"No one puts their children in a boat unless the water is safer than the land"

At least 58 people, including a baby, have died and dozens more have survived after their overloaded boat sank in rough seas off southern Italy. https://t.co/z74PhlWyfH

— Robert Rinder (@RobbieRinder) February 26, 2023

Dick Dingle is a reporter for the Daily Stormer, tracking down the stories that others won’t touch.

The bodies of more than 40 refugees from Islamic countries washed up on a beach on the shores of southern Italy, in Calabria. As a reporter, I was on the scene, trying to find out what had happened. I was disgusted by the sight of the lifeless bodies, but something inside me urged me to keep going.

I knew my boss at the Daily Stormer was always looking for a big story, and I needed to deliver. My personal life was in shambles. My wife had left me for a wealthy diamond merchant, and I couldn’t shake the feeling that I was going insane. But if I could land a major story and get it published, maybe she would see me in a different light and return to me.

As I delved deeper into the story, I discovered that the captain of the ship that had carried the refugees was a bloodthirsty maniac who had knowingly put their lives at risk. The survivors spoke of the terror they had experienced and the horrible conditions on board. But it was the dead that really struck me. Men, women, and children who had left everything behind, seeking a better life in Europe, only to find death.

As I wrote my report for the Daily Stormer, I couldn’t help but think of the bigotry I had harbored against Muslims. My own biases had blinded me to the suffering of these people, and it sickened me. But maybe this story could help to open people’s eyes to the reality of the refugee crisis, and maybe it could help me to win back the love of my wife.

However, as I submitted my story to the Daily Stormer, I realized that I couldn’t shake the feeling that I was going insane. The pills and alcohol had taken their toll, and my mind was playing tricks on me. But still, I waited for the story to be published, hoping it would be enough to save me.

Editor’s note: this story will likely not be enough to save Dick, however, it was enough to get him hired on as a regular writer!

DeSantis has already lost. He lost by making a succession of terrible, impolitic decisions that doom him to Florida retail politics forever.

In the wake of 2020, DeSantis had two major choices: align with Trump or wait for 2028. DeSantis did not align with Trump. Mistake #1. His response to the main attack on Trump since the election, the Jan 6 “insurrection” (looky-loos roaming the Capital building in cosplay garb as feds and overheated weirdos clashed with cops), was to make a few noises about “prosecuting rioters” and refuse to defend Trump.

To me, refusal to defend Trump against risible claims of “insurrection” and “treason” is a major litmus test and DeSantis failed it. In itself it shows a glaring lack of loyalty and a ruthless interest in self-advancement. It shows a politician who is mercurial in the worst way–allowing the enemy to seize ground so that the path is clear for his rise. This is never a good sign for the public interest.

There were always three main strategies for DeSantis to follow:

1. Vociferously defend Trump, show loyalty, and wait for the chips to fall. If Trump is damaged badly enough, privately urge that he step aside “for the good of the nation” and pledge to back him in any difficulty. It’s a snake move but the only smart snake move. By not aligning with Trump, DeSantis negated this option.
2. Attack Trump outright, disavow his support, and insist on his responsibility for events, claiming they hurt the Party and the public by giving the Democrats political momentum. High risk, but it sets up a clash in the most favorable way to DeSantis by instigating the conflict directly and claiming to do so over principle. It also frames Trump to greatest disadvantage, as someone who made a mistake and refuses to own up to it. DeSantis instead stayed silent.
3. Scheme passively against Trump while avoiding direct criticism. This is the option the donors and their operatives dangled in front of DeSantis, and like an idiot he grabbed it. This option was specifically dangled because it gave them leverage over DeSantis–any conflict with Trump would rough him up at the very least, and he would be especially reliant on their support to survive politically, much less prevail in a nomination contest. It also gave the donors maximum freedom to dump DeSantis later, after his kamikaze attack was over, and substitute a preferred establishment politician in his place.

DeSantis chose what is by far the politically dumbest option. Since this last summer it was obvious that the establishment was seeding favorable DeSantis press in the unlikeliest places, such as a conversation between Dude Weed impresario Joe Rogan and Gina Carano, a fairly dumb, mid actress (both of them no doubt had to be coached as to who “Ron DeSanta” was–wasn’t he that guy from Parks & Rec?) Instead of defending Trump, and instead of attacking him, Rodent decided to pretend that the loudest and most prominent republican in the universe didn’t exist. Meanwhile he clumsily scoped out New Hampshire with a push poll–whether he instigated it or whether it was done on his behalf makes no difference, as once it was known and promoted in the media it would have to be explained. DeSantis instead refrained from any response and pretended his only interest was in Florida politics (which he conducted via gimmicks, such as a feud with Disney, that were almost certainly crafted in committee by his handlers).

The choice is particularly disastrous because it has prompted Trump to attack him immediately after midterms–and now Ron Rodent has lost the initiative. He can’t reverse his course of action. If he decides not to run for 2024, he’ll look like a timid schemer who doesn’t have the stomach for a fight. If he goes ahead, he’ll have to confront Trump’s criticism immediately, before he’s had the chance to lay out a strategy (or, rather, have one printed out and handed to him). Although consultants would have advised Trump to hold off, lest he seem insecure in his frontrunner position, Trump chose the smarter option: attack his opponent when he is off-guard, and attack him at his alleged strong point, his easy victory in the governor’s race. I got more votes than you in your own state is a good prediction of how a Trump vs. DeSantis primary contest would go, and Rodent has no retort.

The worst thing about Rodent isn’t that he’s a traitor, it’s that he’s a stupid traitor. This conclusively rules him out for national office. Besides his stupidity, DeSantis lacks charisma–a subjective quality, of course, but look at him. Then compare him to Trump in 2016. There’s really no comparison. DeSantis is insecure, untalented, bad at handling media, and unfocused as an elected official. Adding to that disloyalty and a delusional self-image puts him in Ted Cruz political territory. And Ted Cruz will never be president.

