twisted followers.

He said he’d been reported to police over his videos. Campaigners have made strenuous efforts to identify the vlogger to name and shame him. One investigator managed to identify a building apparently spotted in the background of a video as a hotel not far from Edinburgh’s Leith Walk.

Behold the ‘tolerant’ and ‘inclusive’ left in all their putrid, festering scumbaggery. A national newspaper can proudly proclaim that ‘campaigners’ have spent more than a year chasing a man down for the crime of having an opinion on YouTube. When they say ”name and shame him” what they really mean is terrify him and his family by using their media as a baseball bat, he’ll be found out, named and then plastered across the papers for the masses to sneer at. Perhaps a kicking on the street, maybe a brick through his mother’s window, the cops might smash down the door for hate think, that’ll teach the scumbag for being popular, for being a ‘free thinker’.

This is what the left is, it’s what they have always been. The left are standing up for the little guy, speaking truth to power, by using the mass media to destroy a man who voices an opinion on the internet, but if that opinion is too popular for comfort then that’s the left’s problem, not Millennial Woes’s. If Theresa May was serious about her ”Tolerant liberal Britain” guff then she should ban the left leaning media for attacking an individual because of their views, such behaviour is the antithesis of liberalism!

Pandora Blake is endorsed by the left because peddling barbaric smut to young girls is what the left would consider to be the ”right side of history” what they mean by that is that the general trend of the zeitgeist, the direction which western civilization is heading, is one of increased liberation, tolerance and inclusion or differing ‘lifestyle choices’. A running theme of this blog is that those ‘choices’ always seem to concur with whatever the interests of High Finance and Globalism want, however, we shall leave that to one side this time and concentrate of the left itself.

If, as the left wants us to believe, the direction of history favours their views on personal liberation and self indulgence, if that were the case, then it would happen naturally, truly naturally, there would be no need for ‘Hate Speech laws” or anti-fa thugs in masks hunting people down, girls would feel comfortable watching other women being ”fisted” and boys would enjoy dressing up in pink and playing with dolls.

The problem is….it’s all crap!

….And it isn’t that we are too dumb to understand, we do, we understand it better than the lefties themselves. We know what the arguments are, we know (((who))) conjured up their world view and why, we understand the reasoning of the left, the problem is, it’s a vision of hell on earth which has to be resisted tooth and claw.

The ”Right side of history” argument is a sham, it isn’t based on the raising of conscience or making people ‘socially aware’ or ‘tolerance and understanding’. The historical narrative, control of what we are and where we are headed, is enforced, first through the media, and then through laws, and in the end, through violent street mobs and outright persecution of dissidents. The Daily Record hit piece, and the anti-fa blog which began this witch hunt (I’m not linking to them but we shall revisit them another time) are obviously furious at the popularity of Millennial Woes YouTube channel, and they should be, every single video he has ever made disembowels everything they stand for with consummate ease.

Millennial Woes isn’t a ‘Nazi’ he has a distaste for authoritarianism, he’s the average guy who asks ”What the hell is going on?”. He plays the part of Truman in the Truman Show movie, we are living under a smelly dome of leftist thought and ideas which we are told is natural and good. Millennial Woes invites his audience to explore the dome with him as he points out the fake weather, the false smiles, the plot-holes and the synthetic nature of dome-life. And that’s why they hate him, and why they want him destroyed.

Leftists are merely the dome technicians desperately trying to scare and threaten the increasingly aware captives into not seeing what they’re seeing, not to think what they are thinking, when we look at the left all we see are dead eyed ideologues, boring shit-for-brains imbeciles everybody despises but, who are, nevertheless, dangerous people to cross because of their ‘connections’ which could harm us or our loved ones.

It takes astonishing bravery, fortitude, courage and moral fibre to stand up, or sit in a dressing gown, and simply say ”No! I shall not listen to the lies any longer”. And when such a person is attacked and vilified all it creates is yet more people asking why they were attacked and vilified.

As another prominent YouTuber tried to explain to a prominent leftist recently ”You’re fucked, your ideology is dead, all you people have going for you is violence and hysterics”.

Goodnight left-side.