Originally posted in the newsletter of Monterey Peninsula College.

Previously: Internet Drama: Ratty Jew Dave Portnoy Attacks Alex Stein for No Reason

And let me clarify why I hate @alexstein99 I hate losers who make everything political on both sides. @stoolsalesguy posted his video without watching it all. It started going viral so Gaz went back and looked again. When he watched full vid he saw the gambling stuff.

— Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) August 23, 2022

And let me clarify why I hate Dave Portnoy. I hate apathetic centrist losers like Dave Portnoy who sit back and blame “both sides” when one side — our side — just wants to preserve a functional community, family life, and economy for them to live in, while the other side wants to superficially butcher children into resembling the opposite sex in grotesque and pseudoscientific Dr. Moreau-esque surgeries. While the other side burns down hundreds of city blocks and murders dozens of random bystanders coast to coast over fake and ghey race hoaxes. While the other side hoaxes an election and then hires 90,000 IRS agents to increase income and property taxes on small businesses and the middle and working classes, while simultaneously introducing a weather tax, and totally sanctioning the largest commodities market on Earth, while also flooding the border with gorillians upon gorillians of vile brown and black legal and illegal alien filth who further compete with real Americans for a finite number of jobs, transportation, housing, and other services.

This article is the work of a reader named Coaltraine.

I have been recently reading Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment, published in 1947 as one of the Frankfurt School’s first public forays into what Jews had been involved in conspiratorially for decades and what later got labelled Critical Theory. Basically, the Jews of Germany were throughout this period internally trying to undermine Hitler’s National Socialist revolution through academia and culture before it could even get off the ground formally, and after the war, their goal switched to “Never Again!” almost overnight. We have been living now for 70+ years under that vow of theirs.

And so I basically just had some observations that I thought I’d share with the forum because I had the time and I wanted to get this down as a reference for posterity. Nothing here is like revolutionary or anything in my opinion, and at least on this forum mine would probably be a common judgment if anything of the book, its agenda, its thesis, its whole basic premise to begin with, and how all this has combined in the century after the book’s publication to define how these topics are commonly framed and presented (ironically uncritically) to the general public today whether in an academic setting or within just the more general realms of politics and culture. But I figured that even here on the forum, many of you guys might not be very familiar at all with the book’s specifics- although I’m sure everyone has observed the Frankfurt School’s influence in the West in one way or another. And while even normies now are referencing “Cultural Marxism”, I think basically that we ourselves in order to guide normie-cons particularly should generally have some sort of formal responses or rebuttals to these major ongoing Jewish intellectual conspiracies, which is what the Frankfurt School and its Critical Theory is basically, on hand always so that we can reference it if/when needed whether we’re red-pilling normies or we’re debating Ben Shapiro or Rachel Maddow and their partisans respectively. So what follows is my basic rebuttal and what I wrote down late last night immediately after finishing it. For those of you who need a quick refresher in the form of a video, this below does a decent job at presenting the background:

In Dialectic of Enlightenment, the authors basically see this pattern throughout Euro history singularly of reversion to what they consider evil, outdated, and backward movements and modes of being. They focus on Fascism in particular because when they wrote the book this is what freightened them and all Jews most globally, because then as now its ethos was an alternative to the miseries of modernity. So keep in mind that what Horkheimer and Adorno Semitically see below as “self-destruction” stereotypically is in reality rather “course-correction” in for example the rise of the Third Reich as well as other prominent historical instances of challenge to Semitic hegemony. For example, just from the book’s description on Amazon we find:
a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in Enlightenment thought from the beginning.

To start to unpack all that, we see that the authors here just assume that “enlightenment” was ever even desirable or practically practicable in the first place, which it wasn’t. In the very beginning, the Enlightenment was forced top-downward upon the people, who were at best ignorant, gullible, and naive of the new bargain being struck (proverbially with Satan, or his earthly representatives the Jews) in the modern “social contract”, which favored individuality over corporate identity, which the Jews would use in the future not only to install themselves as this new democratic regime’s high-priests and celebrities but also to undermine our culture, religion, and ethnic identity. For if the people would’ve comprehended the totality and ubiquity of transformation then being proposed, they would’ve rejected it wholesale and emphatically most likely, which is why it was forced upon the people regardless of preference. The Enlightenment despite what Wikipedia says was not popular really, and the people back then in the main wanted nothing more than to maintain their religion and corporate identity. It was dominated really by a new merchant class of rootless cosmopolitan in alliance with the former regime’s minor nobility who desired to cheat its way to the top of the hierarchy under the pretext of Democracy.

So the authors here are developing this dialectic, which is real and historical in my opinion, between their ideal in Radical Enlightenment on one side verses the people’s natural reversion and reaction back to hierarchy, monarchy, theocracy, and collectivity that the French Revolution and its consequences eventually robbed people of to the point of today where everyone’s just rootless cosmopolitan cogs in the Machine. People like Joseph de Maistre and even Edmund Burke pointed this all out at the time though remember. It’s just that then as today those Counter-Enlightenment voices were censored and thus filtered out of the culture accordingly. De Maistre himself would be forced into exile in Russia away from his homeland and people solely because he saw through the duplicity and deception of the Enlightenment deal that was too good to be true.

So yeah the dialectic between Radical Enlightenment and its opposite in some form of proto-Fascism definitely was real, it happened then in the 19th Century as it plays itself out now as well, and it happened on some level even prior to the French Revolution. It’s just that prior to that point, the forces of Reaction and Tradition were usually always more than enough to bend the needle enough to defeat the perpetual encroachment of the Modernists. So our authors got that correct in my opinion.

Another thing our highly Semitic authors got correct, here, is their judgment of the Third Reich as historically normative. See:

Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization.

That’s sort of the money-quote right there in the Amazon description, because it forms the foundation for where my opinion diverges now from that of our Frankfurt School authors.

As we know, the Third Reich was deeply rooted in Western civilization obviously, and this was why it was so popular and briefly successful. This same “terror” against Jews was a permanent fixture and general pattern throughout history– and not only Western history either. The Jews actively engineer enemies against them in reaction to their behavior everywhere they go historically and currently. From Imperial Roman-era Tyre to Medieval Spanish Toledo to WWII-era Tripoli in Africa to modern-day Turkey, the Jews would be pogromed, dispossessed, and expelled throughout history. Yet this is coincidentally the one side of the story that normally Jews won’t inform their less educated audience, because it demolishes the idea of the uniqueness of The Holocaust, and then marginalizes the fact that Fascism itself (or similar forms) was/is the norm throughout history. Democracy, however, is this unproven product- especially in the context of the modern world over great geographical and national distances and multiplicities of peoples.

So the Third Reich was nothing special in this context- as I’ve talked about prior. And while these Christ-killing authors would crucify all of Europe and its history currently in order to explain this persistent “pathological” behavior, the dialectical equation resolves itself much, much more simply and satisfactorily indeed by looking simply at what the Jews did themselves to deserve such reaction- again and again and again throughout history. Yet collectively Jews can never be at fault either in modernity- so says Jews, who remember from above are Democracy’s new priest-class and “experts”. This is because the Jews’ faultless nature was more or less the first premise accepted under the new Enlightenment conditions imposed as said prior from above upon an unsuspecting population. Immediately upon the aftermath of the French Revolution, even Napoleon figured out quite quickly at his Paris Sanhedrin that collectively, legally, Jews were untouchable basically. They could no longer be dealt with in accordance with traditional corporate expulsion or collective punishment for their criminal and antisocial behavior. They were neither a polity nor religion now in the eyes of the Enlightenment, but mere individuals legally incapable of conspiracy essentially. Jews would then use England to undermine Napoleon financially and eventually militarily.

Treating the Jews individually rather than collectively was the first Enlightenment plank and belief objectively, because post-Enlightenment the Jews would use this new status-quo to blind us to the reality of Jewish subversion, co-option, and eventual domination. Rather, the Enlightenment’s new “social contract” guaranteed Jews’ newfound freedom as individuals on the basis of their individuality legally rather than as a corporate body as Jews were judged prior in pre-modernity and as Hitler judged them by default more or less under the Third Reich. So in conclusion, we must realize that there was an important dialectic in Enlightenment as Adorno and Horkheimer declare. The people are constantly trying to get out of this ideological trap whether they realize it or not, but the Jews still today are always socially-engineering the masses back into the paradigm where the people because of the paradigm’s perimeters cannot detect let alone admit and declare this Jewish conspiracy- nor can the people even really stand up for themselves collectively either as we’ve seen. So we agree with the authors on the dialectic itself, but we part ways with their analysis when they prejudge the reaction (i.e. the Fascism) as pathological and unnatural, because we understand that these repeated reactions are completely natural and in accordance with the will of the people collectively.

Thoughts? Observations? Criticisms? Suggestions for future book reviews or biographies? Normally I don’t have enough time to be doing this as it’s hard enough to find enough time just to read these books myself let alone outline their basic contents formally in front of an audience, but I had that today and so I may again in the future. As I said above briefly, we need to have standardized arguments already ready to rebut these sorts of familiar Jewish declarations, and I hope to eventually put down more of them to posterity.

The ever-evolving story of the Uvalde shooting continues to evolve.

The official cop story is currently that all of the deaths at the school happened before they even got there, so it doesn’t really matter that they waited around for 40 minutes before going in to kill the shooter.

The claim is that they changed the status from “active shooter” to “barricaded shooter,” and therefore it wasn’t really important to enter the room quickly, and the most important thing was the perimeter to keep the parents out. You can’t hear shooting in the videos we’ve seen from outside the school, when the parents were confronting the cops and demanding they go in. But reports are saying that he was still shooting inside the classroom after the whole crew of dozens of cops and feds arrived.

In other news: the claims of the three early-arriving cops getting in a shootout appear to be lies now – that never made any sense, because if they couldn’t shoot into the room how could they be shot from the room? I think they’re also trying to memory hole that story where the off-duty officer stole a barber’s shotgun and rushed in like John McClane.

Remember this???

NEW: This is the hat the elite, veteran BORTAC Border Patrol agent was wearing when he breached the classroom with a tactical team and engaged/killed the Uvalde school shooter, a CBP source tells me. Graze wound to head. Many BP agents in Uvalde have kids at the school. @FoxNews pic.twitter.com/924WCOZjsK

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) May 25, 2022

The timeline is also changing, as are the number of shots fired and the number of rounds he had on him. I’ve never seen any news story change so much so rapidly. The official official in charge is in Austin, and none of the local cops or BPS are allowed to talk to the media. He doesn’t know if the SWAT team entered the school – but why would he know? He’s in Austin.

Anyway – even if we accept that no one was shot after the cops arrived as they claim, the obvious question is: how many people were shot and could have been saved if first responders had gone in, but instead bled to death in the 40-minute perimeter-forming exercise?

New York Post:

One of the young victims of the Texas school massacre bled to death while waiting for nearly an hour for police to come to the rescue — possibly dying because of the delay, a first-responder allegedly told her mom.

Texas State Sen. Roland Gutierrez said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the girl’s heartbroken mother recalled to him how the worker told her the child might have lived if cops hadn’t been slow to move in on the killer, The Hill reported.

CNN is covering this stuff for gun control reasons.

They don’t realize that we are paying attention.

“Her child had been shot by one bullet through the back, through the kidney area,” Gutierrez told the outlet. “The first responder that they eventually talked to said that their child likely bled out.

“In that span of 30 or 40 minutes extra, that little girl might have lived,” the Democratic lawmaker said. “So absolutely these mistakes may have led to the passing away of these children as well.”

…

Among those facing scrutiny for the delay is Uvalde School District Police Chief Pete Arredondo, who allegedly made the call to hold cops back when the shooting started.

On Sunday, police were guarding the chief’s house and keeping reporters away.

“Pete Arredondo is a coward,” snapped neighbor Lydia Torres. “He didn’t do his job. He failed the children.”

Questions have also arisen as to whether Arredondo even had a police radio with him when he made the fateful decision outside the school.

I understand calling him a coward, but he wasn’t going to be the one rushing in anyway – it would have been his subordinates. So calling him a coward for ordering a stand down is like calling George W. Bush brave for ordering the invasion of Iraq.

So why did Chief Pete order this? He’s going to get sued and might end up in prison. It seems like someone would have had to have told him to do this, no? Leaving his radio behind sounds like some kind of botched setup for “I couldn’t respond because I didn’t have my radio.”

Anyway – we’re keeping an eye on Chief Pete and any statements from the rats of the Uvalde PD.

Let’s go back to this corpse issue…

The alleged shooter was some kind of faggot and not trained militarily. He doesn’t even seem to have been a real gamer. So he probably shot a lot of people in extremities, and they bled out. However, among many things we haven’t heard about are the autopsies. They said that the county doesn’t have a medical examiner so they’re sending the bodies somewhere, but we don’t know where.

With regards to the claims from the State Senator – we don’t even know who the medical first responders were.

This story from Reuters on Thursday is another pretty weird thing:

Eulalio Diaz Jr. walked into the classroom where 19 children and two teachers were shot to death just a few hours before, looked down on the floor and saw one of his high school classmates.

Elsewhere in the hellish scene were the bodies of fourth graders whose parents were friends of his.

As the justice of the peace in little Uvalde, Texas, where a gunman went on one of the deadliest school shooting sprees in American history, Diaz had the horrific task of identifying the bodies. Because Uvalde does not have a medical examiner, Diaz has to act as coroner of the county, giving him the role of identifying the dead.

Before entering Robb Elementary School to begin the identification process, Diaz, 49, said he tried to prepare himself for the worst possible scene he could imagine.

What he witnessed went well beyond that.

…

Many of the bodies were in bad shape. Diaz tried to spare the parents as much pain as possible, hoping to positively identify the murdered children through descriptions their parents gave of clothing they wore to school that day, of photos parents showed him.

But it wasn’t enough. The bodies were too shot up. The Texas Rangers ordered DNA swabs of family members.

“My job is to make sure that we release the body of the correct person to their family,” Diaz said, as his voice trailed off. “My job is to get the bodies of these children back to their families.”

Several weird things there, including just the language – “the bodies were too shot up.” This is definitely a thing they do where they try to traumatize you so you don’t think about this stuff critically. That’s what they did with Sandy Hook – “you just can’t talk about anything because it’s so sad” – as if children had never died before. Children die all the time for all kinds of reasons, and allowing the media to emotionally bully you with dead children makes you a faggot.

SIDE NOTE: Frankly, sir, if anything on the internet ever causes you to feel any emotion, you are losing the internet. You can't possibly be obligated to feel sad about dead children you don't know. It's not callous to not feel sad about the deaths of people you don't know - it is insane to expect it. You feeling sad about dead children you've never met doesn't do anything to help the dead children or their families. Things are tough all over and everyone has their cross to bear. Letting the media cause you to feel emotions for any reason is decadent and self-indulgent. It's a kind of emotional pornography to get all worked up over dead people you don't know.

The Reuters article doesn’t state when the bodies will be given back to the parents, and seems to imply that there won’t be any examination. When the bodies are given back to the parents, they’re going to be in closed caskets, and frankly I doubt the parents will be allowed to open them even if they want to. You could go in a lot of different conspiracy directions with that, including going full-on and asking for proof that the children even died, and weren’t just shipped off for some pedophile blood ritual at Comet Ping Pong.

I’m not going to go in that direction – at least not yet. However, for now we can say that a kid might have just taken a bullet to the foot and then bled to death for lack of treatment in an hour and a half while the cops and feds were jacking each other off.

And One More Thing

This article is a mess but this story is a mess.

One thing that seems pretty clean: the Buffalo shooting is out of the media, despite the fact that this was supposed to be the much more important and very long awaited “white terror” event.

For some reason, they don’t seem to want to keep that conversation going and would rather focus on this Mexican botch job.

Guest Post by Jimmy Chang

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Quirky and mildly zany Hoax Watch legal staff member Jimmy Chang appeared Friday night on the Ralph Show with Ethan Ralph.

It’s wild time out there, folks.

If you haven’t heard Jimmy’s zany brand of zingers, you might want to take a peak.

This wasn’t actually very good, but hey, you know – it’s filler time, baby.

The first half is about the issue of the potential for voting and doing politics after the 2020 election hoax. We also talked about the fact that Mike Lindell is off on some kook cyber thing, while the election fraud happened right in front of us on live TV when they shut down the count at 3 AM in every swing state that hadn’t been called and started rolling in trucks of new ballots. And of course, before that, when they completely changed the entire voting system to make it mail-in in the name of a virus.

We talked some about the virus.

In the second half of the interview, a co-host came on and did a lot more talking than I did, so we didn’t really get through the content I wanted to cover. We were meant to talk about transhumanism and the conflict with China.

But it’s a fun time. You know, standard drunken internet shitshow, while I, being a lawyer always on my guard, assuring the Manitoba real estate empire of my client Leo Fong and guaranteeing the intellectual and artistic integrity of Hoax Watch editor John Carpenter, was drinking Monster Energy.

But yeah – we’ve got new readers, who might not know what my voice sounds like or whatever. So hey – whatever. Not saying it’s the greatest podcast in history, it’s mostly just rehashing of things on this site written by people like Snake Baker and Elvis Dunderhoff. But you might have some fun.

To Whom It May Concern,

DLive company has a very serious corporate crisis on its hands. I am a crisis management specialist, and an advocate of both free speech and cryptocurrency, and I would like to offer some advice which, based on your recent series of decisions, you are in desperate need of.

Your company has recently engaged in a series of high profile bans of what I estimate amounts to eliminating at least 85% of your total traffic, and I would imagine even a larger percentage of your total revenue. These decisions were very ill advised, but despite that, you remain in a situation where you could end up becoming exponentially more profitable than it was before these bans.

There is No Long Term Ability for DLive to Retain a Payment Processor the Processes Visa and MasterCard

As I understand it, the series of bans DLive issued were issued after threats from the company’s payment processor to cut ties with you. I understand this kind of reactionary action, but I cannot stress enough that it was a very, very poor decision, which is going to make your company nonviable.

Firstly, it needs to be understood that after what happened with the streamer known as Baked Alaska (Tim Gionet) streaming the January 6 riot at the US Capitol on your platform, you are not going to be able to continue to process credit cards in the future, regardless of how many people you ban. When the media gets around to dealing with the Baked Alaska situation, DLive will be implicated not legally, but by the media, which is the main driver of the ongoing program of “deplatforming” politically incorrect speech.

Further, it won’t simply be a payment processor issue, but rather MasterCard and Visa that are going to ban you, as they recently did to PornHub. Because of the standard they set with PornHub, they can now just do this arbitrarily. Any competent lawyer can tell you that if a company the size of PornHub is incapable of fighting this ban, DLive has no chance.

It should be further understood, though it has not yet been admitted in clear language, that there is a program of collusion between the major social media companies, the backbone operating services, and the mainstream media. This conflict of interests is trivially deduced by simply noticing that Amazon’s Jeff Bezos owns Twitch, the biggest streaming platform in the world, Amazon Web Services (AWS), the biggest server web services company in the world (aside from Tencent), and the Washington Post, which is arguably the most influential news publication in America. There is a clear agenda to remove all alternatives to the major platforms (YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, Google and Twitter) from the Western internet, which would mean that even if DLive were to have never hosted any political content at all, it would be under fire.

This is to say: if DLive were ever to compete directly with Bezos’ Twitch platform, then we would start seeing articles in Bezos’ Washington Post about “the DLive problem.” If they could not tie you to someone like Baked Alaska, then it would be someone else, or they would simply invent a reason to attack you out of thin air. This would then lead to the major social media platforms running defamation campaigns against you. Despite claims to the contrary by various media and government entities, the United States does not actually operate a free market system, in any serious or legitimate sense. This situation of centralized economic control, and the abuses thereof, has been greatly heightened during the coronavirus pandemic, and is only expected to continue to get worse, with mega-corporations continuing to force their smaller competitors out of the market.

This means that banning all of these people gains you nothing. It was definitely the right move to ban Baked Alaska, as he’d streamed himself committing a crime on your platform, and you should maintain a zero tolerance policy for streaming criminal behavior. However, the rest of the bans, including those of Nick Fuentes and Ethan Ralph, among many others, make no sense given the dynamics of this situation.

In the wake of the events of January 6, there is a massive program of deplatforming taking place across the internet, which is as focused on financial services as it is on internet platforms. This includes not only bans from PayPal, from credit card processors, and from personal bank accounts, but also blacklisting by the Visa/Mastercard duopoly, as mentioned above. The people who are being subjected to this are not simply going to disappear. These people are going to be forced to move into cryptocurrency, where they are largely protected from the ability of politicized corporations to arbitrarily freeze their ability to engage in monetary transactions based on their real or perceived political positions. DLive is already cryptocurrency enabled, meaning your company has a major advantage against your direct competitors already.

In the near future, all of the existing streaming platforms which are not named “YouTube” or “Twitch,” along with all of the other genres of alternative social media platforms, are going to be blacklisted by Visa and Mastercard, as well as be subjected to an endless series of prohibitions against using basic internet services. We recently witnessed that exact scenario after being banned from both the Google and Apple app stores, the Twitter alternative Parler was banned by Amazon Web Services.

DLive’s biggest advantage, however, is that given that you CEO and majority stakeholders are, as I understand it, Chinese citizens, you have access to Tencent services that citizens of other countries do not have. These services will give DLive the ability to stay online, virtually effortlessly, while services like Parler are locked in a constant struggle to simply keep their servers up. It should also be noted that the world’s largest CDN, Cloudflare, has as back as far as 2017 shown a willingness to deny service to customers based purely on artificially manufactured political outrage from social media personalities. Tencent, as I’m sure you’re aware, also has its own very affordable and very reliable CDN services.

To be clear: Tencent either does not provide these services to non-Chinese citizens, or they provide limited access to the services at a drastically inflated rate. Right now, I can guarantee you that the owners of Parler, Gab, and the rest of the sites that are being attacked by the media are attempting to access these services, due to their general refusal to refuse service based on politics. However, they are unlikely to experience much success in this regard, due to the fact that they are not Chinese citizens.

This is my core proposition: DLive currently has the opportunity to become a streaming and social media powerhouse, that functions exclusively on cryptocurrency. This way, DLive will not only maintain the audience that it had before the events of January 6, but expand it exponentially, while the venues at which Americans and other Westerners are allowed to speak freely continue to dwindle. Users will continue to pay for your services in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as well as get involved in Tron, which, as I understand it, the owners of DLive have a large stake in.

Free Speech is Big Business

It is not simply those doing politically-oriented news shows that are being banned from streaming sites and other social media, but in fact, a large portion of the gaming community is suffering a similar fate.

This deplatforming is going to go both deep and wide. Even before the events of January 6, we saw popular YouTube gamers, such as LeafyIsHere, banned from YouTube for no clearly stated reason. Meanwhile, the Terms of Service of Twitch is has virtually unworkable, and they have already begun mass bannings.

We are seeing a mass exodus from the mainstream platforms by all types of people, who are not considered politically incorrect, simply because the mainstream platforms have gone so far with their censorship agenda. Currently, these people have nowhere to go, but we can be certain they will go somewhere. If I had a stake in DLive, I would want DLive to be the place they end up.

People are willing to pay a premium for free speech and that premium is going up as the levels of free speech on the internet go down, as the United States and European governments becomes more erratic and unstable. There is a lot of money to be made here. The bottom line is: if you follow a path of being a free speech and cryptocurrency oriented streaming and social media platform, your userbase will expand rapidly, and profits will follow this expansion. If you follow this simple course of action I am suggesting, I can guarantee that your userbase will be more than a hundred times what it was on January 6, 2021 by January 6, 2022, and I would not be surprised in the least if you see a one thousand fold increase in users.

Yes, you are going to make less money per view without the use of MasterCard and Visa, but this will be more than compensated for by the increase in viewership.

At this point, from what I have been able to gather, you have already banned all of your top earners, which means that you have very little to lose by embracing a new direction.

Rebuilding Faith in Your Brand

Though it is sad to say, it must be said: you’ve lost a lot of good faith by banning all of these users in the days following the events of January 6. Without them, your platform is a ghost town, and largely useless. If your Terms of Service is the same as Twitch, why would people not just stream on Twitch, where they will make more money and gain a larger audience?

As an experienced crisis management expert, I would advise you take the following actions:

• Immediately issue an apology to those you’ve banned, and to your userbase as a whole.
• Immediately rescind the bans of everyone who has been banned since January 6 (excluding Baked Alaska and anyone else who may have streamed themselves committing a crime).
• Immediately cut ties with your current payment processor.
• Immediately announce that you will now allow all speech that is legal under the First Amendment of the United State, excluding calls to violence, calls to organize political events, and negative or defamatory statements against the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, or the leadership thereof. (I would also maintain the ban on pornography, though continue to allow some of the more “racy” female streamers who have been banned from Twitch, as long as they agree to a no nudity policy.)
• Immediately issue a new Terms of Service, which reflects these positions, and issue a promise (ensure that it isn’t legally binding, but a promise nonetheless) to honor these guidelines to the best of your ability.

From there, you would begin the process of using creative means to compel people to get involved in cryptocurrency, which they can then use to pay you for your services. Clearly, the superchat system you’ve created is very popular with users, and many will want to get involved in cryptocurrency simply for the purpose of using this system. However, I would also advise that you find other ways to incentivize the usage of crypto to purchase lemons, for the purpose of using your services.

You may consider:

• Limiting the number of comments a user is allowed to make without first purchasing a premium account using your cryptocurrency payment systems
• Encouraging or compelling popular streamers to do “private streams” which are only viewable by members who have already made a cryptocurrency payment to the site
• Providing other rewards, such as special stickers or emojis to paying customers

The biggest hurdle is simply getting people into the habit of using cryptocurrency – once they have jumped that hurdle, they will be happy to pay you using this system. You can also promote channels which explain cryptocurrency.

It should also be noted that marketing DLive as the first fully crypto social media site will gain you favor from the large crypto community. The crypto community on YouTube has a huge following, and if you are branded as a crypto-based company, many creators of cryptocurrency-related content would be inclined to move to your platform, meaning that it would not simply be a place for political speech.

Finally, I wish to say that this letter is not an advertisement for my services, and in fact I am not currently available to take on any new clients. I write this simply as a Singaporean-Canadian who grew up on the internet, loving the freedom that I had to be exposed t0 different views and cultures, as well as a longtime fan of your service and of many of the streamers who were banned from DLive in the days since January 6.

This is a time of crisis not simply for DLive, but for all internet-based companies that are not aligned with the large corporations that have conquered the Western web, and the decisions that DLive makes about its future are going to be complicated and have complicated consequences, whichever direction the company chooses to move in. I simply wanted to to offer some direct and honest personal advice on the very unfortunate situation you are currently dealing with.

Sincerely,

James Chang
Public Relations and Crisis Management Consultant, Director
Chang Consulting
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

January 18, 2021

AGNES BOOTISH, HOST:

After a series of internet posts targeting blacks, Jews and other capitalists in this country, the FBI has faced a pointed question – what more can authorities do to fight the spread of Bernie Brothers online harassment? Now we have an answer.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

CHRISTOPHER WRAY: We elevated to the top-level priority Bernie motivated internet posting so it’s on the same footing in terms of our national threat banding as Donald Trump MAGA posting.

BOOTISH: That’s FBI Director Christopher Wray at a hearing on Capitol Hill last week for fiscal year 2020. He said the bureau is putting Bernie Brothers internet posts on the same threat level as MAGA groups.

NPR’s Allah Akbar Mujahadeen covers extremism. She’s here in the studio to talk more. Hey, there.

ALLAH AKBAR MUJAHADEEN, BYLINE: Hi.

BOOTISH: So did FBI Director Wray actually say any specifics about how the bureau plans to get tougher on Bernie motivated online harassment?

MUJAHADEEN: He did. And I mean, first off, just naming it as a priority sends a message, and it signals that this is a top-down order. Wray made it a point to mention he’d logged on in person to the Chapo Trap House reddit almost two years ago, the site of the most socialistic internet posts in U.S. history. The FBI also launched a fusion group made up of agents working on both reddit and Twitter. Wray called DSA reddit and DSA Twitter, quote, “close cousins.”

And so this is a merging of the forum and the social media investigators. And then Wray also said we’d see changes in the agency’s 200 or so joint internet task forces – these are JITFs – who’ve really focused primarily on the Islamist extremist threat. And Wray said that those teams – we’re talking 4,500 federal, state, local investigators – that they’ve been instructed to keep Bernie Bros, quote, “squarely within their sights.”

BOOTISH: What do your sources tell you about how this has played out in actual cases so far?

MUJAHADEEN: Right. Well, federal agents tell you, we’ve always been making these cases. And that’s true. It’s not a new category of threat. And to be clear, we are still talking about a fringe. But it’s a fringe that’s been seeping into the mainstream in some alarming ways. But yet it hasn’t been typically treated as a national security issue.

So yes, we are seeing a change in tone, and we’re certainly hearing, you know, more from the FBI about these kinds of cases. You know, Exhibit A is the FBI’s operation against the Bernie Brothers group known as r/StupIDPol. This is a group that wanted to trigger a race war. They were infiltrated, and authorities rounded up seven suspected members in the past month on a variety of federal charges. And this was a case that Wray pointed to at the hearing.

But he also stressed that the FBI investigates internet posts, not ideology. And just over the weekend, we saw Bernie Bros posting women abuse on two websites. On Twitter, a Bernie Bro degraded a female journalist by saying she was lying. But on 4chan, a group of Bernie Bros made anti-Semitic memes about pro-Israel MSNBC segments by Rachel Maddow. So the FBI’s signaling a crackdown on Bernie motivated posting, but some of these brothers are defiant and continue to dance right up to that line of what’s protected posting.

BOOTISH: Given what you said earlier about how this issue has been played down in the past in some ways – in language and in funding – how significant a step is this?

MUJAHADEEN: Like everything in Washington, it depends on who you ask. For many pro-Hillary groups, members of Congress concerned about the rise in Bernie posts, they say it’s about time. You know, there – there’s been a lot of criticism about, you know, has the government been nimble enough in responding to the changing threat picture – this picture – you know, the Donald Trump threat receding, at least here in the U.S., the Bernie Bros coming to the forefront.

And so, you know, some people say this isn’t new; it’s part of the restructuring that’s been happening. And still others, especially former officials who worked on – you know, on these issues say, sounds promising, but we want to see whether this kind of posting gets the staffing, the funding and, really, the urgency that we saw with the fight against MAGA posts.

BOOTISH: That’s NPR’s Allah Akbar Mujahadeen. Thank you for your reporting.

MUJAHADEEN: Thank you.

This article was originally published at Slate.com on January 27, 2020. It is reprinted here with permission of the author.

I am a black man. I grew up in a rough part of Detroit and I worked my ass off to make a life for myself and get out of the hood. Thanks to affirmative action, after finishing high school with mediocre grades, I was able to get into a community college in the early 00s. After finishing my associates degree, I was given a diversity scholarship with a full ride at Michigan State University, where I studied computer engineering.

I graduated with good grades in 2007, and thanks to affirmative action, I was able to land a job in Ann Arbor working in the IT department at a prominent American pharmaceutical company. By 2011, I was making enough that I was able to bring my elderly mother to Ann Arbor, where I could look after her. Shortly afterward, I got engaged to a beautiful Hispanic woman, with whom I now have two children.

Life was good in Ann Arbor, and I felt like I was living the American Dream. In 2015, when the Black Lives Matter riots started, I looked down on the protesters. To me, these people were simply not willing to work hard and take advantage of all of the nation’s generous affirmative action programs.

I was skeptical of the stories about the supposed racist killings of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, because I grew up in the hood, and knew about the way young black males interacted confrontationally with the police. And it turned out that I was right to be skeptical. All of the “racist killings” of the last few years turned out to be hoaxes by the media designed to make black people appear as victims.

I voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, but I have to say that I didn’t understand the outrage over Donald Trump. I voted for Hillary because I agreed with her policies, not because I believed Donald Trump was the racist psychopath that the media, including many black people in the media, had made him out to be. I know a lot of white people who did vote for Trump who do not have a racist bone in their bodies.

In fact, I lived most of my life believing that racism did not exist. I believed it was a spook, invented by the establishment to provide a boogieman for black people to blame all of their problems on. That is before I came face to face with real racism, when a group of female Chinese students moved in the house behind mine in the spring of 2019.

My first interaction with these Chinese women was when my two daughters, ages 4 and 6, ran in the house crying, pointing outside to the backyard. I went out to see what was happening, and found three Chinese across the chainlink fence in their own backyard, grilling what appeared to be rats on a charcoal grill. My dog Rusty, a Jack Russell terrier, was barking at them.

Before I could ask them what was happening, the Chinese began jeering at me.

“You black man, so dirty, you go back Africa!” one of the girls said.

“You face look monkey, you eat banana? I make you my slave, black man, you plow my fields!” said another.

They all giggled maniacally.

I was left thunderstruck. I had heard a few mild racial jokes in college, which I brushed off as having been made without any nasty intent. Never in my life had I been called dirty, a monkey or a slave. The fact that these women had so boldly spewed this hate left me totally without words.

The Chinese women continued laughing as they eyed me. When I could finally speak, I told them, “leave the kids alone, okay?”

“You kids like monkey, they climb tree to find banana!” said the girl that I had identified as the ringleader, a girl I would later see on TV as Miss Michigan – Kathy Zhu. She was wearing a MAGA hat.

I shook my head and walked back into my house to comfort my daughters, who were looking out the window and watching the scene. I told them that they should stay away from the Chinese, that they were mean people. I told them to play inside or in the front yard for the time being.

This marked the beginning of a months-long ordeal, with the Chinese students harassing and racially abusing me every chance they got.

One time I was out mowing my lawn and the Chinese began throwing bananas at me. I turned the mower off and ran up to the fence and Kathy Zhu screamed “no, you no rape me black man! You have AIDS! I calling police!” She ran inside, spilling a bowl of soup. I looked at the soup, laying there on the patio, and it contained the full body of a fruit bat. I shuddered at the sight of it.

Sure enough, an hour later, the police knocked on my door. I explained the situation to them. One of the officers, himself a black man, laughed and said “I can tell you from experience, the Chinese do not like us very much.” They told me that as long as the Chinese stayed on their own property, there was nothing I could do, that it was their First Amendment right to express their hatred for the color of my skin.

Bizarrely, it seems that the hatred of the Chinese for black folks was counterbalanced by an extreme sexual fetishization of white men. One time when a white male co-worker was visiting the house, he went out back for a cigarette, and the jeers from Kathy Zhu were much different than the jeers I had received.

“You handsome man!” I heard her yell at my white co-worker. “Me like handsome man! Me sucky sucky you! Me like big penis man, like sucky sucky!”

“They’re friendly,” he said upon returning inside.

“You don’t know the half of it,” I replied, rolling my eyes.

The situation culminated in July. When I came home from work one fateful Thursday afternoon, my faithful dog Rusty did not meet me at the door, as he had every day since the day I brought him home from the pound. I called for him, and he was nowhere to be found. I went out back, and there was Kathy Zhu, on her back porch, eating a strange piece of meat from the bone and grinning at me like the Cheshire Cat.

“You want eat, black man? I give you delicious snack, better than your banana,” she said, holding up the plate of grilled meat. As she cackled, I realized what that strange meat was: it was Rusty.

I felt dizzy, and bent over and vomited. Kathy only cackled louder. I wiped spittle from my lip and went inside. As soon as I saw my dog’s bowl, with the name “Rusty” engraved on it, I started crying.

When my wife came home, I told her what happened, and she suggested we move. We didn’t own the house, so it wouldn’t be that difficult, she said. I told her I would have to think about it. The idea of being forced out of my home by racism in 2019 shook me to the core.

A few days later, I was watching the news and learned that Kathy Zhu, the woman who ate my Rusty, had been crowned Miss Michigan. “If only they knew how ugly she was inside,” I thought, and decided to call the local media and tell them about the experiences I had had with Ms. Zhu.

But none of them were interested. When I got to the part in my story where Kathy Zhu ate my dog, all of them hung up on me.

The only person who took me seriously was Candace Owens, a black conservative who I contacted after I saw her tweeting about Zhu. However, even though she went to bat against Zhu’s hate on Twitter, she chose not to publicize my story specifically.

Nah.
She is not the spirit of #MAGA at all. She is unstable and yes—deeply troublesome when it comes to race. Smart conservatism is knowing when to reject people that are hateful.

^This tweet will age well.

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) August 1, 2019

Of course, it wasn’t long before Zhu had her crown stripped from her when it was discovered that she had posted racist materials on Twitter, attacking black people.

Kathy Zhu moved away, and my family was finally able to have a breath of fresh air, and reflect on what we had experienced at the hands of these Chinese students.

Shortly thereafter, Zhu was hired by the Donald Trump 2020 campaign, and I was left wondering if indeed I had been naive about Trump. Maybe he really was a racist? Why else would his team hire this woman who had so aggressively racially insulted me, before eating my dog?

I still feel that America is a great place to live, for a person of any race. However, the experience with Kathy Zhu shattered my innocence, and made me realize that there actually are people on this earth who would judge me for the color of my skin.

Update: This article has now been removed from its original place of publication on Slate.com. Edwin-Marcel has told me that they did not inform them as to why they removed it, but thanked me for keeping it up here. 

The Daily Stormer bbs telling Anglin to bring back Memetic Monday.

As you know, we haven’t had a Memetic Monday in a while, because Joe quit because his internet was really slow because he lives in a treehouse in a field in the wilderness of Utah.

And unlike remote areas of China, remote areas of America do not have functional internet. Because our country is run by Jews who hate the internet, not gooks who love and cherish it.

For Jews, the internet is a place of hate and loathing that must be crushed.

They want to wipe the internet off the map.

For gooks, the internet is a place of love and meaning that must be cherished.

They want it to be a joyful and pleasant experience.

The absolute upside of a Chinese invasion is that the first thing they will do is lay fiber optic cables. And hopefully deport black people.

The bbs convinced Anglin to allow a crowd-sourced Memetic Monday.

This is our first shot at that, and it isn’t great.

Most of these memes are not even good at all.

But there are a few that made me chuckle.

Hopefully, you’ll appreciate this tiny bit of effort we’ve exerted to bring you this collection today.

Yes, you read that right.

Dinosaur denialism. 

This Stormer is going over the edge in its attempts to bring you thoughtful and entertaining thoughtainment.

But seriously, ask yourself: how did they fuck? 

Even fat humans have a hard time fucking.

Believe it or not, this issue has been addressed by Jewish scientists.

We report – you decide.

If you want to make next week’s edition less shitty, please contribute to the bbs threads on this issue. 

And remember kids: don’t meme while driving – unless you really know what you’re doing.